WORLD WIDE TECHNOLOGY CHAMPIONSHIP

Another Steve

Put Pete In
Forum Member
Jul 7, 2002
11,517
235
63
67
Benbrook
WORLD WIDE TECHNOLOGY CHAMPIONSHIP LUCAS GLOVER +2400
WORLD WIDE TECHNOLOGY CHAMPIONSHIP KEITH MITCHELL +2400
WORLD WIDE TECHNOLOGY CHAMPIONSHIP HARRY HALL +2500
WORLD WIDE TECHNOLOGY CHAMPIONSHIP MATTI SCHMID +2250
WORLD WIDE TECHNOLOGY CHAMPIONSHIP HARRIS ENGLISH +3000
WORLD WIDE TECHNOLOGY CHAMPIONSHIP NICOLAS ECHAVARRIA +4500
WORLD WIDE TECHNOLOGY CHAMPIONSHIP PATTON KIZZIRE +6000

WORLD WIDE TECHNOLOGY CHAMPIONSHIP- 1ST RD LEADER HARRY HALL +3500
WORLD WIDE TECHNOLOGY CHAMPIONSHIP- 1ST RD LEADER MATTI SCHMID +3500
WORLD WIDE TECHNOLOGY CHAMPIONSHIP- 1ST RD LEADER HARRIS ENGLISH +4000
WORLD WIDE TECHNOLOGY CHAMPIONSHIP- 1ST RD LEADER NICOLAS ECHAVARRIA +4500
WORLD WIDE TECHNOLOGY CHAMPIONSHIP- 1ST RD LEADER PATTON KIZZIRE +5000

WORLD WIDE TECHNOLOGY CHAMPIONSHIP- 1ST RD LEADER CARSON YOUNG +8000
 

Another Steve

Put Pete In
Forum Member
Jul 7, 2002
11,517
235
63
67
Benbrook
HARRY HALL - 2ND ROUND SCORE UNDER (OVER vrs UNDER) u70½-116
RICO HOEY - 2ND ROUND SCORE UNDER (OVER vrs UNDER) u70½-125
HARRIS ENGLISH - 2ND ROUND SCORE UNDER (OVER vrs UNDER) u70½-125
 

Another Steve

Put Pete In
Forum Member
Jul 7, 2002
11,517
235
63
67
Benbrook
A lot of plays but they are asking for a 2 Under to Win

HARRY HALL - 3RD ROUND SCORE UNDER (OVER vrs UNDER) u68½-105
BEN GRIFFIN - 3RD ROUND SCORE UNDER (OVER vrs UNDER) u68½-105
SAM STEVENS - 3RD ROUND SCORE UNDER (OVER vrs UNDER) u68½-105
MAX GREYSERMAN - 3RD ROUND SCORE UNDER (OVER vrs UNDER) u68½-116
RICO HOEY - 3RD ROUND SCORE UNDER (OVER vrs UNDER) u68½-105

TOM HOGE - 3RD ROUND SCORE UNDER (OVER vrs UNDER) u68½-105
 

Another Steve

Put Pete In
Forum Member
Jul 7, 2002
11,517
235
63
67
Benbrook
They caught on and beefed up the juice and lowered it down a stroke on most.

CARSON YOUNG - 4TH ROUND SCORE UNDER (OVER vrs UNDER) u68½-114
JUSTIN LOWER - 4TH ROUND SCORE UNDER (OVER vrs UNDER) u68½-114

NICOLAS ECHAVARRIA - 4TH ROUND SCORE UNDER (OVER vrs UNDER) u68½-121
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,424
128
63
Bowling Green Ky
Amazing Steve and interesting
I hit good % on o/u but never bet an under ,you never bet an over and are effective!

We need to compare notes. Get my email if you would and I'll explain my madness and you can explain yours.
I am thinking I have only been able on O/U on majors which prove a bit more difficult. Player can recover from errant shot but in majors they pay the price.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top