SPONGE'S take on Billy Walters Chargers bet

Shleprock

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 21, 2007
1,594
29
0
He will lay down this week and he will keep that game under. Same shit he did for Eli and Mcnab to get them to the superbowl. He does it for Brees this time. the guy can score anytime he wants because he is that good. Not sure how much body of work the guy has to have to get u knuckleheads to reach the age of reason. That interception he threw against the Giants late was comical. Hhe even tried it a few plays earlier but the Giants dropped it. :mj07: I will come back to this thread if my opinion changes but definitely the under won't.

I suppose the pass he threw to te donald lee in th 4the quarter that would have iced game where he hit him in a bad spot right between both hands lee would have walked in for a td he yelled to him 25 yards down the field hey donald drop that ball.
 

Shleprock

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 21, 2007
1,594
29
0
I suppose the pass he threw to te donald lee in th 4the quarter that would have iced game where he hit him in a bad spot right between both hands lee would have walked in for a td he yelled to him 25 yards down the field hey donald drop that ball.

The only way this game goes under is if peterson gets 25 rushing attempts. If vikings lose it won't be because of favre the defense will let them down. Like I said before favre is the ultimate competitor and is playing with a chip on his shoulder to prove all doubters wrong he is a very vengeful person and that is his motivation. When he was young and drinking he relied on his god given talent. I used to see him all the time on water street downtown Milwaukee and he was a horrible dispicible person when drinking.
 

Shleprock

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 21, 2007
1,594
29
0
What is really funny is that Farve actually had some of u guys believing he couldn't play in a dome :mj07: :mj07: Remember those days? Some guys will believe anything it is said u enuf. What happen to that excuse :mj07: :mj07: :mj07: :mj07: He couldn't play in a dome. Must have been the lighting effecting his passes. It couldn't have been all the one sided money bet on his team :142smilie . We have corrupt politicians, cops, judges, ceo's, lawyers but god forbid if anyone says an athlete or a ref is on the take. I thought the Donaghy fiasco woke a few up but i guess not.

Its not that he couldn't play in a dome the packers team was not built back than to play in a dome. Theoffensive lineman always were a step behind on snap counts and protection and run blocking was not as good compared to outside on grass in bad weather. If you are looking for corruption remember this nfl refs name SCOTT GREEN check out his history.
 

UGA12

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 7, 2003
7,774
108
63
Between The Hedges
Watch Brett closely this weekend. watch the bad sacks he takes to keep that game under. Watch the 3rd and eight three yard passes. It will happen Judge and then u can tell me how i just got lucky predicting that.

its_a_conspiracy.jpg
 

fatdaddycool

Chi-TownHustler
Forum Member
Mar 26, 2001
13,711
270
83
60
Fort Worth TX usa
of course there is cheating in all major sporting events of this caliber. It may not necessarily be the over but might be a prop bet such as how many catches Devery Henderson gets or the over in a certain quarter. You can call holding on every play if you want to, but to say that you know who specifically is on the take and that Favre is on the take and throwing games makes you either the next Nostradomus or incredibly stupid and narcissistic. Charles Schackelford helped fix games and it could be anyone and I highly doubt that a person of your moral makeup would be the one that is in the know.


Hope that helps,
FDC
 

MadJack

Administrator
Staff member
Forum Admin
Super Moderators
Channel Owner
Jul 13, 1999
104,928
1,487
113
70
home
He will lay down this week and he will keep that game under. Same shit he did for Eli and Mcnab to get them to the superbowl. He does it for Brees this time. the guy can score anytime he wants because he is that good. Not sure how much body of work the guy has to have to get u knuckleheads to reach the age of reason. That interception he threw against the Giants late was comical. Hhe even tried it a few plays earlier but the Giants dropped it. :mj07: I will come back to this thread if my opinion changes but definitely the under won't.
:0corn
 

MadJack

Administrator
Staff member
Forum Admin
Super Moderators
Channel Owner
Jul 13, 1999
104,928
1,487
113
70
home
What is really funny is that Farve actually had some of u guys believing he couldn't play in a dome :mj07: :mj07: Remember those days? Some guys will believe anything it is said u enuf. What happen to that excuse :mj07: :mj07: :mj07: :mj07: He couldn't play in a dome. Must have been the lighting effecting his passes. It couldn't have been all the one sided money bet on his team :142smilie . We have corrupt politicians, cops, judges, ceo's, lawyers but god forbid if anyone says an athlete or a ref is on the take. I thought the Donaghy fiasco woke a few up but i guess not.


:mj07: :mj07: :mj07: :mj07: :mj07:

:142smilie


:0corn
 

The Sponge

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2006
17,263
97
0
Sponge prediction in Superbowl NO 28 INDY 24 That would be Saints ML and Under

Phil Ivey and Billy Walters lose big on Super Bowl
Pro handicapper Brandon Lang, who was protrayed by Matthew McConaughey in the movie Two for the Money, wasn't the only big loser on this year's Super Bowl.

With $82.7 million wagered on the matchup between the Saints and Colts, Onlinepoker.net has reported that $4 million of that came from poker superstar Phil Ivey and renowned sports bettor Billy Walters.

Each player was reported to have placed a wager of $2 million on the Indianapolis moneyline. That number hasn?t been confirmed but MGM Mirage sportsbook director Jay Rood said that they took a ?seven-figure bet on the Colts moneyline.?


With tournament earnings in excess of $12 million and much more on the side, it is doubtful Ivey will lose much sleep over his loss. But apparently Ivey isn?t as good of a sports bettor as he is card player. He was rumored to have lost another $2 million on a Lakers game during the 2008 WSOP.

Walters and Lang on the other hand have handicapping reputations at stake. Lang hadn?t lost a Super Bowl pick in years until this one and Walters claims to have a lifetime win rate of 57 percent.

Ivey bet big on the Super Bowl last year and lost a bundle on the Arizona Cardinals with a first half bet thanks to James Harrison's defensive TD.
 

MadJack

Administrator
Staff member
Forum Admin
Super Moderators
Channel Owner
Jul 13, 1999
104,928
1,487
113
70
home
Sponge prediction in Superbowl NO 28 INDY 24 That would be Saints ML and Under

on the 81st guess when you couldn't pick another score that was the same. genius :s7:
 

Jaxx

Go Pokes!
Forum Member
Jan 5, 2003
7,084
88
48
FL
Anybody that loses 2 mill on a bet like Ivey has to loose some sleep. I don't care what anybody says. I lost fifty bucks on the ml and didn't like it. Damit!
:142smilie
 

The Sponge

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2006
17,263
97
0
I don't mind sponge, only when he talks out his ass i call him out.

taking credit for that prediction is ridiculous :mj07:

ur ass that is what i thought and that is what i played. If u want me to dig up my plays let me know. Yes i had to check everyones to see if anyone had it but nobody did. Pardon me for not coming back to this thread every day.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top