2015 Tennis +

TennisTapir

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 13, 2013
1,285
4
0
IN-GAME ANALYSIS: linemakers have tended to underrate venus. but her problems are due to health alone. not like she forgot how to win or lost any power. she breaks arad at love to start the day's matches. VENUS-ARAD not offered live but other three will be.

9/188 10p: berd(stakh), fed(gasq), alm(r-v), andsn(troi), kvic(harr), ferr(tmic), kvit(nav), safa(pvic), azar(woz), sharap(ryb) L

IN-GAME: ok, the above is more out of boredom, so qualifies as a longshot action play, just to get things started, with a false step like a running back. we'll get pinked, then we'll respond with haymakers all day long... "knowing how to win" it sounds like such bs. but it's very real. if you watch these matches you can see the difference between winners, who know how to close points and matches, and risers who haven't yet learned or losers who do not. ... I don't know how to formulate this correctly but it seems to be true, per the Williams match: power + sufficient control beats control + not much power most of the time. It's better to have power than control. You can't win purely with power, but it seems like it's easier to develop control than to increase power. ... VENUS does it. my leans were both correct, dog and over. ... i'm actually underbetting - not making enough or large enough bets. that's unusual. as you know, 90% of time it's the other way. azar 63... after one set she's looking good. funny dispute, with both players angry, azar screwed, woz cursing. it's going as thought, the diff is azar power. woz is playing well. it's very windy, which is not helping azar. cold, windy tournament this year, which is strange cuz it's not that far from hot last week in dubai. good display by azar, beating a quality opponent. she will face venus next, and i think she will win. they're similar players, but i think azar has a definite edge. she's not missing, playing with good power, and her attitude is solid. venus has to be a little tired, i would think. but that's tomorrow.. much more yet today.

100/125 2p kvit(nav), kvic(harr) L

RUNNING ANALYSIS: i'm betting with the line. nav has beat kvit the last 2x. the line has something in mind or the number would be much closer to pick em. so i'll try that line, and add to it karlovic with his monster serve over harrison coming off upset of dimitrov. some concern kvic wont be motivated after winning last week, but if that's the case early, it will be apparent and i'll get off the parlay, assuming it's alive at that point.

FUTURES (ACAPULCO): sharap 1.5, bacs 5, gcia 8, puig 13, larss 17, lucic 26
VALUE: still on sharap. id expected it to go under 1.5, still there. only one i see with a shot is garcia. bacs qualifies too but i have a feeling it will be garcia if anyone upsets. and i dont think that will happen, but if i hedge my 260, that's who it'll be on. but maybe let it run one more match. the rest i dont think have any chance. larss underpowered, lucic is ok but not going to win. puig sprays like a tomcat.

ANALYSIS: kvit wins first 12 points. hmm.... the line proves right, at least at start. then amazing turn to nav in second set, in a flash she's up 50. not sure what happened there, turned away, a whole set disappeared. have to scramble live if this is going to continue or 100 down the drain.. might be good for future on azar if kvit loses but dont want to blow a good deal on kvit. made call to hedge out 150/93 on nav on bp in second game, appears right call at 03. this could still turn again, but at this point a nice 20 loss would be acceptable. not sure what happened, was half watching and the sound went out as they switched channels. hate stuff like this out of nowhere. no idea how kvit turned off. it's not a true hedge either, cuz it requires kvic to win. it's a genuine risk of losing 250 trying to get 100 back. if this flips again, could well wind up wishing had taken the 100 hit. still, some value in azar playing nav rather than kvit, was part of the reason i hit nav. more afraid of azar losing to power than technique, altho nav is not exactly a light hitter. but i like my chances with azar over venus then nav. hopefully nav can hold on here now. LIVE 30/89 kvit. most diff circumstances, feed bad, no audio, capped live lines. missed 10/100 live for 20, much worse price. just trying.. at worst lock in a 50 loss or so, and i get nav moving on instead of kvit. very difficult today. unbelievabley kvit back on serve. so both my live bets were probably correct, but my MISS was not buying 25/125 after set one. could have avoided all this. at this point, no idea what's going to happen. 34 on serve, kvit to serve. live 2.18/1.65. nav does it. well that was getting roughed up in a dark alley. still cut my losses over 50%. could have done better, could have done worse. it may work out for the best in the end as i dont think nav can beat azar, who is not spraying the way kvit did here. still not sure why it turned so rapidly in second set. gets on serve, then broken again and loses. strange match. hard to call. ...final DOHA match is safa-pvic, should be safa. staying off it, though.

100/50 karlovic (harr) L
100/29 robredo (olivo) W

13/172 9p: robr(oliv), nish(dolg), andsn(troi), kvic(harr), ferr(tomic), safa(pvic), sharap(ryb), gcia(lucic), puig(karant) L

POST-ANALYSIS: safa whips pvic. have to like how this has shaped up. i think azar is the clear fav to win it now. ... acapulco tonight winners should be all favs. all four women and the men too. ... gotta say, puig karatant was probably the worst pro tennis match i've seen in five years. beyond terrible. the quality of play is generally pretty high these days, but this was awful stuff. not sure why they had it live, but it let me escape 13 loss to 7 profit.

20/64 5p: kvic(harr), ferr(tomic), sharap(ryb), gcia(lucic), FRI azar(venus) L

FRIDAY

PRE-ANALYSIS: it's down to four. semis in DOHA. sitting strong with AZAR 100/600 future. only one i got. she should be favored in both her remaining matches. first up she plays VENUS. she is favored at 1.5. that's good value on azar i think. not that it's a great bargain, it's fair. azar and venus play same type of game, but azar is better at it, at this point. i think venus will be a little tired to keep up. she will have to play at a higher level than she has and sustain it to win. i dont think she can. she'll have her moments but azar should be able to drive her back and forth and win. ... SAFA-NAV - i like the dog here. 1.56/2.67, i think the line is significantly shaded toward safa. nav got to last final before pulling out with sore neck. i will definitely put a little on her here, and if need be hedge it off live. if it gets close, i think nav will win. beating up a tired pvic doesnt prove that much to me. both players are on a roll, i dont think this number is justified on the fav. the over, from 20' to 22, is very likely worth a shot as well. ACAPULCO: sharap wins tonight easy over ryb. bacs winning easily. SHARAP will have to beat garcia and then bacs to win it. should do that. both represent about a 1/6 risk. if sharap is on, she wins without much problem. if she's below avg, could have a problem if one of those two is fired up.

100/175 nav (safa) L
100/47 azar (venus) W
100/25 bacs (karat) W

17/121 7p: djok (berd), nad(delbo), nish(andsn), ferr(harr), nav(safa), azar(venus), bacs(karat) L

PRE-ANALYSIS: been getting a little too clever this week, resulting in a lot of near-misses on parlays. let's keep it simple today, for the semis. i think nav is better than safa. probably goes three. think azar wins straightforwardly, one hard one easier set. maybe the wise thing to do is hedge future, but i'll do that in-game if necessary. bacs i think you can load up. it was only puig's incredibly incompetent play that let karat get thru last round. bacs is hardly great but she's competent and will beat karat easily. that should be more like 1.12 than 1.25. am less confident in sharap after last night, she had a serving meltdown. the future on garcia is 8, which isn't terrible, bacs is 5.5. either of those could beat her she plays again like last night. may throw a 30 on each as a hedge, will think about that. ...in the MEN'S, allt he players i like are playing the top favs. i think they'll lose. i'd like to take delbo vs nadal but he'll just lose in the end. same with berd playing fed. same with andsn playing nish. that fucking harrison, i let my dislike get better of me because i knew he was on bit of roll and managed to squeeze kvic last night. well, it's going to be a good week if azar comes through. "put all your eggs in one basket -- and watch that basket" as someone said (twain). above all else, i need to make the azar bet pay. then can worry about sharap later.

RUNNING ANALYSIS: it's windy again, cant stand that. worst day yet. it does favor nav, i think. it will when they start. appeared to help her yesterday in comeback over kvit. DOHA has been unpleasant for the conditions whereas DUBAI was very nice. depressing to see the dark/cool stuff. real tennis doesn't involve wind, but today is going to be WIND TENNIS, which i personally dont like much.

POST-ANALYSIS: flat wrong on nav-safa. the wind seemed to bother nav. she never got aggressive. safa is playing as well as i've seen, not making UE like normal. she will have to be pressured next round, because she's not making errors on her own. she has a real shot at winning this. not sure why nav wasn't playing well today. thought she was figuring out the wind and then going to get aggressive, but she stayed back and just missed all kinds of shots. disappointing match, probably my worst call of the week, and hit it pretty hard. looked like a very live dog going in but it wasnt.

20/54 7p: djok(berd), nad(delbo), nish(andsn), ferr(harr), azar(venus), sharap(gcia) canc., bacs(karat) W adj. /41

podcast: "No Challenges Remaining": tennis discussion (non-betting, but insight into players + tournaments)
http://nochallengesremaining.podbean.com

POST-ANALYSIS: venus extremely sharp set one, looks like it's over. but azarenka does that rare thing: adapts her tactics. starts charging net. it works, and venus begins to fade. great match, venus just got tired as it progressed. azar looks like a champ, only has to get by hot safa now. that will be hard. i think she'll do it. i think they'll go toe to toe as she did here with venus WHOM SHE HAD NEVER BEATEN NOR EVEN WON A SET FROM and safa will blink first. azar is being aggressive. nav played on her back foot today, letting safa get comfortable and drive her around and off the court. azar won't do that, she will be more aggressive than safa, and then the errors will come. that's my read for the final.

FINAL: AZAR-SAFA. have to admit surprise at the opening number. azar 1.385. i expected ~1.6. i expect azar to win, but that is a low number based on how safa has been playing. perhaps the linsmakers know safa is likely to break down under pressure. after all, to their credit, the made azar a < 1.5 favorite when she had never won a set, let alone match, vs venus. anyway, good hedging abounds for those of us with an azar future in hand. always remember: dont get greedy. that's what gets you slaughtered. as long as you are reliably making money, and progress toward your goal, overreaching isn't necessary.

RUNNING: taking 100/58 LIVE on bacs. point before she goes down 02... it's offered live, as long as bacs trails, you can get a decent return. really dont want to drop 200 on bacs but i just cant see her losing to this player. ... back to 22, hit this, easy money, even if only 25% return. it's gonna be gone fast. this is #37 vs about #158.

dimitrov
http://thetennisisland.com/2015/02/26/breaking-bulgarian-an-analysis-of-dimitrovs-top-30-drought/

UGH: huge loss as sharapova pulls out, costing me big on future. have to win azar now or week is a bust. no idea she was sick, no signs yesterday. should have put about 30 on bacs and garcia apiece. ... easy money on bacs as i said, live. karat not quite as bad as i thought but far from good. she gets ball back but has no power.

FUTURE: 264/170 sharapova to win acapulco L

SATURDAY

PRE-ANALYSIS: line has moved back toward SAFA, which makes sense to me. Have been right about line moves all last two weeks, which is good sign. AZAR should win. If she plays aggressively, SAFA will start missing shots and then her confidence will go. ... DJOK should beat FED. This is all I'm playing today, as i see if future will cash. Will do nothing but hedge live if I need to, which hopefully will not. I just cant see SAFA beating AZAR. azar did seem to have a hitch in her leg a couple times, but i dont think that's lasting. she has played 3 sets yesterday, but didnt appear tired, more fired up. azar isn't making UE, and that's when she starts to go mentally. this match will be like yesterday - hot out of the box, with both sides firing. maybe safa has enough 'wad' to take the first set. but in the end it will be azar. i think azar's ability to change tactics shows superior mental ability and flexibility, and i do not think safa has that ability. her mind is on the level of the hair stylist she would probably be if she weren't an athlete. she will do her one thing and go down if it doesn't work. in sports generally, i much prefer to be on the side of the player with the higher IQ. tv announcers focus on the physical and underplay the mental. they are forever talking about athleticism, but what decides more matches is, uh, menticism. gilles simon is a good example of someone who gets an edge from being smarter than other players. well enough blather, let's just play this parlay and go out of these week (well, one day) with a big bang, one way or another. i like all the favs today, except garcia, who i have not seen play. bacs is decent. i think gcia wins, but dont want to back that opinion with money.

100/264 4p: azar(saf), djok(fed), nad(bloq), nish(ferr) L

RUNNING ANALYSIS: funny that parlay equals the amount lost on sharapova. what a painful way to lose. i bet too much on that future, purely to get a larger return. SAFA has never beaten AZAR that i can see (at least not in recent years, it's about 0-6) so let's hope it doesn't start here. but, we can say she is playing as well as we've ever seen her. just dont think it will be enough. the line started about 1.38 went to over 1.5 and ended right at 1.5. And with that, the warmup set is underway... well looks like azar is done. broken down a set with injury, i take 186/82 live. azar had lost one set to safa coming in, in her life. azar may come back but the inj makes it ?? azar had many bp in set one. only cashed one. hate hedging but not going to sit by and throw away 200 without getting something back on it. worst of all the feeds are complete shit today, cant even really see what's going on.

FUTURE: 100/600 azarenka to win doha L

POST-ANALYSIS: azar was a little stiff in legs. safa played well, but next time they play it'll be right back to azar kicking her ass. azar left a boatload of break points. there's no meaning to this victory other than azar was a little more tired/injured than i thought. tough one.

200/20 nadal (bloq) W

NOTE: the principle of not betting against ferrer was in full play last night, as he beat nishikori.

SUNDAY

Not much going today unless you like nadal at 10:1 to beat Monaco, who's no slouch. Ends up a highly disappointing week. Two nicely set futures fall apart late, and because we got greedy, we went down with the ship. The right play was probably to put 200 on hot SAFA in the final. It's very difficult to give up your hopes for the big score and settle for a modest victory, but that inability usually burns us in the end, as it did here. Coming week will be less intense, but we'll pick it up when we get to Indian Wells next week.

[week #8: -461]
cum. 2015: +342
 
Last edited:

TennisTapir

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 13, 2013
1,285
4
0
week #9

MONDAY


KUALA LUMPUR OVERVIEW & QUARTERS PROJECTIONS: normal 32 field. LISICKI (lis) has played like pure shit this year, but is seeded number two. maybe she wakes up but no sign this year so far. WOZ is the clear fav based on YTD. rest are low-second tier players or worse. 1Q: all woz. witthoeft is one to watch. see if she can beat doi and then ach or kouk, who has been horrible this year. i think WOZ beats WITTH in QF. 2Q: DELLA over weak field. no one impressive, should be WOZ-DELLA in SEMI. 3Q: NARA should take this. 4Q is toughest quarter. LIS, DULG, ZHENG, KOZ, GOERG, GAJ could all take it. depends who gets hot. favor NARA to get to final vs WOZ and WOZ to win it.

PROJECTED 16: WOZ-BEY, WITTH-MAYR, DELLA-MEST, PUTIN-JOVANO.
BH: NARA-WANG, KUMKHUM-GAJ, GOERG-ZHENG, DUAN-LIS

TO WIN: WOZ, NARA, ZHENG

MONTERREY OVERVIEW & QUARTERS PROJECTIONS: avg 32 tournament, nothing special. bunch of decent second-tier players. IVIC is clearly the one to beat if she's anywhere near avg. HTUCH is back after a week off after doing so well early. will she retain form? have to give her the nod to come out of the 3q. err lost early in week8 after winning on clay in week7. no telling how she does this week. will DAVIS heat up? will BACS stay hot off win in acapulco? LARSS has been hot. BOTTOM HALF: should be HTUCH and maybe DAVIS if she wakes up and beats ERR, if not, then maybe ERR or someone getting hot. TOP HALF: all ivic if she's playing right. KRUN might be good but plays ivic M2. MLAD could do something, as could ZVONA in 1Q. so could SMIT. most of the good players are in 1Q. 2Q looks weak. maybe GCIA off loss in final at acapulco, could take it.

PROJECTED 16: TOP HALF: IVIC-KRUN, MLAD-ZVONA, GCIA-SCHIA, HCOG-RYB.
BH: HTUCH-TORRO, ROG-BACS, SCHMIED-LARSS, SOLER-ERR

TO WIN: IVIC, HTUCH, DAVIS, ZVONA, MLAD

NOTE: lot of strange lines going on. going to be very conservative until see what's happening. why is puig favored over hutch? puig looked absolutely terrible last week, and hutch has been playing great. there is certainly a reason, and I'm certainly not aware of it - but there's no way i'd put a dime on puig.

good preview of both tournaments
http://mootennis.com/2015/03/01/wta-monterrey-kuala-lumpur-preview-and-predictions/

TUESDAY

KUALA NOTES: lis continues poor play, losing to dulg. woz gets thru easily. witt gets through hard. kouk finally wins a match. she used to be good. has barely won anything for most of a year. perhaps is rekindling. hsieh beat della, which is good for our futures.

KUALA M2 PROJECTED WINNERS: WOZ(zhu), KOUK(witt), HSIEH(egu), KULICH(putin). BH: NARA(linette), GAJ(kum), KOZ(goerg), DUAN(dulg)

PRE-ANALYSIS: woz will win easily. kouk-witt will be a real struggle, OVER is best bet there. HSIEH, KULICH ordinary wins. NARA-LINETTE will be a struggle, over is best bet. GAJ-KUM probably same. KUM is not that good but this is her area, may have fans, so could be an over. KOZ-GOERG also a struggle. DUAN may be too. So, five of eight I like the over. ... Despite my future, LINETTE at 2.5 is live dog to NARA. Other lines aren't out, but I think most of these M2 matches will be close contests.

MONTERREY NOTES: no play yesterday. oddly wunderground showed no rain in monterrey, yet all was rained out. today shows no rain or wind, so perhaps a hurricane or earthquake. "it's really hard to say." I think the best bet of these matches is KRUN(parm). parm has played poorly. she used to be ok, but I think krun takes her. the line has moved steadily down from 30 to 26. KRUN is a riser. read an interview with her, she has read Dreiser trilogy. that bespeaks some intelligence, because dreiser's books are long and not the easiest to get through. perhaps she has the brains to figure out what she needs to do to extract herself from a bad situation, should she find herself in one within a match. ... it's going to be a welter of matches, best to stay aside and let things sort into shape, with qualifying still not finished and no M1 played. ...the lines are explained by past winners more than current form. PAVLYU has done very well here, winning three times I think. yet she has been in terrible form in 2015. no desire to jump on her as a fav at 1.5 over schmied, who has been playing well. avoid. I do think davis may beat errani as a dog at 2.78. not going to bet it, though. larss 1.7 over bertens, has been hot, but I don't trust larss. avoid. wick 4.3 over bacs, the winner last week, might be worth a shot as a big dog. wick did ok at AUS OPEN, bacs may not show up this week after a win. not playing it myself. ... puig 1.6/2.45 over hutch is the most confusing line. this one i might play, at least for a little. puig did beat err, which i missed, last week, but she also played the worst match ive seen this year, losing to lowly karat. i just cant see any which way she should be favored to hutch, who has played very well this year. there has to be a reason for that line, but even after some research i don't see it. even if puig has done well here in the past it seems too high. puig is a sprayer. you can't bet those, they lose. my tendency, and i think it's common to all, is to think of the player in her best form. that is dangerous. many of these players seldom reach their top form. lisicki today is an example. at her top, she can play with just about anyone. but she's rarely at her top, hasn't been for a long time. if puig keeps ball on court, she can do something, with her power. but she can't keep ball on court. that's what matters to this bet. yeah, htuch is definitely worth something, in my view. i would use it in parlay with a couple favs i like, just to go for an even larger return. ... jaksic as big dog to mediocre ryb might be worth something, as she has played well in MONTERREY in past. but that's the only reason to pick her. gcia over knapp, well probably but not attractive either way. one smart guy i know is on smitkova; i prefer mlad myself as dog at 2.3 but will avoid. i do like fav 1.6 zvona over riske. zvona like azar is working her way back up the charts, i like these people who know how to win. decent return for the risk. riske is ok if she's on, and zvona's serve is nothing great, but have to think zvona probably manages to come thru easy or hard.

MONTERREY FUTURES: ivic 2', bacs 7, pavlyu 10, err 13, gcia 15, zvona 19, htuch 23, davis smitk 34, krun 41
VALUE: ivic, zvona, htuch, davis, krun

100/26 krunic (parm) L

10/33 3p: zvona(risk), htuch(puig), woz(zhu) W

POST-ANALYSIS: krun takes set one, then fades. zvona handles riske. should be battle next round. if she gets thru and plays ivic, don't think her serve is nearly good enough to get her a win. MLAD comes thru as dog over smitk. ERR blows davis off the court, that surprises me. qualifiers finishing up their second match of day to get back on schedule.

100/13 ivic (vaid) W

WEDNESDAY

MONTERREY FUTURES: ivic 2', bacs 6, pavly 7, err 12, gcia 15, zvona 16, htuch 17, schia 23, ryb 24, mlad urad 34, larss hcog 41, babos 46, tsur 51 parm 201
VALUE: err, urad, htuch

FUTURES ANALYSIS: ivic played an odd second set, big letdown. still appears fav to win this. don't think zvona serving well enough to beat her. err is in other half of draw, and is more consistent than anyone else. pavly may be heating up. urad sometimes plays at high level, could hit a streak, 34 gives room to maneuver. don't really think ivic is good value at 2'. get pretty much the same price waiting another round or two, and better idea of how bottom half is shaking out. if you think pavly is ready to go (as she has here in past) then 7 is worth it. really, unless you see something i don't, you're just taking a flyer here. err is the only reliable quantity, but any hard court specialist who heats up will take care of her, and if not she probably loses to ivic in finals anyway. so really not much value anywhere after round one.

20/44 4p: mlad-zvona 20' OVER, ivic(parm), woz(zhu), pavly(larss) L

PRE-ANALYSIS: think woz and ivic win fairly easily; pavly I'm betting has found her form, if so will clean up larss pretty easily. this bet is an attempt to leverage profits out of the guess that mlad-zvona will be a tight, long match, that means over.

POST-ANALYSIS: mlad does much better than i thought and dominates zvona after first set, leading to under.

THURSDAY

MONTERREY FUTURES: ivic 2.2, bacs 7, pavlyu 7', err 11, htuch 13, gcia ryb 14, mlad 17, schia 21, urad 24, larss 34, tsur 51
VALUE: mlad, pavly, err

100/110 2p pavly(larss), wis(min) W

PRE-ANALYSIS: larss had a good season, pav needs some wins. if she keeps ball on court, she can overpower larss, and i think that will happen. add WIS on ML to get odds on. not much of value going on in tennis right now. WOZ-WITT should be interesting. might end up woz's toughest match of tournament. PROJECTED WINNERS KUALA: WOZ(witt), KUL(hsi), NARA(gaj), GOERG(dulg). dont like any enough tot bet. already have futures in play. probably should hedge future a little on nara by taking some gaj but going to let that play out. ... MONTERREY: no telling on gcia schia, staying off that one, dont trust gcia tho she is better. HTUCH probably takes URAD but wouldnt touch that either. urad can play well when she's on, and htuch was missing too often for my liking in her narrow win over not-very-good puig. upset would not surprise me there. KULIC i think beats HSIEH but again no interest in 1.6. not much meat in these matchups in these minor tournaments this week, really. WOZ looks on course to win in KL, and IVIC in monterr. unless someone else catches fire, and that hasn't been the case so far.

POST-ANALYSIS: good call by me on the pavlyu. just as i give myself blame, i give credit. had it analyzed correctly. pavlyu is 17-0 in monterrey, has won it 3x. that gave her just the extra confidence needed to win here, because larss has been player much better this year than recently, and would not give it up this match, for a clay-courter with no particular power. pavlyu still missing more than she should but it's coming around. and then she gets flowers and proposed to after match wtf? never seen that before. well, i think she loses next round to err. being put on spot in public like that is going to mess with her mind, my guess. err will miss even less than larss, has more power, and is quicker. pavlyu is one of few girls with midriff on tour, and she does not trust herself enough to use winner-power, nor to come in off her good deep shots and go for putaway volleys. i dont think her level, which is rising, as she cuts down errors, will be enough to defeat a pro's pro like errani.

FRIDAY

KL FUTURES: woz 1.67, goerg 7', gaj 8, kulich 8, dulg 15, nara 15, hsieh 21, witt 23
VALUE: all of them. whichever you think will win, these are all good values. if witt can get by woz she can win it. 23 is a lot. they all but woz are on the same general level, and woz is beatable by someone with power who's on that day. witt fits that bill. as i've said, she's one i'm paying particular attention to over the next two years. she has a long way to go, but the basics appear to be there. needs to develop her control and game management, which she will, she's very young. i doubt she can keep it on the court enough to beat ever-reliable woz, and i now that woz is 2 matches in, i doubt she's going to not show up. it would be ideal to hedge this live if need be, but not being offered.

FUTURE: 20/340 nara to win Kuala Lumpur L

FUTURES MONTERREY: ivic 2.2, bacs 5', pavlyu 7, err 8, gcia 11, ryb 17, mlad 19, urad 21
VALUE: ivic, mlad, urad, err. ivic will be heavy fav in three matches needed to win. i think only a hot mlad or urad could beat her. err probably lacks the power. pavly's run i think ends today. she has to hit harder than she did in beating larss to beat someone like ivic, or even err, and i dont think she can do that without spraying, as she has all year.

FUTURES: KUALA LUMPUR: woz 1.36, gaj 6, dulg 9, hsieh 13
VALUE: gaj. only. value on woz now gone. bet her in final vs gaj, wont be much worse return than you get here. gaj is playing well, she should beat dulg. woz will have to play well to beat her in final, and i think she will.

FUTURE: 10/50 gaj to win KUALA LUMPUR L

100/83 gaj (dulg) L
20/47 urad (bacs) L
100/121 err (pavlyu) W
10/221 6p: gaj(dulg), urad(bacs), err(pavlyu), ivic(mlad), woz(hsieh), gcia(ryb) L
20/13 mlad +6 (ivic) L

PRE-ANALYSIS: finally we get some good lines. let's cut to the chase: i think the bet of the day is ERR over pavly. pavly is on a 17-0 run at monterrey, which she has won 3x. so if you dont want to bet against that, there's reason. but she came into this tourney in poor form. she has improved her play, but in my view not as much as this line suggests. this is a false favorite. it should be more like err at 1.7 than 2.1. my judgment is the mediocre but good-forming larss pushed pavly to her limit last night, and err certainly has more to offer than larss. pavly will have to up the power to beat err, and that will bring the errors and the loss. i dont like to bet against trends, but it's not an absolute. the trend is why the line is where it is rather than where it should be. ... now is the time, if you bet on woz to win it all, to hedge with a little on gaj. gaj is in good form, and was pushed by solid nara last night. she came through. i see no reason she doesnt beat dulg today and make it to final. i'm not worried about woz beating dulg in final; i am a little worried about woz beating gaj. definitely see a WOZ-GAJ final, with a slight but real edge to woz. ... MONTERREY: besides the false err dog, i like urad. i have not seen her play at all this tournament, but following the scores, she appears to be heating up. when she plays well, she is quite formidable. she hasn't played well in a long time, over a year at least. on the educated guess we are seeing her surge, i think she's worth a calculated shot here, as a dog over 200, and also useful in a parlay with all the women's matches today. i dont feel bacs is all that great, though she has been hot lately, and her number against urad is high. i think that's much more a 50-50 match. i like a dog to have at least a 40% chance of winning, and i think urad does, and you get more than 2x your money back, so let's hit it. but let's not go nuts. always keep things simple, and the KISS here is taking ERR(pavly). so says me, anyway. as always, we'll see. i would personally not even be surprised to see MLAD beat IVIC, but i dont think it will happen. mlad might be worth a shot on games. about every sixth match ivic disappears for no reason. it's not predictable really. she is for that reason a tough one to back. she's better than mlad, but mlad is in good form, and the oddsmakers have underestimated her more than once this year. so you see all the projected winners of the 6 matches in my parlay. 5d is even offering some of these live, so additional chances to jump ship if need be.

21/126 5p err(pavlyu), ivic(mlad), gcia(ryb), gaj(dulg), woz(hsieh) L

PRE-ANALYSIS: urad goes down; will take one more shot at the basic idea. again, this is my way of doing it, taking one insight on a 50-50 (slight dog errani) and using that as the base for chasing a big return. but none of these are throw ins, they are all considered legs.

POST-ANALYSIS: boom, nailed err. smarter, tougher player figured out how to win in match. bet on the better player, you get the better player working for your money on every single point. let's hope the rest come thru. funny thing here, it's freezing cold down there in mexico where you would think it would be tropical. ... tough loss on gaj as dulg barely edges her in thirst set tiebreak. today was a good example where keeping it simple results in a big win, but going beyond that results in a net loss.

SATURDAY

100/61 temple (ucon) W
100/50 err +4 (bacs) L
100/120 err (bacs) L
100/55 gcia +6 (ivic) W

PRE-ANALYSIS: following someone on temple. it's a good circumstance for them. don't see why err cant win, she's higher ranked than bacs. both players are in good form. err's problem, as always, is her weak serve. i think she can find a way to overcome bacs. but it's certainly possible bacs overpowers her. ... I may be going a little heavy above, so take that into account. It's no 80% on err today. Games are very tricky. The bias should be toward the FAV, not the dog in TENNIS. It takes some time to grasp this. But, I normally play dogs few times I do. I just don't think bacs can blow err out. If that's the case, then i dont mind losing 50 to chase the big return on the odds on. The contrary view is err serve is so weak that not just the second gets eaten but the first is edible too. If bacs isn't missing lines, could be a blowout. Bacs is nothing that great. It figures to be a tight match. ...Gcia i have to think can come within 6 games of ivic. i thought that of mlad last night, and she came up a game short. Well, if it were cut and dried, they wouldnt take bets on it, would they?

POST-ANALYSIS: painful loss. err serves for the match 2x and gets broken both then loses tb. typical example of why i seldom bet games, it doesn't do you any good unless you're 80% sure, and in most of those cases you might as well bet the dog on the ML anyway. either bet the fav minus the games or the dog on the ML. dog + games is pretty close to being a sucker bet. ... oh look i won on the games with garcia. in reality i lost by turning a 350% return into a 50% return. it might appear i contradict the dont be greedy rule, but not so. you have to get paid, fully, for your risky insights, and bets based on them. it may seem you're lowering your risk by taking games, but that's not really the case. you're increasing your win percentage but it's more than outweighed by the loss on return. ... takeaway is that ivic is a flake who can never be relied on as a favorite. but we already knew that going in. pissed off, actually, should have been perfect today but end up losing.

SUNDAY

FUTURE: 55/50 woz to win Kuala Lumpur W

100/26 posp (ito) canc.
100/109 gcia (bacs) L

PRE-ANALYSIS: dont really see what justifies bacs as fav, gcia is as likely to win. the POSP looks like free money. it's davis cup, so can never be completely sure, but if posp doesn't beat a low-level guy at home in canada, i'll be surprised. might be worth waiting to see how the first match, RAO-NISH, goes. nish wins. they canc the posp bet. not sure why, but i wont count it. ... it's because ito drops out for soeda. ... hedge out to a profit live on bacs as became clear gcia makes too many errors but a loss on here.

POST-ANALYSIS: bacs plays worse and serves better under pressure. garcia hits harder and makes more errors but plays a little better under pressure. garcia makes poor decisions as well as missing shots. if you're down a break mid-third set. your opponent is 8 points from victory. you cant just give away points by making easy UE. it sounds dumb to say, but it is a decision you make to a good extent. you cant overhit or mishit you have to be doubly careful in that circumstance until you have lined up a shot you have a good chance of executing as you go for winner or to set it up on next shot. gcia doesn't seem to understand this. she just hits harder. like so many that's her strategy: "i have to be more aggressive." do what i do, just harder. when you blow an open court because you hit a volley 10x harder than you had to, you have to start questioning what you're doing. she made about 4 micro-mental mistakes in 2-3 points later in set. and bacs was starting to falter. had to bail herself out repeatedly with aces. knowing how to play is really pretty uncommon. it's not rare, but even among the top players it cant be assumed. ...anyway, kind of a near-miss week. not a big action week. indian wells should have more options, but it will take time to build.

[week #9: -178]
cum. 2015: +164
 
Last edited:

LA Burns

Registered
Forum Member
Jun 11, 2003
3,909
32
0
New Orleans
"POST-ANALYSIS: azar was a little stiff in legs. safa played well, but next time they play it'll be right back to azar kicking her ass. azar left a boatload of break points. there's no meaning to this victory other than azar was a little more tired/injured than i thought. tough one."


thought safa looked strong all week - whether or not she can carry it forward who knows but I was impressed with her power and diversity of game - seems like she has improved a good bit
 

TennisTapir

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 13, 2013
1,285
4
0
"POST-ANALYSIS: azar was a little stiff in legs. safa played well, but next time they play it'll be right back to azar kicking her ass. azar left a boatload of break points. there's no meaning to this victory other than azar was a little more tired/injured than i thought. tough one."


thought safa looked strong all week - whether or not she can carry it forward who knows but I was impressed with her power and diversity of game - seems like she has improved a good bit

She did play as well as I've seen her. I've just made a lot of money going against her when she plays people in top ten. I would tend to attribute the loss to something on Azar's part, but no doubt Safa played very well, with more confidence than usual.
 

TennisTapir

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 13, 2013
1,285
4
0
week #10 (c. +164 in)

MONDAY

[will analyze INDIAN WELLS after i study it]

100/52 3p: parm(aoy), tsur(hibi), koz(jaks) W

PRE-ANALYSIS: this tournament doesn't really get going till the first weekend, just a bunch of qualifying, without many good betting matches. no video until the first friday, if it's like last year. taking three heavy favs to get a 50% ROI.

TUESDAY

100/32 3p: mathieu(hanf), coric(smir), gavr(embree) L

INDIAN WELLS PREVIEW

NOTE: halep's cousin killed himself, so she's likely to w/draw or be on tilt. real matches start wed. lot of them and i see nothing of any appeal. No Arghir, cousin of Simona Halep, committed suicide Monday night in huge debt to loan sharks they have. No confirmation yet but looks like h is pulling out. This will change things. It helps Serena considerably. UPDATE: HALEP WILL PLAY. REVISED BELOW...

INDIAN WELLS OVERVIEW: This tournament sets up well for Serena and Sharapova and, beneath that, the winner of early-round MUGU-KAPLIS, in light of pending HALEP withdrawal. Whichever wins will likely take the 2Q and play serena in semis. In the bottom half (BH), Azarenka can take sharapova's place if she gets by her in early round. Otherwise, sharap pretty easy. FINAL is most likely SERENA-SHARAP, and we know who wins that.

QUARTERS PROJECTIONS: 1Q: all SERENA. only real resistance is SAFA and MAKA and they play each other first. every tournament we can say if X, Y or Z heats up, like KERB, but it seldom happens. SERENA has an easy a shot to QF. KERB has sucked for a long time, and she's the only one with an outside shot to beat her. In the QF, serena will probably play the winner of MAKA/SAFA. She should win that and make the SEMI. Basically SERENA has to beat one hot decent player to make the semi. That's as good a setup as you can get.

2Q: HALEP WILL PLAY after reports she would withdraw in light of cousin's suicide. ... What will this mean? Hard to say. It could remove pressure, but it could add stress. The proof is on the court. HALEP has to beat MUGU/KAPLIS and then ARAD to win this quarter. The key match is M#3 betweeen MUGU and KAPLIS. Both are hot. Both can beat halep. I lean slightly to KAPLIS. HALEP would be favored over either. But I trust h to beat arad much more easily than either KAPLIS or MUGU, to whom halep has already lost this year. No other names worth mentioning. The ARAD eighth has GIO, who can get hot, and the steady NAVARRO. Possibly an upset there, but i think halep could handle either of those without too much problem. I put this quarter: h, kaplis, mugu, arad, nav, gio. Not extremely confident. It remains to be seen how halep reacts on court after family tragedy.

3Q: This is the hardest to predict quarter. Bookended by BOUCH and WOZ. WOZ is a known entity. She and ARAD are always there at the bottom of the page, waiting to not-suck (unlike Family Circle. old movie line. you will pardon me.) We just dont know how bouch will play. she's had a bad year so far. Maybe she gets going here. But I'll believe it when i see it. Trying to 'time the market' on this stuff is a bad strategy. It's better to wait for a trend (bouch playing well) to establish itself and then hop on. If you dont collect every high payday, your avoidance of multiple losses trying to catch the start of the streak more than makes up for it. KEYS and BENCIC also in this quarter. First tournament for KEYS since ridiculous overpraise in press, and we're keeping an eye on how she responds. I expect her to be overpriced and lose early often the rest of the year. Look at Sloane Stephens. She won't swoon that bad, but she is far from the budding slam-winner they're selling her as. ... This quarter I think will turn on how bouchard plays, and my guess is she heats back up. But we have to guess WOZ wins the Q until we verify that BOUCH regains form. If Bouch can turn it on, she has a very easy route into the QF, to play WOZ most likely. So this very well could be her rebound tournament, and she certainly needs it. I think that will happen, to guess, but I won't back it until I confirm it with real and impressive victories. Bouch can play her way hot and then see how she performs against SHARAP in the SEMIS. That's what I think will happen, if I had to guess. But it's always dangerous to assume something that has not happened in months, which is BOUCH playing at her ordinary high level.

4Q: SHARAPOVA plays AZAR in second match. That winner should take the quarter. IVIC is the other name, but she bounced last week to GCIA most unimpressively. AZAR played very well, making final the other week. She will give SHARAP a real test. Rest of the quarter is safely ignored.

PROJECTED QF: TH: SERENA-MAKA, HALEP-ARAD; BH: BOUCH-WOZ, IVIC-SHARAP.

PROJECTED SEMIS: SERENA-HALEP, WOZ-SHARAP.

FUTURES: lines are not out yet, but i'm going to put down these as the only serious possibilities to win: SERENA, SHARAP, HALEP, KAPLIS, MUGU, AZAR, IVIC, BOUCH. The VALUE will be on bouch, if you think she breaks thru, or on mugu or kaplis. Or on Azar-Sharap. but since four of these play each other early, best to wait for MUGU-KAPLIS and AZAR-SHARAP to take place. See who's hot. Unless you have a good guess going in. To all appearances, it's SERENA's tournament to lose. I'm still learning how to beat futures, but I really think SERENA wins this and there's no particular value anywhere else. She has to be 100% motivated, and that is crucial. She has changed hitting partners. I guess that could have some effect. But she's healthy and motivated and has the best draw of all serious contenders. She has a history of kicking the snot out her likeliest finals opponent. We'll see what numbers they post. UPDATE: they're up.

FUTURES, FIRST LISTING: serena 2.2, sharap 5.75, azar 9', halep 12, woz 21, ivic 23, mugu arad 34, safa 41, keys 46, kaplis bouch 51, maka 67, nav 81, kerb 101, gio 201, benc 326, htuch 476,
VALUE: SERENA, HALEP, MUGU, KAPLIS, BOUCH, MAKA


PATHS: the serious opps the likely winners will face

SERENA: KERB, MAKA, KAPLIS, SHARAP
HALEP: KAPLIS, ARAD, SERENA, SHARAP
KAPLIS: MUGU, ARAD, SERENA, SHARAP
MUGU: KAPLIS, ARAD, SERENA, SHARAP

BOUCH: PVIC, WOZ, SHARAP, SERENA
WOZ: KEYS, BOUCH, SHARAP, SERENA
IVIC: GCIA, SHARAP, BOUCH, SERENA
AZAR: SHARAP, IVIC, BOUCH, SERENA
SHARAP: AZAR, IVIC, BOUCH, SERENA

That's my read...here's someone else's:

WTA Indian Wells 2015: A sweeping preview

James / 8 mins ago
The 2015 BNP Paribas Open in Indian Wells officially kicks off on Wednesday with the start of the WTA main draw. In what is a very brave and bold decision, Serena Williams has decided to return to the desert for the first time in 14 years. It certainly puts Indian Wells above Miami for the women this year although there have been some high profile withdrawals with Petra Kvitova and Dominika Cibulkova both missing from the main draw. I always remember the start of Indian Wells where it feels like every tennis fan on Twitter is at the tournament! Despite my insane jealousy, it?s great seeing so many fan pictures and i?ll try and link to some of the best over the next week and a bit. Note that the top 32 seeds all have byes into the second round. Let?s take a sweeeeeping look at the draw.

Serena WilliamsSerena Williams heads the draw and it?s a little befuddling! Taking a step back from the draw, it looks pretty dreamy on paper for Serena. Her first match of the week against either Aleksandra Krunic or Monica Niculescu will be intriguing nonetheless. Svetlana Kuznetsova and Angelique Kerber are the highest seeds in Serena?s eighth and both will be looking to kickstart their seasons after disappointing form stretching back to Melbourne; Kuznetsova?s only win this year the WTA tour came via a retirement, while Kerber?s only WTA main draw win since Sydney was against Kuznetsova. Ekaterina Makarova is joined by Lucie Safarova, Timea Bacsinszky and Elina Svitolina in her eighth. Makarova could meet the Acapulco and Monterrey champion, Bacsinszky in the third round although the Swiss player could be fatigued after four of her five matches in Monterrey were three setters. Safarova is coming in off the back of her biggest career title to date in Doha. Rob should be joining her in Indian Wells so confidence should be high. She will play either Mona Barthel or Kristina Mladenovic in the second round, which has the potential to be a sticky opener.

The second quarter features last year?s semi-finalists, Agnieszka Radwanska and Simona Halep. There had been rumours that Halep may withdraw from the tournament due to a family tragedy, but there have been no announcements today. Some of the Romanian fans on Twitter implied that the Romanian media aren?t always to be trusted. On paper, Radwanska shouldn?t have too many concerns about her second round match against Mirjana Lucic-Baroni or Alison Riske. The same cannot be said for her third rounder? step forward, Camila Giorgi. The Italian firecracker, who knocked Maria Sharapova out of Indian Wells last year, could be a very interesting match-up for Aga, if the pair were to meet. The one big talking point from Halep?s eighth is a potential third rounder between Garbine Muguruza and Karolina Pliskova. I?m gutted the pair have landed in each other?s sections because I feel they could both do some damage in this draw. I?m intrigued to see how both players do this week, particularly Pliskova who went on a tear after Melbourne. If seedings all hold (neverrrr gonna happen), Halep would meet Muguruza or Pliskova in the fourth round.

Wozniacki is in the third section and could meet the dangerous floater, Kaia Kanepi in the second round. The Estonian hasn?t played since Dubai when she was forced to retire from her first round match. Eugenie Bouchard and Madison Keys are both present in this section and are playing their first tournaments for quite a while; Bouchard lost early in Antwerp and then pulled out of Dubai and Acapulco, while Keys hasn?t played since a breakthrough Grand Slam in Melbourne. As both come in cold, they will be vulnerable. Bouchard?s draw looks favourable to begin with, but it?s likely to ramp up quickly enough that if she isn?t playing well, she won?t survive. Keys will open against the winner of a coin toss of a first round match between Daniela Hantuchova and Klara Koukalova. The first seed that Keys could meet is Jelena Jankovic. This is a good draw as JJ still hasn?t found her feet this year after an off-season that was derailed by a serious back injury. Finally, this draw could throw up a third round match between Alize Cornet and Andrea Petkovic?. Or it could quite conceivably be Petra Cetkovska against Annika Beck! That?s probably a better alternative because i?m still having nightmares from that Petkovic v Cornet match from Paris last year.

The final quarter is where the excitement is as the number two seed, Maria Sharapova could play Victoria Azarenka in the third round. Vika has had an excellent start to the year and looks to be in a great place right now with a new team featuring Wim Fissette and Serena?s former hitting partner, Sascha Bajin. I?m not going to discuss the Maria-Vika match-up unless it does become reality, but that has the potential to be a real blockbuster. Last year?s champion, Flavia Pennetta is projected to meet Sharapova in the fourth round. It feels like damage control for Flavia in terms of ranking points, but her draw is respectable up to Maria. The first seed she could meet is Sam Stosur, who is one of her pigeons (5-0 H2H lead). The other top eight seed in this section is Ana Ivanovic, who could be in line for a Monterrey rematch with Caroline Garcia in the third round. If that happens, it would tell us more about Ana?s form going forward and perhaps, Caroline too. Sabine Lisicki and Sara Errani are also present in this section and will be vulnerable. If anyone could sweep up, it could Jarmila Gajdosova. The Aussie opens against Roberta Vinci and could meet Lisicki in round two.

Quarter-final predictions: S.Williams v Safarova, Halep v Radwanska, Petkovic v Wozniacki and Ivanovic v Azarenka

Final prediction: S.Williams d. Azarenka

same guy with some first round match previews here:
http://mootennis.com/2015/03/10/wta...mattek-sands-v-townsend-barthel-v-mladenovic/

100/128 2p: fed(dimi), byu+9 (gonz) L
100/260 3p: gonz 2h(byu), pavlyu(larss), flip(rog) W

POST-ANALYSIS: well i'm gonna go out back and burn my money and kick myself in the nuts. you dont bet exhibitions. fed up a break in the third and loses. and i PSEUDO-HEDGE on GONZ at ht when fed is up 31. pavly beat larss last week, should again. no kind of great bet, was the best i could scrounge. flip probably beats rog at 1.59 but rog has power, if she lights up she can win. i abrogated, out of boredom today, the solid principle: "when there's nothing to be done it is necessary to do nothing."

WEDNESDAY

PRE-ANALYSIS: ok, now for the real tournament. 7 matches to win the tournament, 6 for the (32) seeds. TOP HALF starts the tournament. 16 matches today, 16 THUR. that cuts out 32 players, and along with the 32 who get byes, reduces field to 64 into FRI, when the SERENAs play their first match in what i call M#2 instead of round2.

PROJECTED WINNERS WED: VEK(chir), WATSON(goerg), KRUNIC(nicu), MLAD(bthel), TOMLJ(falc), SOLER(gavril), KOZ(vesn), GIB(puig), KUDRY(vick), RYB(arrua), LUCIC(risk), VANUT(nara), SINIA(e-rod), ERAK(min), SCHEEP(steph), PAV(larss). not all these are listed yet, but i like many dogs. vek is small dog. cant trust goerg, watson worth a shot. krun can beat nicu. cant trust bthel, mlad can beat her. cant trust puig. lucic can beat riske. how can we not take a shot on big dog or any dog vs stephens, who seems never to win these days. i dont LOVE any of these. i'm not playing anything big. there's not one reliable player in this bunch, so that means you lean to the number, which means the dogs. this is one of the rarer times i'd be most tempted to tie 5-6 dogs, big and small, into a huge-return parlay, and i may do that. really though, betting on the lower level players who exit the first 2 rounds of 90% of their tournaments isn't worth it, you dont see them enough to know what you're getting. the money comes from insights into the players who play all the time, and that means the better players, when those insights aren't noticed or agreed on by the linesmakers. i will devise some 10-spot big-return parlays, but we can let the lines moves the next 12 hours and see if they go as we think. ... in my view, the START of the year is now over. We move into, with IW, the second portion. the practical meaning is that some hot players will cool and some cool or unplaying players will emerge.

BIG PIC: kaplis -- the concept of disrespect is overrated, and tends to be used by creatures who deserve NO respect rather than more, but -- putting fucking KAPLIS at 51 to win this? Are you fucking kidding me? Is this field crowded with people who play BETTER under pressure? And serve all kinds of aces? Who does that remind you of? That's right. SERENA. i think 51 is an absurd number. of course there will be a couple minor factors i'm not considering but from what we've seen this year, and kaplis being young and still rising, that is ridiculously too high. it should probably be about 20. yes, she has a harder path than other greats, having to navigate mugu, then halep, then serena, then sharap, but...that's four matches she can win. wont be favored in 3 of them. but won't be a bigger dog than maybe 1.3. 51 is not justifiable in my opinion. it is closer to insulting.

kaplis - her fellow players know what's up
http://espn.go.com/tennis/story/_/id/12428410/tennis-karolina-pliskova-new-queen-aces

"She's serving very well," Kvitova recently said. "Doesn't look [like it], but she's playing very aggressively and going for her shots."

That's an interesting quote, and I think she's right. Tennis looks very different from the level it's played on, but you seldom get this camera angle, you're always too high. When you're level, you can see just carved and hard, how tight-angled and as kvit is saying subtle yet powerful kaplis's strokes actually are. She is deceptive because she plays very erectly. She doesn't need to move or dive as most do, she's 6'1". And she hits quite hard.

2/499 6p: krun(nicu), vekc(chir), wats(goerg), mlad(bthel), vanUt(nara), scheep(steph) L

PRE-ANALYSIS: i've learned over years that throwing even amount on dogs i like about the same doesn't really work. Better to go with strong, specific ideas. Almost surely this parlay will lose, but even if one bets each of these individually and goes 33 or 42 and produces profits, the next time it will go 15. I've learned that over time. Just not worth it. So make a little parlay for a tiny amount and hedge it live, and wait for day with matches you have strong feelings about. ... 5d is offering watson-goerg live, that is the classic type of match there's money to be made trading because there is likely to be up and down, or simply an upset that you can see coming after a few games.

POST-ANALYSIS: goerg is just the worst. the absolute worst. absolutely cannot be trusted to win a match or to win from any point including match point within a match. for absolutely no reason at all, from a perfect position four years ago, she has gotten worse. she is nothing but a mediocre doubles player. krun gets whipped but dogs WATSON and VEK come thru. so 2 of first 3 dogs have cashed. bthel barely wins. 2-2 on dogs. TOMLJ loses to FALC, both suck and will go nowhere.

16/144 3p: scheep(steph), erak(min), vanUt(nara) L

POST-ANALYSIS: if you didn't see it, do not bet on steph. she won here but it was purely scheep's weakness. steph will be beaten soundly even by typically weak KERB effort, next round. Any top 50 player would have whipped stephens in two sets here, scheep blew both sets. Steph hits UE under very little pressure, seems to have lost all her ability to hit the ball past the opponent. Did that once the whole match, basically. The key on sloane stephens is the lines are RIDICULOUS. and they dont adjust. She was 1.3 here in what was basically 1.8 to pick em. She'll probably be like 1.5 or even better to KERB, and will get blown out.

PRE-ANALYSIS: the right way to play this particular tournament, with its larger-than-normal field, is to watch matches on WED and THUR to gain insights for FRI and SAT, when the good players play their first match. So, tomorrow, like today, maybe play a few dogs you like but otherwise, lay off. Looking ahead to FRIDAY, here are the projected winners or leans (before the lines even come out), going down the tree: SERENA(nicu), VEKIC dog to (diyas), pass kuz-sinia,, KERB(steph), SAFA(bthel), VANUT as small dog or fav to svit, BACS(erak), MAKA(vesn), HALEP(gavr), vick-lep pass, MUGU(falc), KAPLIS(arrua), NAV(puig), PAVLY maybe small dog to stryc, GIO(watson), ARAD(risk). feel strongest and would make a parlay with: arad, gio, mugu, halep, kerb, serena.

THURSDAY (+94 wtd)

100/43 thiem(duck) L
100/43 melz(nov) W

100/220 5p: colst(fresst), gio(wats), arad(risk), halep(gavr), mugu(falc) L

FRIDAY

Here's what i think for today: GIO(watson), ARAD(riske), VANUT(svit) upset, MAKA(vesn), HALEP(gavr), VEKIC(diyas) upset, KAPLIS(arrua), SINIA-KUZ OVER 20', MUGU(falc), KERB(steph), PAV-STRYC OVER 21', SAFA(bthel) but i wouldnt play it, NAV(puig), LEP-VICK 20 OVER, SERENA(nicu)

FUTURE: 10/500 KAPLIS to WIN Indian Wells

Had mentioned that, not sure if posted it, but i did take it so i'll post it now for real. SERENA will win this tournament, i'm just betting this to hedge it to profit at right time.

PRE-ANALYSIS: The ones I am surest about, enough to use in one parlay are: SERENA(nicu), MUGU(falc), ARAD(riske), HALEP(gavr), GIO(wats). The only one with slight doubt is gio, but that gives enough return to make those five worth parlaying. Gio sometimes throws a rod but she hits much more powerfully than watson and should win. the others should win easily. ... KAPLIS just want to see how she feels. slight chance she's not invested and loses kind of like HTUCH lost yesterday. doubt it, but enough for me to stay off including her in parlay as huge fav. VANUT i feel is coming on. this girl has some power and is maturing, i think she wins or stretches sinia, who is also young riser, to three. MAKA probably wins but vesn shows signs of life, and if maka isnt invested, vesn can upset. best to stay off that one. ARAD should crush riske. MUGU could probably beat falc w a blindfold on, too powerful. HALEP will douse gavr. if she has emo probs from cousin it will kick in against KAPLIS/MUGU. VEKIC i suspect is coming on and diyas may dip after good season so far. that's just a guess, not playing it. KERP should wallop steph, even though she has sucked this year and cant be trusted. steph appeared to me to be that bad, even in victory. kerb power will cause her to UE every other shot. but then kerb is just kerb, makes all kinds of UE herself. PAVLY is coming on, and stryc has played well, i think this match goes either way but to three sets. SAFA, no reason to think she doesn't beat UEmaker bthel, but i dont trust safa, she may not be invested here. NAV is just a lot better than puig. LEP-VICK, neither have done much recently, i'd pick LEP with a gun to head but will pass. SERENA will beat nicu, easy or hard. no real return on it, but over my 1.04 level for parlay inclusion at 1.07.

100/468 7p: SERENA(nicu), KAPLIS(arrua), MUGU(falc), HALEP(gavr), KERB(steph), ARK(ten), ND-DUKE 152 UNDER L

POST-ANALYSIS: ARAD wipes out riske, as expected. GIO gets up a break 2x in s1, blows it 57. gio's all or nothing style makes her difficult to bet on or against. she misses just enough and watson makes just enough defensive blocks to extent the point long enough for gio's next miss. but if her shots go in, she can beat almost anyone. gio has no trouble breaking watson but cant hold herself, keeps double-faulting (DF). ...incredibly dumb decision of me to bet on halep. when you dont know how someone will react, either pass or bet on large dog. ... announcers trying to figure what's wrong with halep. mixed feelings over playing amidst turmoil of her cousin dying. would be the answer. gavr is ok player but nothing to trouble average halep. ... another great mistake to play on kerber, she just cant keep the ball in bounds. she is a no-play at this point. ... irritating, been 90% right about what happened today and flushing money. you CANNOT BET on people who make UE. that is the single most important rule in betting tennis. it will often seem like a good idea, but always ALWAYS in the end it will cost you money. because when you win on it the first time, you just break that rule again, and sure as peas are green, the UE-er will burn you the second or third time. you simply do not bet on sucks like stephens or kerber. not as they are now. kerb, right now, cant use any of her superior power because the second she turns it up, the ball flies into the crowd. that's barely an exaggeration. steph is playing better but make no mistake, she will not beat anyone good. what a waste of money.

100/38 ARK (ten) W
100/91 nd-duk 151' UNDER W

SATURDAY

100/77 kouk +6 (keys) L
10/46 kouk (keys) L
100/26 bouch (hrad) W

100/114 3p: WIS(pur), isner(melz), bouch(hrad) W

POST-ANALYSIS: stupid bet on kouk, came up game short. thought she might be rebounding and keys would slip back, but no. still think keys will exit next couple rounds, will keep fading.

SUNDAY (-4 wtd)

PREDICTED WINNERS: SERENA(diyas), KUZ(steph), SAFA(svit), MAKA(bacs), HALEP(lep), KAPLIS(mugu), NAV(pav), ARAD(wats).

PRE-ANALYSIS: arad should handle watson easily. NAV should be able to handle pav, make fewer errors, just a better player. KAPLIS is again a small dog to mugu, and again i see no reason. mugu didn't look that great in M#2 against a weaker opponent. ... HALEP looked like she was going to quit, then turned it on and won as she should. so i'm guessing she will handle LEP. but i'll stay off her until the next round. still have a feeling she might not be totally invested in this tournament for family reasons. MAKA i never see play, she gets less video coverage than anyone, but is always hanging around. bacs is on a huge roll, has won about a dozen in a row, but i dont think she's as good as maka. probably leave it along though, no need to try to break trend. SAFA i dont trust and never will, and svit came from behind last match. KUZ may beat steph but i'll stay off it. did not think steph could beat kerb, but she improved and kerb played her usual awful match. this is one of the later matches and the crowd will help steph and that could be the difference. kuz goes kooky under pressure. but still, i think kuz will take it, too much power. SERENA should beat diyas, who has had a good year, simply too much power. Overally i like ARAD and NAV best. and for a dog, KAPLIS over mugu.

FUTURES: M#3: serena 2.3, sharap 5', azar 9, halep 10, woz 17, ivic arad 21, mugu keys 26, safa 34, bouch 34, kaplis 51, nav maka 67, steph 81, penn bacs 126, stos 151, kuz corn jj gcia err 201, svit pav lis 251, vand benc 301, wats tsur 401, lep diyas 751
VALUE: serena, azar, bouch, kaplis, maka. i'm not a BOUCH fan but she appears to have reignited and has a comparatively easy path, which is always the key factor. BOUCH at 34 is a good deal. but SERENA will win this. as we've seen, the best laid plans are waylaid by injury or unexpected illness, and at 34, you just need a little to win a lot. M#3 will eliminate two of: mugu/kaplis and sharap/azar, all of whom are serious contenders.

100/52 3p: ARAD(wats), SERENA(diyas), MON: BOUCH(vand) L
100/13 arad (watson) L
100/29 bouch (vand) W

POST-ANALYSIS: so far navrat's attempt to turn arad into a power player is failing miserably. she had never lost a set to watson before today and was clearly going for shots her frame is not equipped to deliver. maybe she learns how, but right now she cannot hit thru the court. of course there is always a learning curve when you're trying to alter your basic approach, but i did not see a single point that navrat could point to as an example of how her power strategy will pay off when arad fully adapts to it. it is possible arad on her own figured out how to get the maximum out of herself, via a defensive and subtle game... ... meanwhile, svit continues to grow by the day, very impressive young player. for sure top 10 in the making, and very likely top 5. And fuck me for not backing Kaplis. She is in mugu's head now, does not believe she can beat her, the spaniard. kaplis is showing every sign of knowing how to win. that is not a small thing, that is a big thing. many with great skills otherwise do not possess it.

[week #10: -175]
cum. 2015: -11
 
Last edited:

TennisTapir

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 13, 2013
1,285
4
0
week #11 (-11 in)

MONDAY and TUESDAY

100/10 serena (steph) W
100/135 svit (bacs) L
100/202 jank (keys) W

PRE-ANALYSIS: will fade keys till i win. fuq the games gimme da cash. serena and svit are tomorrow, feel extremely confident serena wins, 95%, highest rating, and good 70% on svit. bacs has played incredibly and won 2 tournaments and about 14 matches in a row, but svit is simply better. this kid is impressive. i think she'll blow bacs off court. odds on too. pissed i missed her over untrustable safa. i literally forgot who she was. so many of these damn names it's hard to keep these ics and ovas apart. svit is a bum-rusher. if you hold on, she'll fade. if not, she'll blow you away. she hits very hard and very regularly and her serve is solid too. nothing not to like. threat to all and a big threat to anyone outside top ten. ... for the rest of TUE matches, lines are worth watching. often the money moves at this point are correct. dont go against them without a very strong opinion. example: bouch dropped from 129 to 124. people got on her. and sure enuf, nice easy win. as i predicted and expected, she is reigniting here after a slowish start to 2015. halep 1.408 over pliskova, no thanks. plisk is too good. either take her as big dog or lay off. halep had to work hard to get by lep, who really brought some nice play out of her. for some reason, i just feel this isn't halep's tournament. i may be wrong. if her relative had not died, i'd like her much more. im not betting this match except live if i see something cant resist. should be a great match. finally, nav over watson. watson has stung me a couple times. she's a little better than i give credit. hits a little harder. her power is hardly overwhelming, but it caused more trouble than arad could handle. she's normally pretty regular. nav is a subtle player. she was hard tested by pav. may be a little tired. but she has a full day off to recover. i'm juuust a little hesitant to get on this match at 1.35. i like nav but i dont know. something tells me there's a little more danger of an upset than i think. probably stay off that and bet it live. ... as for the rest of MONDAY, i dont see much i like. AZAR as 2.7 dog over sharap is about it. i dont trust penn and ivic as favs. not enough return on them or woz for the risk. not confident enough to use in parlays either. when there's nothing to be done, it is important to do nothing. play azar sharap live, that will have opportunities. lis has power to beat err and may be heating up, but...i dont want to put money on that. i like two dogs today: JANKO and AZAR, and that's about it. already down on janko, but will wait and see how the line moves on azar...

POST-ANALYSIS: got to love that janko. played like complete shit, refused to give up, kept digging, and finaally at the end keys just gives way. beautiful thing. make no mistake, keys is good but overhyped for a political reason. if she had won here, as she easily could have, would have bet against her until she lost. she has power but not enough control. nets far too many. janko did NOT play well, she didnt play smart, she didn't do a fucking thing except keep playing and trying to do better. it's a life lesson for us all there. she missed a boatload of down the line shots and other winners. she is by no means the player she used to be. victory of a pro over a kid, this was. great start to the week. as i said when it happened, gilbert did her no favors saying she'd be on top in 2' years. we will continue to fade her and continue to profit. ... meanwhile benc upends woz. amazing given that bencic had been double-zeroed by woz recently. still to come tonight, the delicious azar and sharap, hoping azar takes her. ...tight for a few games then sharap rolls. gcia beats ivic.

FORECAST: ok, going to be BOUCH-SHARAP in one semi. four pretty easy wins to get there, make some money on that. the other is tougher to pick. SERENA/SVIT vs HALEP/KAPLIS. most likely SERENA-HALEP, but an upset of either would not surprise me. KAPLIS and SVIT are very formidable players. odds are FINAL is SERENA-SHARAP. BOUCH has reignited, but no reason to think she gets by SHARAP. upcoming matches to make money on: Take SVIT over bacs. Take SERENA over steph. BOUCH over tsur, easy or hard, will happen. stay off HALEP-PLIS and NAV-WATS. i suspect one or both are upsets. SVIT is 2.2 over bacs, fire on that. maybe over too. but i feel if bacs is going to end her streak, it may be a collapse, like 6461. i just think svit hits too hard and is too regular for bacs, who has had some escapes and doesnt hit hard enough to stop svit if i'm reading it right. bacs is not as tough an out as safa. SVIT at 2.2, there's your play o' the day on tuesday. parlay serena-svit-bouch if you like. i probably will. i dont mind losing return by watching lines overnight, but i've been right about moves most of the year, so the price on all these will likely be worse tomorrow. ... would be very surprised if kaplis doestnt get at least a tb out of one set, so that means over is probably a good bet in match with halep. i think that match is a lot closer to 50-50 than the line suggests, 1.4/3. just want to say that taking kaplis at +200 is completely justifiable. if had a gun to my head, i think she takes this match. i think it's very tight, and i think h starts thinking about her cousin. and loses.

FUTURES: (i'm shifting from match to round, going with the conventional way, just to avoid confusion)
into R#4: serena 2.15, sharap 3.75, h 9', bouch 13, plis 21, pen 31, nav benc 51, steph janko gcia 67, bacs lis 81, svit 101, wats tsur 151
VALUE: serena, sharap, halep, plis, svit. SVIT at 101 is insane. similar to the former KAPLIS at 51, now to more reasonable 21 but still high. these will probably not win but they have considerably better chances than number suggests. still looks like SERENA-SHARAP final, so both those have value. i'd put a little on svit and wait and see if halep beats kaplis. these have no chance: bacs, lis, wats, tsur, steph, janko, gcia, penn. very little chance: nav and benc. the rest have a decent chance to win.

FUTURE: 10/500 KAPLIS to WIN Indian Wells L
FUTURE: 10/1000 SVIT to win Indian Wells L

100/181 3p: serena(steph), svit(bacs), bouch(tsur) L

PRE-ANALYSIS: lines moved as i thought, a good sign.

100/56 2p: agut (sock), nadal (young) L

POST-ANALYSIS: good to see nav beat watson, who is a mediocrity. nav got a little injured. wasn't clear she would come thru. she essentially waived the second set, then played avg level and watson disappeared. no way arad should have lost to watson yesterday but that's the past. ... on general principles go with reliable agut over sock, he wins first set and then gets blown out. waste of money. ... halep-plis starts.. wow...halep handles plisk easily. second straight time. for some reason, halep just matches up well against kaplis. the linesmakers were right, tho the number did move as i predicted, ie back toward kaplis. halep's game really reveals where kaplis needs to improve if she wants to get higher than 10-12. she can only hang for 4-5 serious groundstrokes. that has to improve. she has to hit more aces if she possibly can. she needs all the free points she can get. halep is going to beat NAV and will be a real, real tough out for anyone, including serena. in fact, it's probably time to buy a little future on halep next time odds are posted. she'll be about 4-5 to 1. ... svit takes first set then bacs just swamps her. she's better than i thought. she plays smart. going to take a power player playing well to beat her. for some reason svit's power seemed off. she hit lots of great shots but couldnt hit any winners. bacs is good at defense and offense. she's now won like 15-16 in a row.

100/22 bouch (tsur) L
100/150 lis (gcia) W

POST-ANALYSIS: bouch is just another overrated media hype. not as bad as sloane stephens or others but she has lost all touch on the ball. meanwhile, lis is heating up. garcia is never a good bet as a big fav.

WEDNESDAY

200/80 halep (nav) W

PRE-ANALYSIS: halep and serena should win, but i'm not getting in front of bacs again. nav just doesn't have enough to beat halep, altho halep sometimes beats herself. halep is healthy and playing in top form. no sign of any emo trouble from her family stuff. nav coming off two three-setters. if halep plays normally, she wins comfortably in two sets. the return is high enough to justify the risk. After all the upsets on Tue, the favs to win are SERENA, HALEP and I'd have to say BACS. Only problem is they're all in the top half. That leaves PENN, last year's winner, as the fav in the bottom half.

OVERNIGHT: BIG drop in halep line from 1.4 to 1.3. We have been right about nearly every line move this week. And still managed to lose money. That takes talent.

NCCA TOURNAMENT: FINAL FOUR: KTY, WIS; DUK, VILLA. FINAL: WIS-DUK. WINNER: WIS.

FUTURES: R#5: serena 1.67, h 5.25, penn 8, jj 11, tsur 21, lis 23, nav bacs 41.
VALUE: serena, h, penn, bacs. bacs playing very well, has won last 2 tournaments, blew away svit after slow set. if serena falters, that 41 is looking damn good. halep also looking great. she's probably the best value this round. serena will have to work very hard to beat her, play better than she has. penn appears to be the one for the bottom half. dont think she can beat either serena or halep or even bacs. halep is the big value this round.

POST-ANALYSIS: nav takes set then folds her tent. Halep didn't play that great, but she knows how to lead a match to a successful conclusion. She will have a good shot against serena, who in some ways is easier than someone like nav, with her odd style.

100/70 3p: colst(sds), nc(harv), nd(ne) L

THURSDAY and FRIDAY (-78 in)

FUTURES:
R#6: Serena 1.56, h 6, penn 9, jj 13, lis 19, tsur 34
VALUE: halep and serena. Play the halep future if you think she can beat serena. Play the serena SIDE vs halep, which is only 20c lower than her future. Either one is very likely to win the final.

100/19 2p: nd(ne), isu(uab) L

100/140 2p: jank(tsur), halep +5 (serena)canc. W adj. /51

PRE-ANALYSIS: see no reason not to trust the number on jj. slight move toward her as well. really looking forward to seeing what halep can do with serena. if she can't upset, i think she can take a set or come damn close. hard to see halep doing worse than 3 games in one set, so i think she can cover the 5, but i'm often wrong on games bets when i take the dog. beware. still the games line at 5 is 1.588 so heavily favors halep +5.

100/355 5p: nc(harv), ncs(lsu), utah(sfa), osu(vcu), djok(tomic)canc. W adj. /329

NOTES: giving you a heads up; even if you're just a fan, HALEP SERENA tomorrow should be one of the matches of the year. both have a full day off to recover going in. both are healthy. it should be a fantastic battle. i believe i played it correctly above, halep +5 games. nothing to add except play it live. ... LIS is heated up and will play JJ. both had terrible years to this point. would lean JJ but just a lean. LIS is hitting hard and developing belief. she still makes too many errors for me to back. playing it live is probably best option. there will probably be some back and forth as there was tonight in her win over penn.

100/146 6p: va(bel), duk(rmor), wis(cc), gonz(nds), nad(rao), fed(berd) L

PRE-ANALYSIS: LIS and JANKO are about pick em. no opinion on that one. why not go with the men's favs today. seems like a decent return along with some easy (lol) college favs.

bacs interview
http://www.asapsports.com/show_interview.php?id=107443

100/164 4p: sds(stj), prov(day), wis(cc), gonz(nds) L

LIVE: 160/100 day(prov) 11:332h W

POST-ANALYSIS: serena withdraws with supposed knee problem. too bad, would have been great match. LIS takes a set then turns back off and JANKO comes thru. so will be HALEP-JANKO final. halep will take that pretty easily. shows you how hard futures are. lot of good paydays on halep, she was never less than 5 on this.

FUTURE: 20/23 SERENA to win Indian Wells L

SATURDAY and SUNDAY

200/237 4p: djok(mur), halep(jank), villa(ncs), kty(cin) L

100/32 halp(jank) W

PRE-ANALYSIS: just dont see halep losing to janko, she's better in every aspect. she may drop the first set, but she'll win. this is a classic 80% pick, which is what i'm looking for, and a better return than that. juice it up with some favs that should win pretty easily. could easily justify a 1000/320 bet. halep starts moving janko around, the errors will come. Note the halep match is SUNDAY not sat.

100/91 team total ohio st 65 UNDER W

100/1190 6p: michs(va), duk(sds), djok(fed), halep(janko), wis(ore), lvil +3(nia) W

LIVE: 100/105 janko(halep) 52 L

IN-GAME: halep again starts slow, seems to have a touch of that fear/numbness, so i buy out live. annoying. she needs to wake up and bitch-slap janko. it's getting to be a thing, h starting slowing, coming out flat in big matches. needs to get past that. swagger like a champ. janko isn't that good anymore. actually buying live when i did - i think halep is actually the right side there. but i think my parlay has a good chance of winning if halep gets thru. if i had no other bets going, i would certainly have taken some halep at even money after she lost the first set. halep is better than janko but janko is playing very well and h is not at her normal level. i dont want janko to get up a break in s2 so i bought before her number drops to 1.5 and there's nothing left.

110/340 4p: djok(fed), lvil+4(nia), wis(ore), rich(asu) W

LIVE: 70/242 fed(djok) 54 s2 L

300/360 nia -4 (lvil) L

[week #11: +1065 ]
cum. 2015: +1054
 
Last edited:

TennisTapir

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 13, 2013
1,285
4
0
week #12 (+1054 in)

MONDAY and TUESDAY

QUALIFYING: in miami, nothing i see on monday. final qualifying and main draw begins tue. preview coming up...

MIAMI PREVIEW

MIAMI OVERVIEW: indian wells all over again, on the other side of the continent. two week tournament, similar layout to IW. bookends are SERENA, who withdrew from IW with injury before HALEP match, and at the bottom SHARAPOVA, who was upset. HALEP, the IW winner, is in the 2Q again, meaning again will have to navigate serena and sharap - IF she plays and doesn't withdraw. i expect her to withdraw or lose in first two rounds, hope i'm wrong though. for the rest, just a matter of who gets hot. it was janko last tournament, will be someone else this. On the whole, the talent is better spread out in this tournament. No one appears to have a significantly easier or harder time to win it; all the top seeds will have at least four good matches they have to win. It should be a good tournament. SERENA and SHARAP have as clear a shot to the final as anyone, and there's no reason to think that doesn't happen. AZAR is the wildcard i'm keeping an eye on.

QUARTERS PROJECTIONS: 1Q: Serena has won this tournament 7x. she has to beat kerb/lis or kerb/mugu to get to semis. then beat halep and then sharapova to win the tournament. serena's toughest test will be kerb to make QF where she will play ivic/lis/mugu. LIS heated up in IW; MUGU was hot earlier in year. IVIC has been up and down. SERENA will be big fav to take this QF. The question, imo, is whether MUGU heats up again, or whether IVIC or LIS are in shape. MUGU seems to give serena the hardest time, but she will have to beat IVIC to get to SERENA. So let's say the odds are: SERENA, MUGU, IVIC, LIS. anyone else is an outsider. we are assuming serena has recovered from her leg problem.

2Q: this is a very interesting quarter. HALEP is top seed. if she falls, as i expect, either from w/d or loss, then it's wide open. i predict halep loses to GIO in M#3. (like IW, the 32 seeds get auto bye to M#2). if that happens, then anyone can take this quarter: GIO, SAFA, or AZAR in halep eighth; or bookend BOUCH, KEYS or SAFA in other eighth. i'm a big fan of AZAR; she does not get a bye because her ranking isn't high enough yet. she will be one to watch in opening match, see how she's looking. BOUCH i dont trust because she cannot hit the ball in, as we saw at IW playing TSUR. i thought she had reignited, but her problems to me seem more technical than personal. she simply cant keep ball on court under pressure; until she can, no reason to think she can beat good players. SAFA has great shot if she's playing well. KEYS and heated STEPH will play in M#2, with winner likely playing SAFA in M#3. i dont think this quarter is predictable going in because we don't know the state of halep's mind and body. we will see what happens on the court. there are about 8 players who could take this quarter, which is about as much as you ever see in a quarter.

3Q: This features ARAD-NAV eighth and VENUS-WOZ eighth. I really like VENUS' chances here IF she's on. She can beat all these people. But usually she tires at some point and gets draggy. Like 2q this is pretty open. Grinders are the bookends, and if any power player gets hot, can easily take it. NAV has had a great year and might as well continue in miami; she could win this quarter. but the top eighth is clearly ARAD or NAV, just depending whether ARAD's new power format can get effective; so far it has failed, under her new coach navrat. she lost to watson at IW; will she be better here? she'll have to play well to beat NAV to make the qf. the rest in that eighth aren't precisely negligible but they're not all that much. bottom eighth is similar, should be VENUS-WOZ. rest are BRENG level. ok, but nothing awesome. so this quarter probably goes to one of these four: VENUS WOZ NAV ARAD.

4Q: top eighth features like M#3 matchup between riser SVIT and MAKA. that will be a key match. the winner is likely to beat, say, PVIC and make the QF vs SHARAP, the big fav in the bottom eighth. bottom eighth is KAPLIS and SHARAP and that's it. I want to see that match. Am expecting SHARAP in shape and hungry. If anyone fails this time it will be KAPLIS. I see SHARAP winning this quarter and KAPLIS the only real competition.

PROJECTED QF: TOP HALF: SERENA-MUGU, GIO-SAFA; BOTTOM HALF: ARAD-VENUS, SVIT-SHARAP

PROJECTED SEMIS: SERENA-GIO; VENUS-SHARAP

PROJECTED WINNER: SERENA (sharap)

FUTURES: lines are not out yet. i like SERENA and SHARAP. long shot AZAR. if halep falls out, azar has a pretty clear shot into the semis, so if she's a big number, is probably worth it. otherwise, the value is probably on sharap and third, serena. hit sharap heavy and hedge into final if serena makes it, appears the optimal strategy here, with some small bucks at big return on azarenka.

FUTURES, FIRST LISTING:

PATHS: the serious opps the likely winners will face

SERENA: KERB, MUGU, SAFA, SHARAP
MUGU: ZVONA, IVIC, SERENA, SAFA, SHARAP
LIS: IVIC, MUGU, SERENA, SAFA, SHARAP
IVIC: LIS, MUGU, SERENA, SAFA, SHARAP

HALEP: GIO, PENN, SAFA, SERENA, SHARAP
GIO: HALEP, PENN, BOUCH, SERENA, SHARAP
KEYS: STEPH, SAFA, BOUCH, HALEP, SERENA, SHARAP
SAFA: KEYS, BOUCH, HALEP, SERENA, SHARAP
AZAR: JANKO, PENN, HALEP, BOUCH, SERENA, SHARAP
BOUCH: SAFA, HALEP, SERENA, SHARAP

ARAD: NAV, VENUS, SHARAP, SERENA
NAV: ARAD, VENUS, SHARAP, SERENA
VENUS: STOS, WOZ, ARAD, SHARAP, SERENA
WOZ: VENUS, ARAD, SHARAP, SERENA

MAKA: SVIT, PVIC, SHARAP, ARAD, SERENA
SVIT: MAKA, PVIC, SHARAP, ARAD, SERENA
KAPLIS: SHARAP, MAKA, ARAD, SERENA
SHARAP: KAPLIS, MAKA, ARAD, SERENA

Someone else's view of things (i deliberately do not read any previews before writing mine, so we'll see what MOO thinks):

WTA Miami 2015: Preview and Predictions

James / 2 hours ago
Indian Wells down, Miami up next. There is barely any time to let the dust settle and reflect on Indian Wells with the WTA main draw to begin on Tuesday. The quick turnaround does frustrate me, particularly with the main draw beginning before qualifying has finished. Indian Wells was a decent tournament this year with some some good matches and a crazy final, which saw Simona Halep beat Jelena Jankovic to win her first Premier Mandatory title. The draw for Miami is more attention grabbing than the one for Indian Wells with some very interesting potential match-ups. Let?s take a sweeping look at the draw?

Maria Sharapova

As ever, Serena Williams is the number one seed in Miami. After withdrawing from the semi-finals of Indian Wells against Simona Halep due to a knee injury, her participation remains with a question mark. There were reports on Twitter (@crosscourt1) that Serena had a cortisone injection to help her be ready for Miami. Her draw is remarkably similar to the one that she was dealt in Indian Wells? in fact it is almost identical! She could play Monica Niculescu in a repeat second round match. That would be a London buses match-up as the pair had never played before last week. The three seeds in Serena?s eighth of the draw are also the same; Zarina Diyas would be a potential third round opponent, followed by Svetlana Kuznetsova or Angelique Kerber in the fourth round.

Serena finds herself in the same quarter as Ana Ivanovic. The Serb suffered a second consecutive loss to Caroline Garcia in Indian Wells. Thankfully for Ana, Caroline is nowhere to be seen in this quarter! Ivanovic?s section features seeds, Garbine Muguruza, Sara Errani and Sabine Lisicki. I?m waiting for another big tournament from Garbine and this is certainly a workable draw for the Spaniard having drawn a duffer in IW where she played Karolina Pliskova in the third round. Lisicki comes in with an injection of confidence after reaching the semi-finals of Indian Wells. She could be in line for a big hitting, helmets-at-the-ready second rounder against Julia Goerges.

Simona Halep and Eugenie Bouchard head up the second quarter, which has plenty of talking points. One of the big storylines for any WTA draw right now is where Victoria Azarenka lands. In this case, Vika has landed in Halep?s eighth and could play the Indian Wells finalist, Jelena Jankovic in the second round. Flavia Pennetta, who reached the quarter-finals in Indian Wells, is also in this section. I was convinced that Halep would pull out of this tournament due to injury, but Courtney Nguyen tweeted that Halep intends to play. In her first match, she will play Nicole Vaidisova or a qualifier. In Bouchard?s eighth, there is the potential for a second round match between Sloane Stephens and Madison Keys. The pair have never met before so it would be a landmark match if it comes to fruition. Sloane would have to overcome Yanina Wickmayer in the first round, which is no way a given. Lucie Safarova is also in this section and will play Yaroslava Shvedova or Johanna Larsson in the second round. Shvedova beat Safarova in an extra-time finish in Melbourne earlier this year. If Lucie wins her first two matches, I like her chances in the draw past round three.

Agnieszka Radwanska is the highest seed in the third quarter and will be looking to reboot her year after another disappointing loss in Indian Wells. Her draw features the likes of Carla Suarez Navarro, Alize Cornet and Irina-Camelia Begu in her eighth. Suarez Navarro has been in great form this year although she did struggle with a foot injury in her quarter-final against Halep last week. Cornet is 6-6 for this year and hasn?t got going yet. Wozniacki?s section looks more challenging on paper; her eighth features Venus Williams, Sam Stosur and Varvara Lepchenko. Venus and Sam are seeded to meet in the third round with the winner likely to play Caro if the draw goes to seeding. Wozniacki suffered a third round loss to Belinda Bencic in Indian Wells and has made a solid, yet unspectacular start to the year. Wozniacki won a title in Kuala Lumpur, but has come up short in the marquee matches she has played in 2015.

Maria Sharapova bookends the draw in a reasonably strong section of the draw. Sharapova will play Daria Gavrilova or a qualifier in the second round. Gavrilova has been steadily rising up the rankings this year and is now deservedly in the world?s top 100. Last week, she took a set off Simona Halep in their second round match. Sharapova?s first projected seed is Caroline Garcia, who she was set to play in the semi-finals of Acapulco before being forced to withdraw with a stomach virus. Garcia has enjoyed two wins over Ana Ivanovic this year and first announced herself when she came close to upsetting Sharapova at Roland Garros in 2011. Karolina Pliskova is also lurking in this section of the draw. If seedings hold up, Sharapova and Pliskova will play each other for the first ever time in the last 16. Ekaterina Makarova is the other top eight seed in this quarter. After a loss to Timea Bacsinszky where she let slip a double break third set lead with an avalanche of errors, i?m not confident about Makarova?s chances. The likes of Andrea Petkovic, Barbora Zahlavova Strycova and Elina Svitolina are all in this section and capable of reaching the quarter-finals.

QF Predictions: S.Williams v Muguruza, Safarova v Azarenka, Radwanska v V.Williams and Petkovic v Sharapova

SF Predictions: S.Williams v Azarenka, V.Williams v Sharapova

Final Prediction: S.Williams d. Sharapova

It all comes down to Serena again? I remember a few occasions where she has come in with injury doubts and ended up winning titles like this. I?ll give her the benefit of the doubt but if she does pull out, i?d go for Sharapova over Azarenka in the final. Comments always appreciated but PLEASE be respectable to others ;-)

http://mootennis.com/2015/03/23/wta-miami-2015-preview-and-predictions/

POSSIBLE SCORES: looking to fade KEYS again and make money there when she loses early; looking to ride AZAR if she shows up in M#1 looking average or better; i think ARAD does ok in this tournament, gets at least one nice to avg win over a good player; KAPLIS - she has a not bad draw but i just wonder if she's off her feed a bit from too many matches, in fact i suspect she may have shot her wad for much the rest of the year. but that's a guess, have to see it confirmed. she has an easy road to SHARAP, and if she falters before then i'll consider my guess correct. SAFA i'll look to fade pretty much every match against anyone half-decent. these are the specific things i'm watching into miami, and the rest will be unexpected stuff that pops up as we move along.

100/653 6p: azar(soler), wis(nc), lvil(ncs), michs(okl), gonz(ucla), duk(utah) W

100/80 rich-mia 61 OVER 1h L

FUTURES: serena 2.65, sharap 5', h 8, azar 13, woz 19, arad bouch 21, safa ivic 34, mugu kaplis 41, keys venus 51, jj 67, kerb nav maka 81, penn steph 101, gcia lis 151, pvic benc 201, gio stos 251, svit 301
VALUE: serena, sharap, azar, safa, kaplis, venus, maka, gio, svit

WEDNESDAY

20/58 3p: pav(zvona), davis(karat), vanUt(ryb) L

PRE-ANALYSIS: still waiting for tournament to get going. lots of matches but nothing really interesting. the players below the second tier dont play enough for me to get a good read on them. have to see people play 2-3 matches in a row to have an idea. wick as a big dog to steph might be worth a shot, last match of night. steph played better last tournament, but she could fall back again and wick is no slouch. first decent matches will be friday. till then, best bets are probably in the ncaa sweet 16 on thur and fri.

100/67 davis(karat) L

NOTE: following the line on this, goes with what i think. i like davis, and i like her more with line moving toward her.

THURSDAY and FRIDAY

100/69 3p: nav(voeg), maka(knap), venus(urad) W

POST-ANALYSIS: i'm looking for kaplis, halep, janko to struggle. arad wins but with great difficulty. no video feed. so she may not be on track as i thought. clearly cannot be trusted yet. kaplis drops first set 26 to beck.

100/35 azar (janko) W

2/246 16p: ariz(xav), wis(nc), michs(okl), gonz(ucla), duk(ut), andsn(quer), stos(parm), lep(kan), woz(breng), svit(jovano), sharap(gavr), mugu(karat), lis(goerg), azar(jj), safa(larss), benc(della) L

100/80 wv team total 62' UNDER (kty) W

10/545 15p: kty(wv), az(xav), wis(nc), lvil(ncs), michs(okl), gonz(ucla), andsn(quer), venus(urad), stos(parm), maka(knap), svit(jov), sharap(gav), serena(nicu), lis(goerg), azar(jank) L

100/37 wis (nc) W

POST-ANALYSIS: most went as thought, but sharap sleepwalking kills parlay. not sure what her problem was, seemed emotional and not into playing. it happens. surprised, because she had as easy a road to the final as anyone. ... We'll see how well Halep does. I'm not playing her till she wins her second match, probably over Gio. She won IW, but didn't play great. That may get her to try to hit top level here, but her history is of losing the first match or two or withdrawing the week after a victory.

100/121 5p: safa(lars), ivic(falc), mugu(karat), azar(jank), serena(nicu) L

NOTE: safa underway on serve as i post this, forgot to post last night. i think the one to make money off today is azar over jj. the line has already moved hugely that direction, from 100/35 to 100/28. if i were halep, might be thinking, well, i won indian wells, i didnt play that great, particularly in final...maybe i can hit peak form in miami. i'll need that to win the french. after miami, can take a couple weeks off.

POST-ANALYSIS: halep wins in three. looks like she'll play gio, as i expected. that match will tell her commitment to this tournament, because gio should stretch her with her extremely hard hitting. ... typically useless safarova. always regret a bet on her, she is completely unreliable. was a double burn, as have lost more against larss than any other player. larss is not a bad player, but she's precisely the type you can make money betting against: she has a definitely ceiling. she can't surprise you with power or placement, she just plays a pretty steady game that regularly falls to those with top 30-ability. but here, she defeats safa, for some reason i have no idea since wasnt any video. disgusting. ... out of nowhere this "bellis" who id never heard of smokes diyas, a top 30 player. bellis is the first player i've seen born in 1999. a rising junior. whipping people who've no doubt never seen her play before. small, but might be one to watch. we've seen flashes in the pan before, like melanie oudin.

IDEA: they seem to be wanting to turn tennis into badminton. the court surface is made abrasive by the degree of sand in the paint. the trend seems to be to add more and more, to make it impossible to hit the ball thru the court, making points longer. i think this trend has gone too far. the court is small enough. it's getting very difficult to hit winners.

LIVE: 13/103 janko(azar) L

ANALYSIS: hit steph live and she takes s1. keys missing. very interesting match. steph seems to be moving into a little better cycle, keeping ball on court, moving well. maybe she's growing up. steph 1.42 (keys) into set two. Remember when I said i was going to fade keys after that obnoxious, foolish, wrong, and political gilbert statement? Anyone else i would have been on steph dead today, but I got her live. This is the second time we've faded keys and won. There will be more. Steph playing the best i've seen from her in ages. ...look at that, got every tennis right except sharap. killed my parlay, otherwise good shot at winning.

100/23 gonz (ucla) W
100/48 duk (utah) W

100/131 LIVE ncs (lvil) L

100/87 michs (okl) W

224/149 LIVE okl (michs) 2h 7:52 L

SATURDAY and SUNDAY (+363 in)

200/210 wisconsin (ariz) W

PRE-ANALYSIS: wis is better than ariz. nc only hung last game cuz they shot great and wis still beat them. wis will beat ariz comfortably, imo.

FUTURES serena 2.6, halep 5, azar 8', woz 13, arad 15, venus 21, ivic maka 26, mugu kaplis 29, bouch 34, nav 41, steph 51, kerb gav 67, penn pvic stos corn 81, lis 101, svit benc 151, gio 176
VALUE: venus, maka, kaplis. you're getting 20-30 to 1 for the bottom half with sharap gone. one of those will come thru, most likely, and face serena or azar or halep. easy hedge at that point.

FUTURE: 50/425 azar to win Miami L

FUTURE: 20/540 maka to win Miami
FUTURE: 20/3020 svit to win Miami L
FUTURE: 20/580 kaplis to win Miami

ANALYSIS: think azar gets to serena, can hedge then. the other three are longer shots, but in bottom half of draw with sharap already out. any of them could get to final, then easy hedge profit. all for a cheap 60 investment.

100/814 8p: woz(kan), maka(svit), serena(nicu), wis(az), venus(stos), kaplis(bad), arad(begu), SUN azar(penn) L

PROJECTED WINNERS: first, i think WIS is the best bet of the day, at pick em over ariz in ncaa. ... for tennis: SERENA(nicu), ARAD(begu), NAV(corn), VENUS(stos), WOZ(kan), MAKA(svit), PVIC(mlad), NARA(gav), IVIC(lis), GIO(halep), AZAR(penn), STEPH(larss)

100/27 azar (penn) L
100/83 gio +5' (halep) W

PRE-ANALYSIS: i'm calling gio upset of halep. but i'm not betting it straight up, i'll try the sucker bet again, dog + games. you could do ML or 19' OVER, both defensible. coin flip whether games or over is better bet. NORMALLY what i would do in this situation is take gio as big dog, 4.45 or so, and couple it with 3-4 80%ers for a huge return parlay. but i dont have any 80%ers i can ID on saturday. so i cant force it. halep has lost one match all year (not counting davis cup loss to mugu); horribly, it was the match i needed her to win the most, the AO QF to maka. i'm not getting in front of the halep train, but i suspect she will be hard pressed on saturday, and bow out. ... the rest of the matches, i just dont quite like enough any which way. it's going to be mostly favs who win, but i cant find some few i like better than others. a parlay will be like yesterday w safa; one of the favs will drop unexpectedly but i cant tell which one. i do have some opinions that are all about 67% so i'll just line them all up with wisconsin and try that, since i'm up for the week. after all, i damn near hit that 10/545 15p the other day, if sharap had showed up, so i'm reading the tournament mostly correctly. but as for hitting these hard, there's just nothing. i'm just a little afraid nav may drop to corn, who can play well. nav i feel is about due for a clunker. mlad could beat pvic. nara might be worth a shot as 2.4 dog to see if gav comes back to earth after whipping sharap. ivic-lis, that's better avoided, neither can be trusted. maka i'm just wondering if she may make a run here with sharap out. she beat svit earlier this year, but the first set was very close before svit faded. if svit gets by maka, she may well get to the final, which is why i put some on her. and then kaplis - it's a real question how interested she is in this tournament, but she didnt fold after dropping first set to beck, she turned it on and won. so she may be into this tournament, if so, she's as likely as anyone to come out of the bottom half - hence her future. arad - won but barely last round, continues to struggle in her attempt to up her power and aggression under navratilova. no way i'd back her heavy against begu, but she should scrape through, it's what she does. venus should beat stos. stos could win, but stos finds ways to lose and venus finds ways to win. in that case, you want to bet on the one who finds ways to win. :0074 ... overall sat is like a big ol' menu with...nothing really that appetizing on it. i'll order a nice plate of maka-svit, the most interesting match of the day, and the rest leave aside. oh...waitress says they're all out. they're not showing that match, as of now! fuck that. get some videos going, miami. ... for sun, it will be halep-gio that's worth watching, and i would certainly think that will have a feed. this is exactly the time when there's a bunch of matches, but none of them can really be got into the right arrangement, so best just to lay back and wait for things to shake out and better options to appear. "when there's nothing to do, it is necessary to do nothing," as they say. no need to force it. i'm going to KISS and go on the one i like, which is in basketball, and leave the tennis mostly to itself on saturday. well...i cant resist one little parlay:

10/97 gio(halep), nara(gav) L

FUTURE: 100/815 wis to win ncaa

POST-ANALYSIS: make some nice profit on WOZ live over kan after she drops a set. this match imo was all about wind, though the announcers mostly ignored it. the players couldnt try anything fancy. KAN is a shell of her former self, woz just struggled thru. no great meaning, woz will play better if conditions are better next match. meanwhile maka and nav win, as i expected. 2 legs of parlay are thru.

100/11 serena (nicu) W
100/21 arad (begu) W

LIVE 150/300 ariz (wis) 15m 2h L

POST-ANALYSIS: playing very conservatively. i think i've lost every single hedge, but it's still worth. we're making profits and moving forward. What beautiful shooting by dekker. do you think kty can beat wis? i dont think so, but more interested in what the public will think. meanwhile tennis has gone as i thought, passed up some 100/40 or 100/30 bets that paid easy, but will all pay off if can cash the 100/800. just need two big favs to come thru. great day so far.

LIVE: 50/380 begu(arad) 2611 L

ANALYSIS: another hedge, since only need arad and azar tomorrow to win 100/800. begu is not bad, could come back. bet hedge right before she breaks, but she gives it right back to 22. arad continues to looked drawn. she looks very stressed, irritated and tired, to me, it's barely covered by makeup. she has looked this way all year, or at least since davis cup. probably pulls thru but am playing conservatively. ... arad does it. one more to complete parlay.

PROJECTED WINNERS: SERENA(bellis). wildcard kid wont beat serena. KERB-KUZ pass. you run, don't walk, from matches like this. you put a winner's head on kuz's body, she'd be on a level with serena, i really believe that. but she's a russian female homer simpson. kerb is as unpredictable as it gets, either could win this. OVER 22 or nothing, and 22 is too high, so go with nothing. this is pure War Games (the movie): the only way to win is not to play. MUGU(err). too much power. err is a fighter but this is the kind of match she can't win if the other player plays her average game. mugu would have to be spraying terrible to lose. it's possible, but likelier mugu comes thru. 1.31 is a decent return for the risk. LIS-IVIC pass. ivic dropped a set to lousy falconi. lis beat goerg in three. no telling what happens here. lis has been heating up, but neither of these is reliable. i suspect ivic will win but i dont want to back it. GIO(halep) has gone in my direction from 4.5 to 4.35. i will take a small shot on gio on ML. but this is breaking a big trend. halep is the better player, this is all about whether halep is truly invested in this tournament. ... AZAR(penn). same as mugu, you get a power hitter over a softer player. penn is playing very well these days but i dont think she can cope with azar. the line is 1.238 which is nothing real great, given the risk. defensible to pass on this. i will hedge my parlay, which needs only azar to win, but azar has said she wants to get to #1 again, and i just dont think penn can get in her way. she's going to be hitting the ball by penn. i may even make a new parlay featuring azar. ... STEPH(larss). larss has burned me about 5x this year. i have more losses going against her than any other player. but i liked what steph showed last time out. the number is 1.385, which shows a lot of faith in steph. but her number has been inflated ever since her initial good showings that led to all the hype. at most id use steph in parlay, and probably not even that. larss i obviously dont have a good handle on, altho i used to. she's having a bit of a career resurgence in 2015. it will end up being a battle if steph level drops at all; if not, steph simply has too much power for her. gotta go wtih BENC over this maria, who is an older player seldom seen in wta events. i attribute her win over BOUCH solely to bouch's being absolutely terrible at the moment, a geyser of unforced errors. BENC is controlled enough to dismiss maria. 1.377 worth a parlay at most. benc is still just a little young for my money to play typical 100/38 type bet on her. good stuff coming monday, but will leave that alone for now to avoid confusion.

100/2578 4p: gio(halep), serena(bell), mugu(err), benc(maria), wis(kty) L

NOTE: running hot lately, this above is a heat check, but a calculated one. it's covered by the 5' games bet, lol. usually lose those. i think wis is better than kty. not as much as it was better than az, but by some. so i dont see that as a true dog bet, in this parlay, but it definitely gets a good dog return. slight chance benc loses, which would suck, but this bet turns on gio. there is no real stat/trend reason to think gio wins. but...it's the first match up, gio should be fired up, halep wont TRULY mind losing. that's my opinion. i think gio takes a set. but this is an instinct bet. i think the true odds of this parlay winning arent 25:1 but more like 8:1. so i'm taking a shot based on a guess. if halep wins, i'll probably back her the rest of the way. she will play azar next, if she gets thru.

100/91 wis +6 (kty)
100/220 wis (kty)

FUTURES into M#3: serena 2.35, halep 6, azar 7.65, woz 11, arad 13, venus 21, kaplis maka 26, mugu 29, ivic 31, steph 34, nav 51, penn 67 kerb 81, lis pvic gav 101, benc 151, gio kuz 201,
VALUE: kaplis, maka, venus, nav, azar, mugu, serena

PRE-ANALYSIS: gio line continued to move my way, to 4.25 and 5 from 5' at close.

100/23 wawr (mann) L
100/165 thiem (sock) W
100/30 mugu (err) L
100/31 benc (maria) W

100/160 LIVE halep to win g7-8 of s2 L

RUNNING ANALYSIS: should have held my water but looked like halep might beat my games bet, so lay down a live hedge. it loses, the games should cash. and the side lose. GIO hits very hard, but her game is about 1/3 winners, UE and DFs. it got her to the top 50, but without some kind of control developing, and a better serve, hard to see her doing much against the top players.

100/360 penn (azar) W

NOTE: that penn is pure hedge. i believe azar will win.

RUNNING ANALYSIS: penn really playing well. most would have yielded but penn took set one. very tough fight. one of better matches of year so far, and in shitty windy conditions. really dont like this tournament much. ... great match, between two winners. penn barely does it 7676. kills my parlay, but hedge puts me in profits. think that's the first hedge that has won in last couple weeks.

100/96 LIVE michs (lvil) 11:59 2h. W

NOTE: looks like refs are helping michs, already in bonus 12m left. worth a shot.

100/91 LIVE duk-gonz 152' UNDER 14:59 1h W

ANALYSIS: easy under on duk. ... steph continues her run, slides by larss 6464. next up lis-ivic. should be ivic but wouldnt put money on it, only live after we see what's going on.

10/260 7p: mon(g-l), ivic(lis), halep(penn), nav(arad), venus(woz), maka(pvic), kaplis(gav) L

20/14 monaco (g-l) W

[week #12: +555]
cum. 2015: +1609
 
Last edited:

TennisTapir

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 13, 2013
1,285
4
0
week #13 (+1609 in)

MONDAY

[open bets from last week]
FUTURE: 20/540 maka to win Miami L
FUTURE: 20/580 kaplis to win Miami L
FUTURE: 100/815 wis to win ncaa
100/91 wis +6 (kty)
100/220 wis (kty)

[notice i correctly picked 3/4 to make the final four. i think wis wins it all. it is vulnerable down the middle, and will have a hard time with kty, but it's smarter and more skilled as a team than kty and duke. i got the wis lines early because i think the number will come down to about 4' by game time.]

FUTURES R4 (16 left): serena 2.35, halep 4', woz 11, arad 13, venus 19, kaplis maka 21, steph nav 26, penn 29, lis 41, pvic benc 51, err kuz 67 gav 81
VALUE: kaplis, maka

PROJECTED WINNERS: SERENA(kuz), LIS(err), HALEP(penn), STEPH(benc), NAV(arad), VENUS(woz), MAKA(pvic), KAPLIS(gav).

PRE-ANALYSIS: these all should be good matches. hopefully the wind dies down. SERENA should beat kuz without too much problem. at 1.1, not much value, maybe use in parlay. LIS seems on a roll now, can probably take err. but i have a lot of respect for err and will not bet this. this is a good one to play live. i did not see ERR-mugu, so not sure why err dopplered her (came from behind and whizzed past). mugu may not be quite as good as i think. err is the ultimate in reliability, even on her second-best surface. HALEP i'm back on board with after she handled hard-hitting gio. penn is at the top of her game, but halep is simply better at it than she is. number is 1.32. not great but not nothing either. penn was really exceptional vs azar; most would have folded under the pressure. she could beat halep. i dont think she will, though. nothing i'd go too big on, though. NAV is 2.35 to arad. nav has had a great year. arad closed strong last match but has not looked great in recent months. i dont see why this line isnt reversed. nav has played more consistently and better tennis than arad. she is definitely worth a shot as a dog here. as this is the first match up, i like to put nav in a parlay, with some favs. that way if it loses, can make it back in other matches, or begin the day with the basis for a nice score. arad beat nav years ago, but nav is better now. the line makes no sense unless there's something i dont know about, like a possible injury to navarro. as for VENUS-WOZ, i like venus. too much power. is like 6-0 vs woz. no reason to think it's different. woz wasn't exactly impressive beating kanepi. return is 1.8. should be more like 1.6. MAKA should beat pvic. at 1.44, and same with KAPLIS around same number over hot GAV. the theme continues, though: bunch of favs, not a lot to choose from between them. they all feel like 2/3ers. 67%ers. will do what i did successfully the other day, parlay them and hedge it live. my parlay went like 7-1 but was able to make a nice profit by hedging. i'll base it on nav 'upsetting' arad to start the day. if that loses, will follow up with an all-favs parlay for a smaller return. really wish there were something to hammer, but i dont see it. forgot BENC-STEPH. was leaning benc, but looking over her record, she hasn't really beat anyone great; i have a feeling this is a very close match, a three-setter, but STEPH squeezes it at the end. probably OVER is best bet there.

100/1173 6p: nav(arad), serena(kuz), halep(penn), venus(woz), maka(pvic), kaplis(gav) L

100/12 serena (kuz) W
100/34 halep (penn) W
100/140 nav (arad) W
100/83 venus (woz) W
100/44 kaplis (gav) W
100/47 maka (pvic) L

NOTE: funny thing is...there is almost nothing written about suarez navarro - anywhere. one of the best players out there, a vast gaping hole. she does nothing but thank people and smile. she is a swift sure silent type. ... maybe i bet too many, but i feel like i've been right about most stuff this year, no reason not to. maybe a bunch of dogs will rise up tomorrow, but i doubt it. nav is a dog because of history, but recent play matters more.

POST-ANALYSIS: got to laugh at some of these lines. venus has now beaten woz at least seven times. she has lost one set to her. but here's the point: she can break woz at will. that is a very slight exaggeration. you can't have a line like 1.8, it's ridiculous. yes, woz is good, but that line should be 1.6 and falling, not 1.8. if you watch the match, you can see this. SHE EATS WOZ'S SERVE ALIVE. ... NAV does it. good for her. playing better, should have won, should have been favored, couldnt because had never beaten arad before, all plays out as predicted.

THAT MACHO THING: ive never heard this remarked on by announcer, but this absolute proclivity both men and women have for hitting AT the player, or trying to wrong-foot him when they have a much easier winner on the other side is the single most bizarre thing in professional tennis. if they have a 60% point-win expectancy toward the player and a 90% away, they will hit it at the player almost every time. it is bizarre. it's like a humiliation or pride factor or something. there is some psychological reason they do it, because the percentage play is the other side. example: nav is up 41 and i think it was 15-15. she has a 95% win expectancy volleying cross court but hits it right at arad, allowing her to hit a nice difficult winner. causing 15-30. leading to break. there is no reason to do that. match appears in hand for nav, but this type of play you see in virtually every match. it is passing bizarre. and never remarked on by anyone.

110/220 pvic (maka) W
150/326 gav (kaplis) L

NOTE: both are hedges. and of course after i hedge they ARE offering pvic-maka live so...would not have hedged if i had known that was coming. we'll see. the hedge is defensible as stands. the principle is, if you want to make money at betting: YOU'VE GOT TO PAY YOURSELF. and the other principle: DONT GET GREEDY. now you know how i feel. it's how you feel. you want to say fuck the bollocks we're the sex pistols. you believe everything you throw down. but the fact is, with only three legs in, this parlay has WON. we can already protect against any but insignificant loss. so it's a matter of how much we want to pay ourselves, measured against risk. there is some risk that one of these two will lose. the halep match comes later. unfortunately the 4th and 5th legs go off around same time. this is why it's best to stagger parlays to make them as close to serial as possible, ie leg by leg. since our return is over 1k, and we've already cashed a dog and 50-50, we have lots of room to play with. this is where i changed my attitude, from letting it run to playing cautiously to lock in a profit. pvic could easily win this. so could gave. i THINK they both lose. but that's just a thought. so we protect against that happening and costing us our profits already i hand. this is the way to bet if you actually want to move forward rather than simply fluctuate with action.

200/156 LIVE pvic (maka) 31 W

NOTE: hit this before pvic runs away, as it's pretty clear kaplis stomping gav. ... 15. maka not playing badly, pvic is playing very well. this is the problem with not seeing these two coming in. hit it live just before 14. price will run away at end of set if pvic continues as she's playing now. any letdown, maka will come right back. ... real struggle. pvic playing as well as i've ever seen, and i've seen her play dozens of matches. she is serving better and making fewer UE than ive seen. the real story here, what we're learning, is about maka. she is really fighting. at the start of s2. ...what a match by pvic. best i've seen her play. maka hung tough but pvic didnt let down until serving for match. then maka broke to 55 but let herself get broken next match and then pvic served it out. 'best set i've ever played' says pvic of set one. i agree. i have never seen her not-miss and serve so well. this was not a bad match by maka but a good match by pvic. nothing else to say. sucks that it killed the parlay but i hedged it correctly. we move forward. perhaps not as fast as we'd like, today, but forward nonetheless.

ANALYSIS: lis destroys err, really on fire now. these courts seem to really help certain people. apparently the wind has died down today. pvic and lis at top of their game. no opinion on benc and steph, dont want either side. the number has moved fairly strongly toward penn away from halep. penn +4 might be worth it but will probably just let my halep bet ride. penn is a winner, so there's definitely some danger, but it also means the return on halep is larger.

100/91 mil-atl 194' under W

POST-ANALYSIS: didnt see much but benc-steph went as i thought, tight with steph edging it in second set tb. one great match left. very unusual to see the line run against halep but it has gone from 35 to 39.

100/630 4p: halep(penn), nish(goff), wis(kty), duk(michs)

ANALYSIS: might as well keep working wis into parlays. guarantee they'll be up at some point in that kty game if you want to bet it off. duk should handle michs. nish should handle goff. figures to be a tough match for halep tonight but her superior movement and power and guile should see her thru against cagey vet winner penn. halep says she wants to "meet" serena many times because she gets better each time. i believe that. she has two matches to win to play her. i think she was really looking forward to the matchup last tournament, but serena withdrew. halep has shown no sign of letting down, so i think she can make it past penn, then have an easier time against steph, then go for the big dog serena in the semi. if they offer halep match live tonight, which they dont show now, you may want to wait and see if she loses the first set, then jump on her around even money.

POST-ANALYSIS: worse, meet better. glove match - both move pretty well, hit pretty well, are tough in the clutch - but one is just a little better at each of those, and younger and fitter too. The race is usually to the strong, and so it is here in set one. Set two figures to be about the same. But it really doesn't matter because they're not offering the match live, so the die is cast. ... tough s2 but penn cant close from 53, loses 57. halep winning streak at 13. has lost ONCE this year outside davis cup to mugu. well, one victory from a huge day, but still made money.

TUESDAY (+390 in)

NOTE: they split the women's QF 2 and 2. PROJECTED WINNERS: SERENA(lis). lis might take a set but serena will force errors and win. HALEP(steph). will be pretty easy. that sets up serena-halep semi, which will be great. will definitely take some halep on that one, games and ML. serena will have to get her serve working well to win. she probably can, but if she can't there's a good chance she'll lose. the way to play it is halep to win tournament. since we already have some kaplis in bag, and halep has handled her in past fairly easily.

FUTURES R#5: serena 1.833, halep 4, kaplis 11, venus 11, nav 17, steph pvic 19, lis 26
VALUE: halep, kaplis. no value in serena, the value will be playing her straight over halep, if you like. on the bottom half, i have to believe kaplis is the one. i cant see pvic sustaing her "best set ever" level vs maka, and i think kaplis beats her. nav-venus should be a real battle.

100/160 2p: kaplis(pvic), WED halep(steph) L

NOTE: STEPH 1.44 to halep? are you kidding me? you think she has nearly 1/2 chance of beating halep? as if... may go 500 on that. watch that line fall. that line will be lucky to close over 1.30. i'll wait for reduced and regret it, but will use in parlay now with kaplis. i just have a lot of faith in kaplis, really like what i see from her. she hits ACES too. more than these others. she has a wicked heavy shot for such a skinny girl. but she is tall, so it's that lowering the boom effect. i just dont think pvic can keep up her level. ... the halep match is wed. the other tue match should be competitive. can nav find a way to get past venus. i dont know. venus' power may tell. i like that one live. i think just a few points will probably show what's going to happen. what i know is that venus will put more pressure on nav than these others like arad have. ...very strange...within 1/2 hour of my laughing at halep 1.44 line it's down to 1.37. not sure what that means.


Karolina Pliskova of the Czech Republic has an extra incentive to win at least one more match to reach the Miami Open semifinal this year.

The 14th-seeded Pliskova, who moved into the quarterfinals with a 6-3, 6-2 win over Russian wild-card recipient Daria Garvilova on Monday, expects to have a special guest courtside. Florida Panthers right wing Jaromir Jagr told Pliskova he would come see her play.

?I just went to see the ice hockey since I got here, which is great,? Pliskova said. ?In Czech, hockey is pretty popular, and we have Jaromir Jagr, who is Czech and one of the best players ever. It was my first time meeting him, live. He said if I?m going to be in the semifinals, he?s going to come and watch, so I have one more match to go.?

Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/sports/tennis/article16954604.html#storylink=cpy

PRE-ANALYSIS: both lines move our direction, toward kaplis and halep, now 1.35. i knew that line was way off. really, it probably should be more like 1.2 to 1.25, the more i think about it. All it takes is 2-3 wins in a row for the steph hype to find its way back into the line. does she really have even a 1/4 chance of beating halep?

50/500 FUTURE: kaplis to win miami L

NOTE: dont think kaplis will win, but she might, think i can hedge this for profits. they are having kaplis-pvic live, so can bet it off if pvic continues playing huge.

POST-ANALYSIS: kaplis gets down 14, comes zooming back, looks like she's going right past pvic. should have bought out at that point. pvic holds to 54 and doesn't look back. this was a bad bet, mistake to get in front of pvic playing this well. for a few games kaplis looked far better, but then she disappeared, nothing but lackluster misses on easy shots. she continues to be very hard to read, for me at least. cant tell if she doesnt care that much or just looks like it. i think the latter. but she needs to work her shots a little more, not give away so many points, particularly when her winners arent flowing.

500/179 halep (steph)

NOTE: will just make this now, line will continue to run to halep. should have made this when line was first posted.

100/920 stan(od), nish(goff), rao(isn), nav(venus), halep(steph) L

200/103 LIVE venus wins set two (nav) 30 L

100/115 2p: rao(isn), halep(steph) L

ANALYSIS: just wow on the nav turnaround second set. i knew she would come back against arad because you could see she had another level, but did not see that coming here at all, what a waste. hopefully she can carry it through to third set, but i'm done losing money on this match. ... triple wow for nav. did not see that coming, very impressive. just gets better and better. she plays with control. a little like simon and halep to an extent, she adds a little angle or power, doesnt really go for winners, just increments. very nice indeed. ... rao 0-2 vs isner, but i think tonight is the night, and the line moving that way. we'll see. ... just the worst sort of most crushing loss by rao, up a set and 41 in tb, cant close. isner showed more heart and determination. pathetic. worst, couldnt hedge because no live. also cost me probably 1k parlay if halep wins tomorrow. fucking weak-minded raonic. he should have won without the tb because isner gave him plenty of shit serves that were returnable - and he'll pay for those when he loses to nishikori.

WEDNESDAY and THURSDAY (-160 in)

500/179 halep (steph) W

NOTE: showing when i made bet, and copying onto day it's played. very rough week so far, come very close to winning two huge parlays. still, have some decent stuff open with a good chance to score or hedge to profits.

FUTURES: serena 1.8, halep 4, nav 8, pvic 9, steph 14, lis 19
VALUE: halep, nav, pvic

PROJECTED WINNERS: have to go with the favs, SERENA(lis) and HALEP(steph). latter is the value. get 1/3 or more return for taking someone better in every way than her opponent. price is higher than started but still good value, as you're likely to win. the interesting match will be the semi, on THUR, between NAV and PVIC. not sure about that. i think nav can edge her, but dont want to bet against pvic when she's this hot. better than taking a side is to take the future on the one you think will win, then hedge it vs serena or halep.

100/18 brook(ny) nba W

100/267 7p: brook(ny), murr(thiem), berd(mon), serena(lis), halep(steph), djok(ferr), nish(isn) L

20/84 LIVE ny (brook) L


POST-ANALYSIS: halep cruising along crushing steph as expected, then a very odd drop. after the match h said s changed tactics, but i couldnt see that. looked to me like h just started missing wildly for several games for no reason. and then squeezed out s2. strange. anyway, we get to see halep-serena this time, hopefully. line closed about 1.339, down from 1.444 when it opened. steph has some skills but has to learn to play aggressively if she wants to beat players like halep. at least she is somewhat able to keep the ball on court recently, next step is to start dominating the points. ... gets tiresome trying to nurse these parlays thru, particularly when legs on different days, but i do believe it's the best way to get a good return. just missed two bigs ones these week. ... not sure about PVIC and NAV tomorrow, hard to tell. they were supposed to play in final in antwerp, nav w/d w sore neck. now she is 1.74 fav. and serena was supposed to play halep last tournament when she withdrew. that line is SERENA 1.4/3.1 halep. get double your money for halep. there will be a right way to play that, we'll wait for the full line to come out.

FUTURES: serena 1.588, halep 4.5, nav 9.25, pvic 11
VALUE: halep

100/40 nish (isner) L

PRE-ANALYSIS: the diff is where rao couldnt get any isner serves back on court, nish can, and from there he can win the point.

100/65 pvic +3' (nav) L

100/83 halep +4' (serena) W
100/74 halep-serena 20 OVER W
100/59 halep +5 (serena) W
100/250 halep (serena) L

PRE-ANALYSIS: think both matches are competitive, but not sure dogs can win, will try games. overnight lines moving toward serena and nav.

NOTE: pvic's great play from earlier in the week completely gone in set one. it's a mystery. ...isner plays best match of his life. frustrating. third straight big parlay loses by one pick. isner was demonic, never seen him play that aggressively and well... the halep line jumping all over. not clear what to expect. serena will be pushed, that's all i know. i translate that into games. i can't see halep doing worse than a 63. altho that happened last time, as they mutually blew each other out at the year-end championship. i'll take halep straight up because i think she'll be up at some point, and hedging to a profit will be possible. ... SERENA too heavy for HALEP, but doesnt often get pushed, and gets closer to breaking down. next time halep may beat her; certainly she picked up valuable intelligence about how to do that. one unmentioned factor is the crowd halep seems to have with her at every stop. miami is williams' home crowd, but the romanians dominated. in fact, i think they had a hand in helping

100/42 2p: djok(ferr), evan(naz) W

FRIDAY (-145 in)

100/46 mem (okc) W
100/77 port (tb) (arena fball) L

chip kelly's thinking
http://www.bleedinggreennation.com/...-roster-engineering-product-design-chip-kelly

SATURDAY (-199 in)

100/98 3p: serena wins 1st set (nav), breng(kali), kudla(garang) W

POST-ANALYSIS: feeds were lousy today, didn't really see it, but match went in line with 4 previous matches between serena-nav. nav has become more aggressive, basically this year, but she's still basically a defensive counterpuncher, and her shot simply isn't hard enough to cause serena trouble, nor does serena make mistakes, generally, except under pressure from the harder hitting of someone like halep. hell, even hard-hitting sharap gives her no problems. halep is not that hard hitting but she is better at redirecting and angling the ball from side to side, hence a greater -- much greater -- threat to serena than sharap, as we will see going forward. the french open, now less than eight weeks out, promises to be a very interesting tournament.


FUTURE: 100/815 wis to win ncaa
100/91 wis +6 (kty) W
100/220 wis (kty) W

100/630 4p: halep(penn), nish(goff), wis(kty), duk(michs) W

POST-ANALYSIS: as predicted, number closes at 4' after opening at 6. now for wisc to win... goes about as expected. wis a better team than kty. this was no fluke. if they played 10x, wis would win 7.


SUNDAY (+840 in)

100/365 5p: djok(murr), breng(glatch), kudla(don), MON lep(mitu), arad(wick) L

100/72 LIVE djok (murr) 34 W

POST-ANALYSIS: that's what i get for trusting breng. typical - after a run of success, a player falls back. and you keep betting them expecting them to play like they started the year, and they dont, not for a long time. enough for you to lose on them 5-6x. so it is with breng. she has basically had no success after AUS OPEN. this week at least she made final of an ITF, but only there to restore confidence. we'll see how she does in charleston. .. as for murray, dont even kid yourself he's on the level of djok. watching this match, i dont think djok played more than about 2/3. he doesnt need to. MURRAY BEATS HIMSELF. murr is his own #1 enemy. easy pickings on the live line when djok got down a break in first set.

100/94 cub (stl) L



[week #13: +712]
cum. 2015: +2321
 
Last edited:

sds222

Registered
Forum Member
Dec 31, 2006
2,937
12
0
No way i think Navarro can beat Williams but getting 6 or 6' holy crap. I watched the halep match and you could see the power difference but williams seemed to lose it and was overly emotional after every other point. Halep played good i thought for the most part, seemed to cut down on UE and serve better which i thought was her weak point in previous tourney, 2nd server was really hittable then.
I lost a play on navarro vs williams a while back with an even higher line i think but would like to think Navarro has gotten better and serena, while still superior, is starting to come back to the pack just maybe.

i know you like wisc but what ya think, i'm playing just for grins, 2p Navarro +7 and Ky(wisc)
*edit actually its 20/22.86
 

TennisTapir

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 13, 2013
1,285
4
0
No way i think Navarro can beat Williams but getting 6 or 6' holy crap. I watched the halep match and you could see the power difference but williams seemed to lose it and was overly emotional after every other point. Halep played good i thought for the most part, seemed to cut down on UE and serve better which i thought was her weak point in previous tourney, 2nd server was really hittable then.

She's learning. The thing is serena never plays anyone on her level. There is no one! So she was pushed last night. She had to play at a higher level for longer stretches. It posed some difficulties. but mainly, that match taught Halep what she has to do to have a chance. Serena is heavier than Halep. her shots are harder hit and comparatively precise (compared to other power players, not to halep, who is also precise). BUT, if you keep at it and at it, she will tend to have a letdown. Halep worked all this out IN match. She learned that she has to go for her shot a little more than against other opponents because Serena's shots are simply harder than other people, yet she also has more control than most. And if her serve gets going, which it really didn't last night, she's not really beatable. I think next time they play Halep will be more aggressive and hit harder. She really hasn't played Serena that much. The stuff that works on the softer-hitting girls is not good enough to get the job done here. Yeah, Serena was eating her serves too. Not a lot but some. Halep has worked on that, but still can get better. i think her game now is enough to beat Serena if she's playing her best, but only then. I do think if halep gets just a little harder hitting, serena is not that far from falling apart. She was close to it last night. She just has so much power at her disposal that people like halep have to work hard to generate, which takes away from their control. The key is that Halep is within range and closing, at least that was my perception. She is unlike most in that she LEARNS from stuff. She THINKS about what she is doing. She tries to figure out the best way to win. Simple as that sounds, most players, even top ones, don't do that. You can see that if you watch matches. They just do what they do, and if it's not enough, they either do it harder, or say "oh well." Halep figures stuff out. Another thing about that match - Serena came out firing. That shows she knows damn well halep is on her ass. In most of her matches, she just slow-foots around until she needs to get it done. but she knew here that approach would not work. She came out as strong as I've seen her. Yet Halep withstood it and even took a set and won 5 games in the third set. Halep has to be a little more aggressive, and if she can keep the ball in the lines, she can beat her. There were a couple shots that showed exactly what it is she needs: halep hit a 3/4 shot. but serena got to it and hit a winner or regained the adv in the point. that is where halep learns: ok, against the #1 player, that 3/4 shot that is good enough to beat the top ten is NOT good enough vs #1 and #2. i have to hit the ball within six inches of the line, rather than 2 feet, or i have to hit it not at 3/4 power but 85% power. little refinements like that - that's what she's learning. and that's why she is quoted in press saying she wants to meet serena many times, because that is how she will improve and learn to beat her. you could almost see her hitting shots with an eye to testing whether it was good enough. and she learns that no it is not good enough for the very best. you have to go for even a little more. now...when you do that...can you keep it in bounds? but she's right there. and she's getting better. i would not be surprised if she wins next time they meet. still, serena can serve better than she did, and that would ratchet up her end, next time they meet, if she can hit more aces down the T, like she normally does. but their matches from here on in will be very competitive. and i think halep will win her share. she will learn from this match the precise degree to which she needs to go for it, and she will play that level form point one next match. she won't need the exploratory surgery shots (so to speak) to establish what serena is capable of. she now knows. and she adds knowledge every time she plays her. you have to back and forth her, hit very hard and near the line, not give her eatable serves, and...just keep at it. dont give up. dont show weakness. just keep trying really really hard. she's very close, that was clear.

I lost a play on navarro vs williams a while back with an even higher line i think but would like to think Navarro has gotten better and serena, while still superior, is starting to come back to the pack just maybe.

that's a lot, the thing is Serena was playing damn well. if she plays how she started set one vs halep, she'll cover that. if she slides into the match as usual, then nav has a shot. but nav is by no means at halep's level. only recently has she started playing a little more forcefully, but i dont think she hits hard enough to give serena problems. serena is not just power, she has damn good placement. if she starts "on" this will be over quickly. in fact, i will guarantee she wins this match more easily than she beat halep. i dont know what that translates into. i'd just play serena on ML, or use in parlay. at 1.1 not much of a return tho.

actually only ONE TIME in the 4 they've played has nav done enough to PUSH that number, not win:

18/2014 R16 Madrid Masters Clay Serena Williams Carla Suarez Navarro 6-2 6-3 1.10 - 9.05
35/2013 QF US Open Hard Serena Williams Carla Suarez Navarro 6-0 6-0 1.07 - 13.00
20/2013 QF Rome Masters Clay Serena Williams Carla Suarez Navarro 6-2 6-0 1.08 - 10.50
3/2010 R32 Australian Open Hard Serena Williams Carla Suarez Navarro 6-0 6-3


i know you like wisc but what ya think, i'm playing just for grins, 2p Navarro +7 and Ky(wisc)
*edit actually its 20/22.86

i think wis is a real team and kty is a couple supersized players. so i think wis will win. i suck at tennis games, but i do know this: they are shaded to the favorite, always. it is the reverse of football; the bias should be toward taking the fav, not the dog. 7 is a lot of games but serena will have the advantage on every single point. if she's on, it will be over quick. but even then, 6263 you dont lose so, i dont know...chances are the number is probably about right. i really think it turns on whether serena is on blast from the opening gun (as vs halep) or just slides into the match like normally. if she's content to go 3-3 before she kicks into gear, then you've got a good shot.
 
Last edited:

sds222

Registered
Forum Member
Dec 31, 2006
2,937
12
0
that's a lot, the thing is Serena was playing damn well. if she plays how she started set one vs halep, she'll cover that. if she slides into the match as usual, then nav has a shot. but nav is by no means at halep's level. only recently has she started playing a little more forcefully, but i dont think she hits hard enough to give serena problems. serena is not just power, she has damn good placement. if she starts "on" this will be over quickly. in fact, i will guarantee she wins this match more easily than she beat halep. i dont know what that translates into. i'd just play serena on ML, or use in parlay. at 1.1 not much of a return tho.

actually only ONE TIME in the 4 they've played has nav done enough to PUSH that number, not win:

18/2014 R16 Madrid Masters Clay Serena Williams Carla Suarez Navarro 6-2 6-3 1.10 - 9.05
35/2013 QF US Open Hard Serena Williams Carla Suarez Navarro 6-0 6-0 1.07 - 13.00
20/2013 QF Rome Masters Clay Serena Williams Carla Suarez Navarro 6-2 6-0 1.08 - 10.50
3/2010 R32 Australian Open Hard Serena Williams Carla Suarez Navarro 6-0 6-3

Probably a sucker bet and this morning the juice has moved some to williams but i like taking the contrarian angle, not always right but often lines and perception are drawn off past history which isn't sure to repeat itself. Trying to buck trends can be foolhardy.
I made the play ignoring all previous events and based on what i've seen this tourney. The lines makers sure don't think much has changed.


i think wis is a real team and kty is a couple supersized players. so i think wis will win.
Ky, to quote some annoying announcers, "has great length", Wis. will probably be their biggest test, just don't ask calipari, he somewhat dissed ND as being one the toughest tests this year after the last game. :facepalm:
Truth be told I haven't watched much of this tourney but i think i missed the game to bet against ky, which was vs ND + the pts after that WestVa drubbing and everyone talking Ky up even more. I think that was the letdown spot and here they will be ready. The "scare" or close game is now out of the way so we'll see.
 

sds222

Registered
Forum Member
Dec 31, 2006
2,937
12
0
ugh, 6-2 set 1, serena playing fantastic. win lose or draw have to like the steady level headed navarro. she has the right mindset and emotional level. not much you can do physically against beasts.
 

TennisTapir

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 13, 2013
1,285
4
0
a whitewashing :poke:hitwithro:0006

didnt see your later comments, actually got onto a new page.

it's a bad matchup for nav, that's the prob. this match was decided on fundamentals, just like the four earlier ones. nav's game is basically a soft sort of luring in of the opponent, a counterpunching, a waiting for mistakes, supplemented with occasional aggressive attempts to hit near-winners (this last is the part of her game that she has improved lately - this miami tournament was her best result ever). it just doesnt work against someone who makes few mistakes and hits really hard. i actually thought the 7 games would cash or not lose, simply because nav has played a little more forcefully lately, but as is usual my instinct is wrong on games. that's why i stick to ML. the way of thinking you mention will work in football and basketball but for some reason it doesn't work in tennis - the bias should be toward the fav. i guess it's because it always SEEMS like the dog is the right side, but then you bet it and damned if it doesn't lose 2/3, and the other third the dog wins outright. the only time taking dogs in tennis really works is if it you're 80% sure its going to go 3 sets or into TB, and then you might as well take the over. for the side, if that's the case, then makes more sense to bet the ML. in the halep case, it went basically just as i thought. i didnt really think she was going to win, but she came even closer than i thought. but i was 80% she would be able to do a 4 in each set. and even that came within about two points of losing. and that's the first games bet i've won out of the last five, maybe. which is why i dont do it often.

in women's tennis the serve matters less. so if you bet the INFERIOR player, you're getting the worst of it every single point, basically. you're basically HOPING the better player has an off day or some other thing creeps in. tennis doesnt really work like other sports, for some reason. honestly, if i were trying to beat games, i would bet the opposite of my instinct. i find it easier to simply pick the ML. in fact, i believe all sports is moving towar ML and parlay betting and teasers, and away from spreads. i think the spreads are too tight, and the books know too well how to shade the ML on the spread, making it too difficult to profit. that's my theory, and it works well for football. if i went back and looked at the games coverage of all the tennis FML i played, i bet id be way ahead if i had taken the fav - games. but my way is to string together favs on ML, and it seems to be working ok so i'll go with it.
 
Last edited:

TennisTapir

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 13, 2013
1,285
4
0
Probably a sucker bet and this morning the juice has moved some to williams but i like taking the contrarian angle, not always right but often lines and perception are drawn off past history which isn't sure to repeat itself. Trying to buck trends can be foolhardy.
I made the play ignoring all previous events and based on what i've seen this tourney. The lines makers sure don't think much has changed.

it's the way they play. nav was absolutely peaking, and the heavy fav with those 7 games, and she still didnt come close. her style simply doesn't match up with serena. you have to hit hard and move her around court to have any chance. or hope that she wakes up on wrong side of bed, which does happen frequently enough.

Ky, to quote some annoying announcers, "has great length", Wis. will probably be their biggest test, just don't ask calipari, he somewhat dissed ND as being one the toughest tests this year after the last game. :facepalm:
Truth be told I haven't watched much of this tourney but i think i missed the game to bet against ky, which was vs ND + the pts after that WestVa drubbing and everyone talking Ky up even more. I think that was the letdown spot and here they will be ready. The "scare" or close game is now out of the way so we'll see.

yeah i get the reasoning, and most times would agree with it, as i've seen that pattern you describe in the past. i am uncomfortable going with the public on BOTH sides of that, betting ON rather than agaisnt what just happens. but i'm still going to do it, and trust to other factors i think outweigh what-we-just-saw. but yeah, i definitely get that reasoning and that approach.

i watched zero basketball this year until the tournament, and not much in it. but i've won most of my bets, mostly cuz once you know the patterns, you know all you need. i fully agree with what you're saying, and the sharps are mostly thinking that way too. my case is that wis is on a mission, they are not satisfied with where they've got, they came back from last year specifically to win. that's no guarantee they will, of course, but it does guarantee, to me, that they will try as hard as they can to win. i think their team play will see them thru. to me, they appeared somewhat soft in the middle defensively vs az, and that's what i'm worried about. i think it will be a close game and they pull it out at the end. ... the other one, i have to think duk wins. ... i just think if wis is up the way nd was up, and i think wis has better players than nd, there's no way kty is coming back. if kty is down 8 pts mid-2h, they're done.
 

TennisTapir

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 13, 2013
1,285
4
0
ugh, 6-2 set 1, serena playing fantastic. win lose or draw have to like the steady level headed navarro. she has the right mindset and emotional level. not much you can do physically against beasts.

yeah, nav really has impressed me lately, i really like her way. but serena just hits too hard. only halep who is quick as fuq can get to her shots and she is strained beyond what she can quite handle. everyone else, forget it. either serena has an off day, or she wins. but i think halep is going to be able to beat her within a year. that's a guess. it will be extremely interesting to see serena forced to come up with something if she is not the better player - if that happens.
 

sds222

Registered
Forum Member
Dec 31, 2006
2,937
12
0
it's a bad matchup for nav, that's the prob. this match was decided on fundamentals, just like the four earlier ones. nav's game is basically a soft sort of luring in of the opponent, a counterpunching, a waiting for mistakes, supplemented with occasional aggressive attempts to hit near-winners (this last is the part of her game that she has improved lately - this miami tournament was her best result ever). it just doesnt work against someone who makes few mistakes and hits really hard. i actually thought the 7 games would cash or not lose, simply because nav has played a little more forcefully lately, but as is usual my instinct is wrong on games. that's why i stick to ML. the way of thinking you mention will work in football and basketball but for some reason it doesn't work in tennis - the bias should be toward the fav. i guess it's because it always SEEMS like the dog is the right side, but then you bet it and damned if it doesn't lose 2/3, and the other third the dog wins outright. the only time taking dogs in tennis really works is if it you're 80% sure its going to go 3 sets or into TB, and then you might as well take the over. for the side, if that's the case, then makes more sense to bet the ML. in the halep case, it went basically just as i thought. i didnt really think she was going to win, but she came even closer than i thought. but i was 80% she would be able to do a 4 in each set. and even that came within about two points of losing. and that's the first games bet i've won out of the last five, maybe. which is why i dont do it often.

Yes it was, bad bet in hind sight, It was navarro's best tourney so was hoping she would keep it a little closer.
One note, for me at least;
it seems the urge to bet on something you want to see happen as opposed to what is more likely to happen can get the best of you. mostly psychological but i think it perhaps clouds ones judgment. sort of like having a preconceived notion, wanting to be right about it and then letting that blind you to anything that supports the other side.

in women's tennis the serve matters less. so if you bet the INFERIOR player, you're getting the worst of it every single point, basically. you're basically HOPING the better player has an off day or some other thing creeps in. tennis doesnt really work like other sports, for some reason.

that's basically what it was, i had to hope serena would not be all there so to speak.


I've got the urge to play Ky ml reduced at -230 but i've been punched in the mouth by the book since the super bowl so a little gun shy.


***********************
Will update in this post so as not to clutter the thread.
What a game its a barn burner, i took Ky ml but got on wisc live.
Wisky is damn good that's for sure.
wow, looked like a flagrant foul committed by ky but no call!

Well nice F'ing call on Wisc. glad you got that, looks like a nice win. :toast::0028


4-5-15
thanks, was a good win. i dont think a fluke either. dickie v says kty would win 4/7 i dont agree, i think wis wins 7/10 against kty. i think they would do even better in future games, they know what they're dealing with now. kty was simply overrated i saw that last week. they're good but nothing that great, certainly not greatest of all time, that's ridiculous.
Yeah have to agree, both teams played really well FG% wise, although they might be closer to 60-40, i didn't think the lanky kaminsky would be as effective but both he and Dekker were great.

well i got to credit myself with picking 3/4 final four and both semis winners. and for the champs i had picked wis. i do hope they win. duk is a cagey team but wis might be able to score a little better on them. i think more of their inside stuff will work. it seemed to me vs kty, wis was much shyer about shooting than other games ive seen. just extreme pressure, i guess, kty was about the same way. notice again dekker hit the key three at the end, tho they weren't really talking about it. i think wis will win, but i not going to pound it. i'm playing conservative these days, lots of hedging to lock in profits.
With the future in play and the game at pick you can easily hedge for 50%. In game if wisc gets a small lead you should be able to get duke +pts for possible middle or just take ml at + odds. You know how that goes, you just have to be on it and hit it if it presents itself. You could play it before for protection against the unlikely event that Duke has the lead for the entire game. A very nice situation to find yourself in
:0056
 
Last edited:

TennisTapir

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 13, 2013
1,285
4
0
Yes it was, bad bet in hind sight, It was navarro's best tourney so was hoping she would keep it a little closer.
One note, for me at least;
it seems the urge to bet on something you want to see happen as opposed to what is more likely to happen can get the best of you. mostly psychological but i think it perhaps clouds ones judgment. sort of like having a preconceived notion, wanting to be right about it and then letting that blind you to anything that supports the other side.



that's basically what it was, i had to hope serena would not be all there so to speak.


I've got the urge to play Ky ml reduced at -230 but i've been punched in the mouth by the book since the super bowl so a little gun shy.


***********************
Will update in this post so as not to clutter the thread.
What a game its a barn burner, i took Ky ml but got on wisc live.
Wisky is damn good that's for sure.
wow, looked like a flagrant foul committed by ky but no call!

Well nice F'ing call on Wisc. glad you got that, looks like a nice win. :toast::0028

thanks, was a good win. i dont think a fluke either. dickie v says kty would win 4/7 i dont agree, i think wis wins 7/10 against kty. i think they would do even better in future games, they know what they're dealing with now. kty was simply overrated i saw that last week. they're good but nothing that great, certainly not greatest of all time, that's ridiculous.

thing i forgot to say earlier, the other point about betting against what just happened. i think that's a lot stronger in 24 or 48 hours. when the next game is a week later, i think that takes away a lot of the value on that. this game was more independent event than related to what happened in sweet 16 and elite 8. now, what happens monday may have more to do with tonight. duke has some advantage playing first, for instance.

well i got to credit myself with picking 3/4 final four and both semis winners. and for the champs i had picked wis. i do hope they win. duk is a cagey team but wis might be able to score a little better on them. i think more of their inside stuff will work. it seemed to me vs kty, wis was much shyer about shooting than other games ive seen. just extreme pressure, i guess, kty was about the same way. notice again dekker hit the key three at the end, tho they weren't really talking about it. i think wis will win, but i not going to pound it. i'm playing conservative these days, lots of hedging to lock in profits.
 
Last edited:

TennisTapir

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 13, 2013
1,285
4
0
week #14 (+2321 in)

MONDAY

carried over:
FUTURE: 100/815 wis to win ncaa L

FUTURE: 100/1400 maka to win charleston

Previews for Katowice (poland) and Charleston...

CHARLESTON PREVIEW

CHARLESTON OVERVIEW: oldest wta tournament, 64/6-round, on green clay, marking start (and the ending) of the green clay season. psychologically, a letdown tournament after 2 straight 2-week biggies INDIAN WELLS and then MIAMI. not a lot of top players at this one, 8 of top 30. PVIC has done well here, and JJ/JANKO. CEPElova of all people made finals last year, shows that this is definitely a lesser tournament.. can be cool and rainy but this week looks pretty good, in 70s. it sets up well for MAKA, who has been frustrated in singles last few weeks but playing well in doubles. i suspect miss maka is all out of bubblegum, and that's where my opening bid is going.

QUARTERS PROJECTIONS: 1Q: a quarter of unhot players, notably BOUCH and KEYS. and then the reheating STEPH. we'll see if bouch-steph happens in R#3. whoever gets hot could take this, including dark horses LEP and DAVIS. really dont have an idea what will happen, depends on bouch. would like to keep fading keys but her opp is not all that good, it's a good tournament for her to recover, if she can.

2Q: ERR and GCIA bookend this quarter, and i'll pick err to emerge, but if not, i'll go with the steady and reliable DIYAS to come thru. PAVLYU has an outside shot if she can keep it on court.

3Q: hot as the 1q is cool: PVIC, who loves charleston, and JANKO, who has done well here, bookend this q and figure to meet in qf. outside shot to MCHALE, if she ever reheats again, and WATSON.

4Q: this quarter is KERB and MAKA, only question is whether STOS can beat kerb to make qf vs maka. i think maka is going to win this tournament, easy path to qf.

PROJECTED QF: TOP HALF: BOUCH-KEYS, ERR-DIYAS; BOTTOM HALF: JANKO-PVIC, KERB-MAKA.

PROJECTED SEMIS: BOUCH-ERR, JANKO-MAKA

PROJECTED WINNER: MAKA(err)

FUTURES: bouch 7', pvic steph 11, err 12, keys 13, maka 15, kerb jj 17, stos gcia 19, benc 23, pav begu 34, bthel diyas 67, davis 81
VALUE: maka, pvic, jj

/////////////////////////////////////////

KATOWICE (POLAND) PREVIEW

KATOWICE OVERVIEW: this is a five-round 32-man tournament, bookended by polish native ARAD and 2014 winner CORNET. it is indoors on hard court. that means wind is not much of a factor, and rain even less, altho occasionally legacy communist sprinklers kick into gear, providing comic relief. the lesser rad, URAD, is also playing this tournament, which could prove interesting. overall a nice lean midsection of players, leaving the tournament open to whoever gets hot. at least a dozen could win this tournament.

QUARTERS PROJECTIONS: 1Q: remember, only 32 in this field. the quarter holds eight. if ARAD can get by unpredictable but hard-hitting WICK in opening round, then should make it to play ZVONA in qf.

2Q: if GIO gets by rising ALLERT in R#1, should make it to qf against KANepi. gio the clear class of this quarter.

3Q: this one is wide open, with FLIP, BECK, NICU, MLAD, SMIT, new kid WITT, VANuT and RYB all roughly comparable. i'm going to take a guess that mlad plays vanUt in the qf.

4Q: let's say CORN vs SCHMIED in qf. why not? corn won it last year, altho been lousy this year. and schmied is pretty good.

PROJECTED QF: TOP HALF: ARAD-ZVONA, GIO-KAN; BOTTOM HALF: MLAD-VANUT, SCHMIED-CORN

PROJECTED SEMIS: ARAD-GIO, VANUT-SCHMIED

PROJECTED WINNER: GIO (vanut)

FUTURES: arad 2.4, corn 6', gio 10, kan 15, flip zvona knap nicu mlad sinia 26, beck smit schmied 34, vanut kouk 46, witt 51, urad 67, aller 81
VALUE: i honestly dont have an idea, because a couple of the high ones will no doubt make a showing. i'd say GIO and nothing else. she hits too hard for the rest of these, and should be easier to keep it in as the competition is weaker. arad is no value at 2.4 the way she's been playing, but given she's in poland and due for good result, line could also be telling us it is going to happen. not playing anything to start, myself.

100/300 vanut(ryb), gio(aller), wis -1 (duk) L

POST-ANALYSIS: vanut gets by easier than i expected; gio has some trouble. aller showed real weakness under pressure, that's the value from this match. she easily could have beaten gio and many players would have from the position aller was in, but aller got small. ... as for wis-duk, i think wis wins, but nothing id hit hard. okafor wont trouble wis but duk's slashing guards will. if duk is hitting threes, they can win. still, i suspect wis gets it done.

100/110 diyas (hrad) L

NOTE: odd, huge late move to diyas. from 2.1 to 1.769 close. why, no idea. not showing match. just an educated guess on my part but someone appears to know something. we'll see what happens. ... diyas wins duel for set one, then fades.

100/127 ariz (sf) L

200/200 duk (wis) 2h. W

NOTE: bet made ht. i think wis will win, but if not, walk without losing a penny. really do think wis takes it though. ... what a loss, wis gets a little passive and that's enough to lose. i felt stronger that wis would win at ht than start of game. it should have. what a painful loss. ... tough day. fully expected to be +800 minimum but ended up down hundreds.

TUESDAY and WEDNESDAY (-200 in)

100/66 2p lep(mitu), stos(karat) L

PRE-ANALYSIS: lots of dubious stuff on tue, best to let it shake out. considered adding beck over flip to get a nice return but looking at beck's record, she just cant be relied on, even though she seems to do well in controlled environments in europe. lots of 60-70% stuff which is just not good enough. i dont trust stos at all; karat is as high as i would go with, that level of opposition. karat plays all the time and has gotten a little better but stos should win. lep has played well and lost, i think she probably wins here. decent return for the risk. ... lep ret w injury. not sure if she was off going in, dont think so. just a completely shit bet, indefensible any way. mitu is not bad but had never won wta match.

POST-ANALYSIS: get up and beck has already lost, not even competitive, so right call there. stos looks to be overcoming the redoubtable karat. disappointing cant figure more bets today, but they're all in that 30 40 range, just begging you to take a bite, and sure enough, one out of three of them will be poisonous. pvic or jj or kerb, one of them will go down, right when you trust them.

100/31 arad(wick), maka(zhang) W

100/59 2p: corn(hcog), err(cep) W

ANALYSIS: maka playing like shit and has some kind of abdominal inj. may scrape thru but will not win tournament playing like this vs an inferior player like zhang, ranked 84, who has barely won a match this year. of course she's a little fired up because she finally did win one yesterday; that combined with maka coming off hard courts produces unexpected result, regardless of outcome. ... coming up we'll get to see the form of ERR, BOUCH, and KEYS. no projections because nothing really to base them on today, or not enough. this is clay. VEKIC and MITU might be worth a shot as dogs. in fact, i lean to dogs in all remaining matches except the two favs in my 2p. WITTH-VANUT is about pick em, will be interesting to see these young risers do battle, no real opinion on it. ... my MAKA bets not looking real smart. looks like will go to third set as i write but seriously underestimated her difficulty in transitioning from her best to worst surface. she likes hard and grass. this is weird clay. she's coming off lots of doubles on hard, without any practice. still, should be able to beat zhang but already dropped a set. zhang plays dumb or maka would already have lost. cant have any faith in her winning this tournament on this forum, altho if she makes it thru this round she'll surely improve a little next round. then again, the slight injury is enough to keep one offer her until that's clarified. ... maka escapes, says in interview that switching surfaces was the problem. will have to play better in coming rounds.

100/95 FIRST HALF det-min 4' under. L

FUTURE: 100/1400 maka to win charleston L

NOTE: maka withdraws w injury. unbelievable. this is the real danger of futures. got completely fucked on sharapova couple weeks ago with a bunch at stake that was 80% to come in for large profits. this is less but still very bad. she had no injury coming in, far as i know. i dont think she was going to win, but might have, and could have hedge it out easily if not.

POST-ANALYSIS: basebaLL follow goes down... dogs arrua(stos), kovinic and mitu come thru. barthel up a break on steph. just a shit day, all kinds of dogs came thru, should have had 100 on about five of 'em. good to see davis kick bouch's ass.

100/175 LIVE johnson (quer) 16 52 L

POST-ANALYSIS: johnson takes set two, then folds.

THURSDAY and FRIDAY (-510 in)

100/51 3p: arad(mes), keys(mitu), err(torm) W

PRE-ANALYSIS: like all the favs remaining today. great to see davis back in form, after losing on her numerous times. she's about to close out bthel. think janko, arad, keys and err all do it, but going to stay off janko, use other three in parlay. pvic should take breng as she hits harder, but want to wait another match to see how into this tournament pvic is. she likes it here and should be game, but had a struggle opening set last match and went deep last week. ...blame me for betting not on pvic ML as i thought but pvic to win a certain game, but give credit to FIVE DIMES for a format as easy to make mistakes with as bank fees. Notice 5d got rid of its superior format, the LIVE BETTING PLUS, and kept the shittier LIVE BETTING EXTRA.

100/369 5p: arad(kouk), gio(kul), corn(schmied), keys(dav), err(hrad) L

100/255 4p: gio(kul), arad(kouk), keys(dav), err(hrad) L

ANALYSIS: apparently corn was inj. i probably missed that one, a mistake. vanut is coming on, handling flipkens. she's young, but is learning how to win. there will be money to be made off her for the next couple years. ... gio nice win. kul has promise. gio ever gains consistency, she can be top ten. but not near there yet. a real danger to bet on or against. ... as thought, keys overpowers jaunty shrimpster davis. ... arad easy over grumpy cat. err down a set but i hedged live so profits either way, tho better if she comes back.

SATURDAY and SUNDAY (-659 in)

NOTES: keys blows out hrad, impressive win. GIO blows out arad. soon as she controls her power, few can beat her. should have put some future on her, as i mentioned at top of week. probably OVER is play on kerb and pvic. they're friends, probably a set apiece before they get down to business. will take a shot against querrey.

100/69 verdasco (querr) L

100/320 LIVE andsn (sock) 67. L

IN-GAME: sock is peaking, no doubt, but this is a decent value for fairly likely andsn comeback. ... nope. sock looking powerful, impressive.

100/322 3p: sock(quer), gio(schmied), keys(kerb) L

NOTES: shit week continues with gio losing in straight sets. schmied has power and is able to keep it on court better, upsets favored gio.

120/205 2p: keys(kerb), sock(quer) L

160/120 LIVE kerb (keys) 20. W

NOTE: bad week. maka screwed everything. should have bet gio to win and could have hedged, but it's clear that futures are very tricky.

[-959 out]
 
Last edited:

TennisTapir

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 13, 2013
1,285
4
0
week #15 (+1362 in)

MONDAY and TUESDAY and WEDNESDAY and THURSDAY and FRIDAY and SATURDAY and SUNDAY

COLOMBIA PREVIEW: only WTA tournament this week, not worth going into in depth. SVIT is far better than the rest. could still lose, not her top surface, she's young, but if you want a future, play SVIT at 3.5 to win.

100/41 svit (chir) W

PRE-ANALYSIS: chir plays with heart but the talent disparity is crushing. Line moving toward chir, so be careful.

100/165 4p: lino(rog), haddad(gonz), TUE puig(berg), thiem(pouille) L

100/84 lad (sea) W

100/1110 5p: shved(zan), arod(gibbs), babos(duq), WED goff(tsong), nad(pou) L

100/167 3p: svit(kov), peir(min), lino(haddad) W

PRE-ANALYSIS: like the over on svit, think she wins a battle that goes over 20'.

POST-ANALYSIS: win as all three favs come thru but wrong that svit would struggle. often in these minor tournaments what we see is 1-2 locals given wild cards, they play over their heads, and top 50 players struggle to beat them, or even get upset. then, in subsequent rounds, it reverts to form. they play their normal foes, and beat them normally, as svit over kov today.

100/523 3p: svit(falc), glush(duq), shved(puig) L

100/27 svit (falc) W
100/151 glush (duq) L
100/94 shved (puig) W

100/51 svit (peir) L [-88]

100/94 shved (peir) L

POST-ANALYSIS: piss match by shved, shows no heart or brains. better player loses without much of a fight. not offered live so just a straight kick in the nuts. ...anyway, a decent tournament coming up next week in stuttgart after this time-water in bogota.

sds forwarded this on azar:
http://www.tennis.com/pro-game/2015...ook-azarenka-court-regime/54423/#.VTPKQSHBw29

[-188 for week / cum. +1174 thru 15]
 
Last edited:
Bet on MyBookie
Top