2015 Tennis +

TennisTapir

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 13, 2013
1,285
4
0
week #16 (+1174 in)

MONDAY

STUTTGART PREVIEW: first major clay tournament of the season. weather will be cool, about 65, doesnt look like rain is coming. [INDOORS, d'oh] 32 absolutely packed with top players by comparison with ordinary tournament. serena missing but sharap and halep are there, bookending it, and most of the other top players. makes less sense this week to break down by quarter because the field is so strong. no easy paths. whoever wins will have to play at least three tough matches and more likely four. i think halep will win it, but not for any particular reason beyond the generic, that she's playing really well, already won three tournaments in 2015, and clay is her best surface. to start the clay season in europe, just depends who's playing well on clay, and that will become clear in the first two matches. should be many good chances to profit, as this is high $$$ tournament with a car prize for winner, i think.

Here is someone else's preview:

WTA Stuttgart 2015: Preview and Predictions

Hello, Stuttgart! So i?m quite excited about the week ahead and this has been further validated by the draw for the 2015 Porsche Grand Prix. There are some superb first round matches, as was to be expected with the quality of the entry list. In case you missed it, I blogged about some of the most memorable matches in Stuttgart over the last five years HERE. For live Stuttgart coverage this week, Women?s Tennis Blog and The Tennis Island are ones to follow. Jimmie48, Women?s Tennis Blog resident photographer, will be in Stuttgart as will @Renestance, one of my favourite follows on Twitter. For now, let?s take a look at this stonking draw?

Maria SharapovaMaria Sharapova returns to Stuttgart as the defending champion and unbeaten in all three previous appearances at this tournament. There has been some speculation as to whether Sharapova would be fit for the tournament after she pulled out of Fed Cup this weekend with a foot injury, but it appears she will be playing. After a bye in the first round, she could meet Angelique Kerber in the second round. After a ropey couple of months, Kerber fought her way through the Charleston draw to claim her fourth WTA title, beating Madison Keys in a superb final. Sharapova and Kerber have had some great matches and their last encounter was a magnificent fourth round match at Wimbledon, which was my favourite WTA match of 2014. Kerber played her best match of the entire year to sneak out the win. Pre-draw, Sharapova v Kerber was the one of the potential matches that I thought about so i?m glad we *could* get to see it. The number six seed, Ekaterina Makarova is projected to meet Sharapova in the quarters.

Petra Kvitova returns to WTA tour action in Stuttgart after taking an extended break from the tour. Petra revealed more about her decision to skip Indian Wells and Miami in her blog with BBC Sport HERE. Petra made her comeback in Fed Cup where she enjoyed straight set wins over Kristina Mladenovic and Caroline Garcia. Her first match of the week in Stuttgart will be against Madison Brengle or a qualifier. As we move onto the clay, this is Kuznetsova?s most profitable time of the year and she will be one to watch at every clay court tournament. Last year?s finalist, Ana Ivanovic is also in this section and has drawn a stinker as she will play Caroline Garcia in the first round. The pair have met twice this year already with Garcia winning in Monterrey and Indian Wells.. There has been conflicting news about Ivanovic?s fitness; there were reports that said she was fully fit for the first time since Australia, but then I also saw a comment on Twitter implying her participation is under question? so who knows!

When the world number 10 goes up against the world number 11 in the FIRST ROUND of a tournament, you know it?s a cracker! In a rematch of the Miami semi-final, Carla Suarez Navarro and Andrea Petkovic will meet first up. Both have been in superb form of late although do have their concerns; Carla has been nursing a wrist injury, while Petkovic has had an exhausting couple of weeks, reaching back-to-back semi-finals in Miami and Charleston and playing Fed Cup. The winner of that match will play either Julia Goerges or Belinda Bencic in the second round. As a former champion of the Porsche Grand Prix, Goerges is always one to watch on this surface. She thrashed Bencic earlier in the year at the Australian Open and although I think it will be much closer this time round, i?d probably still give the edge to Goerges purely based on this tournament. Caroline Wozniacki is the highest seed in the third quarter and could meet Lucie Safarova in the second round? Lucie has beaten Caroline at this tournament before and had a wild Fed Cup win over Caroline Garcia, saving five match points.

The final quarter features Simona Halep and Agnieszka Radwanska. Halep?s first match of the week will be against Garbine Muguruza or Barbora Strycova (note that it is no longer BZS!) in what should be an intriguing first rounder between two completely different styles of play. It is worth noting that Muguruza has beaten Halep in their two previous matches. I think Halep is going to have a storming clay court season, but i?m not entirely sure that this surface suits her game so I wouldn?t be surprised if she falls early. Radwanska opens against Sara Errani, which should be a fun one. The winner of that will meet Sabine Lisicki or Zarina Diyas. In front of a home crowd and at a tournament where she has picked up some notable wins in the past, i?d back Sabine to make the quarters.

http://mootennis.com/2015/04/19/wta-stuttgart-2015-preview-and-predictions/comment-page-1/

NOTE: That's actually a really helpful preview. I don't think Sharap will win this time. She simply hasn't been playing enough to be in form. The rest of what the guy says makes sense. I do agree that halep could lose to Mugu, but i dont think she will. if she gets by her, she may well win it. one strategy is to play halep future and then hedge it, but i will see how she looks vs mugu - assuming mugu gets by stryc. really, mugu has the best chance to beat halep before the final because she has power. if halep beats her, then she has to beat two good players to make the final. but players who are definitely inferior to her. beating an arad or pvic is not that hard for halep. if she has an avg day, she beat them without too much problem. in the final, she gets sharap, if things go to form, but i dont think they will. that means she could get maka, who beat her in the QF in aus, but whom she beat the next tournament, or she could face kvit, kuz or ivic. an in-form ivic might be a problem, but she hasn't been in top form in a long time. kvit is off injury, cant believe she waltzes thru to final. the others just aren't regular enough to trouble halep. more i look at it, if halep beats mugu, she should win. BUT, halep has already had a great year. this is her first matches on clay. she SHOULD be all guns firing, but you just never know, and if she's off, then mugu will expose her.

FUTURE: 200/700 halep to win stuttgart
FUTURE: 100/2600 maka to win stuttgart

100/673 5p: btel(witt), maka(jj), kuz(breng), ivic(gcia), mugu(stryc) L

FUTURES FIRST LISTING: sharap 4, halep 4', kvit 8', ivic 13, woz 15, nav mugu 19, arad 21, maka kerb err 26, jj pvic safa 29, gcia 34, lis 41, kuz 51, benc stryc 67, bthel 101, witt 151, breng diyas 201.
VALUE: maka. maybe value in mugu if you think she upsets halep. halep reverse. ? is who comes out of top half if sharap loses, the value is there. i guess maka.

100/31 det +2' (yank) W

TUESDAY (-69 in)

100/180 3p: nav(erod), ivic(gcia), maka(mattek)

ANALYSIS: mugu is ON. blows out stryc. sets up MUGU-HALEP next round, will be very good. mugu definite chance if halep isn't on, and even if she is. pvic and kuz pulled out. replaced by erod, who plays NAV next. and BRIANTI will substitute for kuz vs BRENG. PROJECTED WINNERS: all favs. maybe dogs BRIANTI and MELNIKOVA worth a shot. ... NAV holds on. this is her problem: she messes around with players and then is out of steam by the end of the week. EROD did play well, nearly won. NAV is developing some ace-ability, but has to learn to close. Save yourself a set of wear and tear by tightening up. When you're up a set and 52 in s2 tb, you have to close it. She does not seem to like to go for the throat. She plays in a way that lets her opponent hang around. Like she prefers keeping her top game in reserve. That's ok if she's winning sets comfortably, but, as here, she often is not.

100/62 maka (mattek) W

WEDNESDAY (-109 in)

100/71 arad (err) L

PRE-ANALYSIS: big match is halep-mugu. many think mugu takes it. i think mugu is a real threat to take set one, but i think halep wins. line slightly to h overnight. that's the last match of the day, and there are only five matches PROJECTED WINNERS: ARAD, LIS, KERB, BENC, HALEP. ... arad serves better, just has small edges around over err, whose serve is just too weak. LIS has been in form lately, altho i would not bet her in this case, as diyas can play well. kerb should win, but no value at 1.11, not even in parlay. benc is better than goerg, but younger, and goerg has won this tournament, probably her best win, when she was at her peak. still think benc is more regular and wins, good prices at 1.8. finally halep and mugu. mugu playing well, halep off a couple weeks. any kind of slow start and mugu will take first set, maybe even match. mugu has beaten halep this year, and looked great. but this is halep's surface. even if she loses first set, i think she wins match. this figures to be about like mattek-maka yesterday. play the over.

100/83 benc (goerg) W
100/80 lis-diyas 19' OVER L
100/54 halep (mugu) W
100/74 halep-mugu 19' OVER W

POST-ANALYSIS: err takes it. arad breaks her serve but cant hold own. figured out she needed to hit harder, but was too late making change. her tricks dont work against err like avg player. err has own tricks. ... and of course i stay off diyas and she blows out lis. just on wrong foot today.

100/14 kerb (glatch) W

POST-ANALYSIS: pretty easy for kerb, but playing and ITF opponent. ... goerg blows 3 match points, benc proves tougher. ... now for halep-mugu. line has moved small but steady toward halep over last 24 hours.

100/80 LIVE halep (mugu) 01 W
200/108 LIVE mugu (halep) 6311 L

LIVE: appears halep tweaked something, i sell out to get something out of my roughly 500 on the line (incl future). naturallly halep holds and breaks... and then take set 61. that was as out of nowhere as we'll see. but mugu does the roller coaster fairly often. we'll see if this is a true turn in set three. ... great finish by halep. mugu has the power to dominate points but not the finesse, gives too many points away. halep played great defensive tennis, keeping her in many point and the match. very few players would have gotten to much of what mugu was hitting. ... very rough day betting, all can say is at least halep future is still alive. rueful not that i bought the mugu but that i bought it at the absolute low point.

100/71 lad (sf) L

THURSDAY (-303 in)

10/330 5p: kvit(breng), witt(gcia), diyas(err), maka(melnik), woz(safa) L

100/290 diyas (err) L
100/91 diyas-err 19' over L
100/125 woz (safa) W
100/179 witt (gcia) L
100/39 2p: kvit(breng), maka(melik) L

POST-ANALYSIS: didnt see breng, but upsets kvit off injury. miss another huge dog. diyas just not slick enough for err, who pulls away, costing me total too. witt comes close but fails. just a shit week. only thing can save it is halep winning, and will just get me back to where i started. and is far from sure thing, as will have to get thru sharap in final most likely, if can get by err and nav. let's hope woz can take out safa... Actually, forgot i had future on maka too. that's valuable. if sharap is at all off, then this should be a maka-halep final, both of which i have futures on. sharap hasn't played in a while. maka will at the least give her a very stern test, assuming she gets by heating kerber. .. and she does not. i mark this as the informal point at which HALEP becomes the #2 player in the world. ... last up, NAV-BENC. i expect nav to do it.

QF PREVIEW: KERB-MAKA: expect maka to win in a struggle. ... BRENG-GCIA - i go for breng in upset. worth a shot. not a big believer in gcia. ... WOZ-(NAV) - should be a real battle. will watch, not bet. suspect woz may do it. ... HALEP-ERR - halep does it. similar to err-arad, halep has more power and control than err, a glove match, one is just bigger than the other, and contains it. err is very subtle player, but halep has significantly more power, as good touch, quicker movement, better serve. if halep plays avg game, she wins. arad was breaking err serve pretty easily, and halep will find it even easier to eat. in fact, even err's first serve is edible. ... going to be a maka-halep final, book it. despite a horribly shitty week, the loss of sharpova means have a real chance to make a bunch or get out even.

100/98 cle-bos 204' over L

FRIDAY (-688 in)

200/52 halep (err) W
100/165 maka (kerb) L
100/900 3p: maka(kerb), halep(err), breng(gcia) L

PRE-ANALYSIS: kerb has 6-4 record vs maka, including wins in 2014. still think maka does it. at the least, the line is overrating kerb's victory over sharap. it wasn't that kerb played great, altho she played better in the final set, it was that sharap started missing. i think this win was all due to sharap, and almost nothing due to kerb. sharap didn't have any harder shots tomake in set 2 and 3 than in 1, she just missed them. inexplicably. if maka plays just a little better than she has so far, i think she can take kerber. no way in the world i would bet on kerber at nearly 2:1 over a maka, so that means maka is a good bet. the minute kerb gets some pressure she misses. even without pressure she misses plenty. she'll have confidence off this match, but if maka matches her intensity from start, she should win. ... H i dont think will have trouble with err. breng should hang iwth garcia, maybe upset her. woz 1.8 over nav may win, but i'm staying off that match. nav been great lately. woz coming on some. probably an over is the right way to play, 20-21.

100/74 maka +4 (kerb) L
100/69 woz-nav 20 over L

PRE-ANALYSIS: both of these seem to me very likely wins. woz-nav will be what i call a PBP, a point-by-point slog. i cant see it not being at least 6464. both will win many games. as for maka, i cant see her dropping more than one serve per set. all analysts ive seen are overrating her contribution to victory over sharap, which had far more to do with the latter's energy and preparation than kerb playing great. kerb is still kerb - if she's put under pressure she will spray. i think maka should be favored. she has had a rough go the last few tournaments - pulling out without losing from charleston, costing me a future, and before that losing to pvic playing best of her life, and losing to some other top people. i think she beats kerb outright. what i know is that she will not fade, it will be a struggle the whole way if kerb prevails.

"I haven't spent that much time on the court..and Im lacking that! I didnt know where my conditioning or my tennis would be!" #Sharapova

POST-ANALYSIS: halep exactly as expected. err wins like 10% of her second serves. halep never played at full power. even though err broke her and was even up a break in set 2, this match was never in doubt. ... woz blows out nav. think nav was just flat, perhaps a little tired. nav showed in flashes she's better than woz, but just wasn't in the mood today. again, this is why you close out matches early rather than play the extra set as nav did in round one. ... Well fuck me with a tent pole. Flat wrong about maka. zooms to 30 lead, then 36 and blown out. kerb continued to improve from yesterday, when should have been tired and receded. maka did not improve. she has the right idea but just not keeping the shots in bounds. diasastrous week, mitigated only if halep wins this tournament. she would not have beat kerb as playing today. she will have a battle against woz next just to get to final.


FUTURE: 100/2600 maka to win stuttgart L

POST-ANALYSIS: figures, been dodging good dogs all week. if maka had come thru, would have been huge win, but had nothing on brengle except dead parlay. gcia is always a good go against as heavy fav against competent players.

SATURDAY (-1136 in)

100/44 halep (woz) L
100/26 kerb (breng) W

FUTURE: 200/700 halep to win stuttgart L

POST-ANALYSIS: disaster week continues. i missed every single large dog, and there were many. and neither of my "book-it" final made it. woz played very well. should be a real struggle with kerber in finals. halep might have been more aggressive from the start. she didn't turn it up until later in second set, and then ran out of energy. woz almost let her back in by letting her catch her breath at 51. just a rare loss for halep, she formally moves to #2 ranking at the start of the new week.

[-1410 for week / cum. -226 thru 15]

NOTE: less posting next month for unrelated reasons. couple good tournaments but have to be away. will resume full posting with French Open. will make one new post between now and then and add the few picks I make to it. after two terrible weeks, seems good time to take a break.

WEEK #17: KAPLIS comes off layoff and wins in Prague. Doesn't coast; most of her matches go three sets. but her great year continues. ... Meanwhile, SVIT prevails over rising BABOS in Marrakech. ...

WEEK #18: both svit and kaplis turn right around after victories on saturday, fly to spain, get easy wins sunday over their first-round opponents in the 64-field in Madrid. HALEP loses in first round to CORN, her worst result of the year, following on subpar showing in Stuttgart, where she lost to WOZ. With French Open less than month away, Halep has some tuneup work to do on her clay game.
 
Last edited:

TennisTapir

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 13, 2013
1,285
4
0
[YTD cum. -226 into French Open]

WEEK 21 & 22

FRENCH OPEN...

PROJECTED ROUND 2 WINNERS TOP HALF: SERENA AZAR, STEPH PIRONK, PVIC ERR, WOZ FALC, KVIT BEGU, BACS BENC, KAPLIS KUZ, DIYAS MLAD
BOTTOM HALF: IVIC VEKIC, MAKA VESN, SVIT KANIA, HALEP CORN, NAV PENN, MUGU KERB, SAFA GAV, SHARAP STOS.

TH PROJECTIONS: 11-5

BH PROJECTIONS: 13-3

- got a 4p going on azar (underway), andsn, bacs and diyas.

100/81 2p: nav(penn), sharap(stos) LOSS

- wily vet penn knows how to close. i got out live at tiny profit but loss here

SATURDAY

PROJECTED WINNERS: KVIT, SCHIA, ERR, BACS, GOERG, MLAD, STEPH, AZAR

140/100 azar-serena 21 OVER WIN
100/195 azar (serena) LOSS

- won on bacs over keys, think azar at the least comes very close

PROJECTED WINNERS: MAKA, SVIT, MUGU, SHARAP

100/74 svit (corn) WIN
100/170 maka (ivic) LOSS
100/38 sharap (safa) LOSS

- safa has really kicked my ass this year, has never been able to beat top players and all of a sudden she can. bacs is the one to watch now, doing nearly what halep did. not sure why halep didnt show up. lucic played great to beat her again, after beating her last US Open, but expect more from now #2. halep has fallen off last few months, needs to get going again. i still think she has never got back to the level she was at end of 2013, except for the FO final vs sharapova, her finest match, perhaps. i really had expected halep to win or make final this year on her best surface.

100/102 safa (mugu) WIN
100/54 safa-mugu 20' over WIN
100/180 wawr (fed) WIN
100/87 svit +4 (ivic) LOSS

FUTURE: 100/1250 bacs to win French Open LOSS

150/51 2p serena(err), bacs(vanut) WIN

- err serve simply too soft to beat serena; bacs is simply better than vanut, who is really emerging in recent months, has nice power. good return for the risk. ... post: as expected. bacs has figured something out. just doesnt lose, and aggressively takes the closing points, with great confidence. vanut has come along faster than i expected, can see her topping out somewhere around safa level; she's barely 21 but has had a very nice 6 months. intereting to see where she is in two years. has enough power, needs a little more control, just experience mostly.

PROJECTED WINNERS, SEMIS: BACS, SAFA

100/53 safa-ivic 20' over WIN
100/48 bacs +6 (serena) LOSS

100/121 3p wawr(tsong), djok(murr), serena(safa) WIN

[YTD cum. -226 into French Open]
+135 for week into men's final

week 21-22: +135/ c. 2015: -91
 
Last edited:

TennisTapir

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 13, 2013
1,285
4
0
[week 23 in c. -91]

grass season begins. will be making some plays, some comments as week moves along

Halep blamed her poor results on clay this year on a change in her practice routine to emphasize power over the court craft and angles that had brought her to a career-best ranking of No. 2 last year.

?I just wanted to hit too strong maybe, and to change the game is not good,? Halep said.

?I have to play like what I feel on court and just to be like, to create the game. So I started to hit the ball too strong, and that is not my style. I don?t feel it, and I don?t handle it. So I have to go back, you know, in my game and just to train again how I did till now.? http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/28/s...-other-top-players-cruise-at-french-open.html

"I'm stronger, I think, mentally, and I'm stronger, as well, on court,'' Halep said. "I feel stronger -- I have a stronger body, I have improved a lot in my game. Serve is better, so I feel more confident now with my game.''

This was the first time Halep faced Rodina, who didn't go down easily.

"It was a tough match, because it was the first round and it's always difficult to start the tournament,'' Halep said. "But, you know, she played well. She's playing well. I did feel [I made] easy mistakes, but it's normal and I accept that. Next round I will be better, for sure.'' http://espn.go.com/espnw/news-comme...hy-simona-halep-take-step-further-french-open

100/98 3p benc (peg), arad (kudry), diyas (schia) WIN

100/379 2p vanUt(benc), beck(kouk) LOSS
100/60 arad(mch), diyas(vick) LOSS

right on beck, wins as dog, has been playing better lately. wrong on vanUt, a bigger dog, not able to do much with bencic. arad wins easily. i suspect she will be money the next few months as she recovers from attempt to alter her basic game with navratilova. diyas is just better than vickery, should pull through. ... nope. diyas i think had a match point but couldnt do it, let vickery back in after being well up multiple times.

on nadal and arad 2p today, past posting as nadal is started.

100/41 arad(nicu), nad(troi). LOSS
100/21 nad (troi). WIN

100/550 halep to win Birmingham LOSS

assuming halep back in ordinary form, think she or azar wins this. will be watching to see how kaplis does. interesting that halep is back to 17/1 to win wimbledon after her disaster at french. that's not a bad price at all. kaplis is like 46/1 which is also good.

finally some good luck on futures as azar withdraws, ivic loses.

pliskova looking great.

20/232 3p troi(isn), sinia(kerb), halep(mlad) LOSS
100/71 mlad +4' (halep) WIN
20/53 mlad (halep) WIN

not actually that confident in halep. beating kouk means little. beating mlad will be difficult, followed by kaplis will be very difficult. final will be easier if she gets there. kouk missed everything but mlad wont. kaplis is serving aces right and left. ... halep crushes first set, tanks second, third just starting.. halep loses. just not the player she was. she gets dominated inside points now, by almost every player who can keep the ball on the court. this was the kind of match she usually wins in 2013 and 2014. she is well off peak, doesn't come through like she used to. not clear why.

100/77 sinia +5 (kerb) LOSS
100/881 sinia(kerb), troi(isn) LOSS
100/137 troi (isn) WIN

200/122 kaplis (mlad). WIN

first line on kaplis, i think she wins comfortably. ... wow, one of the best closes i've seen in a long time from kaplis, down 36 in tiebreak. this woman is really something.

[2015 cum. -209]

100/1201 3p troi(murr), china to advance (cam), ger to advance (swe) LOSS

there's feeling betw murr and troi, latter is playing well, the price is moving wrong way but i'm taking a shot, coupling with what i feel are pretty easy soccer wins in women's world cup later today.

100/332 3p ger advances (swe), china advances (cam), kaplis (kerb). LOSS
100/18 ger advances (swe). WIN
100/137 kaplis (kerb) LOSS

i think the kaplis line should be reversed. kaplis should be about 1.6 over kerb.

kerb got lucky, but that was the best ive seen her play in terms of not making UE. make no mistake, kaplis is a real threat to win wimbledon at not much under 50/1.

thoughts on halep. she has now fired her coach and taken on darren cahill. this means she is at sea mentally. this is her third coach in a year. she said all the stuff about needing a romanian who understands her, then she ditches him after one poor major result. i'm not sure what her problem is. externally, she allows herself to be bossed by inferior players almost every match. there's no clear reason for this. she's not injured, not overplaying, just more passive on court, and misses more shots. she is well off her peak when she would hit it just inside the line routinely, really a near-perfect mix of power and control. she simply doesn't have the regularity anymore, and any top 50 player who can keep the ball on the court has a chance against her. i would like to say she's a good value at nearly 17:1 to win wimbledon, but unless you see some hidden factor, there is no reason to think she is suddenly going to perform better than she has been the last few months.

[2015 cum. -491]

100/58 aus +1 (bra). WIN.
100/71 aus-bra 2' under. WIN.
100/9 aus-bra 4' under. WIN.
100/27 aus-bra 3' under. WIN.

[2015 cum. -326]

100/15 france advances (skor). WIN.
100/22 HT sui-can 2 under. WIN. [2015 cum. -289]

WEEK #24: EASTBOURNE

100/44 maka (konta). LOSS.

100/18 norway +1 (eng). PUSH.
100/49 nor-eng 2' under. LOSS.
100/79 nor-end 2 under. LOSS. [2015 cum. -489]

really thought that match would be low scoring and COL-USA would be high. still think latter will be high.

100/84 col +2 (usa). PUSH.
100/370 col-usa 4' over. LOSS.
100/700 col-usa 5' over. LOSS.
100/95 col-usa 3 over. LOSS.
100/190 both col and usa score goal. LOSS. [2015 cum. -989]

100/87 svit (watson). LOSS.
100/22 woz (gaj). WIN. [2015 cum. -1067]

100/50 ger to advance (fra). WIN.
100/69 FIRST HALF: usa-chi 1 under. WIN.

100/37 arad (benc). LOSS. [2015 cum. -1048]

as predicted, arad has bounced back. her time with navratilova was not a waste. she took a step to test a radical possibility - that she could be turned into a power player. she now knows with clear head she cannot. so her mind is clear and settled. god made her the #5 player in the world, it is what it is. a couple injuries and some luck, she could win a major. but mostly likely she never will. and that's ok. she's back to being what she can be, playing within her limits, and she's doing, as one would expect, very well. ... great win by benc, maturing nicely. first tournament win.

WIMBLEDON (will start new thread from this point with this in a couple days)

GOING IN: halep all the way to 19.25. boy, i thought the days we'd seen anything over 10 for her as a future were long gone. kaplis at 61 has also fallen back, which i see no reason for. that kaplis is value if you want a long shot.

PREVIEW: quarter by quarter. FIRST QUARTER. only CIB and VENUS stand between SERENA and the QF. In the bottom half of the 1Q is IVIC, VANUT, BENC and AZAR, if she's healthy. And NAV. serena looks good thru all that to the SEMIS, so long as AZAR is not healthy and CIB doesnt come out of nowhere off injury. The rest she can handle pretty easily. if azar is healthy, she's the biggest threat to serena ... SECOND QUARTER: top half looks sure to be SHARAP AND PVIC to see who makes QF. easy for SHARAP to QF, very easy. bh is KAPLIS, my fav longshot, vs SAFA or if she falls, STEPH or even STRYC (who plays Steph in first round). Again, nothing real tough. ... 3Q: top half 3q is where someone will get hot, it's pretty open. could be top seed WOZ or MUGU or even WITT, ALLER or KERB. kerb has played best lately but i dont trust her. bh of 3q looks easy to halep and bacs, winner makes QF vs whomever. ... 4Q: top half: MAKA, KEYS, BOUCH look best, but none of them has played well recently. the rest are sorry lot, so almost sure that one of those three will come out of that eigth. in bottom half, you have KVIT as #2 seed and boottom bookend to serena. last year KVIT destroyed bouch, who hasnt been the same since. so we know what she can do. but will she? SVIT and ARAD are the other two names in the final eighth, and they will play each other before kvit.

QF PROJECTION: SERENA-AZAR; SHARAP-KAPLIS; BH: MUGU-HALEP; MAKA-KVIT

SEMIS PROJECTION: AZAR-KAPLIS; HALEP-KVIT

FINALS: HALEP OVER KAPLIS

WINNER: HALEP

FUTURE: 200/3650 halep to win Wimb.
FUTURE: 200/12000 kaplis to win Wimb.
 
Last edited:

TennisTapir

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 13, 2013
1,285
4
0
[2015 cum. -1048]

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
futures and previews...
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

WIMBLEDON 2015

GOING IN: halep all the way to 19.25. boy, i thought the days we'd seen anything over 10 for her as a future were long gone. kaplis at 61 has also fallen back, which i see no reason for. that kaplis is value if you want a long shot.

PREVIEW: quarter by quarter. FIRST QUARTER. only CIB and VENUS stand between SERENA and the QF. In the bottom half of the 1Q is IVIC, VANUT, BENC and AZAR, if she's healthy, and NAV. serena looks good thru all that to the SEMIS, so long as AZAR is not healthy and CIB doesnt come out of nowhere off injury. The rest she can handle pretty easily. if azar is healthy, she's the biggest threat to serena ...

SECOND QUARTER: top half looks sure to be SHARAP, against probably PVIC to see who makes QF. easy road for SHARAP to QF, very easy. bh of 2q, fourth eighth, is KAPLIS, my fav longshot, vs SAFA or if she falls, STEPH or even STRYC (who plays Steph in first round). Again, nothing real tough. ...

THIRD QUARTER: top half 3q is where someone will get hot, it's pretty open. could be top seed WOZ or MUGU or even WITT, ALLER or KERB. kerb has played best lately but i dont trust her. bh of 3q, the sixth eighth, looks easy to halep and bacs, winner makes QF vs whomever. ...

FOURTH QUARTER: top half: MAKA, KEYS, BOUCH look best, but none of them has played well recently. the rest are sorry lot, so almost sure that one of those three will come out of the seventh eighth. in bottom half, the eighth eighth, you have KVIT as #2 seed and tournament bookend to serena. last year KVIT destroyed bouch, who hasnt been the same since. so we know what she can do. but will she? SVIT and ARAD are the other two names in the final eighth, but they will play each other before kvit.

QF PROJECTION: SERENA-AZAR; SHARAP-KAPLIS; MUGU-HALEP; MAKA-KVIT
SEMIS PROJECTION: AZAR-KAPLIS; HALEP-KVIT
FINALS: HALEP OVER KAPLIS

[FUTURE: 200/3650 halep to win Wimb.]
[FUTURE: 200/12000 kaplis to win Wimb.]

In one sense Wimb is THE tournament; in another sense it's just another tournament. Who wins it? Who wins other tournaments: serena, halep, kaplis, bacs. and maybe sharap or kvit. anyone else would be a freak victory, pretty much. look for a power player getting hot. azarenka, if healthy, or even mugu or gio. all the names i mentioned are worth buying futures for, depending on your preferences. i'll stick with halep and add kaplis. and hedge it off on serena. this is the first time we've seen true value on halep in a long, long time. kaplis is STILL underrated by my estimation. she has the second-best serve in game. she plays better under pressure. those are huge things, and characteristic of serena. halep is an excellent player who has sucked the second quarter of the year, but is a threat to turn it back on, and has a pretty easy draw. bacs is a very defensible choice, she has been on long winning streaks, and had a set on serena deep in the french. i always like azarenka myself as she has power and control.


adding:

[FUTURE: 100/1800 bacs to win 3rd quarter]
[FUTURE: 100/400 halep to win 3rd quarter]
[FUTURE: 100/1400 maka to win 4th quarter]
[FUTURE: 100/6600 svit to win 4th quarter]

serious underestimation of how good svit is. maka has been shit but is still a good player. the lines are based on assumption this is last year. but what if kvit is what she has been this year, injured and not much? then someone like maka or svit could easily take this section.

[FUTURE: 100/800 kaplis to win 2nd quarter]
[FUTURE: 200/250 sharap to win 2nd quarter]


//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
the tournament begins...
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

2015-06-29. M.

100/375 7p: cib(htuch), nav(osta), azar(kveit), sharap(konta), kaplis(falc), bacs(goerg), halep(cep). LOSS. [2015 cum. -1148]

?I didn?t play tennis for about five days, which was very good,? she explained. ?I relax myself. I took the pressure off of my head. I just said that I have to enjoy (tennis) again, just to work hard every day. So I started to work harder more. Now I feel pretty confident that I can play good tennis again.?

Despite having achieved her best results on other surfaces, Halep believes her aggressive game is well suited to grass. ?I like to play fast, to play close to the baseline, just to take the ball very quickly,? she said. ?I play my style. I play with confidence. I improved a lot in my serve so (that) can help me now on grass.?

halep keeps saying her serve is improved but i havent seen it.

100/190 stryc (steph). LOSS. [2015 cum. -1248]

2015-06-30. T.

100/249 5p: svit(doi), mugu(lep), halep(cep), gio(peir), bacs(goerg). LOSS.
FUTURE: 200/3650 halep to win Wimb. LOSS.
FUTURE: 100/400 halep to win 3rd quarter. LOSS. [2015 cum. -1648]

unbelievable loss by halep. she has lost all her confidence, is now routinely bossed by shit players like cepelova. expected her to bounce back but she continues to play as she has all quarter. it is truly amazing an uninjured unaffected halep can't find a way to overcome a player who is not even in the top 100.

FUTURE: 200/12000 kaplis to win Wimb. LOSS.
FUTURE: 100/800 kaplis to win 2nd quarter. LOSS. [2015 cum. -1948]

my picks continue to suck as kaplis goes down. she has never made past second round. vandeweghe playing as well as i've seen, serving aces. i have an unposted 4p for about even money today T on: azar, venus, mlad and diyas.

2015-07-02. Th.

250/266 5p: gio(arrua), bacs(soler), maka(ryb), arad(tomlj), kvit(nara). LOSS. [c. -2198]
FUTURE: 100/1400 maka to win 4th quarter. LOSS.
FUTURE: 100/6600 svit to win 4th quarter. LOSS. [c. -2398]

watch out it's raining if you dont want money tied up. maka continues to destroy my year, after whipping halep in QF. she hasn't hit the ball inside the lines since that match. up 53 s2 cant force third. ryb looking very strong.

100/116 8p: nad(brown), fed(quer), wawr(verd), bacs(soler), arad(tomlj), kvit(nara), serena(watson), sharap(begu). LOSS. [c. -2498]

like all these easy except for wawr. bacs playing the way halep used to, hitting lines, inside outing, bossing the play with ease. lisicki heating up. going to be a real battle with bacs next round, but i think bacs wins it. bacs has to beat lis then kerb/gio to win quarter, get me back toward zero. definitely possible. i dont think lisicki can keep ball on court as well as bacs, and that will prove the difference. these big power players like lis and kerb really like grass and have good history. amazing how kerb turned it around, she's a real threat if she's not making UE.

100/17 venus (krunic). WIN.
100/205 diyas (pvic). WIN.
100/315 mlad (azar). LOSS.
100/235 mattek (benc). LOSS.
100/123 steph (safa). LOSS.

100/118 bacs (lis). WIN.
100/62 ryb (govort). LOSS
100/24 keys (maria). WIN.
100/179 gio (woz). LOSS. [c. -2634]

[FUTURE: 100/2200 azar to win wimb.]
[FUTURE: 100/8000 bacs to win wimb.]
[FUTURE: 100/160 serena to win wimb.]
[FUTURE: 100/1025 sharap to win wimb.]

very interesting, bacs performs as expected. just better player, misses less, knows how to win. beats lis easily. when kvit loses, that half of draw really opens up, and the futures on mugu and bacs look very very good. of course, they will most likely meet each other in the qf. which i need to cash 19/1. bacs can win this whole thing. so it's looking like serena, azar or sharap in the final vs bacs or mugu.

100/94 ger-eng 3 over. LOSS.
100/65 ger-eng 1 over first half. LOSS.
100/2300 ger 3 eng 2. LOSS. [c. -2934]

100/26 serena (venus). WIN.
100/39 azar (benc). WIN.
100/30 bacs (nicu). WIN.
100/23 wawr (goff). WIN. [c. -2815]

[FUTURE: 200/2000 wawr to win Wimb.]

[FUTURE: 100/1525 azar to win Wimb.]
[FUTURE: 100/620 sharap to win Wimb.]
[FUTURE: 400/480 serena to win Wimb.]
[FUTURE: 100/2500 mugu to win Wimb.]
[FUTURE: 100/1800 bacs to win Wimb.]
[FUTURE: 100/1575 woz to win Wimb.]


it becomes very interesting... i need bacs all ways. she should beat nicu fairly easily, as the number suggests. mugu-woz should be a struggle. if mugu isn't tired from other day, have to think her power tells. surely this isn't the year a woz or arad wins a major? it would be funny if arad rebounded from her lowest lows to her highest high. just cant see someone with no power winning - power at least to the halep/bacs level. have to think serena and azar meet. dont see venus beating serena. benc has really been playing well, but dont see her beating azar, who is a champ who knows how to win. benc is becoming that but azar's power and control should see her thru to match with serena. sharap should see off doughty diyas, and face up against safa or coco, either of which she should be able to handle. keys should be govort but wouldnt be surprised if didnt happen. arad favored over jj, but i will lay olff all these matches until the winner plays bacs in semis, i hope. so my r16 winners are: serena, azar, sharap, safa, mugu, bacs, keys, janko. ... for the men's why not take a shot on wawr. this guy now knows he can win. he proved he's not a fluke, he's still hungry is my guess. then again maybe djok blows him away this time. the way to play him is on future and then hedge vs djok and in final. so long as he's over 10:1 there's room.

2015-07-07. T.

100/23 sharap (coco). WIN.
100/120 bacs (mugu). LOSS.

FUTURE: 200/250 sharap to win 2nd quarter. WIN.
FUTURE: 100/1800 bacs to win 3rd quarter. LOSS.
FUTURE: 100/8000 bacs to win Wimb. LOSS.
FUTURE: 100/1800 bacs to win Wimb. LOSS. [c. -2942]

FUTURE: 100/1575 woz to win Wimb. LOSS.
FUTURE: 100/2200 azar to win wimb. LOSS.
FUTURE: 100/1525 azar to win Wimb. LOSS. [c. -3242]

bacs cant quite do it, had chances. sharap overcomes coco as expected.

FUTURE: 200/2000 wawr to win Wimb. LOSS. [c. -3442]

FUTURE: 100/1025 sharap to win wimb. LOSS.
FUTURE: 100/620 sharap to win Wimb. LOSS. [c. -3642]

FUTURE: 100/160 serena to win wimb. WIN.
FUTURE: 400/480 serena to win Wimb. WIN.
FUTURE: 100/2500 mugu to win Wimb. LOSS. [c. -3102]

futurers are wasted except on serena... still think the 19/1 on bacs to win QF was a real good deal. she had her shot. serena should beat mugu without too much trouble.
 
Last edited:

TennisTapir

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 13, 2013
1,285
4
0
[c. -3102]

/////////////////////////////////////////////
after wimbledon...
/////////////////////////////////////////////

2015-07-13

100/115 barthel (bert). WIN. [c. -2987]
 
Last edited:

TennisTapir

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 13, 2013
1,285
4
0
will be making some plays again, will keep posts to reasonable size, but adding plays day by day within the same post. ideally one post a week, but will vary.

2015-08-12. W.

100/97 2p halep, arad. WIN.

over janko and goerg. ... goes as expected.

100/103 2p halep, azar. LOSS.

over kerb and err.

100/50 halep (arad). WIN.

100/29 halep (err). WIN.

halep playing like halep of old, hitting shots just inside line and not missing. should give serena a real test.

200/104 halep (benc). LOSS.

beating serena is surely enough for benc, not to mention playing a much later match. i expect halep to win this fairly easily. ... benc showed great confidence, halep got intimidated, clenched up, all her shots hitting service line. but still came thru second set, then appeared exhausted. she seems to tire so easily this year, without really playing that much. it has to be more emotional with her than physical. she is a big shot in romania, and that adoration can flip easily with poor results. anyway, this tournament showed her playing the best she has for a long time. begin to see the return of the shots that took her to #2 inside a year.

100/87 bacs (keys). LOSS.

cin begins. bacs is a winner, should find a way, good return for the better player. ... flat wrong. best i've seen keys play, very impressive.

100/214 nav (steph). LOSS. [c. -3311]

100/157 3p steph halep kaPlis. WIN.

over barthel, mlad, babos.

100/14 azar (pavlyu). LOSS.

100/50 halep (pvic). WIN.

100/504 4p svit serena halep janko. WIN.

over safa ivic pavly schmied

100/67 serena halep. WIN.

over svit janko

NEW HAVEN

100/118 2p bacs kaplis. LOSS.

over garcia and babos. ... bacs doesnt show up.

100/51 kaplis (babos). WIN. [c. -2681]

great come from behind win by kaplis.

[FUTURE: 100/500 kaplis to win New Haven.]

100/105 3p kaplis woz arad. WIN. [c. -2576]

over sav vinci corn. ... just snaked it, with two easy wins and woz skirting by in the third. i expect kaplis to get stronger moving thru after tough opener she could easily have lost. but she has tough opponents to get thru to win it, for sure.

100/54 kaplis (tsur). LOSS.
100/228 2p kaplis kvit. LOSS.

FUTURE: 100/500 kaplis to win New Haven. LOSS. [c. -2876]

100/120 kvit (arad). WIN. [c. -2756]

over tsur and arad. think arad is false fav. kvit handled excellent keys very easily in sets two and three and should be able to get buy arad, and the odds on is very nice. i think we're headed for kaplis-kvit final. ... nope, kaplis not involved in this match. she does this a fair amount, makes it hard to bet on her.

100/120 kvit (woz). WIN. [c. -2636]

100/115 FIRST HALF IND -' (stl) 2.15. WIN. [c. -2521]

i like ind ML, +1, +2 and 19' over TT, but going with them to win the first half, selling a half point or point to get the odds on. so far the O has not showed up for Ind, and i think it will tonight, at least in 1h.
 
Last edited:

TennisTapir

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 13, 2013
1,285
4
0
[c. -2521]

US OPEN

PREVIEW: PROJECTED QF:

- no way not to pick serena to win this. go for a QF winner if you want a future for non-serena.

1Q: kaplis benc/venus to make QF vs serena. serena has to beat lucic, steph then keys to make QF: SERENA-KAPLIS.
2Q: sharap vs svit/maka to make QF vs janko/cib/ivic. QF: SVIT-CIB
3Q: mugu/kvit vs woz: QF: KVIT-WOZ
4Q: azar vs bacs/halep: QF: AZAR-HALEP

SEMIS: SERENA-SVIT, KVIT-AZAR. FINAL: SERENA OVER AZAR.

serena has a fairly tough road early, with lucic, steph and keys. she definitely could lose if she lets down. but that's not likely to happen, it hasn't all year. sharap has done nothing lately, and she can't beat serena anyway. maka hasnt done shit this year except cost me huge bucks. i prefer the steadier, younger, hungrier SVIT to come through. i think CIB makes some noise, as a semi-underdog, making the qf. for the bottom half KVIT has been hot lately, and knows how to win. showed real will in new haven. if she's up for another tournament, she will do well. if not, she'll lose early. mugu hasn't played much lately, she could come thru this quarter if she's in form, with her power. on the bottom, i think halep makes the QF, and she seems to be peaking for second time this year, but i like azar's power to see her thru to final.

FUTURE: 1000/870 serena to win US Open
FUTURE: 100/4000 muguruza to win US Open
FUTURE: 100/8800 kaplis to win US Open
FUTURE: 300/3900 halep to win US Open
FUTURE: 100/12500 bacs to win US Open
FUTURE: 10/2000 cib to win US Open
FUTURE: 10/1500 maka to win US Open

FUTURE: 100/1600 bacs to win 4Q

[all futures added at end of tournament]


thought: i like to bet on people who have proven they can win tournaments - serena, bacs, halep, kaplis - especially in the year in question. it really doesn't take many upsets for someone like bacs to suddenly find herself in the final. if serena has a bad day to keys or steph or even lucic, boom, she's gone and it's anyone's game. at least a dozen people could win it if serena bows out. if kvit shows some desire, and makes it through her first two matches, i will put some future on her. azar is the big risk i'm taking here.

someone else's preview
http://mootennis.com/2015/08/30/womens-us-open-2015-draw-predictions/

2015-08-31. M.

200/46 kaplis (tat). LOSS. [c. -2721]

kaplis wins 3 games, should be embarrassed by that performance. 2 straight flat, no-energy performances from her. it's easy to say she's overplayed this season, but she's just as likely to play as usual next match, so who knows.


NFL PROPOSITIONS

1000/940 was wins over 6

100/700 was makes playoffs

100/320 was wins over 7'
100/254 was wins over 7
100/150 was wins over 6'
100/63 was wins over 5'


[added at end of season] [futures: -1720]

- in my view, the media, for the usual reasons, are completely misrepresenting the situation in washington. the problem in dc is griffin. and secondarily, the owner who demands he be played for political rather than football reasons. so long as the coach is allowed to start the superior players, dc will be just fine. i would not be surprised at all if dc goes 8-8 or better. the challenge is they have a difficult schedule, not that they are a lousy team. look at these preseason games: the media simply blame the line for any problem griffin has. but when mccoy or cousins come in, the offense moves just fine. i predict dc goes 8-8.

US OPEN D2 & D3 (Tue and Wed)

100/46 3p azar halep cib. WIN. [c. -2675]

over hrad erak peg.

100/886 10p azar halep cib svit venus gio bacs err mugu kvit. LOSS. [c. -2775]

over hrad erak peg kanepi falc larss stryc hibi witt sieg

100/120 keys venus svit cib. WIN. [c. -2655]

over smit falc kan peg

100/189 9p wawr sock andsn nad berd isner azar kvit halep. LOSS.

over chung bemel kraj fog melz youzh wick gibbs kat-bond

100/320 10p wawr sock andsn nad berd isner azar kvit halep mugu. LOSS. [c. -2855]

over chung bemel kraj fog melz youzh wick gibbs kat-bond konta

2015-08-04. F.

100/299 2p: cib keys. LOSS. [c. -2955]

over bouch and arad. take the power players. free odds on for keys because she hasn't beaten arad before, but if she plays as she has she will win. same with cib. bouch has a terrible record this year, if cib plays as she normally does she'll win. great returns individually, even better together.

100/2617 6P svit cib keys halep serena, redskins ML (mia). LOSS.
100/135 svit (maka). LOSS.

going to play progressive with svit, cib and keys, just keep betting till i'm in the money. maka at best is perhaps a little better than svit, but maka hasn't played her best more than 1-2x this year, and svit is rock-steady. ...naturally maka plays best all year. really fired up. i believe players play 2x as hard in these majors now because of the money involved. normally they dont care much.

200/2118 5p: skins halep serena cib keys. LOSS. [c. -3355]

over mia rog mattek bouch arad

100/120 keys (arad). WIN. [c. -3235]
[400/2255 serena halep skins keys]

mattek rogers miami arad. finally comes thru with keys, easy power win over arad. cib had every chance to beat bouch but couldn't. good bet, just lost. now just need skins.

i honestly believe the redskins over 6 wins at near even money is as good a bet as you'll find this football season. it's funny how griffin gets 25 seasons to prove himself, but 6 games is enough to conclude cousins is useless. every single fan and analyst out there is assuming he will continue to turn the ball over/throw INTs as he did in a few games in one season. i'd sure as hell bet on cousins to fix his problems before griffin's, which are physical. griffin cant run anymore and hasn't ever been able to read defenses. this latter is the reason most QB with other virtues wash out. there are only two people in DC who deserve blame. most goes to griffin - he hasn't been able to learn how to play the position. second, the owner for sticking by him too long. the rest - blaming shanahan and the coaches is ridiculous. it's just the usual political PC applied to sports. now that the better QB is allowed to play, the results will improve. i will always believe if they had held an open competition from year 1, cousins would have won it and griffin wouldn't have made the field. the person whose career has been messed up isn't griffin but cousins. that's the owner's prerogative, but it's foolish. perhaps now he sees he has been wrong. listening to these leftist liars talk about how griffin was left in behind a terrible line. he played 4 series. in week 3. did the line suddenly improve when he left and cousins and mccoy moved the team easily? there just isn't any responsibility or honesty in ANY sport journalism. it's the same bias you get in politics, mutatis mutandis. every excuse is made for one type, and every blame leveraged against another. the key here is we can take advantage of this, and the way to translate the insight into money is to take the season wins over - any of the number, but i say 6 at near even money is a great value. the chances are that cousins will be better than he was, and he has people to get the ball to. the redskins will win their share of games.

100/1360 5p stanford kvit konta halep skins. LOSS.

over nwes schmied pvic rogers miami

cooley
http://www.hogshaven.com/2015/8/27/9211185/hogs-haven-interviews-chris-cooley

the key to political profits in the nfl is understanding why certain things are played the way they are - always. where the public is misled, the wise can see thru the lies to the truth, the profitable truth. this is not the only way to beat the nfl, but it's a way that offers some good opportunities here and there. probably the best way to beat the NFL, and the starting point for analysis, is looking for teasers, 2-team teasers. they used to say teasers are sucker bets, but by 2015, betting the nfl side is far closer to a sucker bet than the 2-TEAM teaser. right now, because of media hype, the public thinks washington is a worse team than it actually is. and the season wins OVER is the way to take advantage of that misperception.

100/35 azar halep. WIN.

over lep and lis. everything as expected. going to be serena, kvit, azar or halep who wins this, probably in that order. possibly with azar/kvit reversed. i dont think halep can win, her lack of aggression and confidence were on display again today vs lisicki whom she very nearly let get away with a win. she doesn't trust herself enough to hit the ball as she did when on the rise. she used to hit the ball both harder and more consistently. she's still better than most, but the margin is reduced. when she plays someone truly confiden, and with power, she will come out second best. i dont think she can beat any of the three i mentioned. not to mention she has some kind of leg problem.

probably the true women's ranking is 1) serena, 2) kvit at her best, 3) azar at her avg match form when healthy, 4) halep. it's great they're all in the final 6.

great win by halep. she played as well in parts as she has since her french open final vs sharap, perhaps her finest performance since making top 10. semis were delayed till friday by rain. i think this will help halep in final. surely halep and serena will meet.

Remember how last year they said Dallas had worst defense in league, was going to be terrible. This year smiilar garbage about Redskins.

"I respect him as much as I respect anybody that I've ever met," Redskins defensive leader Ryan Kerrigan said. "He's just a good man with good morals who lives the right way. Those kinds of qualities stick out more than anything.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap30...y-to-make-good-on-latest-chance-with-redskins

The accurate view is that all Cousins has to do is not throw INTs and the skins then become above average on offense. And they have a decent defense, at least the front. There's no way they are not a .500 team if Cousins has cleared up his problem. He hasn't even started 10 games in NFL. It makes more sense to think that he has fixed his problems than that he will repeat. Now, if he had multiple seasons of the same thing under his belt, then that would be the way to guess. But I think he will take advantage of his second real chance to lead. All interviews say he's just focused on one play to the next, handing the ball off, making good passes, not trying to do too much. This approach should work. The Skins are being RIDICULOUSLY UNDERRATED going into this season. ... Of course good morals doesn't guarantee good play - but in my view if Cousins is smart enough to see and avoid media mistakes, unlike Griffin, then he is surely able to IDENTIFY what he was doing wrong in his first opportunity. So for him not to succeed now, in his second chance, you have to believe he is not capable of fixing the problem. I think he is. I think that's the way to bet. I think it's an easy call. The brilliant and abused Mike Shanahan agrees with me. We'll see very shortly, probably have our answer in week one.

TENNIS: really think the extra hours will help halep, not so much in semi but in final. no way she should lose to pennetta, but that's how penn always goes further than she should: she can't do much positive against the top 10, but if they let down, she's there to exploit it. it should be serena and halep in final, and it should be a good match. i expect serena to win, but i think halep gets a small but real bit of help from the rain postponement.

off the charts good from pennetta, much better than i've ever seen her play. halep played well, continued her newfound old aggression, but was blown off court. didnt think penn had it in her.

very disappointing year in tennis futures, but perhaps some hope from it. i had the aus open absolutely nailed. one -300 win would have made me a considerable amount of money, but it didn't happen. we'll try it again next year, and this time perhaps it will come through. now, on to nfl, mostly.

[c. -5520 - only the skins parlay open, reposted below]

400/2255 serena halep skins keys. LOSS.

need was over mia to complete parlay. wk1 nfl.

100/268 wawr (fed). LOSS. [c. -5720]

why not? won on it last time. both are peaking. wawr is capable, the price is great. ... nope, fed on all cylinders.

100/2308 mich nd byu penn fed was. LOSS.
100/97 mich nd penn. WIN.
100/39 mich nd. WIN.
100/125 byu (bois). WIN.
100/117 fed (djok). LOSS.
240/100 penn (vinci). WIN.

over ores va bois vinci djok mia

article about cousins training his brain

?It?s kind of an abstract thing, but I call it brain performance,? Cousins said ? ?I see it as the next frontier because you look at weightlifting in the 1950s and ?60s, not every football player was lifting weights; they weren?t sure about the benefit it would give you. Now everybody has a strength coach; everybody lifts weights. And I see brain training kind of being that next thing. I just want to maximize what I?ve got.?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/spor...1-b488d231bba2_story.html?tid=pm_sports_pop_b

disappointing outcome. was dominates 1h, moves ball pretty easily, but cant put up points. kills itself with penalties as mia turns it up 2h. cousins looked pretty good, did throw INTs, but moved ball well through air, and running game was generally good. but the penalties were terrible and must be cleaned up.

155/100 fed-djok 45' UNDER. WIN. [c. -5459]

END 2015

[will wrap it up there as not much tennis left. will start new record for NFL in next post, in this thread. will pick up tennis again at the start of the new year. this year went same as others: start off doing really well, then get progressively worse after french open]
 
Last edited:

kellyindallas

Registered User
Forum Member
Apr 28, 2006
1,552
32
0
Wow, caught the last set of the Serena/Vinci match. Vinci totally cowgirl-ed up, impressive. thoughts on the final?
 

TennisTapir

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 13, 2013
1,285
4
0
Wow, caught the last set of the Serena/Vinci match. Vinci totally cowgirl-ed up, impressive. thoughts on the final?

italians are tough fuckers mentally, a lot of them - errani as well. and you see this in soccer too. they play smart and don't give up. they dont get too high, they just keep going. vinci and penn are seasoned pros. but vinci's win was more serena's just being a little off. this was basically a 1/30 time that serena doesn't come back down a break. no real meaning to it other than she cant win all the majors in one year. if they played 100x, serena would win 98 of them, most likely. but for penn halep - that was all penn. she played better than i have ever seen her play. halep was playing WELL, she didn't fold or freeze like she has in other major matches. she is starting to get back to the aggressive confident player that rose to #2, but penn was off the charts today. serena would have had to play her best to beat penn today. penn will probably play a little worse in final, but should beat vinci. but vinci gets credit for not yielding to serena's tiresome screams, which is kind of similar to the way rosie o'donnell intimidates people into laughing as a standup. plenty of people get ahead of serena, but they get passive when she starts screaming and coming back. vinci held her nerve. i've seen vinci play that well before, nothing remarkable, just the accumulated weight of it finally bringing serena down. vinci gets credit less for great play than great psychology, because the crowds in nyc are basically 100% for serena (or venus) against everybody else. at one point, vinci made a great shot and just appealed to the crowd to give her some respect, and it worked. too many players just give in to crowd pressure and serena screaming.
 
Last edited:

TennisTapir

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 13, 2013
1,285
4
0
[okay starting afresh, calling this the 2016 record... will be mostly NFL until new year, so will repost my futures/propositions]

[2016 record. c. 0]

NFL PROPOSITIONS

1000/940 was wins over 6

100/700 was makes playoffs

100/320 was wins over 7'
100/254 was wins over 7
100/150 was wins over 6'
100/63 was wins over 5'

LIVE 110/100 50 under (3-0 1q 6m) phi-atl. PUSH.

cant imagine how much money the books made with phi and min going down, AND both unders catching. normally these first two MNF games are very high scoring, but not this year. bradford looks like the same old stiff he's always been, whereas foles is throwing the ball deep. cousins looked pretty good, and morris ran great, but terrible INT drops and more than that stupid penalties did WAS in. bad loss because this was not just a winnable game but a game washington should have won.

200/148 2t (7' pt) kc +4' was +11. LOSS. [c. -200]

vs den and stl

100/232 4p psu PIT CIN NO. LOSS.

over rut sf sd tb, all ML.

200/320 5t (11pt) no +' pit +4 cin +8 was +14 gb +8. LOSS.

over tb, sf, sd, stl, sea. pathetic. made at least one pick per game. got every single one right - except NO.

340/200 cin (sd). WIN. [c. -300]

100/245 dal (phi). WIN.
100/100 dal +6' (phi). WIN. [c. +45]

230/200 gb -3 (sea). WIN.
326/200 gb ML (sea). WIN. [c. +445]

220/200 IND tt 26' OVER (jet). LOSS. [c. +225]

100/153 was (gia). LOSS. [c. +125]

see no reason not to take was on ML. if it loses, probably the points wont matter. i also teased it to 11 with az +1 but not listing that. in my opinion this game was considerably tweaked by the refs, more than others will talk about, and that's the main takeaway, which will be turned to profit when the two play again. the refs set the tone on the opening drive, aborting what was a solid start. that's what actually happened, in my view, but most will not see it that way. the refs tweak results in NFL all the time, that's what makes it easier to beat than other sports. i'm afraid i let me emotions get the better of me, wanting to see cousins do well. gia was the right side ONLY because it was foreseeable the refs would provide help.

400/1840 9t (11pt) (fri) bois +11, stan -2. (sat) psu -4, oks +8. (sun) CIN +13', OAK +14, IND +8, DAL +11, AZ +4. WIN. [revised to 1460 due to dal push] [c. +1585]

over va, ores. sds, tex. BAL, CLE, TEN, ATL, SF.

200/378 4p phi-jet 47 UNDER, NE, AZ, SEA. WIN. [c. +1963]

only really like ML and teasers in nfl, in my opinion straight sides in nfl are closer to sucker plays.

good calls, only the dal was even close. rest would have won straight up. lot of years i muddle around the first 6-7 weeks, then explode. some years, like this one, i'm right about most games from week one, and then struggle in midseason, improve again at end. those are two common patterns re nfl.

100/120 venus (arad). WIN. [c. +2083]
 
Last edited:

TennisTapir

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 13, 2013
1,285
4
0
[c. +2083]

NFL WEEK FOUR

100/400 3p kerber (coco), bal (pit), (sunday) was (phi). WIN.

500/500 bal -3 (pit). PUSH.
200/606 bal -10' (pit). LOSS. [c. +2283]

i think this will be an easy win for baltmore. normally i would play the ML, but the return has eroded to the point i consider it too little. so i risk the -3, which i do not advise or normally do myself. here i think it's safe. because i see a bal blowout, due to injury to roeths. this is the type of game where you sell as many points as they let you, go for a big return. i'm counting on vick scoring points for baltimore thru turnovers as well as flacco improving his play with some TD passes. something like a 31-10 is what i expect here. even if i'm wrong, i expect bal to pull this out late by 3-7 points.

looking forward to the phi-was game. bradford continues to play poorly. i think this may be the most important game of cousins' career. is he capable of being a serious leading qb in this league or is he just another spotty backup? i think this game may be a turning point. phi is utterly beatable. bradford sucks. any kind of pressure on him, he will do nothing. he did little last week against the jets. washington can and should win this game. but cousins needs to lead. it doesn't matter if he throws INTs, he needs to lead TD drives and particularly if the game is on the line, he needs a winning TD drive. no more coming close. he needs to play with controlled desperation and make this win happen for was. the problem is was lost that first game vs mia which it completely should have won, that makes this game much bigger. was has potential, but if it's to go even .500, it has to win games like this against mediocre teams. phi is mediocre with bradford at qb; no scheme in the world can overcome inferior qb play like you get from bradford and sanchez. they are both avg qbs, whereas i think cousins has the potential to be better than avg, but he needs to show that right here. if was goes to 1-3, the calls will become howls, and it's all likely to fall apart. i think cousins will come thru and i think dc will win. but we need to see some desperation play from cousins, really going all out and making the result happen. personally i dont think bradford is as good as sanchez. there's an air of uncertainty and tentativeness i always feel watching bradford, it never dissipates. sanchez is just a good solid mediocre player. without pressure, he can complete passes. under pressure, he does nothing. dc has the better team - IF it can stop killing itself with penalties.

200/3861 6p: (thur) BAL, (fri) byu, (sat) ala, osu, (sun) MIA, WAS. LOSS. [c. +2083]

well i strayed from my principle of avoiding sides in nfl, and sticking w teasers/MLs/parlays, and nearly got burned. flacco played poorly, and that was the difference in this. they were on way to blowout when he turned 14-3 into 7-10 with a terrible pass, completely turned the game around. very lucky to escape with a push.

200/200 3t (9pt): (sat) ala +8, (sun) MIA +9, WAS +11'. LOSS.

228/7698 8p: (sat) nwes, tcu, ok, ala, oks, (sun) MIA, WAS, GB. LOSS [c. +1561]

all ML on 8p.

everything turns out ok on sat. now for mia and was. the mia game, i think people are exaggerating how bad mia is. i watch every game, imo the jets game will turn on jet inability to score. mia will score a few. mia is familiar with the london trip, jet are not. mia will win 17-7, i predict. fitzp cant do squat without decker to throw to.

HEDGE 300/553 2p: JET, PHI. LOSS. [c. +1261]

ugh, a rare total misread on mia, plus was wrong about decker, my bet was based on him not playing. bad mistake.

was game goes as i think, cousins comes thru, great relief all around. mia lays egg to prevent +10000 day.

270/100 bacs (d-m). WIN. [c. +1361]

Football Notes: season is shaping up nicely. dalton and ryan continue to win. the time to bet against them soon approaches. dont kid yourself that they've changed. neither of them can handle pressure, they just haven't seen it yet. almost surely will be teasing was at atl this week. and remember...the NFL is the easiest league to beat because it gets the most publicity. that means it gets the most lies told about it. we're seeing that play out with the washington redskins. you know what the fact is? as i've said before: griffin 3 retarded cousins' development. that's how it will be seen when all is said and done. cousins was better suited to the pro game from day one, and it was politics alone that prevented the owner from seeing this and the media from acknowledging it. the coaches tried to point it out, and in exchange were personally and viciously abused. it's precisely the pattern you see in politics proper. and for the same reasons and agenda.

100/80 bacs (err). WIN.

was on bacs over nav last night. both started year great, have sucked in recent months, just lately began reheating. figured it would be a duel, and easily went over 21. tonight, have to believe bacs can get by err. (actually this is not played until late night Thur)

100/582 2p hou (kc), ind-hou 35 UNDER. LOSS.

HINT: the qb of the future is a pocket passer with good judgment. And always will be.

more opinions, from watching games. foles plays smart. the mistake kelly made, and i do regard him as a genius, was dumping a sure thing for a ?. foles proved he could run the offense. bradford was speculative. kelly lost that bet. if he intended to use bradford in a trade for mariota or someone else, he lost that bet too. he gave up a bird in hand for 1.5 birds in the bush, and wound up with no birds at all. bradford and sanchez at best can win with a first-rate line and loads of time - but so can any random qb in the league. not only would foles have been better kept, i would stake a huge amount of money that tim tebow would have the eagles with a better record than bradford. it's insane he cant have a job when he won on the field. i guarantee you, if he had fantastic stats and LOST games, that's ALL you'd hear about him. that stats don't matter, it's all about your win loss record, that's the bottom line. because the talk against him was never driven by his abilities or lack thereof, his enemies simply promoted some dubious statistical deficiencies as a pretext for their hate. again, if you know politics, you know the agenda. i wont discuss it in detail here, as it's not the place, but we can profit from knowing what's actually going on, rather than what is advertised. in similar vein, we heard for months how horrible the skins are when in fact they have more talent than the average team, and we're seeing that played out. the only thing stopping them from 9 or 10 wins is their inability, so far, to stop making penalties. foles is similar to cousins in that he does not get the respect he's due. watch the game at az. he played very conservatively. but when he had to, he made a couple of excellent throws. he plays winning, smart football. he's not the best, but he is certainly above average - and who's to say what his limits are? you can't tell with him the way you can with others, not at this point. the media and loudmouths want to give up on type A after one bad game, while they won't give up on type B after multiple bad seasons. at some point, qbs become a known entity. i don't think foles is quite there, at least not in my mind. the way to beat the NFL is to believe what your eyes see and not what your ears hear from media.

250/100 IND TT 21' UNDER (hou). LOSS.

Just don't think hasselbeck can push it over this. hou turnovers might, but not ind offense. look for overexposed watt and his frustrated Texans to have a field day hassling the sick, lousy hoff i mean the beck.

more opinions based on watching games. bridgewater. i think minn is going right way, due to coach. bridge is ok mentally. he doesnt seem to make dumb decisions. he seems to be able to identify the right guy to throw to (ie, read defenses). he is small and rag armed, though. someone gets one arm on him, he goes down, he is definitely undersized. he's not a speedy fragile type like griffin used to be, he's just undersized and underpowered. he'll be a perfectly avg nfl qb, is my guess. if the line is good and the running is good, he'll do ok. if not, he's not going to make much of a difference. gurley: was more impressive for his thinking than his running, altho the media not mentioning this. he showed game-management awareness, which most players and even coaches lack. this is a huge thing. it is nearly as big as his size, power and quickness. it is very rare in the nfl. this bodes well for the rams.

100/95 LIVE hou 1.95 (ind) (hou 17-20 4m 3q). LOSS. [c. +991]

ugh...worst bets of year on hou game, and compounded live. just terrible team. if they ever get a good play it's called back on penalty. hasselback played much better than i expected. really thought this was about a 24-10 hou win. just amazing how often it happens you get up on your high horse and preach, and get smacked down that very same day. lose on bacs to complete the sweep. nope, give up on bacs too early, after 06 she comes back to 6375.

100/460 hou, cub, (sun) was +14'. LOSS.

200/240 hou (kc). LOSS. [c. +691]
500/490 cub (stl). LOSS. [c. +191]

more bad ones. worst is i lost a huge parlay, not posted here, on usc going down last night at -900.

100/176 met (lad). WIN. [c. +367]

back to football tomorrow. will see if i can work out a nice profitable high-paying parlay on college and pros.

100/1325 10t (8-pt): psu +1', duk -5', osu -23', bc +1, byu -1', mich -2, (sun) was +16, gb 53'U, sea +11, ne -2. LOSS.

104/1022 6p: (sat) md tt 12'UNDER, (sun), was, sea +3', ne, gia, sd. LOSS. [c. +163]

parlay based on was winning as big dog. have no doubt cousins will be able to put up points on atl, but was d is the ? with its corners injured. probably an over game. both sides should be able to pass all over each other. if you think ryan is significantly better than cousins, you're wrong. ryan is a small-game player who folds under pressure. he has retrieved some losses from completely unloseable situations, and he will do it again later this year. this game is basically a tossup, and there is no reason was doesn't end up with more points.

100/7582 9p: (sat) mich, byu, usa soccer pk [PUSH] (sun) bal, was, kc, sea, ne, gia. LOSS. [c. +63]

my quick reads on games: first, nfl is dueling qbs. that's a good way to think of it. chi-kc - i like smith more than cutler. yeah, cutler could win. but it's likelier smith does. he's more regular. sea-cin. i dont believe in dalton. i believe he folds under any pressure. this game is a tossup, so i'll take the dog of proven ability in pressure games. was-atl. this is a points battle between dumbass ryan and cousins. i see no reason this game doesn't end within a td, given that was corners are out. should be lots of passing and points. tease was and the over. i see it as 50-50, so better to take was on ML in a nice parlay, as above, and was in teaser, either sell points for odds on down to 3-4 or buy up to 14-17, depending on other stuff you like. i see no way this is a blowout for atl. they have not fully taken the reins off cousins yet. they have limited him to shorter, more controlled passing game, except when they've needed to come back or go on game winning drive, like last week. now we're going to see them open it up a little more, i think. i dont know what will happen, but the last thing i see is atl blowout. again, atl like cin is fake. people dont change their spots any more than leopards. ryan and dalton are at best second-tier qbs. cousins we dont fully know yet. jax-tb. not sure about this. tb may be able to win this with chris martin running. beyond that. id stay off it. no result would really surprise me. no phi. phi is at low point. but i've been fooled for last time on NO, they are not the team of old by a long stretch. the only thing keeping me off phi here is bradford. he only started seeming to play well last week after he was down a couple tds, and remember that was was missing its best corners. i like brees injured even better than bradford. apart from that, id be all over phi, but the qb is simply too big a position to ignore. remember: the same morons who praise kelly as a god when he wins over-crap on him when he loses. phi isn't that bad, just having some troubles. they will get better as season goes along, but will be limited by bradford, who is not the right qb. cle-bal. i bet more of the same as last week, with bal getting lucky win over pit. they should beat cle here. play ML. mccown isnt bad but bal should be better. just a parlay stuffer. stl-gb. i like stl teased. just an avg bet. the best play on this game is the under. tease the under, that's the best bet. buf-ten. i like ten here. this is like was - play ten on ML and tease it to 11 or 11'. i like ryan as personality but he's one of these guys that thinks saying something is same as doing it. you will see shitty, sloppy play from his teams, always. i trust mariota more than ttaylor. az-det. these are two qbs i cant stand, they're both fakes. cant bet this. stafford cant beat anyone good. palmer is exactly like dalton: he's good until you get pressure on him, then he's useless. if i had to, would tease arizona to +4' or 8' but better stayed away from. ne-dal. ne appears on mission, take them on ml. weeden's not the worst, but ne will outscore dal. den-oak. might tease oak up to 14' minimum. the line feels a little high but oak will probably give den some points thru turnovers. sf-gia. this should be an easy win by gia. gia is a basically solid team, and sf is just terrible, if you saw the gb game. just play gia on the ML and dont worry about it, perfect parlay, play, like bal. pit-sd. the line is low enough i'd just take sd on ML or teased to +4'. i dont trust rivers, but he's definitely better than vick. sd/rivers is a team one has to be very careful with, they appear reliable but are not.

150/240 5t (11pt): was +18', stl-gb56'UNDER, sea+14, ne+1, sd+7. WIN. [c. +303]

100/260 was (atl). LOSS.
100/158 sea (cin) LOSS.
100/37 bal (cle) LOSS.
100/24 kc (chi). LOSS. [c. -97]
100/26 ne (dal). WIN.
100/35 gia (sf) WIN.
100/53 sd (pit) LOSS. [c. -136]

also say atl has very easy schedule, and this is a game they can afford to lose, another factor pointing in was direction. i do like atl's new coach, but he won't be able to overcome ryan any more than kelly can overcome bradford or sanchez.

wow...my huge parlay had a real shot, only to be whipped by four late bad beats. i dont think ive ever seen that many in one place. was sea bal kc all looked to be winners, all flipped late. this is why teasers are the way to make money on nfl. was and sea never came close to losing on the teaser. nor did the gb under. in fact, the gb total came in higher than it should have due to a couple freak tds. what a tough loss for was, that one hurt. i really think they had the wrong game plan for their offense. they should have gone to deeper passes today, and they didnt. i think atl was vulnerable, but they didnt test them. was kind of the same with atl, oddly enough.

NFL WEEK 6

50/755 4p: NO (atl), lad +1' (met), (fri) Kaplis (babos), (sun) WAS (jet). LOSS. [c. -236]

did bradford look good? i think he looked mediocre. foles made mistakes. but gb defense is very good. the line for was at jet is too high. i expect was to win that. was should be 4-1 but hasnt quite learned how to win yet, which involves cutting the penalties and other forms of getting out of its own way. cousins is still a little up and down. for the most part he's good - moves ball well, good reads and passes. but he still is making some crucial mistakes. what's new is he has added ability to make closing drives, last two weeks. he's adding good things, and his bad things are no worse than they were, and actually somewhat better. phi should play better, but bradford is still making lots of dubious throws in between good ones.

100/7694 9p: (sat) nwes, ala, ga, tcu, mis, mich -7, met -1, (sun) cle, sea. LOSS.

100/407 3p: mich, ala, kc. LOSS. [c. -436]

WEEK SIX NFL NOTES: was is really banged up, missing half their line. i dont know. i still think they beat jet, who are not that good. fitzgerald isn't as good as cousins. if they get pressure on him, no problem. skins are really suffering from injuries though. this game should be a real fight and come down to the end, like so many dc has played. ... like ariz over pit. like kc over min. like cin over buf. pass on chi-det. like cle over den. manning is so rag-armed now it's not even funny, how he doesnt get every other floater intercepted i have no idea. tease this up to 11' and bet cle on the ML is how i'd play it. love that type of bet, that's the kind that wins in nfl. hou-jax pass. like mia on ML. getting rid of philbin should help, ten isn't that good. like sea to win easily over car. car is ok but sea at home should roll. like gb over sd, tease that one down to 1. bal-sf, pass, no idea. ne-ind, tease ind up to 17'. everyone thinks ne will crush 'em, but i dont know. i have faith in luck. this is a national spotlight game, SNF. it's exactly the type of game where the public is likely to get burned by ref-tweaking league marketers. i can see ind winning or losing by 1-2 points. again, tease ind to 17' and take some on ML. MNF gia phi really looking forward to this. i like gia teased to 11'.

100/157 cle (den). LOSS.
100/100 cin -3 (buf). WIN.
100/157 kc (min). LOSS.
100/310 was (jet). LOSS.
200/190 was 8 (jet). LOSS.
100/95 az -5' (pit). LOSS.
100/44 az (pit). LOSS. [c. -1036]

100/33 sea (car). LOSS.

100/7523 7p: cle, cin, was, az, mia, sea, gb. LOSS.

70/107 4t (9-pt) cle 12, was 18, mia 10, sea 1'. LOSS. [c. -1306]

was doing great first few weeks. soon as i start big posting here, straight down. it'll come back though.

NFL WEEK 7

150/99 2p bacs, kaplis. LOSS. [c. -1456]

over sieg and sevast

1000/230 bacs (sieg). LOSS. [c. -2456]

fuck this, last loss on kaplis this year. she is really difficult, not a come from behind type altho a great pressure player. if she's a liittle tired, no hope. have to be much better on her matches in 2016. going effectively all in on bacs. if she loses, going to be extremely selective in what i post here moving forward. will admit this bet on bacs is angry action bet the equivalent of hitting your tv and cursing at it (70s style). let's have some reality prevail for crissakes. ... and of course bacs blows 6341 and gets injured and quits.

last entry this post. new post when i make next pick...
 
Last edited:

TennisTapir

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 13, 2013
1,285
4
0
[c. -2456]

WEEK 7 NFL

100/63 kc (pit) WIN.
100/50 mia (hou) WIN.
100/69 was (tb). WIN.

have a rare intuition on washington. i think they will be down at ht and come back and win game. going to hit them hard at ht if they're trailing.

200/190 2H was -4' (tb). WIN. [c. -2084]

WEEK 8 NFL

1000/617 halep (arad). LOSS. [c. -3084]

this is real tennis. vs wind tennis. under perfect conditions, the better player has a better chance to win. halep has everything arad has +10%. she should beat her, whether it's close or not close. both are uninjured with full incentive, a good return for the better player, line has already moved significantly in halep's direction since last night and i expect that to continue, with line closing around 57 down from 67 (ret. on 100 bet).

wow halep falls to 1.5, even farther than i thought, figured 1.55 for lowest. ... nope. halep blows 51 in tb. feel like this is tenth time i've said this this year: i have never see the opponent play better in her life, and seen her hundreds of times. arad hit harder than ever seen and missed less. just ridiculous. arad had a strategy of max power and aggression and it worked. halep did not play smart or tough. repeatedly hitting the ball at arad when she had a winner hitting it away from her. she was afraid to go for her down the line shots, always hitting them in 1/4 court, and arad had the answer to this, hitting it into the diagnonal for a winner. so for me the tennis year ends as it began with a terrible loss - on halep. will probably be my last tennis bet of year, but will try it again in 2016. focused on nfl and bowl season until january rolls around.

100/2385 5p: ne, stl, cle +180, gb, ind +245. LOSS. [c. -3184]

trying this big-return parlay based around two big dogs. car is not that good, they will be losing or not covering multiple games the back half of the season, and that may well start this week. with cle, just think they win if manziel starts. i think manziel will be a good nfl qb if they let him play. just as phi would be doing better if kelly kept and used tebow.

arad follows up with 3set win over mugu. that is impressive. suggests her time with navratilova did help her, ultimately, even if it seemed unlikely based on results at the time. she hit harder than ive ever seen her vs halep and was not missing as she usually does when she goes for extra power that mugu and even halep have naturally. very impressive result. 2016 should be a great year for all these players, as we see kvit defeat sharap. hopefully azar will climb back to the top for a great top 7-8: serena, kvia, azar, halep, arad, mugu, kaplis.

100/233 5p wis, iowa, oks, nd, stanf. WIN.

110/100 LIVE oks +10' (tt) (0-17). WIN. [c. -2851]

10/4895 7p: tb, no, stl, cle, pit, sea, gb, ind. LOSS. [c. -2861]

130/364 7t (11pt) tb +20', no +8, stl +2, pit +11, sea +6, gb +8', ind +18'. LOSS.

400/3088 3p: sea, gb, ind. LOSS.

400/276 3t (11pt) sea +6, gb +8', ind +18'. LOSS. [c. -3791]

1000/2000 ind (car). LOSS.

500/515 ind +4 (car). WIN. [c. -4276]


NFL WEEK 9

100/1214 3p mia, gb, ind. LOSS.
250/288 4t (11pt) mia +15, was +26, gb +9, ind +15. LOSS.

100/730 2p was 2h ML, ind. LOSS. [c. -4726]

100/1897 3p: sf, gia, ind. WIN.
300/278 gia-tb 49 UNDER. LOSS. [c. -3129]

unbelievable bad beat on that under, as bad as you'll ever see. but nailed the parlay. notice also the 11pt teaser lost by one game by ONE point.


NFL WEEK 10

200/206 3p beck (chir), gb, ne. LOSS.

LIVE 150/207 chir (beck) HEDGE. WIN. [c. -3122]

i always think beck is getting better...and she never is! lucky to escape burn here.

200/210 4t (11pt) gt-vt 61' UNDER, buf-jet 53' UNDER, (sat) byu +4', (sun) was +11'. WIN.

really dont like much in pros this week. think the game tonight is low scoring due to injuries, mainly

100/1535 5p: aub -1, ala, osu, (sun) dal, cle. LOSS.

i believe in johnny football. i also like tb but i think dal wins here. also worth teasing both dal and cle. will post a teaser on sunday.

200/5254 6p: ala, mich, bay, (sun) dal, cle, sea. LOSS.

200/2855 5p: gb, dal, cle, ne, sea. LOSS. [c. -3412]

LIVE: 1000/105 was (no) (was 30-16) 3q 5m. WIN. [c. -3307]

500/597 2p ne, sea. LOSS. [c. -3807]


WEEK 13

200/230 4t (11pt): chi +3, sea +11, hou-buf 52' under, ne +1'. LOSS.
200/3900 8p: chi, cin, sea, car, bal+5, az, ne, was. LOSS. [c. -4207]


WEEK 14

i think this is one of the easier weeks to read. best bets are gb and ne.

1000/1349 3p sea, gb, ne. WIN.

100/1005 7p: sea, gb, ne, car, phi, kc, cle. WIN.

200/186 phi -1 (buf). WIN.
200/150 cle pk (sf). WIN.
200/208 pit (cin). WIN.

LIVE: 1000/455 was (chi) (7-0 start 2q). WIN.

1000/444 ne (hou). WIN. [c. -418]

[repost of my futures...]
NFL PROPOSITIONS

1000/940 was wins over 6

100/700 was makes playoffs

100/320 was wins over 7'
100/254 was wins over 7
100/150 was wins over 6'
100/63 was wins over 5'

[added at end of season]

- in my view, the media, for the usual reasons, are completely misrepresenting the situation in washington. the problem in dc is griffin. and secondarily, the owner who demands he be played for political rather than football reasons. so long as the coach is allowed to start the superior players, dc will be just fine. i would not be surprised at all if dc goes 8-8 or better. the challenge is they have a difficult schedule, not that they are a lousy team. look at these preseason games: the media simply blame the line for any problem griffin has. but when mccoy or cousins come in, the offense moves just fine. i predict dc goes 8-8.
 
Last edited:

TennisTapir

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 13, 2013
1,285
4
0
WEEK 14

i think this is one of the easier weeks to read. best bets are gb and ne.

1000/1349 3p sea, gb, ne. WIN.

100/1005 7p: sea, gb, ne, car, phi, kc, cle. WIN.

200/186 phi -1 (buf). WIN.
200/150 cle pk (sf). WIN.
200/208 pit (cin). WIN.

LIVE: 1000/455 was (chi) (7-0 start 2q). WIN.

1000/444 ne (hou). WIN. [c. -418]

[repost of my futures...]
NFL PROPOSITIONS

1000/940 was wins over 6

100/700 was makes playoffs

100/320 was wins over 7'
100/254 was wins over 7
100/150 was wins over 6'
100/63 was wins over 5'

[added at end of season]

- in my view, the media, for the usual reasons, are completely misrepresenting the situation in washington. the problem in dc is griffin. and secondarily, the owner who demands he be played for political rather than football reasons. so long as the coach is allowed to start the superior players, dc will be just fine. i would not be surprised at all if dc goes 8-8 or better. the challenge is they have a difficult schedule, not that they are a lousy team. look at these preseason games: the media simply blame the line for any problem griffin has. but when mccoy or cousins come in, the offense moves just fine. i predict dc goes 8-8.


WEEK FIFTEEN

BOWL SEASON

after tremendous week 14, time to make money on bowls and rest of the nfl. i will keep it all in this post thru week 17, then one last post for the playoffs.

200/58 ariz (nm). WIN.

everybody is on nm. all the touts, all mj. one thing i have seen over many years is that touts are way off on bowls because their information is stale by the time bowls are played. this would be the least afflicted by that problem, but still. dont like it when everyone is one way. ariz is better than NM, should win outright.

200/250 byu (ut). LOSS. [c. -560]

emotional game, no reason to take points rather than ML. the way to play this type of game, if you like the dog is, to take dog on ML and tease dog to 11'.

100/4198 8p: az, byu +7, jet, (sun) was +2', cin, ne, gia, sd -1. LOSS. [c. -660]

parlay based on gia upsetting car. i think was wins outright but if buf wins it may well be 1-2 points. normally i dont worry about points, but in this case i think points are valuable. i would much rather have 4' pts than 2' but was not allowed to buy up to 4'. if you can, do. too bad, easily could have won this. this type of bet is how you beat the nfl. in fact if had taken the points with gia would have won. as we saw it was a freak that it ended up within the number 9/10 this breaks one way or another, and in this game it actually broke both ways.

134/725 8t (9pt): az -', byu +11', jet +5', (sun) was +10, gia +13, cle +25', sd +9, cin +3'. WIN. [c. +65]

well fuck byu, been right on them almost every time this year. should have ignored public and gone with wittingham's record.

200/1147 4p: arkst, jet, (sun) ne, sd. LOSS. [c. -135]

jets squeak by. have to know how to interpret results: that game was completely altered by bogus ref calls in 1h, otherwise jet wins by 14-21 points. there is always risk in prime-time games like this, which is why i play ML or teaser mostly.

sunday...

really disliking that everybody has the same idea on the giants, that's not a good sign.

500/233 car (gia) HEDGE HEDGE HEDGE. WIN.

150/365 3p: car, kc, sd. WIN.

100/831 3p: kc -7, ne -15', sd -3. WIN. [c. +1294]

really going to be interesting to watch buf-was. buf has been consistently overrated. it is not that good a team because of its coach. endless penalties. was has had same problem in many games. but was is peaking. it will give max effort. it is well aware it has gone up and down, lost on road, not been able to tie wins together, and it will do all it can to win here. same reasoning as last week with phi over buf when most liked buf, except here we get an even better qb and team playing at home. buf always makes the crucial mistake, and likely will here too. close game with an edge to washington.

52/990 4p: cle, gb, pit, cin. LOSS.

110/100 cle +14' (sea). LOSS.

1000/952 sd (mia). WIN. [c. +2084]

great day, works out as expected. our takeaway? manziel is going to be a great qb. lots of chance to profit off him next year before people finally catch on. really looking forward to next week at kc. guy is winner. comes from a family of winners. he corrects mistakes. that's perhaps his most impressive feature. it took him one game to adjust throwing lanes. he has hardly played and is showing very solid control. if hartline hadn't been injured, they might have covered here. they are playing one of the hottest teams in league. seattle is real threat to win it all, wilson is playing very well. drops and terrible run tackling for cle. it's similar to dc and cousins - we can see it before others do, we can make money. cousins was not the problem; manziel is not the problem.

cashed big season wins bet on WAS but will add that and those when all those futures are completed.

THOUGHTS ON MANZIEL, GRIFFIN AND COUSINS, TWO YEARS IN MAKING

notice that manziel corrected more in one game, literally within one game, than griffin learned over 2 seasons. griffin had his initial success purely, as it turned out, because of his legs. he was fast, he surprised people. then they caught on. then he got injured. he never understood, until it was too late, that running qbs, particularly those with chicken legs, get smashed up like junked cars. there is no clear evidence that griffin understands this even today. manziel grasped this very quickly. in fact, he overcorrected. he was NOT running last game when he should have been. same thing in 1h of this game. then he altered this - he made an in-game adjustment in his head -- and started running when it was advisable. and he always understood, when you are as small as he is, you cannot take hits. then you have manziel's comments about throwing lanes after his first start this year. but he adjusted in second game. he learned. that's what you need in qb. griffin never learned a damn thing on any front: he never learned to get down. he never to keep his mouth shut up off the field. he never learned that if you're going to talk, accept blame yourself and dispense credit liberally (see kirk cousins after bills game). there's no other way it works. there's too much media pressure, any opening will be taken to rip you to shreds if you're not winning. then after his running was gone, griffin showed absolutely no ability to read a defense. he's starting from the beginning, at this point. i frankly doubt he has learned anything, as that's his background, but he'll get another shot with another team. his situation is made more difficult because the media, in their typical way, went out of their way not just to blame but absolutely to abuse the character of everyone around him except him, blaming his coaches, his coordinators, his head coach, his line, etc etc. when everyone of any objectivity could see that he was the main problem. where does shananhan go to get his reputation back? he who won two super bowls? if he had yanked griffin in the playoff game, the media would have impaled him. since he let him play, at his own request, they blame him for the injury. cant have it both ways - unless you're the media, and you don't allow contrary voices. so they shit on shanahan(s) for years, even though they werent the problem. then shanahan left. and he praised cousins this year, said he had the potential to be great. looks pretty darn prescient now. and how about that line? holding up pretty darn well when the qb knows what he's doing. again, everything here is directly parallel to what you see in politics proper. certain parties are never held responsible for their actions, but everyone else is. the key is, if you pay attention, you could see all this before it happened, as i did, and make money off it. and there is more to be made. whatever the media is saying, it's safer to assume the opposite is true and go from there, the more it touches on political matters, the stronger this principle. the basic lie in the NFL is that there is a QB of the "future" that isn't like the qb of the past. this is disproved 10000x, but the media will never give up on it for political reasons. you can use this insight to make money, because it means that certain types of qb will always be overrated, and others will be underrated. in the end it will be what i said: blind bigotry on the part of the redskins owner delayed kirk cousins' development for basically 2 years. cousins was BETTER than griffin from day one, better meaning more prepared to head an nfl team as a professional defense-reader and pocket passer. i am delighted to see cousins succeed not just for the money, but because he is a genuinely articulate, funny, smart friendly guy. i heard him on dan patrick show years ago, and he was quite impressive. he's good looking too (no homo), and i honestly think this helps compel support and respect, as it does most places in life (tom brady). i'm not against griffin, other than him never learning to stop blaming others, but i suspect he'll wash out as so many do from inability to read defenses. qB is basically about accuracy and judgment. not about running. that's a nice extra. but when ANY qb runs, it's basically because the field is wide open, and it doesn't matter if one guy is 1 second slower than the top guy in the 40 yard dash, it's just not that big a deal. running is another element, and very useful - IF the qb knows how to use it correctly. newton and wilson know how to use it, so they succeed. so do rogers and luck. cousins has an unknown ceiling. he's already better than 70% of the league's qbs, and he's just getting started. what people dont realize is that part of the reason dc hasn't done better this year was injuries to receivers, secondary and line. but cousins and gruden couldnt say this, even though it was the main reason, because it would look bad after last year's lack of success. so they kept their mouths shut, kept plugging away, and look at the results. people got healthier, cousins got used to working with the first team, and all of a sudden, they're able to produce nice drives frequently. cousins has a very catchable pass (compare to newton, who burns it). the only limitation i've seen in him so far, if it is, is that when he's got a guy open deep, but he's under pressure and on his back foot, he has failed to throw the ball far enough. that's either a limitation in strength, or he simply hasn't been in position often enough to guage just how hard he needs to throw it in nfl. i've seen this 2-3x over the seaons. when the media want to bash someone for political reasons, they will seize any pretext. so it was with cousins' turnovers. but if you watched their games, like half of his last year were in one game, and he was madly trying to come from behind, forcing throws. that's not really proof of anything. but the media want to say, welp, that's it, another failed/backup qb, and not give him any real chance. whereas a guy they favored from day one, he's never had enough chances, even 3-4 years into the league. blame skip bayless for dishonestly promoting griffin over luck when he knew, and he did, that luck was the superior qb. that set the tone for everything that followed. and it was all due to politics that are 100% common through the mass media. like i say, if you know how to read media bias, you can definitely find spots to profit from it in football betting.

WHERE SKINS ARE NOW: good OL and passing game. running game still not that good. secondary ok. still not that great against run. sometimes good, sometimes bad on penalties. they will lose to a team that can run the ball.
 
Last edited:

TennisTapir

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 13, 2013
1,285
4
0
[c. +2084]

WEEK 16

550/500 LIVE temp 45' UNDER (3-9 2q 10m). LOSS. [c. +1534]

100/470 3p: temp, (wed) bois, (sun) was. LOSS. [c. +1434]

100/29390 11p: boiS, WAS, CLE, NE, SEA, PIT, bay, hou +14', ala, osu, stan. LOSS. [c. +1334]

This is how you get a massive return. KC can lay an egg any week of the season, dont believe the hype. Andy Reed can barely figure out which end to put his pants on. WAS is better than phi. Circumstances favor phi slightly, but who do you want? Cousins or Bradford. The reasoning that has worked the last two weeks might as well work again, DC has no reason to let down and every reason to be inspired and play even harder as a win gives it the division, something nobody but me (see futures bet) seemed to think possible. Football is about QBs, and Cousins is better than Bradford or Sanchez. The rest of phi - look how discombobulated they were vs Ariz, they're not suddenly going to play great next week. hedge this huge parlay by taking dc +11' and two others, such as cleveland and/or pit. ... The rest of the legs are likelier to win than lose. Or at least, no big surprise if baylor wins, and the rest are favored. So basically we need only really one truly unlikely result here (cleveland) to get nearly a 300x return. and that "unlikely" is no worse than a 1/4 or 1/5 chance, in my estimation. not saying this will win, saying that this is how you make a parlay that fetches a giant return (easy) but has a decent shot at winning (not so easy). You take 1-2 big dogs with clear reasoning why they have a good chance, then couple them with some favs that you've also put thought into.
?Week in and week out Johnny has been improving despite what the outside people may see, we see it in the building. He?s making a real good effort to be that guy, that starting quarterback. It?s going to take time. I really believe Johnny will be an elite quarterback in the NFL.?

http://www.seattletimes.com/sports/...stgame-game-comments-we-were-not-good-enough/

keep in mind: mike holmgren says it takes 40 nfl starts to truly know what you're dealing with in a QB

manziel is positioned to the follow the arc in 2016 that cousins traced this year. the difference is that cousins has a lot more talent to work with. manziel can't play defense and can't force his teammates to stop making dumb penalties. cousins is able to locate the open guy thru progressive reads and get the ball to him. he doesn't do this back-foot cool-guy gunslinger crap like rodgers does far too often.

?They see him ultra-prepared. They see him seamlessly calling plays in the huddle and getting guys lined up, and knowing where to go with the ball and doing his job. There is no substitute for hard work to get to that point,? Browns coach Mike Pettine said. ?He has put it in and has done it."

cousins micd up vs buffalo
http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-films-sound-efx/0ap3000000608302/Sound-FX-Kirk-Cousins

200/340 was (phi). WIN.
200/240 3t (8pt): was +11', neb-ucla 69' under, cle +19. WIN. [c. +1914]

now everybody believes in dc and predicts they beat phi. i do too. but i think it will be up and down, and the best idea is to bet was on the dip when it's +200 or better.

LIVE: 100/360 was (phi) (0-7 1q). WIN.

LIVE 500/500 was (phi) (13-7 1q). WIN. [c. +2754]

my futures

NFL PROPOSITIONS

1000/940 was wins over 6. WIN.

100/700 was makes playoffs. WIN.

100/320 was wins over 7'. WIN. [c. +4714]
100/254 was wins over 7. WIN.
100/150 was wins over 6'. WIN.
100/63 was wins over 5'. WIN. [c. +5179]

LIVE: 100/95 ucla +7' (neb) (29-37 4q). LOSS. [c. +5079]

couple browns get busted by cops, bad news for parlay now that wash is in easily.

at this point, going into sunday games, really dont feel much hope for cle, given the arrests. just shows half the team doesn't care. i'm sure manziel will play hard and well but the rest dont know. probably wise to hedge that off. not so sure about new england either, the jets are a good team.

100/854 3p: atl +6', kc -13, gia +4'. LOSS. [c. +4979]

100/460 6t (7'pt): gia +14', atl +15, dal +14', cle +21, jet +10, cin +10'. LOSS.

140/4171 4p: gia, gb, sea, cin. LOSS.

150/180 3t (8pt): gia +15, gb-az 58 UNDER, cin +11. LOSS. [c. +4589]

terrible wk 16 after best weeks of year last two.

LIVE 1000/286 min (cmich) (10-7 2q 8m). WIN. [c. +4875]
 
Last edited:

TennisTapir

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 13, 2013
1,285
4
0
[c. +4875]

WEEK 17

O/U are 13-6 in bowls so far. 20 left. i think we're going to see a flip to unders starting today.

200/194 af-cal 69' under. LOSS.

some sharps are knocking manziel, but what i saw was a continuation of what i've seen - manziel is a smart, tough, resourceful guy. the wind was bad at kc. and he threw some poor passes. still, the game ends with cle within 30 seconds of taking the lead. the criticism of his low passer rating ignores that what matters is getting the win, and manziel kept kc competitive on a day in which he was not playing that well. cle would be insane to get rid of him, and the players want them to keep him, the ones quoted anyway. manziel will have growing pains all through next year but he has shown 1) he can learn lessons, 2) he's a very competitive guy, a winner. these guys dont grow on trees in nfl. cle should follow the washington path: get a first-rate talent evaluator like mcloughlan, then give him time to acquire the right pieces.

200/198 af-cal 70' under. LOSS. [c. +4475]

way off on total, zero pass defense from af. like betting under on threat offenses, often hold possession with good short runs but not here. time to hit even harder.

400/444 nc-bay 72 UNDER. LOSS. [c. +4075]
400/460 nev-cols 54 UNDER. WIN. [c. +4535]
400/520 tt-lsu 72 UNDER. LOSS. [c. +4135]

no reason not to sell points with these numbers, best to sell a couple and take odds on. ... fucking annoying results. just shit tackling. that is the story of the last ten years at least in college football. no defense, rules tweaked for offense, and tackling technique untaught. not why i lost these games, i was wrong, but still irritating watching football that's more like bumper pool. going to chase the unders because they will come up. last year almost all games were over on new years, so it's likelier they will be closer to the opposite this year. i have the overs at 16-7 so far.

eagles fire chip kelly. dont doubt he's a genius. but a good system still needs first-rate qb to make it work, if goal is not just to win but to win it all.

100/680 4p: aub, misst, lvil-tam 48 under, usc. LOSS.

after yesterday's nutboot going to relax on the unders and play in game, and look to hit them before-game on new years.

LIVE 200/160 mem-aub 54' under (10-3 2q 10m). WIN.
LIVE 210/200 " OVER (31-10 4q 13m). LOSS.

200/194 ncsw-misst 60 under. LOSS.
LIVE 200/210 FIRST HALF 34' under (14-0 start 2q). LOSS.

400/448 lvil-tam 49 under. WIN. [c. +3985]

finally a piece of extreme good luck fetching under by 1 pt cuz line moved. and parlay still alive too.

190/290 4t (9pt): hou-fsu 65' under, ala -1, okl +4', stan +3. LOSS.

1000/571 okl (clem). LOSS. [c. +2795]
1000/260 ala (michs). WIN. [c. +3055]

200/186 clem-okl 63' under. WIN.
200/190 michs-ala 44' under. WIN. [c. +3431]

sometimes you're flat wrong. i was flat wrong on okl. so be it. you gotta hit hard to make big bucks. now i'm going to bet a lot that the majority and possibly all games on New Year's Day go under, reversing last year. the line has already moved that direction on tonight's game. my parlay involves linking them all up, and buying about 2 points on each game, because what you see in these things sometimes is 4/5 go far under, and one comes in right on the number, where if you bought at the wrong time, you lose by a point. that's what i want to avoid. normally it's better to sell points, of course.

NEW YEARS DAY

1000/455 stan (iowa). WIN.

200/4222 6p: mich-ala 46 under, ten-nwes 49 under, fla-mich 41 under, nd-osu 59 under, iowa-stan 56 under, miss-oklst 70 under. LOSS.

1000/274 ten (nwes). WIN. [c. +3960]

following somone on ten, i'm just playing ml, he is playing side.


500/476 ten-nwes 49 under. LOSS.
500/476 fla-mich 39 under. LOSS.
500/463 nd-osu 57' under. LOSS.
500/463 iowa-stan 53' under. LOSS.
500/476 mis-oklst 69 under. WIN. [c. +2436]

421/6900 9p: stan -6, okst, psu +7, kanst +12', tcu-ore 74 under, ala, NE, PIT, OAK +7. LOSS. [c. +2015]

mccaffrey gonna have 500 yards...

500/1350 oklst (mis). LOSS.
500/465 oklst +7'. LOSS. [c. +1015]

heading into the late game above, i could not have been more wrong about the totals. the march to the over continues not merely unabated but stronger than before. it's been all FO today, mabye the last game will go the other way, and why not.

my theory is looking bung after one bad beat on ten total, and blowout apparent losses on mich and osu. of course have sides right. if all favs come in thru stan, will look very hard at playing oklst on ML.

TENNIS: guy in comments nails halep - what she should do to improve game
http://www.tennis.com/pro-game/2015/12/2016-preview-wta-no-2-simona-halep/57001/#.VodXY0orKUk

HALEP'S 'PROBLEM': can it be called a problem if you're #2 in the world playing that way? perhaps not. but halep is not playing to maximize her advantages. she has enough power. she needs to get aggressive in coming in to net. not necessarily all the way. but taking the ball early takes advantage of her comparative strength: her rabbitlike speed and agility and ability to reverse directions. she played like this in 2013. but last 2 years, she retreated behind baseline and slugged it out with the 6' girls. of course she still mostly won - but not against the very top. and she wasted energy, and courted injury with this wrong approach. she has enough power. but she can still gain ground by maximizing her speed and rabbity reversal agility. the only other flaw left in her game is psychological - she seems to freeze or get unsure at times in the big moments. not sure how to cure that. may just be a matter of playing more matches at the highest level in the biggest tournaments.

SATURDAY-SUNDAY

500/1000 psu (ga). LOSS.
500/535 psu +4' (ga). LOSS
500/1000 psu +11, kanst +17', tcu +12'. LOSS. [c. -485]

LIVE 550/500 41' UNDER ga-psu (3-0, 1q 7m). WIN
LIVE: 500/1250 psu (ga) (3-0 start 2q). LOSS [c. -485]

1000/1340 ore-tcu 70 under. LOSS. [c. -1485]

unbelievably bad beat, should have won by 18 pts.

1000/926 wv-asu 61' under. LOSS. [c. -2485]

SUNDAY

all out end of season big bets. back to normal next week for tennis...

500/808 4p: ten, stan, PIT, NE. LOSS. [c. -2985]

1000/263 ne (mia). LOSS.
1000/118 pit (cle). WIN.
1000/1700 was (dal). WIN. [c. -2167]



why is dal favored over was? was starters will start. when backups come in, they are fired up to contribute. cowboys suck. and mccoy is better than whoever is playing qb for dal. dal has no incentive to play hard, as it showed last week. ... lot of sharps on buf, but i wouldnt touch that. jet are a damn good team, buf never does anything right, and i personally dont believe buf cares about this game the way many seem to think. will have somethign on gb-min, leaning min. got the last game right, gb at min. here, i think it comes down to gb just not going anywhere in playoffs, so might as well lose this game. but under may be the better bet.

1000/13250 5t: ne -2', cin -2', was +11, min +11, phi-gia 59 under. LOSS. [c. -3167]

1000/429 2p: pit, ne. LOSS. [c. -4167]

1180/11422 6p: min, car, kc, stl, az, den. LOSS. [c. -5347]

1000/250 car (tb). WIN.
1000/645 stl (sf). LOSS.
1000/333 kc (oak). WIN. [c. -5764]

1000/4993 2p: was, min. WIN.

1000/1350 min (gb). WIN.

END: [c. +579]

That will do it for this thread. Will start a 2016 thread for tennis and include NFL playoffs.
 
Last edited:
Bet on MyBookie
Top