bobby..help a brother out,please

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,573
225
63
"the bunker"
that thread and comment you allude to in your sig...can you pull it up?...i can`t get it...

we could all use the laugh...

thanks...:toast:
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,573
225
63
"the bunker"
Are you claiming that you never said that? Is that your attempted point?

You think he just made it up, or what?

no(although i don`t recall saying it)..i`m not good with the "search" feature....figured if i were that wrong,it would be worth a laugh to all the "weasel haters".....

it`s an attempt at self defecating humor...:shrug:
 

kosar

Centrist
Forum Member
Nov 27, 1999
11,112
55
0
ft myers, fl
kosar...bunky....you can pull it up,can`t you?....i mean,we go way back,don`t we........:toast:

I'm not good with the search either, and that one would be pretty broad as you've used 'chimperor' like 324 times. I can take a quick stab at it, but it sounds exactly like something you would, and almost certainly did say.
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,573
225
63
"the bunker"
I'm not good with the search either, and that one would be pretty broad as you've used 'chimperor' like 324 times. I can take a quick stab at it, but it sounds exactly like something you would, and almost certainly did say.

appreciate the effort...:grins:
 

kosar

Centrist
Forum Member
Nov 27, 1999
11,112
55
0
ft myers, fl
kosar...bunky....you can pull it up,can`t you?....i mean,we go way back,don`t we........:toast:

Took less than a minute.

Go to advanced search. Put in your name in the user box. Put Chimperor in the keyword box.

Hit send.

You are the first person responding to a thread that Wayne(shocker) started about this on 9/25/08.

As mentioned in another thread, my computer is screwed up and I can't open another browser, but i'm sure you can find your way there.

You posted the exact quote that Bobby posted about you.

Post the link if you would.

If not, I will do it when this problem gets fixed.
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,573
225
63
"the bunker"
i found it,. ..it;s very easy to find , by the way. I guess Weasel would rather others do the work for him, than do for himself. He must be some kind of lazy ass socialist.

http://www.madjacksports.com/forum/showthread.php?p=2055891&highlight=chimperor#post2055891

i must`ve really gotten under wubby`s skin for him to dig around back in june of 2008..:142smilie

thanks smurph...:mj07: ...this is a classic weasel/kosar thread....i`m sure that kosar said something about,"bush putting n.korea on the axis of evil" list and i did my "madeline haflbright" riff....lol


look...you can`t blame me for taking this tack.....obviously, the cia "lied" and "skewed the intel"....

/just ask nancy...
 

kosar

Centrist
Forum Member
Nov 27, 1999
11,112
55
0
ft myers, fl
..i`m sure that kosar said something about,"bush putting n.korea on the axis of evil" list and i did my "madeline haflbright"

You were the first one to respond to Wayne's thread, so I find it hard to believe that we were into the 'axis of evil' and Madeline Albright stuff at that point.

I suppose you didn't even click on the thread, huh?
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,573
225
63
"the bunker"
You were the first one to respond to Wayne's thread, so I find it hard to believe that we were into the 'axis of evil' and Madeline Albright stuff at that point.

I suppose you didn't even click on the thread, huh?

yeah...you were talking about n.korea resuming their nuclear program because of "something that george bush said".....lol...

i was mocking the moonbats about giving bush credit for anything...and you were blaming n.korea`s nuclear program`s resumption on bush saying something about n.korea being evil....

i was busting balls...you were dead serious...

obviously,n.korea never had any intention of stopping in their quest for nukes...

3 administrations were played like violins....

and now hillary is STILL asking for talks...

talk about stupid people making the same mistake over and over again...:SIB

idiots all...
 

kosar

Centrist
Forum Member
Nov 27, 1999
11,112
55
0
ft myers, fl
yeah...you were talking about n.korea resuming their nuclear program because of "something that george bush said".....lol...

i was mocking the moonbats about giving bush credit for anything...and you were blaming n.korea`s nuclear program`s resumption on bush saying something about n.korea being evil....

i was busting balls...you were dead serious...

obviously,n.korea never had any intention of stopping in their quest for nukes...

3 administrations were played like violins....

and now hillary is STILL asking for talks...

talk about stupid people making the same mistake over and over again...:SIB

idiots all...

Ummm. No.

I only said that they kicked out the inspectors, removed the cameras and unsealed the fuel rods and possibly re-processed them after W said that. That was true.

I have also CONSISTENTLY said that there is no easy solution in regard to NK. None.

You criticize Obama about this, when W and Clinton tried the same thing with similar(uhhh...exact) results.

They(NK) are intractable.

That said, let's not be paranoid. They have no reliable means to deliver any weapon anywhere near America, nuke or not.

I see you splashing around in other threads all of a sudden about how we should get tough, but i'd be interested in what that means and why you just started thinking like this. (rhetorical)

If they invade like they(NK) did in 1950, not only would 10-15k troops of ours immediately(2 weeks, maybe) die, but another 1.5 million SK civilians and ROK soldiers. I was there, man, when the old man died in 1994. There would be no hope of our help for weeks.

Extrapolate from there.

DJV mentioned something before about a million people living in Seoul. More like 10-11 million, actually.

It's easy to be a chickenhawk when we're talking about Iraq, but any major conflict in Korea would be a disaster beyond belief.
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,573
225
63
"the bunker"
Ummm. No.

I only said that they kicked out the inspectors, removed the cameras and unsealed the fuel rods and possibly re-processed them after W said that. That was true.

I have also CONSISTENTLY said that there is no easy solution in regard to NK. None.

You criticize Obama about this, when W and Clinton tried the same thing with similar(uhhh...exact) results.

They(NK) are intractable.

That said, let's not be paranoid. They have no reliable means to deliver any weapon anywhere near America, nuke or not.

I see you splashing around in other threads all of a sudden about how we should get tough, but i'd be interested in what that means and why you just started thinking like this. (rhetorical)

If they invade like they(NK) did in 1950, not only would 10-15k troops of ours immediately(2 weeks, maybe) die, but another 1.5 million SK civilians and ROK soldiers. I was there, man, when the old man died in 1994. There would be no hope of our help for weeks.

Extrapolate from there.

DJV mentioned something before about a million people living in Seoul. More like 10-11 million, actually.

It's easy to be a chickenhawk when we're talking about Iraq, but any major conflict in Korea would be a disaster beyond belief.

heres your quote..."The translation is that in 2000, the fuel rods were sealed, there were real-time cameras in all of their sensitive facilities, inspectors were on the ground.

That all changed when Cowboy Georgie rattled his saber."

you`re saying that because bush "rattled his saber"(lol),that everything changed and a peaceful kim jong il resumed his nuclear program...which is absurd(which i pointed out in my response)....

"noteworthy..."The diplomatic team describes the 1994 agreement under which North Korea said it would no longer seek to develop nuclear weapons."

from the cnn link i provided that has since been zapped:

" The agreement also called for inspections to verify that the terms were being adhered to, but so far Pyongyang has blocked all attempts to make such inspections. ":rolleyes:

"Another senior U.S. official told CNN that Washington received intelligence "back over the summer months" indicating that North Korea had a nuclear weapons program involving the use of highly enriched uranium.

The intelligence, the official said, indicated the program was launched in the late 1990s -- several years after North Korea signed the agreement with the United States, Japan and South Korea."

as i mentioned,i provided a cnn link but it`s since been zapped(no,not a fox news link...i`m glad i quoted from the article))..

".The intelligence, the official said, indicated the program was launched in the late 1990s -- several years after North Korea signed the agreement with the United States, Japan and South Korea."

hmmm?...i don`t think bush became president until 2001...

/:nono: :grins: ...checkmate...
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,573
225
63
"the bunker"
theres only one answer to this( i mentioned it the other day)....no,not hand wringing.....japan and s.korea have to have a deterrent...it`s time that we no longer held japan(and i think s.korea)to their agreements on non-militarization and helped them offset the north koreans` nuclear advantage...

this is as much about china as it is about s. korea and japan and it`s time china felt the heat in their hemisphere....

then maybe...just maybe..they`ll decide to get tough with n. korea...

theres no stick as far as china is concerned...and they can turn the thumbscrews on n.korea antime they feel the need...

they need some skin in the game...
 

kosar

Centrist
Forum Member
Nov 27, 1999
11,112
55
0
ft myers, fl
heres your quote..."The translation is that in 2000, the fuel rods were sealed, there were real-time cameras in all of their sensitive facilities, inspectors were on the ground.

That all changed when Cowboy Georgie rattled his saber."

you`re saying that because bush "rattled his saber"(lol),that everything changed and a peaceful kim jong il resumed his nuclear program...which is absurd(which i pointed out in my response)....

"noteworthy..."The diplomatic team describes the 1994 agreement under which North Korea said it would no longer seek to develop nuclear weapons."

from the cnn link i provided that has since been zapped:

" The agreement also called for inspections to verify that the terms were being adhered to, but so far Pyongyang has blocked all attempts to make such inspections. ":rolleyes:

"Another senior U.S. official told CNN that Washington received intelligence "back over the summer months" indicating that North Korea had a nuclear weapons program involving the use of highly enriched uranium.

The intelligence, the official said, indicated the program was launched in the late 1990s -- several years after North Korea signed the agreement with the United States, Japan and South Korea."

as i mentioned,i provided a cnn link but it`s since been zapped(no,not a fox news link...i`m glad i quoted from the article))..

".The intelligence, the official said, indicated the program was launched in the late 1990s -- several years after North Korea signed the agreement with the United States, Japan and South Korea."

hmmm?...i don`t think bush became president until 2001...

/:nono: :grins: ...checkmate...

Link from my quote, please.

I said in 2000 that all those things were in place.

I didn't say that it ended in 2000.

I said that it ended after Bush said what he did.

I didn't say that W rattled his sabre(lol) in 2000.

You are either drunk or retarded.

Checkmate. :rolleyes:
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,573
225
63
"the bunker"
Link from my quote, please.

I said in 2000 that all those things were in place.

I didn't say that it ended in 2000.

I said that it ended after Bush said what he did.

I didn't say that W rattled his sabre(lol) in 2000.

You are either drunk or retarded.

Checkmate. :rolleyes:

you`re parsing...by all accounts there were no inspections(cameras?...i don`t see no steenking cameras)...

/google`s gettin` a workout tonight...;)
 

Trench

Turn it up
Forum Member
Mar 8, 2008
3,974
18
0
Mad City, WI
theres only one answer to this( i mentioned it the other day)....no,not hand wringing.....japan and s.korea have to have a deterrent...it`s time that we no longer held japan(and i think s.korea)to their agreements on non-militarization and helped them offset the north koreans` nuclear advantage...

this is as much about china as it is about s. korea and japan and it`s time china felt the heat in their hemisphere....

then maybe...just maybe..they`ll decide to get tough with n. korea...

theres no stick as far as china is concerned...and they can turn the thumbscrews on n.korea antime they feel the need...

they need some skin in the game...
Yeah, we know what your answer is because you're a frightened little chickenhawk. On the "NK sets off nuke" thread, you argued that it's time Japan goes nuclear to deter the "Norks". Nevermind the fact that it would violate their own Constitution and that 82% of Japan's citizens oppose it. Then there's China... the LAST thing China wants is a nuclear armed Japan. But in your warped view of the world, it doesn't matter what 1.3 billion Chinese and 100 million Japanese want. It's all about alleviating YOUR fears. :rolleyes:
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top