I missed the line opener at pinnacle (I pretty much just started betting, so I'm only at pinnacle for the moment) and now I see Andrade is -300ish as is Santos. I don't know if I want to bet on them at those odds. Like Romi was asking, where do you guys think the cut off point is for those fights?
Boxing 10/4 - 10/6
- Thread starter BOXLOCKS
- Start date
Thanks, I knew they would try to screw you, they always do, and then they wonder why poeple call them crooks...lol.
I'll respond to your pm shortly
Yes, I was referring to Daniel, I really like that play at -160...but -310 is starting to lose value imo. I know you're not big on parlays, but at the current price I would combine Daniel with another solid favorite to get the odds down a little
Side note...I heard that it was Mack and his poeple's idea to make this fight with Andrade. We need to know if this is 10 or 12 rounds....any help out there?
Did you read that over at fightwriter? Anyway, he's indicated that it's a 12 rounder.
I wouldn't play Andrade at -300
D.Santos I would consider laying the wood on, but only if I couldn't find a solid parlay partner or my book didn't allow parlays
gl bl
That doesn't necessarily mean its true, fightwriter also says its for the vacant NABF title, but boxrec doesn't confirm that information and 5dimes has it listed as 10 rounds as well
According to Graham, it's for 12 rds which of course helps Andrades cause. I saw where he referred to Macks people wanting this fight. I still like Andrade. Andrade doesnt stop, has an iron chin. He's a better more powerful version of Julio gonzalez. I thought if Kessler was off just a tad in that fight, Andrade would have gotten to him. He lost all the rds but made it a very tough fight for Kessler. If this is 12, I don't see Mack going the dist. Not crazy by the current -250 odds though.
Thanks, I'll have to play Santos on his own as unfortunately pinnacle doesn't allow boxing parlays.
The espn and yahoo boxing schedules also list it as a 10 rounder.
http://sports.yahoo.com/box/leaguepage/boxsked?prov=st&type=lgns
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/print?id=1748215&type=story
Yes, I have a small value play on Barrera +270, it has been posted in my futures for awhile I just forgot to add it to my weekly plays...my bad. I'll update my top page accourdingly, thanks for reminding me
gl bl
It's being reported that Rivera will retire after his fight with Santos. I suppose it could be argued that he's going to lay it all on the line and go out with a career performance, but I doubt it. Santos looks even better now.
- Aug 28, 2005
- 639
- 1
- 0
I was talking about my bonus. But like I said before you can place bet on the phone while you have problems.
I still did not get my bonus probably because you had those problems.
Good luck to you and thanks for trying to get me bonus.
I still did not get my bonus probably because you had those problems.
Good luck to you and thanks for trying to get me bonus.
I have figured it out and have meet the betting requirements needed for you to claim your bonus.
Have they said anything giving the impression that you will not receive ?
BTW good CS. His english sounded even stranger than mine (and thats not easy to do), but he got things done.
- Aug 28, 2005
- 639
- 1
- 0
They said that I have to wait for 48 hours, and they said that I will recive e-mail. So far nothing but now I know that you meet all requirements so they can not play around 
Check your mail, I sent something to you.
Check your mail, I sent something to you.
Last edited:
Anyone think Antonio Davis might give Luevano a tougher fight than the odds indicate. Interesting that Davis has come down to 126 after 5 years in the game. Luevano is actually pretty tough so a decision prop wouldn't be terrible. It came out at a ridiculous + 2300 or so on dimes so I couldn't resist 20 bucks.
Golata stopped McBride at 2:42 of the 6th round
Golata cashed but I missed the Under by 1 minute
Golata cashed but I missed the Under by 1 minute
