If they were doing something corrupt why not just rewrite that whole mastercard? Then you wouldn't have been able to see they wrote over round 12 and there would be no suspicion.
Boxing 5/16 - 5/20
- Thread starter BOXLOCKS
- Start date
maybe because like their ability to judge, their ability to cheat is second rate and amateurish.
just a thought.
just a thought.
maybe that wasn`t the original card?.....
teddy atlas mentioned that in the decision box it said"barrera split decision"...that`s not what the card graded out to....
that wasn`t crossed out.....why wasn`t "draw" written in originally?..then crossed out......how`d they miss that on the first go-round?.....
it was written in clearly...yet it was still read as a draw?...
all i`m saying is that i think there are enough questions here to warrant some serious skepticism...
teddy atlas mentioned that in the decision box it said"barrera split decision"...that`s not what the card graded out to....
that wasn`t crossed out.....why wasn`t "draw" written in originally?..then crossed out......how`d they miss that on the first go-round?.....
it was written in clearly...yet it was still read as a draw?...
all i`m saying is that i think there are enough questions here to warrant some serious skepticism...
gardenweasel said:
I agree, but why go through all this when Barrera was keeping his belt anyway?
This is not a trick they can pull twice, so why waste it on this fight? Why not pull this when their fighter actually loses and they have something to gain?
BOXLOCKS said:
He's in a huge minority. I look at a lot of different boxing forums and maybe 1 out of 10 actually think John won. :142smilie Even people who dislike JMM like me coceed that he got screwed. 8-4 for John is just inexcuseable. The cards were horrible.
