Hussein Obamas' pastor "Blacks should not sing "'God Bless America'"

Tenzing

Registered
Forum Member
Jun 14, 2002
274
0
0
55
Austin, Texas
By the way, since everyone else who posts here knows what polls he's referring to, please post a link or two. I figure somebody can prove this claim - plenty of people spouting off in the same vein of late.

And, since you are so focused on Smurph responding to your posts, maybe you can do the same with mine, both here, and in the other thread. No biggie - I certainly don't expect it.

When is Wayne getting back from his trip? At least he posts a bunch of links 'n stuff...:mj07:

Chad, come on bro..

Why are you in this thread if you don't even know what we're debating?

45+ years of post-war continuous Dem control of congress, need a link for that too?

Oh, btw, yeah, my mind is only "fast" enuf to come with one retort at a time, sorry Chad. I mean to write to your stuff, but I get distracted easily.
 

smurphy

cartographer
Channel Member
Jul 31, 2004
19,907
133
63
16
L.A.
You worthless piece of shit.

HIS CAMPAIGN IS OVER AND TO PROVE IT THE DEM LEADERS ARE DEMANDING THAT CLINTON STOP BRINGING UP FACTS ABOUT OBAMA, AND JUST DROP OUT ALTOGETHER. SEN HUSSEIN OBAMA GAVE $27,500.00 TO THE CHARITY RUN BY THE CHURCH OF PASTOR WRIGHT. TWENTY-SEVEN THOUSAND, FIVE-HUNDRED DOLLARS. HIS ****ING NAME IS HUSSEIN, HE WAS BORN IN, LIVED, AND WENT TO SCHOOL IN THE MOST POPULOUS MUSLIM NATION ON EARTH, INDONESIA, HE HAS NO RECORD OF ANY ACHIEVEMENTS AT ALL, HIS ASSOCIATION WITH REZKO AND THE DEALING/CLOSURE OF THE PURCHASE OF THEIR REZKO FINANCED HOUSE ARE GOING TO LAND THE CHICAGO SUN-TIMES A ****ING PULITZER, AND POLL AFTER POLL SHOWS THAT DEMOCRATS HARBOR DEEP-SEEDED ANIMOSITY TOWARDS HIM, FOR BEING JUST ANOTHER NIXON. 2 OR 3 POLLS THIS WEEK SHOW THAT NON-HUSSEIN SUPPORTERS WILL DEFECT EN MASSE TO MCCAINS CAMP IN THE GENERAL ELECTION. SORRY TO USE FACTS AND "REALITY", BUT IT'S TIME FOR YOU PERSONALLY AND THE AMERICA-HATING LEFTISTS YOU SLEEP WITH TO SEE THE FOREST FOR THE TREES. HUSSEINS CAMPAIGN IS OVER, AND I HOPE HIS CELL MATE IS MUCH KINDER TO HIM THAN YOU ARE TO "TEXANS".

:kiss: You had me at "worthless peice of shit", but "sleeping with America-hating leftist" pushed my love for you beyond anything I've ever felt before.

When this whole mess is over, let's get an apartment together.
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
What "we're" debating? You sure sling a lot of crap around here, and when things are posted directly to you, you hide away with inane, off-putting comments that avoid direct questions. That's fine - I think people have a pretty good handle on what you post.

Let me make it as simple as I can for you. You made a comment about a couple polls you saw this week. I asked for a link, so I could look at them. How in the hell could I know what polls you say you saw? Is that hard to understand? And then you say everyone else knows what you mean? Dream on, Mr. Delusional. All you have to do is prove your blustering with a simple link. You either can't do it (which proves you are making it up) or you won't do it (which makes your making fun of me worthless and of no value).

I ask a couple more questions - allowing your point about the 45 years, and you try to make fun of me asking if I need a link to what I allowed? I swear, man, you just can't make up that kind of off-pointedness...

Carry on...:rolleyes:
 

Jabberwocky

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 3, 2006
3,491
29
0
Jacksonville, FL
45+ years of post-war continuous Dem control of congress, need a link for that too?

Even the one stat that you have tossed out at least 10 fvcking times is not correct.

" In the 1946 US Congressional election, the Republicans regained control of both the US Senate and US House of Representatives, as a result of President Truman failing to handle the vast post-war labor strikes. The Democrats were able to retake control of Congress in 1948, thanks in part to the huge popularity Democratic US President Harry Truman had for his support of a Civil Rights legislation [12]. In 1952, the Republicans were able to retake control of the US Congress and the US Presidency, thanks in part to the support Republican Presidential Candidate Dwight Eisenhower had over being willing to end the stalemated Korean War [13]. In 1954, the Democrats regained control of Congress, as a result of top Republican US Senator Joseph McCarthy becoming very unpopular through Army-McCarthy Hearings, where it was shown that McCarthy's accusations against the US Army were nothing more than a move for maintaining political power; even President Eisenhower's huge 1956 victory could not give the Republican Party control of the Congress again, despite Eisenhower winning a lot of support from Americans for condemning the Suez Canal seizure and supporting the Hungarian Revolution and Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka ruling. After the 1954 Congressional elections, the Democratic Party now dominated both houses of Congress until 1994, except when Republicans held a majority of seats in the Senate, after the party dominated the 1980 US Presidential and US Senate elections, due to the fact that the Democratic US President Jimmy Carter became more and more unpopular as he failed to rescue the Iranian US hostages- being held during the Iranian Hostage Crisis-, and failed to end the high US unemployment and inflation rates [14]; this Republican hold over the Senate ended in 1986, as a result of the Iran-Contra Affair scandal occurring against President Reagan; the Democratic Party was able to break the Conservative Coalition, after President Johnson was able to gain a great amount of support through his Great Society policies, but the coalition rebounded in 1966, as the Democratic Party began to lose support after President Johnson began to escalate the number of troops involved in the Vietnam War, and could continue to help the Republican Party gain more Congressional seats between 1966 and 1970- when the Republican Party and Richard Nixon started an anti-war platform, until the 1970 US invasion of Cambodia occurred, and the Republican Party became more unpopular after the Kent State Shootings occurred during a protest to this invasion- and 1972 and 1974- when the once-again anti-war Republican Party regained popularity after Republican President Nixon passed the SALT I agreement and re-opened US-China relations-, until the Watergate Scandal helped bring President Nixon and the Republican Party down further between 1974 and 1980. The Republicans finally returned to a majority position, in both houses of Congress, in the election of 1994, thanks in part to Newt Gingrich's Contract with America. The Republicans have controlled both houses since, until they lost both chambers in the past 2006 Congressional elections, as a result of huge opposition to the Iraq War, which had been started and continued by Republican President George W. Bush. [The last sentence is factually incorrect--control of the Senate flipped twice in the 107th Congress (2001-2003), ending effectively tied. The 108th Congress (2003-2005) saw the Senate return to a GOP majority of 51-49. The attribution of the cause of the 2006 flip is specious, and requires sourcing attribution.] In 2007, Hindu chaplain Rajan Zed read the first Hindu prayer in United States Senate."
 

smurphy

cartographer
Channel Member
Jul 31, 2004
19,907
133
63
16
L.A.
Jabber and smurphy, why should I or anyone for that matter, vote for a guy for whom the answers are "yes", "...yes", and "yes"??

Nobody is asking you to vote for Obama. Please DO NOT vote for him.
 

smurphy

cartographer
Channel Member
Jul 31, 2004
19,907
133
63
16
L.A.
Even the one stat that you have tossed out at least 10 fvcking times is not correct.

" In the 1946 US Congressional election, the Republicans regained control of both the US Senate and US House of Representatives, as a result of President Truman failing to handle the vast post-war labor strikes. The Democrats were able to retake control of Congress in 1948, thanks in part to the huge popularity Democratic US President Harry Truman had for his support of a Civil Rights legislation [12]. In 1952, the Republicans were able to retake control of the US Congress and the US Presidency, thanks in part to the support Republican Presidential Candidate Dwight Eisenhower had over being willing to end the stalemated Korean War [13]. In 1954, the Democrats regained control of Congress, as a result of top Republican US Senator Joseph McCarthy becoming very unpopular through Army-McCarthy Hearings, where it was shown that McCarthy's accusations against the US Army were nothing more than a move for maintaining political power; even President Eisenhower's huge 1956 victory could not give the Republican Party control of the Congress again, despite Eisenhower winning a lot of support from Americans for condemning the Suez Canal seizure and supporting the Hungarian Revolution and Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka ruling. After the 1954 Congressional elections, the Democratic Party now dominated both houses of Congress until 1994, except when Republicans held a majority of seats in the Senate, after the party dominated the 1980 US Presidential and US Senate elections, due to the fact that the Democratic US President Jimmy Carter became more and more unpopular as he failed to rescue the Iranian US hostages- being held during the Iranian Hostage Crisis-, and failed to end the high US unemployment and inflation rates [14]; this Republican hold over the Senate ended in 1986, as a result of the Iran-Contra Affair scandal occurring against President Reagan; the Democratic Party was able to break the Conservative Coalition, after President Johnson was able to gain a great amount of support through his Great Society policies, but the coalition rebounded in 1966, as the Democratic Party began to lose support after President Johnson began to escalate the number of troops involved in the Vietnam War, and could continue to help the Republican Party gain more Congressional seats between 1966 and 1970- when the Republican Party and Richard Nixon started an anti-war platform, until the 1970 US invasion of Cambodia occurred, and the Republican Party became more unpopular after the Kent State Shootings occurred during a protest to this invasion- and 1972 and 1974- when the once-again anti-war Republican Party regained popularity after Republican President Nixon passed the SALT I agreement and re-opened US-China relations-, until the Watergate Scandal helped bring President Nixon and the Republican Party down further between 1974 and 1980. The Republicans finally returned to a majority position, in both houses of Congress, in the election of 1994, thanks in part to Newt Gingrich's Contract with America. The Republicans have controlled both houses since, until they lost both chambers in the past 2006 Congressional elections, as a result of huge opposition to the Iraq War, which had been started and continued by Republican President George W. Bush. [The last sentence is factually incorrect--control of the Senate flipped twice in the 107th Congress (2001-2003), ending effectively tied. The 108th Congress (2003-2005) saw the Senate return to a GOP majority of 51-49. The attribution of the cause of the 2006 flip is specious, and requires sourcing attribution.] In 2007, Hindu chaplain Rajan Zed read the first Hindu prayer in United States Senate."

Wow. My man couldn't have been more wrong. Tenzig - honey, do you care to explain your miserable error? I mean it's not even close, lover. I know our passion doesn't leave you walking straight, but I still thought you had some thinking power. .....Dear?
 

Tenzing

Registered
Forum Member
Jun 14, 2002
274
0
0
55
Austin, Texas
wow

wow

I asked nicely, but obviously, isn't in your puerile natures to be civil. Debate the facts, please, "apartments" sounds funny, but that's how you divert the issue, but my boys, I ain't gonna let you.

Explain why should I or anyone for that matter, vote for a guy for whom the answers are "yes", "...yes", and "yes"??

THAT'S IT, THAT'S THE POINT OF THIS HERE PARTICULAR THREAD. NOT APARTMENTS, NOT OFF-TOPIC BS THAT AMOUNTS TO NOTHING MORE THAN STEER MANURE I AVOID ON MY FARM EVERY DAY, AND JUST ANSWER THE GD OP'S ASSERTION THAT HUSSEIN IS UNFIT TO GOVERN ANYTHING.

:mfpost

I'm sure, however, that instead of doing that (although I thank Kosar for at least trying, if not accomplishing that directive) you will post more off-topic bullshit, and ad hominem attacks, that, obviously, have nothing to do with the Post's clearly defined topic.

:mfpost
 
Last edited:

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
Maybe this would explain his grasp on the other issues he is spouting off on in these threads - one of which I just posted a link disputing dramatically.

The truth - and not opinion based on assumptions - can be a tough thing to prove, eh?
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
So, Tenzing, so I have this straight...you can post something off topic in a thread, either initially or in response to a point made by someone else, and when someone else responds to your point, they are off topic?

That about sum it up in your posting world? :thumb:

And by the way, do you consider someone posting a comment like "You worthless piece of shit" to be someone acting civilly? :shrug:
 

Tenzing

Registered
Forum Member
Jun 14, 2002
274
0
0
55
Austin, Texas
So, Tenzing, so I have this straight...you can post something off topic in a thread, either initially or in response to a point made by someone else, and when someone else responds to your point, they are off topic?

That about sum it up in your posting world? :thumb:

And by the way, do you consider someone posting a comment like "You worthless piece of shit" to be someone acting civilly? :shrug:

Lol, but "Texas", which you yourself used is appropriate?

What a hypocrite.

Gonna stay on topic, yes or no...?

BTW chad, when I post facts on here, as I have had in the past, you just reply they aren't relevant. But regardless, ain't here to educate you. In fact **** it :00x7, just ignoring all of your dumb asses til such time as you all grow up.
 
Last edited:

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
Lol, but "Texas", which you yourself used is appropriate?

What a hypocrite.

Gonna stay on topic, yes or no...?

BTW chad, when I post facts on here, as I have had in the past, you just reply they aren't relevant. But regardless, ain't here to educate you. In fact **** it :00x7, just ignoring all of your dumb asses til such time as you all grow up.

Did I use Texas in this thread? Don't remember it - I will admit I'm being pretty confrontational with you - a little testy at some of your responses, yes. See, there is a simple difference, in my opinion. You say something is a fact. I ask for a link or some proof of the statement - I don't even say it's wrong or irrelevant. You don't provide it, and just say I'm right...LALALALALALA.

Let me pose it this way. If I type something as being a fact, does that make it a fact? No, it doesn't. That's why most sensible people try to back up their "facts" with links to prove them. And that's why ignoring that makes them just personal statements.

But, carry on with the ear plug karaoke, and be pleased with your own self.
 

smurphy

cartographer
Channel Member
Jul 31, 2004
19,907
133
63
16
L.A.
I'm sorry I called you 'Texas', Tenzing. It was an awful slanderous thing to say, I know.

...But when did you become such an easily offended liberal pussy?
 

Tenzing

Registered
Forum Member
Jun 14, 2002
274
0
0
55
Austin, Texas
I'm sorry I called you 'Texas', Tenzing. It was an awful slanderous thing to say, I know.

...But when did you become such an easily offended liberal pussy?
Classy, as always. Come to Texas, and spout off like that, I double-dog dare ya.

For the record, I'm SLIGHTLY to the right. I support Affirmative action, tightly controlled markets, free health care for everyone everywhere, and a stop to corporate/billionaire welfare. I am in favor of a 1000-year war against radial Islam, end to food-stamps for non-working individuals, no ponzie scheme SS checks backed by imaginary money, most of which goes to the rich anyways, against abortion (I fail to see what laws were cited in Roe v.Wade), for a massively increased amount of LEGALIZED Immigration, for all countries 'cept Mexico, as a punishment for deliberately disregarding our sovereignty.

I too, went over the edge, I apologize for my own, much worse hypocrisy. Sorry Madjackers.
 
Last edited:

smurphy

cartographer
Channel Member
Jul 31, 2004
19,907
133
63
16
L.A.
And you like sunsets on the beach. Blah blah blah. Nobody asked for your life story, liberal.:rolleyes:
 

smurphy

cartographer
Channel Member
Jul 31, 2004
19,907
133
63
16
L.A.
See, I knew we would find common ground. Let's rendez vous at the Alamo, and head to Galveston from there. Don't mess with Texa....I mean Tenzing.;)
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top