if stats were the deciding factors,we would all be rich and their would be no books left...anyone whos been watching football for more than 10 years and has a brain could tell you the pats would lose to all 3 of those teams...by more than a td!
New England Patriots....
- Thread starter 3 Seconds
- Start date
if stats were the deciding factors,we would all be rich and their would be no books left...anyone whos been watching football for more than 10 years and has a brain could tell you the pats would lose to all 3 of those teams...by more than a td!
His immaturity has been established since week 1. He's done nothing but solidify it since then.
And why is that? Because you say so? Can you also tell me what the MegaBucks numbers will be next week?
Been watching football for over 40 years. Not brain dead yet! It's all a matter of opion.
:142smilie :142smilie :142smilie
:shrug: :shrug:
Amazing , the best team ever in the NFL " haven't destroyed any team in the last 6 games"
GET YOUR :0corn READY
so i guess the 72 dolphins were the best team ever b/c they went 17-0....yeh right...there lucky to be in the top 10..
I was too young to see the 70's Steelers...so I cant comment on them...
The Cowboys of 1992-1995 would absolutely beat this Patriots team IMO.
That O-line would just wear them out. Emmit would run wild. Irvin & Harper on the outside w/ Novacek running over the middle....
Dallas had tons of speed & could cover on D. Haley, Tolbert, Marlyand & Lett would get pressure.
Jimmy would have those boys ready to play.
It would be quite a coaching battle between those two.
The Cowboys of 1992-1995 would absolutely beat this Patriots team IMO.
That O-line would just wear them out. Emmit would run wild. Irvin & Harper on the outside w/ Novacek running over the middle....
Dallas had tons of speed & could cover on D. Haley, Tolbert, Marlyand & Lett would get pressure.
Jimmy would have those boys ready to play.
It would be quite a coaching battle between those two.
if you think this pats team is the best team ever ,then you must have forgotten the 1st 35 that youve watched
Well unless both teams actually play each other there's no way to ever know. I can point to an 18-0 record as a case for New England and the fact that players are faster, bigger and stronger than they used to be. What factors can you use for the other teams?
One is depth. Dallas had so much more depth its not even fair.
9 potential Hall of Famers on the 1992-1993 roster.
yes i can tell,i watched them play..biiger and faster..last time i cheked eric allen is still going to probowls...........their is something called SALARYCAP...I can see that youve been only watching for a few years but no cap meant their was some stacked teams before...teams that i dont think you ever saw
So under that premise would you ultimately state that the superbowl winner in 2030 would be better then this NE team you speak of???
That's just your view. Are you a football scout or have anything to do with football? Are you a coach? Or are you even just a water boy?
now look who the pats get to play in the superbowl...the winner of the nfc champ game...a game in neither team could get into the redzone to win it for possesion after possesion..............im not saying they suck..they are the team of the decade and get to be mentioned with the other greats,but they would be a dog against more than a couple of those great teams