New Ethic Rules Less Then A Day
- Thread starter djv
- Start date
2005
population Percent of
population
Total Population 296,410,404 100.0% 281,421,906 100.0%
White 237,854,954 80.2 211,460,626 75.1
Black or African American 37,909,341 12.8
American Indian and Alaska Native 2,863,001
Asian 12,687,472 4.3 10,242,998 3.6
Two or more races 4,579,024 1.5
Hispanic or Latino 42,687,224 14.4
NOTE: Percentages do not add up to 100% due to rounding and because Hispanics may be of any race and are therefore counted under more than one category.
..........................................................
I knew I read that somewhere.
I wonder if that is by intent ?
population Percent of
population
Total Population 296,410,404 100.0% 281,421,906 100.0%
White 237,854,954 80.2 211,460,626 75.1
Black or African American 37,909,341 12.8
American Indian and Alaska Native 2,863,001
Asian 12,687,472 4.3 10,242,998 3.6
Two or more races 4,579,024 1.5
Hispanic or Latino 42,687,224 14.4
NOTE: Percentages do not add up to 100% due to rounding and because Hispanics may be of any race and are therefore counted under more than one category.
..........................................................
I knew I read that somewhere.
I wonder if that is by intent ?
The intent is part of an Hispianic conspiracy to infiltrate and pollute all other races. They are just like Jews, only less crafty and have way better food and way hotter women.
For some reason, demographers distinguish between dark Hispanics and light Hispanics. Light skinned Hispanics from Spain are counted as White because they are clearly more advanced peoples.
:com:
im down this far in reading this thread so how in gods name has it turned into this? Are you two serious? You are worried about stupid shit like this when something really nice is happening? Could it be a minority thing? You two play right into the neocons hands. Enough already.
........................................................
not sure but I think the good old boys have these cacuses all the time, they just call it lunch.
its where things get decided
AR, you friggin quoted yourself. I thought you was better than that.
Are these Caucus meetings secret?
I assume then that you are also just as angry at the White House and Secret Service's attempt to keep private the visitor logs of Bush and Cheney. Yes/no? Afterall it was the public access of these records that got Clinton busted. Funny, it was a good thing for the Cons then, but they are trying to suddenly make these things innaccessible to the public.
I think its a good start--now if they just implement it on both sides--did not think giving "cold cash" jefferson a standing ovation was a positive 1st step on being serious on issue.
When they come out with proposals on immigration--ssn ect I will believe they serious about solutions for major issues. They can do these minimum wage ect that have their main block of voters doing cartwheels but sooner are later are going to have to address issues that effect your average tax payor and will have to get off the fence.
Looking forward to 08 primaries--in which someone will have to make a stance on what they are for--not what they are against.
Dog you say its a nice start without condemning what has happen in the last six years when it pertains to this. This a complete waste of time that never should be happening in the first place. You bring up the Jefferson 90 grand which is peanuts compared to what the people you support steal. How about lets hear some more about this before we fry him and if he is guilty then lets fry him. I think Smurph or Chad would say the same thing but you never said anything about Delay and how disappointed you were in him. Why is it that guys that lean left want all crooks gone but the rightees want only lefty crooks gone? And what in the world are you talking about with the minimum wage. The main block of voters? To me this min wage crap should be the last thing to think about. Your buddies messed so much stuff up the min wage doesn't seem that important to me if you had to make a list. This is a complete waste of time this ethics bill because we shouldn't have to be wasting time making bills like this. Unfortunately when guys are scum you have to.
Yes and at Country Club not MC Donald's. Some one said Minorty. I always believed only way minorities are heard are in a group beating on the door. Remember our woman having to march for the vote and to stay out after midnight. Some them good old boys as called. Were really bunch of white ass holes wanting to rule the country for there own wealth. It's OK for many of us Whites to be a shame of them.
RE: Black Caucus
The thing I have always been unable to comprehend is how a minority rants on segregation--and then proceeds to segregate themselves ie-- Black caucus-Black entertainment network-Black miss america ect ect ect.
Scott per your population #'s
The scarey part is with 80 million minority voters and rising-- given 90% political demographic affiliation that's about a 72 million vote spot every election and rising.
I made note in 04 when liberals were whing about rebs in power another 4 years--to just wait another decade or so and we will have one party system. It is not a hypothosis but is inevitable.
The thing I have always been unable to comprehend is how a minority rants on segregation--and then proceeds to segregate themselves ie-- Black caucus-Black entertainment network-Black miss america ect ect ect.
Scott per your population #'s
The scarey part is with 80 million minority voters and rising-- given 90% political demographic affiliation that's about a 72 million vote spot every election and rising.
I made note in 04 when liberals were whing about rebs in power another 4 years--to just wait another decade or so and we will have one party system. It is not a hypothosis but is inevitable.
You really need to do something about this, DTB. The numbers are clearly out of control. Is it time for some good old fashioned ethnic cleansing?
Maybe Trent Lott and Robert Byrd could sponsor a bi-partisan bill that would only count every black person as 3/5th of a person in matters like these, just like our adored Framers set-up back in the good old days. That would help slow down this onslaught of minority voters who threaten everything America stands for.
I mean, how silly that black people are represented proportionally to their percentage of the population. That doesn't seem fair.
I mean, how silly that black people are represented proportionally to their percentage of the population. That doesn't seem fair.
lol- they've been the majority for two working days. Let's at least see what happens.
Any opinion on what the republican congress 'did' in 6 years? :shrug:
I Googled "Pelosi first 100 hours" and this is what I got.......I don't know a thing about the author or the site. Probably a bunch of whack-jobs.
and Kosar, get out of the chair, your not the Monday morning quarterback anymore:sadwave: . (that's a sports reference. I know you been out of the sports loop for a while. Probably still counting your winnings:mj07: )
http://www.chronwatch.com/content/contentDisplay.asp?aid=25966&catcode=13
America?s New Liberal Direction: The First 100 Legislative Hours
Written by J. B. Williams
Saturday, January 06, 2007
As Washington Republicans line up to sing a politically tuned rendition of Rodney King?s classic hit, ?Can?t we all just get along,? soon-to-be House Speaker Pelosi angles to bury the bi-partisan hatchet right in Bush?s back.
Convinced that the American people completely rejected the Bush doctrine and embraced liberal socialism in the 2006 mid-terms, Democrats poised to take full control of Congress on Thursday are prepared to take no prisoners as they ram their agenda through the legislature, challenging Bush?s weakened veto alternative.
In other words, they are preparing to do just as Republicans should have done but failed to do while they controlled Congress. Had Republicans taken the same no prisoners approach to leadership, they?d still be in control of Congress. It was their spineless efforts to compromise with their friends on the left that caused conservatives and independents to defect in the last election. Still, they think they can get along with their political foes.
Democrats are about to teach Republicans what real partisan smash-mouth leadership is all about. They have set their first 100-hour legislative agenda and Republicans are already crying foul as Democrats set a minefield of road-blocks to keep Republicans from having any say at all in the process. As the home town San Francisco Chronicle points out: ?Democrats say they will bypass House committees, move legislation directly to the floor, and strictly limit the GOP's ability to make changes.? Now that?s bi-partisanship at its best! Pelosi style! Remember all the GOP initiatives allowed to be held up in committee, never allowed a floor vote where they would have easily passed a partisan roll call? No need for committee review now!
Their 100-hour agenda sounds good to average Americans limited only to lamestream headlines for their daily dose of reality.
? Raise the federal minimum wage from $5.15 to $7.25 an hour.
Though few Americans hold minimum wage jobs, increasing a national minimum wage has historically resulted in increased unemployment of the very people liberals claim to represent. Further, as economic conditions vary in different parts of the country, a high national minimum wage negatively impacts the poorest regions most. Many states already have a minimum wage above the national number. Those that don?t, have special economic challenges. A 41% increase at the national level should deliver the kind of unemployment numbers Democrats seek as a campaign tool for the 2008 presidential election.
? Curb lobbyists' influence by banning meals and gifts to lawmakers and requiring more disclosure and oversight.
This is what McCain-Feingold was supposed to accomplish. However, Democrats quickly circumvented true bi-partisan campaign-finance-reform efforts with the invention of 527 organizations like MoveOn.org, which led to the biggest illegal/unethical campaign sludge-fund bonanza in world history. Look closely at the details of what Democrats propose now. It has little to do with any honest lobbyist curbs.
? Repeal subsidies for the oil industry.
We have an energy crisis in this country. We are far too dependent upon foreign resources and Democrats? answer is to attack American energy producers while restricting domestic exploration and refining? The energy agenda in a nut-shell--bankrupt private energy industry and send the fed in to save the day.
? Cut college-loan interest rates in half.
College loan rates are the lowest in the world. We already don?t require repayment of college loans. What difference does the interest rate on uncollectible loans make? Another feel-good measure that means nothing to students, but much to tax-payers who are making those loans!
? Reduce prescription-drug prices for seniors by requiring Medicare to negotiate rates with pharmaceutical companies.
Reduce government intervention in drug manufacturing and curb frivolous law suits and everyone can better afford medical treatment including drugs. Study why American medical expenses are high to begin with, as compared to say Canada, where there are no frivolous law suits against manufacturers and no government gouging (taxation) of products on the way to market. Like our friends to the north, liberals will be happy to curb frivolous law suits once the government controls the medical industry and is the subject of such suits.
? Pass another bill that allows expanded federal funding for embryonic stem-cell research, betting on better prospects for an override if the president vetoes it again.
What they mean is, allow federal funding of embryo farming for stem-cell research. We already fund stem-cell research. We just don?t fund embryo farming for research purposes. That?s about to change.
? Implement unfulfilled recommendations of the Sept. 11 commission and beef up port security.
As most folks know, almost all of these recommendations are already in practice. The few that are not, have downside consequences that security experts (not partisan political hacks) prefer to leave un-implemented. If you want to do the number one thing to better secure this nation, start by securing our borders and prosecuting illegal aliens. Watch how Pelosi?s Democrats manage the number one threat to American security? ?What illegal aliens? They are undocumented American citizens, specifically, future federal dependents and Democrat voters! Come one--come all!?
Here?s what they haven?t put on their public agenda talking points list?
As military and national security experts prepare to increase troop strength in Iraq to put down the rising tide of terror attacks on innocent Iraqi citizens struggling to move their nation towards peaceful co-existence with the world, Democrats strategize how to cut or block funding for all current and future Iraq operations, publicly voicing support for victory in Iraq while working to legislatively guaranteeing failure via unfunded operations. The goal is to appear pro-troop while acting anti-Iraq mission. This nuanced lie won the election. So it will stand?
There it is in all its glory--America?s New Liberal Direction, a glance at the first 100 legislative hours under Democrat control.
And you thought you were forcing the two parties to cooperate with each other for a better America. You thought you were voting for secure borders and a brighter American future.
Foolish is as foolish does! Now we will reap what we have sown: pure foolishness!
Last edited:
