THE SPORTS REPORTER
SUNDAY, JANUARY 20
BEST BET
*NEW ENGLAND over SAN DIEGO by 3
[San Diego, plus the points] Norv! The power of Norv! They laughed, called us madmen at
the 2007 Winter Symposium of Football Forecasting for selecting the supercharged Nation
of Norv to win outright in Indianapolis last Sunday. As if that result shouldn?t have happened
last season? As if the Colts weren?t lucky enough to draw the Pats and the Bears at the right
time a year ago? Come on! NFL leading rusher Tomlinson on the sidelines? No problem, they
have other guys. Tight end Gates banged up? No problem, they?ll complete some passes.
Quarterback Rivers forced out, too? Since when was he ever the straw that stirs this drink,
or more than just one step beyond game manager? Nine-season NFL veteran Billy Volek has
forgotten more than Rivers knows about quarterbacking. Norv on the sidelines as the leader?
Hey, why not Norv?
All season long, we?ve been happy to buy in against the public outcry of Norv as a ninny,
simply because ?he? was 1-3 SU, then 5-5 SU at various junctures in his first season with
the Chargers. The selection label above has been planned from the outset of the post-season
? ride San Diego as far as they go in the playoffs. At 2-0, Norv times 2, the right to ?opt
out? is there. Injury excuses are staring us in the face.
It wasn?t that Norv was some secret Rockne,Walsh, Lombardi or the best football coach of
them all, Bill Belichick. It was that the negative public perception of Norv helped create value
on a team that had, and still might be clinging to, the best assortment of physical talent in
the NFL. The Chargers outplayed the Patriots in a post-season loss at San Diego last year.
Man for man, San Diego better that day, and would have been the better team the next week
vs. Indianapolis ? a game that wasn?t played?until last Sunday, that is!
Norv Turner was simply a different football coach than Marty Schottenheimer, a coach with
more NFL experience than any turkey who would be condemning him in print, on the air, or
in the stands. He primed the team differently than Schottenheimer, so that if, and probably
when they got to this point with some injuries, they would still have a team remaining to
compete. The guy was hired to get San Diego to the Super Bowl, not go 17-0 SU before they
got there. Aha! 17-0 SU is where the Patriots stand. They?re really, good. But as far as highprofile
post-season games go, Bill Belichick is more valuable as the underdog. It is to his
supreme credit that with this New England team, Belichick has gone 180 degrees from
where one would normally expect an ex-defensive coordinator to be. That?s what makes him
such a terrific NFL coach. In recent seasons, the NFL has instituted a series of rules that minimized
the effectiveness of defensive tactics. Instead of being eclipsed by their damn rules,
he went out and assembled the best offensive team instead!
Belichick?s defensive game plan from the 1990 Super Bowl against Buffalo is in the NFL Hall
of Fame, for cryin? out loud, along with the players his defense beat in that game, Jim Kelly
and Thurman Thomas! Who did the Giants have that day? Back-up QB Jeff Hostetler, overthe-
hill short-yardage back Ottis Anderson, and receivers nobody ever heard of. Eleven years
later with the Patriots, he pulled out essentially the same game plan to beat essentially the
same bull-headed, high-flying offensive team, the St. Louis Rams! With who? A rookie quarterback
Tom Brady, sluggish Antowaine (Where Am I Now?) Smith as the running back, and,
and wide receivers nobody ever heard of.
These Patriots are now the teams that were ripe for the taking by Belichick in the past. They
have the most points ever scored in an NFL season. The Chargers? They have the best twodeep
in the NFL, and a cast of characters very similar to the 1990 New York Giants and 2001
New England Patriots. This movie has been done before, and if they edit the old final cut, the
worst we can be is 2-1 with the plan. Long-range forecast of 15 degrees? Forget the warmweather
knocks, because the San Diegos can run in the cold. NEW ENGLAND, 26-23.
SUNDAY, JANUARY 20
*GREEN BAY over NY GIANTS by 10
Continuing with the lesson on who not to listen to and why regarding your football selection
mindset and avoiding media-created biases, there was a guy on ESPN radio in September with
the initials M.K. who was intent on leading the bandwagon for getting Tom Coughlin fired. He
asked the rhetorical question on the air, ?Come on, if you were starting an NFL franchise, which
coach would hire to help build it, Tom Coughlin, or Eric Mangini!?? The correct answer would
have been, ?Listen, b-hole, we?re not, and you?re not, starting an NFL franchise, ever, so the
question is moot and so are your motives. Let?s play the games.? Coughlin?s Giants were 0-2 SU
and ATS in early September, the losses to?Dallas and Green Bay! And here they are in Green
Bay, playing for the NFC Championship seven days after beating Dallas, against whom they were
0-2 SU and ATS in the regular season.
Your editor is flogging himself with a Big Blue noodle for going against his heart and inventing a
reason to lean to Dallas in last week?s game. The Romo hype. The Owens hype. It seeped into
the forecast. For shame. And here are the Giants traveling into the NFL?s ultimate hyped stadium
Lambeau Field, on what is forecasted to be a 4-degree night, to match up against the NFL?s ultimate
in hyped super-humans, the Man Who Would Be Favre.
But just like San Diego is more than its second-season starting quarterback Rivers, and just like
the Giants are more than the poor ol? maligned younger-brother quarterback Eli (hey, Rivers and
Manning were traded for each other, weren?t they?), the Packers are more than Brett the Living
Legend. The Green Bay pass rush is good. The secondary can cover, and is hammering receivers
right after the catch. But the biggest edge for Green Bay is that in the second season following
a conversion to a zone-blocking offensive system, the Packers represent an unusual challenge
to NFC opponents unaccustomed to seeing it anywhere else. Atlanta tried to do it, but it never
really clicked because who would fear a Michael Vick play-fake? Opposing defenses would just
be glad Vick wasn?t running himself, and they didn?t have to fear a 54% passer. Denver has done
well with the zone-blocking system for more than a decade, enjoying the most success with it
when John Elway (a Favre if there ever was another Favre) was the strong-armed quarterback
for defenses to fear. Green Bay head coach Mike McCarthy was brave and bold enough to start
the zone-blocking conversion in the 2006 season, his first, right when the Packers were beginning
to sprout talent as the team with the most draft picks since 2005, right when Favre was at
the crossroads for staying or going with the Packers, his career, or both. In three seasons at the
post, Green Bay general manager Ted Thompson has turned 21 draft picks into 34, and these
guys are like the lean and mean San Diego team in the AFC when the Chargers were rising from
obscurity a few seasons ago ? aggressive, talented, and under-the-radar with not much prior
activity for defensive coordinators to go to school against.
The Giants? pass rush was very effective against Tony Romo last Sunday because the Giants
were able to maintain a lead into the fourth quarter. But Packers? RB Ryan Grant has been getting
yards while untouched, such is the effectiveness of the Packers? blocking scheme. Dallas
ran some long drives at the Giants last Sunday with workhorse RB Marion Barber the key to setting
them up. But that only shortened the game and actually helped keep the Giants in it. It also
might have helped soften up the Giants? defense for this game. Hard-fought wins against divisional
rivals are often difficult to rebound from anyway, anytime, and if the Giants ? off Dallas -
- are getting defensive linemen double-teamed at the line of scrimmage and Grant is running
through lanes created by subsequent confusion, the Packers ? with the experience and strong
arm of Favre as an extra asset -- will have a lead, and have the Giants back on their heels like
they have so many other opponents this season. Note that also-ran 2007 teams Kansas City and
Denver ? defenses familiar with playing against this particular offensive scheme ? actually
played even or close to even with the Packers for four quarters in the regular season. But Green
Bay ultimately had enough all-aroundtalent and ability to overcome that, on the road each time.
GREEN BAY, 24-14.