Nolan interviews Sportsbook Manager of the Stardust Casino
- Thread starter MadJack
- Start date
Ahhh, bring in the clowns. One, two and three. Comical.
First we have the world according to monk,
"Guess what, naked girls no longer get posted here. I guess someone had to clean up you and your buddy barfly's act."
I've never posted a picture of any kind, and if I recall, it was your threads that caused the banishment of 'naked girls'. Not quite sure what you're talking about here.
"The same topics I post that you find distasteful are the same ones that some people enjoy. Didn't mean to tread on your turf tough guy."
Tough guy? LMFAO! Listen, you aren't 'debating' with Eddie Haskell here. He is the only tough guy that I know of. I don't find your posts 'distasteful'(where did you get that?), I just find it interesting when somebody (Neemer) whines about gambling debate in a gambling forum, but finds nothing strange about the 99% of posts that have nothing to do with gambling.
"You might have missed it from all the ego you seem to have. Maybe it's the voidance of sound reasoning, logic, and intelligence due to the vortex created by that blackhole head of yours."
I have to be honest here. I have no idea what you are talking about. Voidance? Vortex? Blackhole head? Missed posts because of ego? Yikes!
First we have the world according to monk,
"Guess what, naked girls no longer get posted here. I guess someone had to clean up you and your buddy barfly's act."
I've never posted a picture of any kind, and if I recall, it was your threads that caused the banishment of 'naked girls'. Not quite sure what you're talking about here.
"The same topics I post that you find distasteful are the same ones that some people enjoy. Didn't mean to tread on your turf tough guy."
Tough guy? LMFAO! Listen, you aren't 'debating' with Eddie Haskell here. He is the only tough guy that I know of. I don't find your posts 'distasteful'(where did you get that?), I just find it interesting when somebody (Neemer) whines about gambling debate in a gambling forum, but finds nothing strange about the 99% of posts that have nothing to do with gambling.
"You might have missed it from all the ego you seem to have. Maybe it's the voidance of sound reasoning, logic, and intelligence due to the vortex created by that blackhole head of yours."
I have to be honest here. I have no idea what you are talking about. Voidance? Vortex? Blackhole head? Missed posts because of ego? Yikes!
Now we have clown #2, the fatdadcoolguy chiming in, desperate for a response, apparently.
"You say the forum has been taken over by strokeathon from Myself, Freak and Monk."
Nope, didn't say that at all. I said to Neemer that he might be content with those types of posts, but asked him not to be surprised if something gambling related happened every now and then. Are you reading the same thread, or are you projecting?
" By stating this can I assume that don't approve of our threads, and that also you feel that we have "taken over" the forum."
Hmmm, once again, I never 'stated' this. Not even close. fatdad, I have to assume that you are slightly slow. Don't you remember our last discussion where I pointed out your straw-man arguments. This is another one. I'll explain it to you this time. This type of argument is when one throws something out there that was never stated or not true or not relevant and then shot down. You have a bad habit of this type of debating technique. It's intellectually dishonest, buddy.
" Am I correct in that assumption?"
Well, no. See above.
" So if we had taken over the forum yet had not posted in this thread at all until you felt it necessary to "bring us in''."
Again with the 'taken over'?
"It seems that everytime I reply you run and hide your head in the sand , and I am left with no reply or retort."
Are you placated with this retort? It will probably be the last one. I have seen how you go around and around in a circle when you get into arguments. It never ends and it's boring.
" I believe the last time you inadvertenly addressed me you called me a "jerk-off""
Well, no, actually that wasn't inadvertent.
"This was about Nolan Dolla interviewing a player in the sports game and instead of reading it and saying nice job, you felt you had poetic license to critique his work."
What?? wow, this one is quite funny. Right, how dare I critique Nolan's 'work'. Poetic license? WTF are you talking about? You're right, no need to discuss the dynamics of the industry, i should have just said 'nice job'.
"Then you spout off about a subject that means absolutely nothing...Who is the most influential person in Vegas? Who gives a shit, it isn't you."
I imagine that this is the type of intelligent comments that would pervade a seperate forum about gambling realted issues here.
" You consider this a deep topic yet gay couples adopting is inane."
Deep? No. Pertinent? Yes.
"I must say if you spent more time contributing and a little less patting yourself on the back you might be considerably more respected around here."
Oh God, here we go again. Ok, man. And where have I ever patted myself on the back?
" As I am sure this will meet with no reply, stick to what you know best. Who the most influential guy is in sports betting, and leave real topics to the rest of civilization, and I use that term loosely."
Not quite sure the meaning of this paragraph(I'm studying Chinese, but not fluent yet), but ok.
"You say the forum has been taken over by strokeathon from Myself, Freak and Monk."
Nope, didn't say that at all. I said to Neemer that he might be content with those types of posts, but asked him not to be surprised if something gambling related happened every now and then. Are you reading the same thread, or are you projecting?
" By stating this can I assume that don't approve of our threads, and that also you feel that we have "taken over" the forum."
Hmmm, once again, I never 'stated' this. Not even close. fatdad, I have to assume that you are slightly slow. Don't you remember our last discussion where I pointed out your straw-man arguments. This is another one. I'll explain it to you this time. This type of argument is when one throws something out there that was never stated or not true or not relevant and then shot down. You have a bad habit of this type of debating technique. It's intellectually dishonest, buddy.
" Am I correct in that assumption?"
Well, no. See above.
" So if we had taken over the forum yet had not posted in this thread at all until you felt it necessary to "bring us in''."
Again with the 'taken over'?
"It seems that everytime I reply you run and hide your head in the sand , and I am left with no reply or retort."
Are you placated with this retort? It will probably be the last one. I have seen how you go around and around in a circle when you get into arguments. It never ends and it's boring.
" I believe the last time you inadvertenly addressed me you called me a "jerk-off""
Well, no, actually that wasn't inadvertent.
"This was about Nolan Dolla interviewing a player in the sports game and instead of reading it and saying nice job, you felt you had poetic license to critique his work."
What?? wow, this one is quite funny. Right, how dare I critique Nolan's 'work'. Poetic license? WTF are you talking about? You're right, no need to discuss the dynamics of the industry, i should have just said 'nice job'.
"Then you spout off about a subject that means absolutely nothing...Who is the most influential person in Vegas? Who gives a shit, it isn't you."
I imagine that this is the type of intelligent comments that would pervade a seperate forum about gambling realted issues here.
" You consider this a deep topic yet gay couples adopting is inane."
Deep? No. Pertinent? Yes.
"I must say if you spent more time contributing and a little less patting yourself on the back you might be considerably more respected around here."
Oh God, here we go again. Ok, man. And where have I ever patted myself on the back?
" As I am sure this will meet with no reply, stick to what you know best. Who the most influential guy is in sports betting, and leave real topics to the rest of civilization, and I use that term loosely."
Not quite sure the meaning of this paragraph(I'm studying Chinese, but not fluent yet), but ok.
Nolan I know how you must feal. You start a discussion on your thoughts and half the place goes nuts. Some replies are so far of the track it's on real. I remember the feeling. I once asked why a bunch of good guy's here we all counted on for one sports or another for help. Just kind of went in business and here we were. Man mmmy balls got busted both of them for asking why. And saying I thought it hurt us all when it happened. Here you have a nice artical I liked it a lot. Hey it's not perfect and many had there say about that. Many disagree. Many are just as nasty as ever. Mad Jack the idea of a forum to talk only gambling ideas and news is not that bad of a idea. Then those who want to do other things in the general forum can. I find a few things in there that can be fun at times. Hey we all like to fight over politics.
Nolan keep bringing us what ever you got to give. It's not about right or wrong. It's about offering it for us to enjoy and do as we want with it. I don't think you ever told us we had to believe every word of what you said. Just your opinion and some things to discuss. Thats how it should always work. Thanks.
Nolan keep bringing us what ever you got to give. It's not about right or wrong. It's about offering it for us to enjoy and do as we want with it. I don't think you ever told us we had to believe every word of what you said. Just your opinion and some things to discuss. Thats how it should always work. Thanks.
Bluemound Freak said:
Blue,
You got all that from a comment to neemer? On account of that, you felt it necessary to clarify that 'Jack, not Kosar' makes the decisions?
You gave us an 8000 word treatise on making people laugh because of one quick comment?
I know that the 'horny' thread wasn't started by one of the 3 clowns. I never said that it was. Read it again, guy.
Quit being so hyper-sensitive, you three amigos. My irritation was with somebody that found discussion, debate and differing opinions on a gambling related subject to be unsatisfactory. I found that to be quite ironic given the nature of the site where we hang out.
I used your posting style and content as foils to anything even remotely resembling gambling. Who could possibly argue with that?
KotysDad said:
Kotysdad,
I wouldn't say that Nolan is a 'dope', I just think he was a little off-base on this one. But that's what discussion is all about!
BLOSAR(Like that, should stick)....
Perhaps you've forgotten what the "General Discussion" forum is all about. Jack himself describes it pretty well on the opening page; "Discussions about everything else and Non-Handicapping Issues" Does that make sense knucklhead? If you're truly interested in other types of information, then there are 8 other threads to suit your fancy.
I've never understood why people bitch about certain topics of particular threads when all they have to do is "NOT READ THE FUHKING THING". You're like some kid who keeps touching the hot stove. For God sakes, close your eyes and move on dipwhit.
The POINT to my reply was that Nolan simply posted some GAMBLING INFO. in regards to an interview that he had done, and now has to deal with some smart ass remarks by yourself and a few others. If ya don't agree, fine, move the fuhk on, but don't be some pompous ass who thinks he should be held in some sort of high esteem by other members of this board. If you would've contributed 1/1000th of material that ND has contributed, perhaps you would be held in a higher regard than Nolan. BUT, you haven't, and really all you seem to do is bitch and complain. I wouldn't doubt is ya had a slice b/t your legs cuz you sound just like my fuhking wife! Take a couple of Zolofts and drink ya a few beers b/c life is certainly not as bad as you think it is.
Perhaps you've forgotten what the "General Discussion" forum is all about. Jack himself describes it pretty well on the opening page; "Discussions about everything else and Non-Handicapping Issues" Does that make sense knucklhead? If you're truly interested in other types of information, then there are 8 other threads to suit your fancy.
I've never understood why people bitch about certain topics of particular threads when all they have to do is "NOT READ THE FUHKING THING". You're like some kid who keeps touching the hot stove. For God sakes, close your eyes and move on dipwhit.
The POINT to my reply was that Nolan simply posted some GAMBLING INFO. in regards to an interview that he had done, and now has to deal with some smart ass remarks by yourself and a few others. If ya don't agree, fine, move the fuhk on, but don't be some pompous ass who thinks he should be held in some sort of high esteem by other members of this board. If you would've contributed 1/1000th of material that ND has contributed, perhaps you would be held in a higher regard than Nolan. BUT, you haven't, and really all you seem to do is bitch and complain. I wouldn't doubt is ya had a slice b/t your legs cuz you sound just like my fuhking wife! Take a couple of Zolofts and drink ya a few beers b/c life is certainly not as bad as you think it is.
Replying to two separate questions which were posed above:
ON LEM BANKER: I'm sure we could get a sit-down interview with Mr. Banker if we chose to pursue it. Trouble is, his notions of sportsbetting are probably more in the stone age than mine. If I'm a dinasour, then he's a Taranasaurus Rex. To my knowledge, he still uses runners and phone in accounts locally in Vegas. Perhaps he has come into the 21st Century and actually opened up an offshore account, but I suspect his first-hand knowledge of what goes on in the Caribbean is nil. There are people who know more about offshores here at this site than Mr. Banker (or myself for that matter). If someone has information to the contrary, then please post it here, but I just think we'd be spinning our wheels by talking to Banker -- not that he's not an exceptionally gifted and disciplined handicapper.
ON INTERNET GAMBLING (LEGAL ISSUES): My track record predicting what the electorate or legislators (state or federal) will do is pretty poor. Hell, it's worse than my hockey record. One of the reasons I left Texas several years ago was when the voters of that state rejected legalized horse racing (it's since been legalized, of course). In the years since, I could never predict what the voters of any state would do on gambling issues -- since it's such an emotional topic with so many people parroting so many scare tactics (get organized religion involved and the whole thing turns a clusterphuck of confusion). Regarding Congress (banning Internet gambling at the federal level), what you have to understand is this is essentially a corrupt collective of high powered lawyers who sell legislation and turn into whores to the highest bidder. If the anti-gambling zealots mobilize with the banking industry (credit card companies are increasingly becoming anti-Internet gambling), we might be screwed. Also, anti-gambling forces have several prominent spokespeople -- Goodlatte, Wolf, Kyl, and so forth. But there is NOT one single legislator who wants to be construed as PRO-GAMBLING. There is also not a lobbying force that I know of which seeks to protect our freedoms as gamblers (the ACLU is noticably silent on Internet gambling -- leading me to realize it's not interested in real civil liberties on the Internet, as it doesn't fit in with their narrow agenda). And the American Gaming Association is now neutral on the question (it's basically a lapdog for the Nevada gambing industry -- and nothing else). If Nevada casinos and gambling corporations are determined to increase their involvement in Internet gambling (i.e. they think they can make money from it), then they are likely to try to get more involved in stopping the dangerous legislation now in Committee that seeks to take away our rights. If corporation at any level get involved, that will increase the ammunition for our case that gambling should continue to be legal. However, without some kind of heavyweight support (bribes in the form of campaign contributions), I see Internet gambling being criminalized by the end of the next Congressional session. Whether or not Federal enforcement of those laws is possible remains an even bigger question.
-- Nolan Dalla
ON LEM BANKER: I'm sure we could get a sit-down interview with Mr. Banker if we chose to pursue it. Trouble is, his notions of sportsbetting are probably more in the stone age than mine. If I'm a dinasour, then he's a Taranasaurus Rex. To my knowledge, he still uses runners and phone in accounts locally in Vegas. Perhaps he has come into the 21st Century and actually opened up an offshore account, but I suspect his first-hand knowledge of what goes on in the Caribbean is nil. There are people who know more about offshores here at this site than Mr. Banker (or myself for that matter). If someone has information to the contrary, then please post it here, but I just think we'd be spinning our wheels by talking to Banker -- not that he's not an exceptionally gifted and disciplined handicapper.
ON INTERNET GAMBLING (LEGAL ISSUES): My track record predicting what the electorate or legislators (state or federal) will do is pretty poor. Hell, it's worse than my hockey record. One of the reasons I left Texas several years ago was when the voters of that state rejected legalized horse racing (it's since been legalized, of course). In the years since, I could never predict what the voters of any state would do on gambling issues -- since it's such an emotional topic with so many people parroting so many scare tactics (get organized religion involved and the whole thing turns a clusterphuck of confusion). Regarding Congress (banning Internet gambling at the federal level), what you have to understand is this is essentially a corrupt collective of high powered lawyers who sell legislation and turn into whores to the highest bidder. If the anti-gambling zealots mobilize with the banking industry (credit card companies are increasingly becoming anti-Internet gambling), we might be screwed. Also, anti-gambling forces have several prominent spokespeople -- Goodlatte, Wolf, Kyl, and so forth. But there is NOT one single legislator who wants to be construed as PRO-GAMBLING. There is also not a lobbying force that I know of which seeks to protect our freedoms as gamblers (the ACLU is noticably silent on Internet gambling -- leading me to realize it's not interested in real civil liberties on the Internet, as it doesn't fit in with their narrow agenda). And the American Gaming Association is now neutral on the question (it's basically a lapdog for the Nevada gambing industry -- and nothing else). If Nevada casinos and gambling corporations are determined to increase their involvement in Internet gambling (i.e. they think they can make money from it), then they are likely to try to get more involved in stopping the dangerous legislation now in Committee that seeks to take away our rights. If corporation at any level get involved, that will increase the ammunition for our case that gambling should continue to be legal. However, without some kind of heavyweight support (bribes in the form of campaign contributions), I see Internet gambling being criminalized by the end of the next Congressional session. Whether or not Federal enforcement of those laws is possible remains an even bigger question.
-- Nolan Dalla
nothing against trying to get a bw sit down talk,but don't hold your breath. is right in the middle of upgrading one of his local country clubs putting in lots of cah and has brought in the best to work out some kinks. yes he makes great money playing,but he is a major businessman and very good at it.
i don't think he will really want to talk about gambling and i really don't blame him for what the feds have put him through. might be one of the top guys but doesnot like to be in the spot light,but a very nice person and a truely genius in the business world. also gives a lot back to community more then people really know. very charitable to those in vegas that are in need and civic groups.
people over look that,they tend to look at him as a high priced gambler. but the truth is he is a good civic person who gives to the good causes,employs lots of people and takes care of them and all he ask for is good hard work in return. his gamining is privite and he really likes to keep it that way.
i don't think he will really want to talk about gambling and i really don't blame him for what the feds have put him through. might be one of the top guys but doesnot like to be in the spot light,but a very nice person and a truely genius in the business world. also gives a lot back to community more then people really know. very charitable to those in vegas that are in need and civic groups.
people over look that,they tend to look at him as a high priced gambler. but the truth is he is a good civic person who gives to the good causes,employs lots of people and takes care of them and all he ask for is good hard work in return. his gamining is privite and he really likes to keep it that way.
Well tough guy,
I don't know what else to say. You've beaten me in every conceivable facet of verbal discussion. What am I to do? The only person that has been civil is YOU. You'll notice where I also tried to veer Nolan's thread back to what you might consider relevant, but you've managed to suck it into the depths of despair. Bummer.
Don't worry, some day you will find a BBS with people who appreciate you. Dork.
:spotting:
I don't know what else to say. You've beaten me in every conceivable facet of verbal discussion. What am I to do? The only person that has been civil is YOU. You'll notice where I also tried to veer Nolan's thread back to what you might consider relevant, but you've managed to suck it into the depths of despair. Bummer.
Don't worry, some day you will find a BBS with people who appreciate you. Dork.
:spotting:
Neemer (who never met a diabetic that he didn't want to rip off) opines,
"BLOSAR(Like that, should stick)...."
Could stick, who knows? I'm sure it will stick with the mentally infirm like yourself. Should be interesting!
"Perhaps you've forgotten what the "General Discussion" forum is all about. Jack himself describes it pretty well on the opening page; "Discussions about everything else and Non-Handicapping Issues" Does that make sense knucklhead? If you're truly interested in other types of information, then there are 8 other threads to suit your fancy."
True 'nuff, yo. The thing is, there isn't a whole lot of discussion in the other forums and once every blue moon in one forum or the other, something interesting comes down the pike. Regardless of your whining about things getting too complicated, there was at least a decent, if truncated, exchange about the subject matter. If it was up to you, we would all say 'great job Nolan' and leave it at that. Just like fatdaddy would have us do. Strangely enough, there are differing opinons Neemer. Is that OK with you?
"I've never understood why people bitch about certain topics of particular threads when all they have to do is "NOT READ THE FUHKING THING". You're like some kid who keeps touching the hot stove. For God sakes, close your eyes and move on dipwhit."
Oh, actually I was bitching about somebody bitching about a gambling related discussion actually going on. That somebody would be you, in case you haven't figured it out.
"The POINT to my reply was that Nolan simply posted some GAMBLING INFO. in regards to an interview that he had done, and now has to deal with some smart ass remarks by yourself and a few others."
Right. And his info was generally wrong and/or misguided according to everybody else who had an opinion. It's ok if we post our opinon, isn't it neemer? You want to put the pink practice jersey on Nolan? Is that it? You know the one where nobody on the practice field can touch him?
" If ya don't agree, fine, move the fuhk on, but don't be some pompous ass who thinks he should be held in some sort of high esteem by other members of this board."
Why would you think that that I 'think I should be held in high esteem'? What have I ever said that would make you think that? Right. Nothing.
" If you would've contributed 1/1000th of material that ND has contributed, perhaps you would be held in a higher regard than Nolan."
He's a very good poker player. Also, he's a good writer and I look forward to his Stu Ungar book, if the little bit that he shared with us is any indication.
" BUT, you haven't, and really all you seem to do is bitch and complain."
Different people see different things, neemer. You would see 'contributions' by any one person differently than me. For instance, you would see a flat-out losing 'theory' as being a contribution if it was proferred by a particular person. I would see it for what it was. Ya know? That doesn't mean you are stupid, just that you are a mindless lemming.
" I wouldn't doubt is ya had a slice b/t your legs cuz you sound just like my fuhking wife! Take a couple of Zolofts and drink ya a few beers b/c life is certainly not as bad as you think it is."
Nice. Nah, life ain't that bad here, buddy.
"BLOSAR(Like that, should stick)...."
Could stick, who knows? I'm sure it will stick with the mentally infirm like yourself. Should be interesting!
"Perhaps you've forgotten what the "General Discussion" forum is all about. Jack himself describes it pretty well on the opening page; "Discussions about everything else and Non-Handicapping Issues" Does that make sense knucklhead? If you're truly interested in other types of information, then there are 8 other threads to suit your fancy."
True 'nuff, yo. The thing is, there isn't a whole lot of discussion in the other forums and once every blue moon in one forum or the other, something interesting comes down the pike. Regardless of your whining about things getting too complicated, there was at least a decent, if truncated, exchange about the subject matter. If it was up to you, we would all say 'great job Nolan' and leave it at that. Just like fatdaddy would have us do. Strangely enough, there are differing opinons Neemer. Is that OK with you?
"I've never understood why people bitch about certain topics of particular threads when all they have to do is "NOT READ THE FUHKING THING". You're like some kid who keeps touching the hot stove. For God sakes, close your eyes and move on dipwhit."
Oh, actually I was bitching about somebody bitching about a gambling related discussion actually going on. That somebody would be you, in case you haven't figured it out.
"The POINT to my reply was that Nolan simply posted some GAMBLING INFO. in regards to an interview that he had done, and now has to deal with some smart ass remarks by yourself and a few others."
Right. And his info was generally wrong and/or misguided according to everybody else who had an opinion. It's ok if we post our opinon, isn't it neemer? You want to put the pink practice jersey on Nolan? Is that it? You know the one where nobody on the practice field can touch him?
" If ya don't agree, fine, move the fuhk on, but don't be some pompous ass who thinks he should be held in some sort of high esteem by other members of this board."
Why would you think that that I 'think I should be held in high esteem'? What have I ever said that would make you think that? Right. Nothing.
" If you would've contributed 1/1000th of material that ND has contributed, perhaps you would be held in a higher regard than Nolan."
He's a very good poker player. Also, he's a good writer and I look forward to his Stu Ungar book, if the little bit that he shared with us is any indication.
" BUT, you haven't, and really all you seem to do is bitch and complain."
Different people see different things, neemer. You would see 'contributions' by any one person differently than me. For instance, you would see a flat-out losing 'theory' as being a contribution if it was proferred by a particular person. I would see it for what it was. Ya know? That doesn't mean you are stupid, just that you are a mindless lemming.
" I wouldn't doubt is ya had a slice b/t your legs cuz you sound just like my fuhking wife! Take a couple of Zolofts and drink ya a few beers b/c life is certainly not as bad as you think it is."
Nice. Nah, life ain't that bad here, buddy.
Felonious Monk said:
I've tried to be nice here , monk, but if you call me a dork one more time i'm going to explode. That just isn't very nice.
Kosar,
You apparently have not run into people at the scrapyard that have your superior intellect and vocabulary....Let me assure you I am impressed. So the rest of the guys at the bowling alley think you are "one smart feller" also.....You opened your mouth.....I replied......I did not engage you, on the contrary.
Do not let your delusions peregrinate the complex world you live in.....breakfast is at 6:00a.m. sharp, after which is nap time,...shall I go on....you do not impress me...you make insinuations and then reply...""I never said that"....I never actually called you a yellow coward did I?
Do me a favor.....do not EVER refer to me in a thread in which I am not subscribed or currently posting on ok? You follow?....let me make this a little more clear....put me on your ignore list and we won't have these type of discussions again...plus your Mommy won't catch you up late again.
You apparently have not run into people at the scrapyard that have your superior intellect and vocabulary....Let me assure you I am impressed. So the rest of the guys at the bowling alley think you are "one smart feller" also.....You opened your mouth.....I replied......I did not engage you, on the contrary.
Do not let your delusions peregrinate the complex world you live in.....breakfast is at 6:00a.m. sharp, after which is nap time,...shall I go on....you do not impress me...you make insinuations and then reply...""I never said that"....I never actually called you a yellow coward did I?
Do me a favor.....do not EVER refer to me in a thread in which I am not subscribed or currently posting on ok? You follow?....let me make this a little more clear....put me on your ignore list and we won't have these type of discussions again...plus your Mommy won't catch you up late again.
In the words of Rodney King
" Can't we all just get along? "
The sun is shining, the birds are chirping and the MARINERS SUCK
" Can't we all just get along? "
The sun is shining, the birds are chirping and the MARINERS SUCK
See, I told you Joe Lupo was "influential." Just look at all the chit he stirred up on the MadJacks Forum.
-- Nolan Dalla
-- Nolan Dalla
Nolan Dalla said:See, I told you Joe Lupo was "influential." Just look at all the chit he stirred up on the MadJacks Forum.
-- Nolan Dalla
I don't care what anybody says, he is a powerful man, may not be the most influential, but he is highly respected...
