Scott4USC Read this

[Mr Hockey]

Not true. That statement shows pairity, nothing more, nothing less. Does that statement mean the PAC10 is tough? No. Does that statement mean the PAC10 is weak? No. It simply shows that PAC10 members are close to equal. (except for USC, obviously) There are no dynasty teams in the NFL anymore. Does that mean the NFL is "tougher from top to bottom"? I think you know the correct answer to this...



You cannot apply todays clear-cut method of declaring the NC to teams from years ago. Take this year for example. You feel like your AP championship is legit, right? There has been tons of debate this year (we are all guilty of it :nooo: ) over which is the true NC. Years ago this arguement occured every year. There were split NC almost every year. And no, the AP and coaches poll were not the "most recognized". There were many polls that gained plenty of recognition. So simply looking over old stats and applying todays NC standards is absurd. You are a young man Scott, so you most likely have never known college FB without the BCS. Declaring the NC in today's times is much more standardized. (except for this year, I look for BCS tweaks to come) So for you to discredit any of Ole Miss' championships is really showing your "young" knowledge of college FB.

You are dead on with this post & Scott save your breath. You can't argue with the facts of how different titles are determined & recognized now.

 

[Kdogg21]

Phin
I completely agree. Scott is a waste of everyone's time is almost comical. D :tongue :tongue

I second that notion and completely agree with bbk and Phin. You guys bring some great information to this website and I would hope you continue in the future.....

 

[phin8181]

So simply looking over old stats and applying todays NC standards is absurd.

So simply looking over old stats and applying todays NC standards is absurd.

....hmmmm...is this metric or standard?? :shrug:


.Totally and completely agree Stuman & Mr. Hockey.....

 

[Mr Hockey]

Scott the official NCAA site lists Ole Miss as winning 3 titles. Let it go, you have nothing you can say that will change it.

This clown should be banned.

 

[Scott4USC]

Stuman

AP POLL has been around since 1936. The Coaches poll has been around since 1950. Both are the oldest and most recognized polls to determine the National Champion of college football.

The country did not feel Ole Miss was #1 at the time. So how can you claim they were National Champions? If AP and BCS had LSU #1 last season, there is no way USC could claim a National Championship even if these small time organizations crown USC National Champion. Why is this so hard to understand? This is been going on way before the BCS.

How come the MEDIA and FANS across the nation recognize USC with 9 National Titles instead of 14. (you can insert any other team instead of USC) Why? You cannot explain that. I easily can and did.

How come the official website for the SEC conference only recognizes 1 National Title for Ole Miss? I think of all sites that would be the one to recognize all 3 National Championships for Ole Miss?

Yes Ole Miss technically won 3 NC's and USC technically won 14 NC's. But Ole Miss is recognized for winning ZERO NC's and USC is recognized for winning 9.

Why would I argue this when I could claim USC won freaking 14 titles??? Because I do not believe in it (majority don't either) and I always stand up for what i believe in even if it is against USC. That must hurt my "homerism" somewhat, right?

 

[Mr Hockey]

Technical over opinion

Simple, get it