DAVE MALINSKY
GAME: Ball St. @ Rutgers Jan 5, 2008 12:00PMSPORT: College Football PicksPICK: Ball St.Offered at: 11 REASON FOR PICK: 4* BALL STATE over RUTGERS
The past couple of years we have used Notre Dame as Exhibit A as to how media perceptions can create false impressions about college football programs, to the point at which the betting markets also end up reacting improperly. Now we get a chance to go to work with Exhibit B, with Greg Schiano and Rutgers getting a lot of play in the major Northeast media centers in recent years that has created an entirely different impression than what is really happening. Part of that market influence can be seen in an opener of -9.5 that is now reaching -11 in some key precincts, and this favorite simply does not deserve that kind of respect.
It is more than just the betting markets, however. In recent weeks Schiano actually was contacted for the Michigan head coaching job, which shows how others have fallen into the trap. Yes, Rutgers is a better team now than when he took over. But the bottom line is still just a 37-46 record in his eight seasons, with the lone bowl win coming over a mediocre Kansas State team LY. That does not earn you a round-trip ticket to Ann Arbor or lunch at Zingermans. And instead of building off of LY?s bowl win to begin reaching a higher level, the Scarlet Knights actually regressed this season. An awful non-conference schedule gave them walk-overs vs. Norfolk State, Army and Buffalo, which means that they were under .500 in all other games. How about road games vs. bowl opponents, one of our usual starting points in bowl breakdowns? There was just one, an ugly 38-19 loss at Connecticut in which they allowed the Huskies to run for 256 yards, their second high for the season, at 6.6 per carry, their high. And we all saw where Connecticut is at this time with our 4* ticket on Wake Forest last Saturday. At home the Scarlet Knights lost to the likes of Maryland and Cincinnati and nearly fell to Pittsburgh as well, while in the biggest challenge of the season they were destroyed 31-3 vs. West Virginia. They only time they boarded a plane in 2007 (they did not even play a road game until October 13th), they lost outright at disappointing Louisville. You can not go 7-5 vs. that class of schedule and be laying double figures in a bowl game, but that is where the perceptions are.
While Rutgers has had a great deal of media attention, Ball State is about as far off of the radar as a program can get. But NFL scouts are already watching sophomore QB Nate Davis, who threw for 3,376 yards with a special ratio of 27 touchdowns passes vs. only six interceptions this year, and his preferred targets will also end up playing on Sunday?s ? WR Dante Love caught 87 passes for 1,229 yards and nine TD?s, and TE Darius Hill caught 56 for 837, and also nine scores. They all return next season, so it is just the beginning for a program that has increased its win total for three straight seasons, and is showing real signs of progress.
Can Ball State play at this level? There is no question about that. The Cardinals have gone 5-1 ATS the past two seasons as road underdogs against teams from outside of the MAC, including 4-1 vs. bowl-bound opponents and there were some sparkling performances along the way ? a near-upset of Michigan LY, an outright win at Navy this season, and a near-miss at Nebraska this past September back when the Cornhuskers were still trying. And they also bring one of the prime ingredients that has helped underdog in this price range to play with far more passion at bowl time ? this game represents a real reward for them, while for Rutgers it is actually a step below where the Knights had hoped to be. A hungry underdog is in this one all the way, and even should Ball State fall behind the passing game creates outstanding back-door potential.