Nick Douglas said:
ctownguy is typically uninformed, so I almost shouldn't respond here...
Even the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court acknowledges that the legal right to an abortion is settled federal law. He was nominated by one of the most fundamentally religious presidents we've ever had. What more needs to be said?
Here moron read this and see who is uniformed you pompous ass:
Settled law is settled until it is unsettled
Michael Gaynor
Michael Gaynor
July 28, 2005
"Separate but equal" was settled law from 1896 until 1954.
About 58 years.
Lower courts respected it.
As they were required to do.
Then the United States Supreme Court decided to unsettle it.
As it was entitled to do.
And so Plessy v. Ferguson was rejected in Brown v. Board of Education.
With the Court stating:
"We conclude that, in the field of public education, the doctrine of 'separate but equal' has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal. Therefore, we hold that the plaintiffs and others similarly situated for whom the actions have been brought are, by reason of the segregation complained of, deprived of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment."
Roe v. Wade was judicial activism at its worst.
It has been settled law since January 22, 1973.
Less than 33 years.
A quarter of a century less than the period of time "separate but equal" was settled law.
Senator Patrick Leahy, Democrat of Vermont (that's Howard Dean's home state) announced that he may oppose Supreme Court nominee Judge John Roberts over the issue of abortion.
He will vote against Judge Roberts if he determines that Judge Roberts
will be an "activist" judge on issues like abortion. That is, vote to overturn Roe v. Wade, to which Senator Leahy apparently is committed with the fervor to which many were committed to Plessy v. Ferguson.
Senator Leahy put it this way: "I want to find out if he's going to be as active as this ? as people like Justice (Antonin) Scalia and Justice (Clarence) Thomas, who have almost willy-nilly overruled things."
And added: "I don't see how somebody who said that they didn't consider Roe vs. Wade settled law ... I don't see how they get confirmed."
Senator Leahy really wants a pledge that Judge Roberts will consider future abortion cases with a closed mind.
Ignore scientific progress that undermines Roe v. Wade.
And refuse to revisit the merits under any circumstances.
AND SENATOR LEAHY IS THE RANKING DEMOCRAT ON THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE.
Judge Roberts is fit to sit on any court.
Senator Leahy is unfit to sit in judgment of Judge Roberts' fitness.
Judge Roberts told the Senate Judiciary Committee during his 2003
confirmation hearing that he considered Roe v. Wade to be "settled law."
I don't doubt him, or disagree.
Attorney General Alberto Gonzales recently pointed out that as a Supreme Court justice, Judge Roberts would not have to abide by the precedent.
That's right as well.
And if Alberto is not prepared to overrule Roe v. Wade, then President Bush's next United States Supreme Court nominee should be Judge Roberts' wife!
Senator Leahy's opposition would be a badge of honor for Judge Roberts.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------