It speaks to her ability to lead, no?
and to his even more so as he is on the top of the ticket:shrug:
It speaks to her ability to lead, no?
for a start check out this month's us magazine, which is owned by the village voice, & whose owner is a big contributor to the obama campaign...
Al, I see a negative Palin article as well as one where McCain's daughter comes to Bristol's defense. Seems fair and balanced to me.:shrug:
okay stevie if that's how you see it that's fine....nothing that i am going to say will change your mind so i'm not going to try....
nobody mentioned fred thompson`s speech....he kicked some proggie arse tonight....
he was on `em...
of course,two major networks aren`t even carrying the convention(now theres fair and balanced)...
"two questions we'll never have to ask about john mccain: who is this man?... and can we trust him with the presidency?"
"john's been to iraq 8 times since 2003, and he went every time seeking truth, and not publicity."(
whoa)...ouch!
on obama......."not because of a teleprompter speech designed to appeal to our critics abroad!"
whack!..
fred, you magnificent bastard!...usa!....usa!...
The fact that Palin knowingly gave birth to a downs syndrome baby solidifies her pro-life stance with more than just rhetoric.
okay stevie if that's how you see it that's fine....nothing that i am going to say will change your mind so i'm not going to try....
This is the thing I just don't get - what exactly is "pro-life"? Is giving birth to a baby where it ends? To me, the fact that she goes back to work 3 days after giving birth to a high-needs child, isn't "pro-life". To me, dragging her pregnant teenage daughter into the spotlight (which she had to know was going to happen by accepting this nomination) isn't "pro-life". If a person is truly "pro-life" then they should care for and about the life of their children more every day that the child is alive. Just giving birth doesn't make a person pro-life. In fact, I would go so far as to say that those people who are not ready to have a child and decide instead to have an abortion are more pro-life because they realize that they cannot give a child the time, attention, and support that he or she will need.
I'm sure this isn't the proper thread for this debate, but I am sick of hearing she is "pro-life". If that is true, then she should be taking care of her family #1.
This is the thing I just don't get - what exactly is "pro-life"? Is giving birth to a baby where it ends? To me, the fact that she goes back to work 3 days after giving birth to a high-needs child, isn't "pro-life". To me, dragging her pregnant teenage daughter into the spotlight (which she had to know was going to happen by accepting this nomination) isn't "pro-life". If a person is truly "pro-life" then they should care for and about the life of their children more every day that the child is alive. Just giving birth doesn't make a person pro-life. In fact, I would go so far as to say that those people who are not ready to have a child and decide instead to have an abortion are more pro-life because they realize that they cannot give a child the time, attention, and support that he or she will need.
I'm sure this isn't the proper thread for this debate, but I am sick of hearing she is "pro-life". If that is true, then she should be taking care of her family #1.
now the msm is asking for dna tests to prove she is actually the 5 month old`s mother?...
this isn`t the media doing an investigation...this is the media being willfully led by the nose by the extremist left wing smear sites...
they didn`t give a whit about edwards` shenanigans..as he was running for president....but palin`s 17 years old daughter?...now that`s news....
lets denigrate a candidate`s children...i mean,whatever it takes,right?......
feminism is a sham...it`s not about women...it`s political...
if anything these stupid attacks on Palin's daughter are mobilizing the social conservatives and also are very offensive to small town people. Almost everyone in small towns deal with these issues if not for their kids, for their kids friends.
To see this ridiculed in the press, in such a hateful way, will do nothing but earn sympathy for Palin, AND is an attack on small town/rural values and way of life.
This act could actually be the whole key to a McCain victory.
Losing rural America by a landslide is what will happen if the "angry left" keeps doing what it is doing.
How the hell do you know the quality of the childs' life? Just because she goes back to work 3 days later doesn't mean the child isn't loved or being cared for. Are we now in the business of measuring a womans' love and ability to care for her child by how long she stays out of the workforce after giving birth? This isn't 1960 anymore, most women are going back to work MUCH sooner than they used to but I'll bet you've never had a problem with that until now right? Mighty presumptous of you to assume she isn't "taking care of her family".
As far as "dragging her daughter into the spotlight", that's a family matter that has nothing to do with her political abilities yet leave it to the pathetic assholes on the left to dig up this petty and juvenile shit. It seems to be a pattern with Liberals, feminists, the democraps as a whole. Don't stick to the issues, just personal attacks, even if you have to slam children. And YOU of all people have the gall to lay this shit at HER feet? That's laughable dude....get a fawkin clue!
As far as "dragging her daughter into the spotlight", that's a family matter that has nothing to do with her political abilities yet leave it to the pathetic assholes on the left to dig up this petty and juvenile shit. It seems to be a pattern with Liberals, feminists, the democraps as a whole. Don't stick to the issues, just personal attacks, even if you have to slam children. And YOU of all people have the gall to lay this shit at HER feet? That's laughable dude....get a fawkin clue!
This is the thing I just don't get - what exactly is "pro-life"? Is giving birth to a baby where it ends? To me, the fact that she goes back to work 3 days after giving birth to a high-needs child, isn't "pro-life". To me, dragging her pregnant teenage daughter into the spotlight (which she had to know was going to happen by accepting this nomination) isn't "pro-life". If a person is truly "pro-life" then they should care for and about the life of their children more every day that the child is alive. Just giving birth doesn't make a person pro-life. In fact, I would go so far as to say that those people who are not ready to have a child and decide instead to have an abortion are more pro-life because they realize that they cannot give a child the time, attention, and support that he or she will need.
I'm sure this isn't the proper thread for this debate, but I am sick of hearing she is "pro-life". If that is true, then she should be taking care of her family #1.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.