Trump Election Trail

Old School

OVR
Forum Member
Mar 19, 2006
38,197
370
83
74
Ladies and gentlemen I present to you the 1 term POTUS.


Signs and symptoms of narcissistic personality disorder and the severity of symptoms vary. People with the disorder can:



Have an exaggerated sense of self-importance


Have a sense of entitlement and require constant, excessive admiration


Expect to be recognized as superior even without achievements that warrant it


Exaggerate achievements and talents


Be preoccupied with fantasies about success, power, brilliance, beauty or the perfect mate


Believe they are superior and can only associate with equally special people


Monopolize conversations and belittle or look down on people they perceive as inferior


Expect special favors and unquestioning compliance with their expectations


Take advantage of others to get what they want


Have an inability or unwillingness to recognize the needs and feelings of others


Be envious of others and believe others envy them


Behave in an arrogant or haughty manner, coming across as conceited, boastful and pretentious


Insist on having the best of everything ? for instance, the best car or office


At the same time, people with narcissistic personality disorder have trouble handling anything they perceive as criticism, and they can:


Become impatient or angry when they don't receive special treatment


Have significant interpersonal problems and easily feel slighted


React with rage or contempt and try to belittle the other person to make themselves appear superior


Have difficulty regulating emotions and behavior


Experience major problems dealing with stress and adapting to change


Feel depressed and moody because they fall short of perfection


Have secret feelings of insecurity, shame, vulnerability and humiliation


well at least he checked all the boxes on his way to infamy
 

Old School

OVR
Forum Member
Mar 19, 2006
38,197
370
83
74
Congressional Democrats will pursue second impeachment of Trump -sources
By Susan Cornwell, Joseph Ax, David Morgan

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...nd-impeachment-of-trump-sources-idUSKBN29D1J8

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Democrats in the House of Representatives plan to introduce articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Monday, two sources familiar with the matter said, after a violent crowd of Trump supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol in an assault on American democracy.

If successful, the move would mark a historic first: No president has ever been impeached twice.

Democrats had called on Vice President Mike Pence and Trump?s Cabinet to invoke the U.S. Constitution?s 25th Amendment, which allows them to remove the president if he is unable to discharge his official duties. But Pence is opposed to the idea, an adviser said.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called Trump ?unhinged? on Friday and said Congress must do everything possible to protect Americans, even though Trump?s term in office ends on Jan. 20.

Trump exhorted thousands of followers on Wednesday to march to the Capitol, prompting a chaotic scene in which crowds breached the building, sent lawmakers into hiding and left a police officer and four others dead in their wake.

Reporting by Richard Cowan in Washington and Joseph Ax in Princeton, New Jersey, and Susan Cornwell, Steve Holland, Doina Chiacu, Andrea Shalal and Susan Heavey in Washington; Editing by Scott Malone and Alistair Bell


Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
 

Old School

OVR
Forum Member
Mar 19, 2006
38,197
370
83
74
House impeaches Trump again
https://news.yahoo.com/house-impeaches-trump-again-213653397.html

David Knowles?Editor
Wed, January 13, 2021, 4:36 PM EST

Wed, January 13, 2021, 4:36 PM EST
The United States House of Representatives voted Wednesday to impeach President Trump on charges of ?incitement of insurrection? for his role in the Jan. 6 siege of the Capitol building by his supporters that left five people dead.

Before Wednesday, no U.S. president had ever been impeached twice.

The impeachment article was passed by a vote of 232-197 with 10 Republicans joining Democrats in the chamber.

Under the Constitution, the next step would be a trial in the Senate, which could result in his removal from office. But with just a week left in his term, the issue appeared to be moot ? although nothing is certain in the head-spinning developments that have engulfed Washington, D.C., since Trump was defeated in the presidential election on Nov. 3.

The article of impeachment charged that Trump ?gravely endangered the security of the United States and its institutions of Government,? by promoting false election fraud claims, seeking to illegally manufacture a different election outcome, and by inviting his supporters to attend the Jan. 6 rally in Washington that turned violent.

?He threatened the integrity of the democratic system, interfered with the peaceful transition of power, and imperiled a coequal branch of Government,? the impeachment article stated. ?He thereby betrayed his trust as President, to the manifest injury of the people of the United States.?

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said in a speech on the House floor that the aim of the pro-Trump mob was to ?overturn the duly reported will of the American people,? and laid blame at the feet of the president.

?We know that the president of the United States incited this insurrection, this armed rebellion against our common country. He must go,? Pelosi said.

Unlike the almost entirely party-line vote on Trump?s first impeachment in the House on Dec. 18, 2019, on charges of obstruction of justice and abuse of power, the president could not portray the House vote as simply a partisan exercise. Republican Reps. Liz Cheney of Wyoming, Peter Meijer and Fed Upton of Michigan, Adam Kinzinger of Illinois, David Valadao of California, John Katko of New York, Anthony Gonzalez of Ohio, Tom Rice of South Carolina, and Jaime Herrera Beutler and Dan Newhouse of Washington all voted in favor of impeachment.

?A vote against this impeachment is a vote to validate the unacceptable violence we witnessed in our nation?s capital. It is also a vote to condone President Trump?s inaction,? Newhouse said in a statement released as Congress debated impeachment. ?He did not strongly condemn the attack nor did he call in reinforcements when our officers were overwhelmed. Our country needed a leader, and President Trump failed to fulfill his oath of office.?

Even some of the Republicans who voted against impeachment acknowledged that Trump shouldered at least some blame for the unrest last week.

"The president bears responsibility for Wednesday?s attack on Congress by mob rioters," House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy said. After McCarthy had challenged the Electoral College certification at the center of the insurrection at the Capitol, he also signaled for the first time that Trump had lost.

?Joe Biden will be president,? McCarthy said, ?because he won the election.?

As the vote was taking place, Trump released a statement about reports of further protests that the FBI and the Justice Department warned Tuesday could involve further violence.

?In light of reports of more demonstrations, I urge that there must be NO violence, NO lawbreaking and NO vandalism of any kind,? Trump staid in a written statement. ?That is not what I stand for, and it is not what American stands for. I call on ALL Americans to help ease tensions and calm tempers. Thank you.?

Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, read the statement on the House floor moments after it had been released.

Another striking difference between the two impeachment votes was apparent just outside the House chamber, where thousands of U.S. National Guard troops were posted to protect the Capitol from threats by Trump supporters aimed at the Biden?s Jan. 20 inauguration.

Such a buildup of troops at the Capitol had not been witnessed in Washington since 1861, when seven Southern states seceded from the Union, precipitating the Civil War.

Before Wednesday?s vote, Rep. Cheney, the third most powerful Republican in the House, issued a forceful declaration in favor of impeaching Trump.

?The President of the United States summoned this mob, assembled the mob, and lit the flame of this attack,? Cheney wrote in a statement. ?Everything that followed was his doing. None of this would have happened without the President. The President could have immediately and forcefully intervened to stop the violence. He did not. There has never been a greater betrayal by a President of the United States of his office and his oath to the Constitution.?

With news reports swirling Tuesday night that Sen. Majority Leader Mitch McConnell favored convicting Trump on the incitement of insurrection charge and removing him from office, more House Republicans stepped forth to announce that they would also vote to impeach the president.

But on Wednesday, Trump?s Republican supporters moved to punish Cheney for what they saw as her betrayal of the president. Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, said he would seek a vote to remove Cheney from her position as House Republican Conference Chair.

With just seven days remaining before Biden is set to be inaugurated, the Senate has little time to debate Trump?s removal. Since the U.S. Constitution mandates that a two-thirds majority in the Senate is required to remove a president, at least 17 Republicans and every sitting Democrat would need to vote in unison to do so.

Sens. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania, Ben Sasse of Nebraska have all stated that they would vote to convict Trump and remove him from office. Reports circulated on Wednesday that as many as 20 Senators might vote in favor of conviction.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell holds the key to what happens next, and minutes after the House voted to impeach Trump he released a statement signaling that the Senate would not take up the impeachment article until after Trump had left office.

?Given the rules, procedures, and Senate precedents that govern presidential impeachment trials, there is simply no chance that a fair or serious trial could conclude before President-elect Biden is sworn in next week,? McConnell said in the statement. ?The Senate has held three presidential impeachment trials. They have lasted 83 days, 37 days, and 21 days respectively. Even if the Senate process were to begin this week and move promptly, no final verdict would be reached until after President Trump had left office. This is not a decision I am making; it is a fact. The President-elect himself stated last week that his inauguration on January 20 is the ?quickest? path for any change in the occupant of the presidency.?

McConnell and Trump, who worked closely for Trump?s entire term, have fallen out over the president?s disruptive antics since the Nov. 6 election, which he reportedly believes cost the Republicans two Senate seats in Georgia, reducing McConnell to minority leader for at least the next two years. Reports circulated that McConnell was open to allowing a vote to convict Trump.

As the House debated whether to impeach Trump, McConnell sent a letter to his Senate colleagues indicating he had not decided on the matter of convicting the president.

?While the press has been full of speculation, I have not made a final decision on how I will vote and I intend to listen to the legal arguments when they are presented to the Senate,? McConnell said in his letter.

But convening a trial before Jan. 19, when the Senate is scheduled to return to session, would require a declaration of a national emergency by the two Senate leaders, McConnell and Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. Before the House even voted on Wednesday, McConnell rebuffed Schumer?s call for an emergency session.

A trial will almost certainly wait until after Jan. 20. If Trump is ultimately convicted, the Senate could impose a lifetime ban on him holding office again, which would preclude any intention on his part to run for president again in 2024.

Wednesday?s vote to impeach Trump came the day after the House passed a resolution calling on Vice President Mike Pence to invoke the 25th Amendment in concert with the president?s cabinet to oust Trump from office.

In a Tuesday night letter to Pelosi, Pence declined to do so.

?I do not believe that such a course of action is in the best interest of our Nation or consistent with our Constitution,? Pence said in the letter, adding that invoking the amendment ?would set a terrible precedent.?



_____
 

Old School

OVR
Forum Member
Mar 19, 2006
38,197
370
83
74
Why remove Donald Trump now? A guide to the second impeachment of a president
Catie Edmondson
https://thenewdaily.com.au/news/world/us-news/trump-news/2021/01/14/donald-trump-second-impeachment/

The United States? House of Representatives on Wednesday impeached President Donald Trump for a second time, a first in American history, charging him with ?incitement of insurrection? one week after he egged on a mob of supporters that stormed the Capitol while Congress met to formalise President-elect Joe Biden?s victory.

Democrats moved swiftly to impeach Mr Trump after the assault, which unfolded after he told supporters at a rally near the National Mall to march on the Capitol in an effort to get Republicans to overturn his defeat.

At least five people, including a Capitol Police officer, died during the siege and in the immediate aftermath.

The process is taking place with extraordinary speed and will test the bounds of the impeachment process, raising questions never contemplated before. Here?s what we know.

Impeachment is one of the Constitution?s gravest penalties.

Impeachment is one of the weightiest tools the Constitution gives Congress to hold government officials, including the president, accountable for misconduct and abuse of power.

Members of the House consider whether to impeach the president ? the equivalent of an indictment in a criminal case ? and members of the Senate consider whether to remove him, holding a trial in which senators act as the jury.

The test, as set by the Constitution, is whether the president has committed ?treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanours?.

The House vote requires only a simple majority of lawmakers to agree that the president has, in fact, committed high crimes and misdemeanours; the Senate vote requires a two-thirds majority.

The charge against Mr Trump is ?incitement of insurrection.?

The article, drafted by Reps. David Cicilline of Rhode Island, Ted Lieu of California, Jamie Raskin of Maryland and Jerrold Nadler of New York, charges Mr Trump with ?incitement of insurrection,? saying he is guilty of ?inciting violence against the government of the United States?.

The article cites Mr Trump?s weeks-long campaign to falsely discredit the results of the November election, and it quotes directly from the speech he gave on the day of the siege in which he told his supporters to go to the Capitol.

?If you don?t fight like hell,? he said, ?you?re not going to have a country any more.?

Proponents say impeachment is worthwhile even though Mr Trump has only days left in office.

While the House moved with remarkable speed to impeach Mr Trump, a Senate trial to determine whether to remove him cannot begin until January 19, his final full day in office. That means any conviction would almost certainly not be completed until after he leaves the White House.

Democrats have argued that Mr Trump?s offence ? using his power as the nation?s leader and commander in chief to incite an insurrection against the legislative branch ? is so grave that it must be addressed, even with just a few days remaining in his term.

To let it go unpunished, Democrats argued, would set a dangerous precedent of impunity for future presidents.

The biggest consequence for Mr Trump could be disqualifying him from holding office again.
Conviction in an impeachment trial would not automatically disqualify Mr Trump from future public office. But if the Senate were to convict him, the Constitution allows a subsequent vote to bar an official from holding ?any office of honour, trust or profit under the United States?.

That vote would require only a simple majority of senators.

Such a step could be an appealing prospect not just to Democrats, but also to many Republicans who either have set their sights on the presidency themselves or are convinced that it is the only thing that will purge Mr Trump from their party. Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican leader, is said to hold the latter view.

There is no precedent, however, for disqualifying a president from future office, and the issue could end up before the Supreme Court.

A Senate trial most likely won?t start until after Mr Biden becomes president.

Democrats who control the House can choose when to send their article of impeachment to the Senate, at which point that chamber would have to immediately move to begin the trial.

But because the Senate is not scheduled to hold a regular session until January 19, even if the House immediately transmitted the charge to the other side of the Capitol, an agreement between Senate Republican and Democratic leaders would be needed to take it up before then.

Senator McConnell said on Wednesday that he would not agree to do so, meaning that the proceeding could not be taken up until the day before Mr Biden is sworn in.

Since time is needed for the Senate to set the rules for an impeachment trial, that means the proceeding probably would not start until after Mr Biden was president, and Democrats had operational control of the Senate.

?Given the rules, procedures and Senate precedents that govern presidential impeachment trials, there is simply no chance that a fair or serious trial could conclude before President-elect Biden is sworn in next week,? Senator McConnell said.

?In light of this reality, I believe it will best serve our nation if Congress and the executive branch spend the next seven days completely focused on facilitating a safe inauguration and an orderly transfer of power to the incoming Biden administration.?

-New York Times
 

Cricket

sporadic wins
Forum Member
Nov 25, 2005
5,219
354
83
71
WNY
The left has no plan but to persecute Trump and his voters. After they secured the election,you'd think they would get on with the business of unifying the country or anything that might highlight progress. How long can they get by on Trump hate? Wait until they have to satisfy their own party on real issues,let alone the terrorist party.
 

yyz

Under .500
Forum Member
Mar 16, 2000
41,660
1,448
113
On the course!
The left has no plan but to persecute Trump and his voters. After they secured the election,you'd think they would get on with the business of unifying the country or anything that might highlight progress. How long can they get by on Trump hate? Wait until they have to satisfy their own party on real issues,let alone the terrorist party.

Trump pretty much assured the country's division for many, many years.
 

Old School

OVR
Forum Member
Mar 19, 2006
38,197
370
83
74
persecute Trump and his voters. .

transitive verb. 1 : to harass or punish in a manner designed to injure, grieve, or afflict specifically : to cause to suffer because of belief. 2 : to annoy with persistent or urgent approaches (such as attacks, pleas, or importunities) : pester.

Trump orchestrated a coup against the U.S. Government..

He is not being persecuted.

He is being held accountable.

and you can forget about your false idol holding any postion in government or conspiering
to other throw Democracy ever again.

How in the hell can you watch Trump flag poles destroy doors and windows to gain entry in the U.S. Capitol and have any admiration for this man?

Cult life is a horrible thing.
 

Cricket

sporadic wins
Forum Member
Nov 25, 2005
5,219
354
83
71
WNY
transitive verb. 1 : to harass or punish in a manner designed to injure, grieve, or afflict specifically : to cause to suffer because of belief. 2 : to annoy with persistent or urgent approaches (such as attacks, pleas, or importunities) : pester.

Trump orchestrated a coup against the U.S. Government..

He is not being persecuted.

He is being held accountable.

and you can forget about your false idol holding any postion in government or conspiering
to other throw Democracy ever again.

How in the hell can you watch Trump flag poles destroy doors and windows to gain entry in the U.S. Capitol and have any admiration for this man?

Cult life is a horrible thing.

How can you condone BLM and antifa terrorist acts. The vice president elect funded their bail outs for Christ's sake. What the f##k does that make her?
 

WhatsHisNuts

Woke
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2006
27,579
1,003
113
50
Earth
www.ffrf.org
The left has no plan but to persecute Trump and his voters. After they secured the election,you'd think they would get on with the business of unifying the country or anything that might highlight progress. How long can they get by on Trump hate? Wait until they have to satisfy their own party on real issues,let alone the terrorist party.

Let the adults handle this. It's time to make an example out of some people. That should job 1. I hope some heavy prices are paid.
 

Old School

OVR
Forum Member
Mar 19, 2006
38,197
370
83
74
That's when them dems will have to show something for their pay.


4 years of creating discourse and hatred by Trump should take at least 6 years to clean up considering the majority of the Republicans who haven't quit or will be ousted have no interest in repairing the damage to "Our Democracy".

One thing "We The People" have done is show the power of collective adjustment.

Now comes the very tuff job of.........

?WE THE PEOPLE of the United States, in order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.?

All the things Trump tried to destroy with his narcissism.

I hope we can count on you aid in the repairs.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top