Trump Election Trail

Old School

OVR
Forum Member
Mar 19, 2006
38,204
374
83
74
a full fledge narcissist

Symptoms
Signs and symptoms of narcissistic personality disorder and the severity of symptoms vary. People with the disorder can:

Have an exaggerated sense of self-importance

Have a sense of entitlement and require constant, excessive admiration

Expect to be recognized as superior even without achievements that warrant it

Exaggerate achievements and talents

Be preoccupied with fantasies about success, power, brilliance, beauty or the perfect mate

Believe they are superior and can only associate with equally special people

Monopolize conversations and belittle or look down on people they perceive as inferior

Expect special favors and unquestioning compliance with their expectations

Take advantage of others to get what they want

Have an inability or unwillingness to recognize the needs and feelings of others

Be envious of others and believe others envy them

Behave in an arrogant or haughty manner, coming across as conceited, boastful and pretentious

Insist on having the best of everything ? for instance, the best car or office

At the same time, people with narcissistic personality disorder have trouble handling anything they perceive as criticism, and they can:

Become impatient or angry when they don't receive special treatment

Have significant interpersonal problems and easily feel slighted

React with rage or contempt and try to belittle the other person to make themselves appear superior

Have difficulty regulating emotions and behavior

Experience major problems dealing with stress and adapting to change

Feel depressed and moody because they fall short of perfection

Have secret feelings of insecurity, shame, vulnerability and humiliation

20-0 Perfect
 

Old School

OVR
Forum Member
Mar 19, 2006
38,204
374
83
74
It?s Over For Donald Trump: Joe Biden?s Transition To White House Finally Formally Starts As GSA Signs Off
By Dominic Patten


https://deadline.com/2020/11/donald...rphy-gsa-janet-yellen-coronavirus-1234620868/

Over three weeks after he was declared the winner of the 2020 election, Joe Biden?s transition to the White House has finally officially started.

As General Services Administrator Emily Murphy was facing scrutiny from Congress on why she hadn?t signed off on the process, a still somewhat swinging Donald Trump announced he gave the green light to his exit from the Executive Mansion on January 20, 2021:

Though Trump is still refusing to formally concede, the move to ascertainment means that President-elect Biden and Vice President-elect Harris can receive top tier security briefings as well as access to materials and funds necessary to taking over the most powerful country in the world. Moves that are all the more vital with the coronavirus pandemic hitting record numbers on the eve of Thanksgiving and a weaken economy.

A state of affairs, Biden and Harris made clear Monday morning in a virtual meeting with members of the Conference of Mayors, including LA?s Eric Garcetti. Along with key staff appointments, Biden today also unveiled his pick for his foreign policy and national security team As well, the rumor is that ex-Fed chair Janet Yellen has been tapped to be Treasury Secretary. If confirmed, Yellen would he first woman to hold the cabinet position originated by Alexander Hamilton.

?I have dedicated much of my adult life to public service, and I have always strived to do what is right,? Murphy herself said in a letter to Biden stating the trump administration was prepared to start the handover of power. ?Please know that I came to my decision independently, based on the law and available facts,? the ex-Republican National Committee staffer added.

?Today?s decision is a needed step to begin tackling the challenges facing our nation, including getting the pandemic under control and our economy back on track,? stated Biden-Harris Transition Executive Director Yohannes Abraham after Trump?s tweet and Murphy letter went out.

?This final decision is a definitive administrative action to formally begin the transition process with federal agencies, Abraham added. ?In the days ahead, transition officials will begin meeting with federal officials to discuss the pandemic response, have a full accounting of our national security interests, and gain complete understanding of the Trump administration?s efforts to hollow out government agencies.?

Coming just hours after Michigan certified Biden?s victory in the Lake State today, the move towards ascertainment was made a day before Murphy was requested to appear at a hearing on Capitol Hill to explain what the holdup was with the transition. Had the GSA Administrator neglected to show up, she could have been found in contempt of Congress ? which is not a good place to be when you?ll likely be looking for a new job in less than two months.

On the other hand, the President-elect is set to give his first post-election interview tomorrow to NBC Nightly News? Lester Holt. The sit down will air on the Comcast-owned net on Tuesday night, with more to be seen on the likes of Today and MSNBC on November 25.
 

Old School

OVR
Forum Member
Mar 19, 2006
38,204
374
83
74
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
?
2h
I want to thank Emily Murphy at GSA for her steadfast dedication and loyalty to our Country. She has been harassed, threatened, and abused ? and I do not want to see this happen to her, her family, or employees of GSA. Our case STRONGLY continues, we will keep up the good...
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
?
2h
...fight, and I believe we will prevail! Nevertheless, in the best interest of our Country, I am recommending that Emily and her team do what needs to be done with regard to initial protocols, and have told my team to do the same.

:sadwave::sadwave::sadwave::sadwave::sadwave::sadwave::sadwave::sadwave::sadwave::sadwave::sadwave::sadwave::sadwave::sadwave::sadwave::sadwave::sadwave::sadwave:
 

ChrryBlstr

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 11, 2002
7,407
54
48
Hoosier country
I wonder how many of our MAGAt friends here at Madjack fell for the con and donated....Hmmmmm....

Peace! :)


<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">It's not that the legal team's awful.<br>It's not that he has no case.<br><br>They've been fundraising nonstop from our <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/maga?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#maga</a> friends.<br>It's the same con.<br><br>The longer they drag it out, the longer campaign 2020 can continue to fundraise off the true believers.<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/TrumpTheFool?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#TrumpTheFool</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/TrumpTheGrift?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#TrumpTheGrift</a></p>— John Fugelsang (@JohnFugelsang) <a href="https://twitter.com/JohnFugelsang/status/1331038035505532929?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 24, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 

Old School

OVR
Forum Member
Mar 19, 2006
38,204
374
83
74
Will Trump ever concede to Biden? Approving the transition may be as close as he gets to that, aides say
David Jackson
John Fritze
USA TODAY
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...in-after-legal-stumbles-gop-angst/6393269002/

WASHINGTON ? When President Donald Trump signed off this week on formally allowing President-elect Joe Biden's transition to move forward, it was a decision he arrived at after a series of embarrassing setbacks in his efforts to challenge the results of the Nov. 3 election.

Though Trump made clear he intends to keep up his election legal battle, it was a turning point after conversations over the weekend with top aides about how he could approve a transition without conceding the race.

Trump faced dwindling prospects for overturning the election through the courts, a point driven home by a decision in Pennsylvania over the weekend in which a federal judge dismissed one of his campaign's lawsuits as a "Frankenstein's Monster."

White House officials speaking on the condition of anonymity said the government is preparing for Biden to take over Jan. 20, but the president made no direct reference to the election in two brief appearances Tuesday and continued to hammer away on Twitter with evidence-free claims of widespread fraud.

Facing mounting criticism from fellow Republicans, court stumbles, the certification of Biden's lead in several battleground states and internal squabbling over his own legal team, Trump was gradually talked by aides into acknowledging the need to begin a transition ? an outcome that some close to the president predicted could be the closest he will get to a formal concession.

"In the best interest of our Country," Trump tweeted this week, he recommended that the official machinery of the federal government "do what needs to be done with regard to initial protocols," a nod to beginning the transition.

Trump's acknowledgment that the General Services Administration should begin that process, which will allow federal agencies ? including those battling COVID-19 ? to interface with the Biden transition, was a break from his frequent assertions, leveled without evidence, that voter fraud robbed him of reelection.

Speaking for about a minute at the White House on Tuesday, the president touted growth in the stock market but did not address the election. He was similarly reticent hours later in the Rose Garden, where he honored the tradition of pardoning a turkey before Thanksgiving.

"And as I say, America First," Trump said, repeating a campaign slogan. "We shouldn't go away from that."

Trump campaign aides dismissed the significance of the transition announcement, and the president vowed on Twitter to continue his fight despite the series of setbacks undermining his case.

Friday, Michigan state lawmakers left a meeting at the White House saying they had seen no evidence indicating Biden's win was in error. The same day, Georgia certified the Democrat's narrow victory there.

The next day, a federal judge in Pennsylvania dismissed a Trump lawsuit as an amalgamation of "strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations."

Sunday, Trump ordered his team to distance itself from attorney Sidney Powell, whose claims days earlier of an anti-Trump election conspiracy drew ridicule from across the political spectrum. By Monday, Michigan certified its election results.

A presidential tradition:If Trump still won't concede to Biden, he'll break more than a century of tradition

White House chief of staff Mark Meadows and counsel Pat Cipollone were among the aides who spoke with the president about the transition. Trump tweeted his announcement to go ahead minutes after the GSA wrote Biden to confirm the decision.

If Trump doesn't concede, he would break with 124 years of American history ? which could rile partisanship and create divisions within the Republican Party. Trump and some aides see a strategy in continuing the fight. Some expect Trump to complain about the election for the rest of his public life, using it to retain a core group of supporters, raise money and perhaps make another presidential run in 2024.

Although Trump has no plans to call off lawsuits and election protests, aides said, Meadows wrote in an email to staff late Monday that the administration would "comply with all actions needed to ensure the smooth transfer of power."

White House officials cleared Biden on Tuesday to receive the same daily intelligence briefings that Trump does, according to a White House official speaking on the condition of anonymity.

Trump returned to the lawsuits in a series of tweets Tuesday, asserting that "we are fighting hard." He retweeted a message from about a week ago that "I concede NOTHING!!!!!"

Trump downplayed the significance of the GSA's announcement, saying the agency had been "terrific" and had "done a great job," but it "does not determine who the next President of the United States will be."

Legal options dwindle
Rick Gates, a 2016 campaign aide to Trump, said the president's short-term goal is to get one or more of his election lawsuits before the Supreme Court, and there's no way to know when that might happen. Gates said he expects Trump to fight until at least the meeting of the Electoral College scheduled for Dec. 14 ? and probably beyond.

"However," Gates said, "with each passing day, the clock is narrowing his constitutional options considerably."

Biden continued to roll out top level appointments, including several national security positions. In Delaware on Tuesday, Biden said he would nominate longtime confidant Antony Blinken as secretary of state and named Jake Sullivan, who worked for Biden when he was vice president, as his national security adviser.

Biden said he was "pleased" the administration was moving toward a "smooth and peaceful transition" of power.

"And as more states certify the results of this election, there's progress to wrap up our victory," he said.

Trump and his team have filed lawsuits, demanded recounts and protested procedures in several states, an effort designed to throw out ballots or block certification of Biden's victories in Michigan, Arizona, Georgia, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania. Those initiatives have failed, and legal experts said there is little evidence of widespread fraud.

Trump is running out of battles to fight, a point underscored by an increasing number of Republican allies.

Minutes after Michigan certified its results, Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., called on Trump to "put the country first and have a prompt and orderly transition to help the new administration succeed."

In an op-ed for the Cincinnati Enquirer, Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, said he has supported Trump's efforts, but "there is no evidence as of now of any widespread fraud or irregularities that would change the result in any state."

An orderly transition is important, Portman said, and "it is now time to expeditiously resolve any outstanding questions and move forward."


One sign of Trump's commitment to complaint: He canceled his Thanksgiving weekend at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida, aides said, so he could be seen at the White House in charge of the election protest.

Trump took part in the annual pardoning of the national Thanksgiving turkey Tuesday, a lucky bird selected in an online election. In 2018, when a turkey named "Peas" triumphed over "Carrots" for the pardon, Trump joked that Carrots refused to concede and demanded a recount.

As he pardoned this year's turkey, Trump made no similar jokes.

"What we?ve endured and been able to endure, with the (coronavirus) vaccines now coming out one after another ? it?s an incredible thing that happened," he said. "But it's time to remember that we live in a great, great country ? the greatest of them all."

Contributing: Deirdre Shesgreen, Michael Collins, Courtney Subramanian
 

Old School

OVR
Forum Member
Mar 19, 2006
38,204
374
83
74
Trump campaign lawyer stirs outrage by saying ex-cyber chief should be 'taken out at dawn and shot'
Matthew Brown
USA TODAY
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...a-says-ex-cyber-chief-should-shot/6475099002/

An attorney for the Trump campaign said that the federal government's former top cybersecurity chief should be "shot" for describing the 2020 U.S. election as secure.

Joe DiGenova called for violence against Christopher Krebs, the former director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, on a Monday episode of the "Howie Carr Show."

"That guy is a class A moron," DiGenova said. "He should be drawn and quartered, taken out at dawn and shot."

The comments were syndicated on Carr's radio show, as well as aired on the cable channel Newsmax.

Trump last month fired Krebs after the DHS agency's declaration that the general election was the most secure in U.S. history.

That statement served as a contradiction to Trump, who has repeatedly pushed unsubstantiated allegations of voting fraud while his legal team is seeking to overturn President-elect Joe Biden's win.

Krebs was fired almost two weeks after the 2020 election for repeatedly casting aspersions on the president's unfounded claims of voter fraud.

During an interview on NBC's "Today Show," Krebs, who has received a flood of criticism from Trump allies in recent days, said DiGenova's comments was "certainly more dangerous language."

"The way I look at it is we are a nation of laws. I feel like I have an exceptional team of lawyers who win in court and I think they're probably going to be busy," Krebs said.
 

Old School

OVR
Forum Member
Mar 19, 2006
38,204
374
83
74
Michigan appeals court delivers latest defeat against Trump campaign lawsuit
https://thehill.com/homenews/state-...delivers-latest-defeat-against-trump-campaign

The Michigan Court of Appeals on Friday rejected an appeal from the Trump campaign that attempted to stop ballot counting among other alleged issues in the Wolverine State, calling the effort moot.

The 2-1 ruling marks the latest defeat for the Trump campaign, which has filed various lawsuits in an attempt to challenge the election outcome showing President-elect Joe Biden's win.

The court stated that campaign lawyers had not followed proper procedure when filing the suit. Though the appeal initially began on Nov. 6, it was not filed in completion until Nov. 30 ? a week after the state had certified its election results, validating Biden's win, according to the filing.

The court found that the only valid recourse at the time would have been to request a recount, but the window to do so had passed.

"Because plaintiff failed to follow the clear law in Michigan relative to such matters, their action is moot,? Judge Stephen Borrello wrote in the order.

Dissenting Judge Patrick Meter argued the appeal should be heard by a three-judge panel, arguing that the "issues are not moot because state electors have not yet been seated, the Electoral College has not yet been assembled, and Congress has not yet convened."

The order upholds a previous ruling in early November that denied Trump's attempt to stop absentee vote counting.

The ruling marks the latest denial in a slew of recent legal losses for Trump and his legal team.
 

Old School

OVR
Forum Member
Mar 19, 2006
38,204
374
83
74
Biden officially secures enough electors to become president
Although members of Congress can object to accepting the electors' votes, it would be almost impossible for Biden to be blocked at that point.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/20...res-enough-electors-become-president-n1250085

Dec. 4, 2020, 8:04 PM EST / Source: Associated Press
By The Associated Press

California certified its presidential election Friday and appointed 55 electors pledged to vote for Democrat Joe Biden, officially handing him the Electoral College majority needed to win the White House.

Secretary of State Alex Padilla's formal approval of Biden's win in the state brought his tally of pledged electors so far to 279, according to a tally by The Associated Press. That?s just over the 270 threshold for victory.

These steps in the election are often ignored formalities. But the hidden mechanics of electing a U.S. president have drawn new scrutiny this year as President Donald Trump continues to deny Biden's victory and pursues increasingly specious legal strategies aimed at overturning the results before they are finalized.

Although it?s been apparent for weeks that Biden won the presidential election, his accrual of more than 270 electors is the first step toward the White House, said Edward B. Foley, a law professor at Ohio State University.

?It is a legal milestone and the first milestone that has that status,? Foley said. ?Everything prior to that was premised on what we call projections.?

The electors named Friday will meet Dec. 14, along with counterparts in each state, to formally vote for the next president. Most states have laws binding their electors to the winner of the popular vote in their state, measures that were upheld by a Supreme Court decision this year. There have been no suggestions that any of Biden's pledged electors would contemplate not voting for him.

Results of the Electoral College vote are due to be received, and typically approved, by Congress on Jan. 6. Although lawmakers can object to accepting the electors' votes, it would be almost impossible for Biden to be blocked at that point.

The Democratic-controlled House and Republican-controlled Senate would both vote separately to resolve any disputes. One already has arisen from Pennsylvania, where 75 Republican lawmakers signed a statement on Friday urging Congress to block the state?s electoral votes from being cast for Biden. But the state?s Republican U.S. senator, Pat Toomey, said soon afterward that he would not be objecting to Pennsylvania?s slate of electors, underscoring the difficulty in trying to change the election results through Congress.

?As a practical matter, we know that Joe Biden is going to be inaugurated on Jan. 20," Foley said.

2020 ELECTION
New campaign filings show Trump's fundraising haul off claims of voter fraud
That was clear in the days after the election, when the count of mail ballots gradually made clear that Biden had won victories in enough states to win the Electoral College. It became even more apparent in late November, when every swing state won by Biden certified him as the winner of its elections and appointed his electors to the Electoral College. Trump has fruitlessly tried to stop those states from certifying Biden as the winner and appointing electors for the former vice president.

He made no effort in deeply Democratic California, the most populous state in the nation and the trove of its largest number of electoral votes. Three more states won by Biden ? Colorado, Hawaii and New Jersey ? have not yet certified their results. When they do, Biden will have 306 Electoral College votes to Trump?s 232.

Trump and his allies have brought at least 50 legal cases trying to overturn the results in the swing states Biden won ? mainly Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. More than 30 have been rejected or dropped, according to an AP tally.

Trump and his allies have also raised the far-fetched notion that Republican state legislatures in those states could appoint a rival set of electors pledged to Trump.

But state Republican leaders have rejected that approach, and it would likely be futile in any case. According to federal law, both chambers of Congress would need to vote to accept a competing slate of electors. If they don't, the electors appointed by the states' governors ? all pledged to Biden in these cases ? must be used.

The last remaining move to block the election would be the quixotic effort to vote down the electors in Congress.

This tactic has been tried ? a handful of congressional Democrats in 2000, 2004 and 2016 objected to officially making both George W. Bush and Trump president. But the numbers were not enough to block the two men from taking office.
 

Old School

OVR
Forum Member
Mar 19, 2006
38,204
374
83
74
No, faithless electors won't hand Donald Trump a second term

BY DAVID DALEY AND ROB RICHIE, OPINION CONTRIBUTORS ? 12/09/20 09:00 AM EST 977THE VIEWS EXPRESSED BY CONTRIBUTORS ARE THEIR OWN AND NOT THE VIEW OF THE HILL
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-h...electors-wont-hand-donald-trump-a-second-term

Donald Trump?s options continue to narrow. The president lost the Electoral College vote to Joe Biden, 306 to 232. Trump has sought, unsuccessfully, to delay certification in states that Biden narrowly won, including Michigan, Georgia, Arizona and Pennsylvania. His legal team?s allegations of voter fraud have not fared any better, failing to produce evidence that meets a legal standard.

Now time itself no longer is on the president?s side, either. The 538 Electoral College electors will gather in their states and cast their ballots on Dec. 14, the penultimate step before Congress finalizes the count on Jan. 6, 2021.

So what might the president still do? Given that Trump seems disinterested in any traditional concession ? and that many of his media allies and supporters are invested in struggling on, no matter the odds ? one of his few remaining strategies might be an appeal for electors to ?turn rogue? and support him, even if they are pledged to Biden. For many reasons, however, this is not a promising path for the president, either.

A quick civics refresher: Remember that when we vote for president, we are not actually voting for the candidate we prefer, but rather for a slate of electors. Almost every state ? except for Maine and Nebraska, which allocate a single elector via winning the popular vote in a congressional district ? awards every elector to the statewide popular vote victor. The U.S. Constitution provides latitude to individual electors to cast their ballot for the person of their choosing.

On paper, that?s where it could get interesting. Biden?s lead in the popular vote is approaching 7 million. Nevertheless, under the rules of the game, Trump?s campaign would need to convince 37 electors pledged to Biden to vote for Trump instead, rather than the winner of their state?s popular vote, in order to tie the Electoral College and pitch the election into the U.S. House. It?s the longest of long shots.

First, 33 states and the District of Columbia require electors to vote for the candidate to which they are pledged. Nineteen of those states, as well as Washington, D.C., went for Biden ? which means that 199 electors of the 270 are pledged by law to the former vice president. While many states do not provide a penalty for a ?faithless elector,? 14 states do allow for the vote to be canceled and the immediate replacement of the elector. The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of those laws this summer in a case called Chiafalo v Washington.

Trump, then, faces a shrinking pool. He would need 37 of the remaining 106 Biden electors to switch sides. History shows how unlikely this would be. Faithless electors, after all, never have changed the outcome of a presidential election. More than that, so far, only one elector in the nation?s history has ever cast a vote for the opposite party?s nominee instead of his or her own in a close race. For that, you need to go all the way back to 1796, the very first contested presidential election, when Samuel Miles, a Federalist from Pennsylvania, voted for Thomas Jefferson rather than his own party?s candidate, John Adams.

Indeed, there have been a total of 23,507 electoral votes cast across 58 presidential elections. Only 90 of them have been cast as ?deviant? votes. And 63 of those were cast for another candidate because of the death of a losing candidate ? Horace Greeley, in 1872 ? between the November election and the Electoral College gathering.

Simple math shows that Trump would need more electors to defect to him ? 37 ? than the 27 that have cast ballots for someone other than their pledged candidate across the last 224 years.

Now consider this: Electors aren?t chosen at random. Political parties understand the importance of choosing a slate of electors who can be trusted to reliably vote on behalf of their nominee. In Pennsylvania, for example, the state?s slate of 20 Democratic electors includes an array of elected Democrats and labor allies, including the state attorney general, several former and current members of the legislature, the mayor of Biden?s hometown of Scranton, and the president of the AFL-CIO. Nationally, other Democratic electors include Stacey Abrams in Georgia and Hillary Clinton in New York. Electors are selected for the intensity of their partisan leanings; this is not a group where a second Trump term would hold much, if any, appeal.

It is certainly true that the 2016 election between Trump and Clinton featured an abnormally high number of electors willing to break with their party and cast a deviant Electoral College vote. Three Democrats from Washington, for example, voted for Colin Powell instead of Clinton as part of an unsuccessful effort to convince other Republicans to vote for someone other than Trump. In some ways, that shows the difficulty Trump would face going down this road: It?s the losing electors, not those on the winning side, who are most inclined to broker some kind of deal. In the end, after deviant electors from Minnesota and Colorado were replaced, seven votes were cast for candidates other than Trump or Clinton. Rather than the expected outcome of Trump 306, Clinton 232, history will record the final tally as Trump 304, Clinton 227, others 7.

When electors meet this month, the expected vote, once again, is likely to be 306-232, but with the Democratic candidate, rather than Trump, in the lead. We don?t know if that will be the final tally, but we can feel every confidence that it will be the final result.

David Daley is the author of ?Unrigged: How Americans Are Battling Back to Save Democracy? and ?Ratf**ked: Why Your Vote Doesn?t Count,? and a senior fellow at FairVote.

Rob Richie is the president and CEO of FairVote.
 

Old School

OVR
Forum Member
Mar 19, 2006
38,204
374
83
74
Electoral College begins voting to make Biden's victory official
The president-elect is expected to speak in prime time after he has surpassed 270 for the win.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/20...e-make-biden-s-2020-victory-official-n1251076

2020 ELECTION
Electoral College begins voting to make Biden's victory official
The president-elect is expected to speak in prime time after he has surpassed 270 for the win.

Dec. 14, 2020, 7:28 AM EST / Updated Dec. 14, 2020, 10:52 AM EST
By Rebecca Shabad

WASHINGTON ? The Electoral College on Monday began voting to make President-elect Joe Biden's victory in the 2020 presidential election official.

All 538 electors will meet in their respective states to cast their votes for president based on the election results that were recently certified by all 50 states and Washington, D.C.

Most electors, who were chosen by political parties in each state ahead of the November election, are expected to cast their ballots in state Capitol buildings.

The first states to vote Monday were Indiana, New Hampshire, Tennessee and Vermont, which started to vote at 10 a.m. ET. Vermont's and New Hampshire's electors cast their combined 7 votes for Biden, while Tennessee and Indiana awarded their 22 total votes to Trump. Battleground states that have been hotly contested with legal challenges by President Donald Trump vote a little later ? Arizona, Georgia and Pennsylvania's electors are slated to vote at noon, while Wisconsin's are scheduled to vote at 1 p.m. and Michigan's at 2 p.m.

In Michigan, the state Capitol will be closed during the vote because of threats of violence and anticipated protests.

California, which has 55 Electoral College votes, the most of any state, and could put Biden over the top is set to vote at 5 p.m. ET.

Biden is expected to deliver remarks in prime time about the Electoral College vote around 8 p.m. ET.

Trump and a number of Republican officials tried to overturn the results in battleground states, but the Supreme Court rejected that attempt Friday night. Trump has repeatedly said since the Nov. 3 election that he won by a landslide and that the election was rigged.

Biden, however, was deemed president-elect Nov. 7, four days after the election, once he surpassed the 270 electoral votes needed to win the presidency. Ultimately, Biden received 306 electoral votes, while Trump won 232.

On Jan. 6 at 1 p.m. ET, the Electoral College votes will be counted in a joint session of Congress. Biden and Vice President-elect Kamala Harriswill then be sworn into office Jan. 20.

On Thanksgiving, Trump told reporters it would be a "very hard thing to concede" the election even when the Electoral College finalizes Biden's win. He said, "If they do, they've made a mistake." When asked whether he would leave the White House under that outcome, Trump said, "Certainly I will."


Rebecca Shabad is a congressional reporter for NBC News, based in Washington.
 

Old School

OVR
Forum Member
Mar 19, 2006
38,204
374
83
74
Electoral College results confirm it: Joe Biden is the next president
David Knowles
David Knowles?Editor
Mon, December 14, 2020, 5:28 PM EST
https://news.yahoo.com/electoral-co...oe-biden-is-the-next-president-222811405.html

It?s over, again.

The 538 members of the Electoral College cast their ballots on Monday, the penultimate step in confirming President-elect Joe Biden?s victory over Donald Trump in the November election.

In Georgia, a state Biden was able to flip in 2020, former Democratic gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams took the roll call of electors and announced that the state had cast its electoral votes for him.

?I am pleased to announce that Joseph R. Biden has received 16 votes for president of the United States,? Abrams said.

As more members of the Electoral College cast their votes around the country, the drama-free proceedings resembled previous elections in which the results were a foregone conclusion. A little after 5:30 p.m. ET, when California cast its 55 votes, Biden crossed the 270-vote threshold needed to officially be declared the next president.

Despite pressure for Trump and his legal team to convince the Republican legislatures in battleground states to appoint a slate of electors who would overturn the popular vote, none obliged. Biden was on track to receive his 306 votes compared to 232 for Trump ? coincidentally, the same margin Trump won in 2016, which he has characterized as a ?landslide.?

Stung by Biden?s victory, Trump has relentlessly claimed that it was the result of electoral fraud. But the outcome was all but sealed on Dec. 8, the ?safe harbor day? deadline to resolve any outstanding disputes about the results. That left the formality of casting the electoral votes that had already been decided.

Still, even on the day that the Electoral College confirmed his loss, Trump continued to push baseless conspiracy theories about the election results in social media posts immediately flagged as containing misinformation.

But judges in Nevada, Arizona, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Georgia did not agree that fraud had played a role in deciding the winner. In ruling after ruling, Trump?s legal team suffered stinging rebukes from judges, many of them appointed by the president himself, who either found no evidence of fraud, or took issue with the idea that the judiciary would simply toss out enough votes to keep Trump in office for a second term.

A last-ditch effort by 18 Republican attorneys general to ask the Supreme Court to throw out the votes in four states won by Biden was turned down decisively on Friday.

On Monday, Wisconsin?s Supreme Court handed Trump?s lawyer?s their latest defeat, refusing to invalidate some 220,000 ballots and overturn the election results.

?We conclude the Campaign is not entitled to the relief it seeks,? Justice Brian Hagedorn wrote in the the majority opinion.

By 3:00 p.m. ET, all six of the battleground states where Trump contested the election results had cast their electoral vote ballots for Biden.

Without an assist from the courts, and with the Electoral College having cast its ballots, all that remains now is for Congress open and count them on Jan. 6. Vice President Mike Pence, who presides over the Senate, will pronounce Biden the winner.

When that happens, the election will truly be over, again.
 

ChrryBlstr

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 11, 2002
7,407
54
48
Hoosier country
Peace! :)


<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Last week we discussed Barr's strategy on <a href="https://twitter.com/gaslitnation?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@gaslitnation</a> in anticipation that he might resign. Some excerpts from the transcript: "It's important to remember that the inner players of this GOP crime cult never really leave." <a href="https://t.co/rULzWpMm3O">https://t.co/rULzWpMm3O</a> <a href="https://t.co/9RAtLOGb38">pic.twitter.com/9RAtLOGb38</a></p>— Sarah Kendzior (@sarahkendzior) <a href="https://twitter.com/sarahkendzior/status/1338618893628223491?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 14, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 

Old School

OVR
Forum Member
Mar 19, 2006
38,204
374
83
74
Trump turns on McConnell for calling Biden president-elect
The Senate majority leader had been reluctant to recognize the president?s loss in recent weeks.

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/12/16/trump-mitch-mcconnell-biden-president-elect-446221
By QUINT FORGEY


12/16/2020 07:21 AM EST


President Donald Trump scolded Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell on Twitter early Wednesday morning for finally acknowledging that President-elect Joe Biden won the 2020 White House race.

The rebuke from the president came more than 14 hours after the Kentucky Republican delivered a speech on the Senate floor Tuesday in the aftermath of the Electoral College?s vote formalizing Biden?s victory.

?Our country has officially a president-elect and a vice president-elect,? McConnell said. ?The Electoral College has spoken. So today, I want to congratulate President-elect Joe Biden.?

Trump shared a news report on McConnell?s remarks in a tweet posted shortly after midnight. In an accompanying message, he wrote: ?Mitch, 75,000,000 VOTES, a record for a sitting President (by a lot). Too soon to give up. Republican Party must finally learn to fight. People are angry!?

McConnell further broke with Trump on Tuesday during a call with Republican senators, warning the lawmakers against objecting to the presidential election results when they are delivered to a joint session of Congress for certification early next year.

A spokesperson for McConnell declined to comment to POLITICO on Trump?s criticism.

In recent weeks, the president has trained his fire on Republican governors and other local officials he has deemed insufficiently supportive of his baseless claims of widespread voter fraud and scattershot legal bid to overturn the results of the election.

But his tweet Wednesday marked the first time Trump has so publicly turned on his party?s most senior Washington lawmaker for recognizing Biden as president-elect. McConnell had been reluctant to do so since the race had been officially called for Biden early last month, instead deferring to Trump?s ongoing effort to reverse the election?s outcome.

The Electoral College vote Monday was also an inflection point for many other Senate Republicans who until then refused to accept the reality that Trump had lost his campaign for a second term.

?I understand there are people who feel strongly about the outcome of this election,? Senate Majority Whip John Thune (R-S.D.), McConnell?s top deputy, told POLITICO. ?But in the end, at some point you have to face the music. And I think that once the Electoral College settles the issue today, it?s time for everybody to move on.?
 

WhatsHisNuts

Woke
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2006
27,633
1,035
113
50
Earth
www.ffrf.org

Trump shared a news report on McConnell?s remarks in a tweet posted shortly after midnight. In an accompanying message, he wrote: ?Mitch, 75,000,000 VOTES, a record for a sitting President (by a lot). Too soon to give up. Republican Party must finally learn to fight. People are angry!?

He's making millions off the suckers sending him money to fight this in the courts. The con man doesn't want the cash to stop flowing in. It even has a disclaimer that says almost none of the money is going to be used for the legal fight. DONATE TODAY SUCKERS!!!!
 

Old School

OVR
Forum Member
Mar 19, 2006
38,204
374
83
74
Trump promises 'wild' protests in Washington DC on the day the Electoral College will finalize election results
Sophia Ankel 1 hour ago


President Trump promised his supporters there would be a "wild" rally in Washington DC on January 6, the same day that Congress is scheduled to meet to formally finalize the presidential election results.

"Statistically impossible to have lost the 2020 Election," Trump tweeted on Saturday. "Big protest in DC on January 6th. Be there, will be wild!"

Trump was tweeting in response to a 36-page report published by economist and White House advisor Peter Navarro, which claims alleged election fraud. Many of Navarro's claims have been widely debunked.

His tweet has since been flagged by Twitter as "disputed."

The January 6 gathering between House and Senate lawmakers is considered just a formality, in which they simply approve the long-decided state electoral votes.

However, several pro-Trump Republicans have said they plan to disrupt the formal process, with Georgia's Representative-elect Marjorie Taylor Greene tweeting on Saturday: "On January 6th...I will OBJECT and REJECT the fraudulent electoral votes from several states across the country."

Trump has refused to concede, repeatedly pushing the baseless claim that Biden won the 2020 election because of mass fraud.

Congress is set to meet on January 6 to count President-elect Joe Biden's 306 to 232 win among state electoral votes.

Two weeks later, on January 20, Biden is expected to be inaugurated as the 46th president of the United States, in what his team called a "more imaginative" virtual event.

Trump told aides this week that he might refuse to leave the White House that day, according to CNN, although few of them believe he will actually follow through on the threat.


Biden told Stephen Colbert in an interview on Thursday that while it doesn't bother him "personally" that Trump might not attend his inauguration, it still worries him how Trump's absence will look like "to the rest of the world."
 

Old School

OVR
Forum Member
Mar 19, 2006
38,204
374
83
74
House Republicans join with Democrats to override Trump's veto of defense bill
If, as expected, the Senate follows suit later this week, it will be Congress?s first such rebuke of his presidency

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...crats-to-override-trumps-veto-of-defence-bill

Donald Trump suffered fresh humiliation on Monday when more than a hundred Republicans joined Democrats in the House of Representatives to override his veto of a $741bn defence bill.

If, as expected, the Senate follows suit later this week, it will be Congress?s first such rebuke of his presidency, which has only three weeks left to run.

During a high stakes day on Capitol Hill, the Democratic-controlled House also voted to boost coronavirus relief payments to $2,000 per person. This was a step endorsed by Trump but is thought unlikely to progress in the Senate.

The National Defense Authorization Act, which funds service members? pay, overseas military operations and other needs, has been passed by Congress every year since 1967. Trump exercised his veto last week, returning the bill with objections including its proposal to change the names of 10 military bases honouring Confederate leaders.

Trump was also aggrieved that the legislation did not repeal repeal Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which protects tech companies from legal liability over content posted by their users. The president has accused Facebook and Twitter of political bias against him.

His objections served as the latest loyalty test for Republicans in the aftermath of his election defeat by Joe Biden. Kevin McCarthy, the House minority leader, announced that he would not vote to override Trump?s veto despite supporting the original bill, which passed both chambers of Congress with strong bipartisan backing.

But it was not enough. Some 109 Republicans broke from Trump on Monday and joined Democrats to support the bill. The final tally of 322-87 comfortably reached the two thirds threshold required to override the veto.

Mac Thornberry, the most senior Republican on the House armed services committee, urged colleagues who had supported the bill earlier this month to back it again. ?It?s the exact same bill, not a comma has changed,? he said. ?I would only ask that as members vote, they put the best interests of the country first. There is no other consideration that should matter.?

Democrat Adam Smith, chair of the committee, said: ?It is enormously important that we pass this bill. We did it once. Let?s just do it one more time, and then we can all go home for the year. We can be done, and we can be proud of what we have accomplished.?

The bill is expected to go before the Republican-controlled Senate later this week. It will become law if passed with a two thirds majority. Trump has exercised a veto nine times during his presidency, but this would be the first override by Congress.

Nancy Pelosi, the speaker of the House, expressed gratitude that Trump?s ?dangerous sabotage efforts? had been thwarted. ?The president must end his eleventh-hour campaign of chaos, and stop using his final moments in office to obstruct bipartisan and bicameral action to protect our military and defend our security,? she said.

But activists found little consolation in the Republican defiance. Mary Small, Indivisible?s acting national policy director, said: ?This is no cause for celebration. It?s sad and infuriating that the only time Republicans banded together to rebuke Trump was in pursuit of an over-militarized foreign policy and bloated defense budget and not any of the other horrifying, democracy-destroying, cruel things he has done.?

Trump blindsided Republicans again last week when he initially refused to sign a $2.3tn government funding and coronavirus relief package that had taken Congress months to negotiate. He eventually relented on Sunday night at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, averting a government shutdown.

Trump had demanded direct stimulus payments to US citizens be increased to $2,000 as opposed to the agreed $600. On Monday the House voted 275-134 in favour of the higher sum, with 44 Republicans joining Democrats. But it is not certain whether it will even be taken up by the Senate, where again many Republicans would find themselves in the uncomfortable position of crossing Trump.

Bernie Sanders, an independent senator from Vermont, said: ?The House has passed a $2,000 direct payment for working people. It is time for the Senate to act. This week on the Senate floor Mitch McConnell wants to vote to override Trump?s veto of the $740 billion defense funding bill and then head home for the New Year. I?m going to object until we get a vote on legislation to provide a $2,000 direct payment to the working class.?

Sanders, a former candidate in the Democratic presidential primary, added: ?Let me be clear: If Senator McConnell doesn?t agree to an up or down vote to provide the working people of our country a $2,000 direct payment, Congress will not be going home for New Year?s Eve. Let?s do our job.?
 

Old School

OVR
Forum Member
Mar 19, 2006
38,204
374
83
74
Hawley vows to challenge Biden electors, forcing vote McConnell hoped to avoid
By Kyle Cheney 1 hr ago

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/12/30/hawley-challenge-biden-electors-forcing-vote-452319

Sen. Josh Hawley on Wednesday pledged to challenge President-elect Joe Biden's victory in Pennsylvania and possibly other states on Jan. 6, when Congress is set to certify the results of the 2020 election.

The Missouri Republican's announcement guarantees that both chambers will be forced to debate the results of at least one state and vote on whether to accept Biden's victory, a process that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell had urged Republicans to avoid, despite pressure from President Donald Trump, who is urging Republicans to overturn the democratic results.

Though Hawley's challenge will have no bearing on the ultimate outcome of the election ? numerous GOP senators have accepted Biden as president-elect ? it will delay the certification of Biden's victory and force every member of the House and Senate on the record affirming Biden's win.

Prior to Hawley's pronouncement, all eyes had been on Sen.-elect Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.), who had signaled his willingness to support a challenge to Biden's victory. Trump had praised Tuberville and blasted other Republicans as "weak," threatening to end the political career of Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.), who told reporters that any challenges were doomed to defeat.

The traditional rules of the Jan. 6 session ? a joint meeting of the House and Senate ? require a single House member and senator to join together to lodge a challenge. If they do, the branches are required to separate and debate the challenge before resuming the joint session.

Dozens of House Republicans have already pledged to challenge the results but had yet to secure unequivocal support from a senator.

The rules that govern those challenges are due to be adopted on Jan. 3. But at least some Republicans have endorsed a legal effort to scrap the rules altogether and empower Vice President Mike Pence, who will preside over the session, to unilaterally introduce electors backing Trump.

House Democrats have challenged the results of the 2000, 2004 and 2016 elections, but only after the 2004 election did a senator ? California's Barbara Boxer ? join in the challenge. That year, Democrats objected to Ohio's electoral votes, which forced a two-hour debate and was ultimately defeated by a wide margin.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top