Trump Election Trail

Old School

OVR
Forum Member
Mar 19, 2006
38,197
371
83
74
Trump Broadens His Efforts to Overturn Election Outcome
As key states prepare to certify their results, the president is pressuring Republicans to back his fraud claims and refusal to concede

https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-...election-outcome-11605800104?mod=hp_lead_pos6

Rebecca Ballhaus, Alex Leary 1 hr ago

WASHINGTON?President Trump has broadened his push to overturn the election outcome and threatened Republicans who challenge his refusal to concede, as looming deadlines for key states to certify their results are set to narrow the path for his legal challenges.

Mr. Trump?s postelection campaign to reverse his loss to President-elect Joe Biden?one without precedent in modern U.S. history?is increasingly showing signs of strain among some Republican lawmakers and governors, while many of the president?s own advisers say they are ready for the campaign to turn the page.

For more than two weeks, prominent Republicans have supported the president?s right to litigate the results. But some are now expressing frustration over an effort they believe has no chance of success and over Mr. Trump?s firing of a cybersecurity official who defended the election?s integrity. Some Trump advisers say they are concerned the continued push risks giving false hope to millions of Mr. Trump?s supporters.

The president this week has ramped up his efforts to put personal pressure on lawmakers in key states where his campaign is contesting the results. On Thursday, he invited two Republican legislative leaders from Michigan, where the campaign is trying to stop the state from certifying the vote, to a Friday afternoon meeting at the White House, according to a person familiar with the matter. The legislators, Senate Majority Leader Mike Shirkey and House Speaker Lee Chatfield, plan to make the trip, the person said.

The Trump legal team has said it is aiming in some states to have Republican-controlled state legislatures appoint pro-Trump electors who would swing the Electoral College in his favor.

Four of the states where the Trump campaign is contesting the results are required to certify their votes in the coming days, a step states take before winners can be officially confirmed. The Electoral College holds its vote Dec. 14. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R., Ky.) indicated earlier this week that he believed a resolution to the president?s challenge was nearing, saying the states? certification of results would be final.

Mr. Trump?s legal campaign?now led by the president?s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani?is still pursuing court challenges in Pennsylvania, Georgia and Nevada, in some cases asking that results from entire counties or states be thrown out. On Wednesday the campaign transferred $3 million to Wisconsin for a partial recount. On Thursday, the campaign withdrew its lawsuit in Michigan, claiming it had already succeeded in its effort to stop certification in the state?s most populous county. A spokeswoman for the Michigan secretary of state has said the county?s vote is certified and the state?s certification process would proceed as planned.

Georgia was expected to release the results of its recount Thursday. Mr. Biden leads Mr. Trump in the state by more than 12,700 votes in the latest count. Michigan must certify the results by Monday, as must Pennsylvania, where Mr. Giuliani appeared in court earlier this week to ask a judge to block certification of the vote count. Nevada must certify results by Tuesday.

Mr. Giuliani on Thursday led a press conference where the Trump campaign?s legal team laid out its strategies for lawsuits.

No evidence has emerged of widespread fraud, and several of Mr. Trump?s lawyers have told judges across the country that they don?t believe such fraud occurred.

Advisers to the president say that even though he understands he won?t win the fight, he remains intent on pushing the legal battle as far as it will go because ?he believes he was robbed,? one adviser told associates.

Some also see the fight as important to keeping the Republican base fired up ahead of two coming Senate contests in Georgia, which will determine which party controls the chamber. Democrats already hold the House.

Jeffrey Engel, a presidential historian at Southern Methodist University in Dallas, said there is no precedent for the president?s refusal to concede.

While candidates have challenged close elections before, there were clear and legitimate arguments made in those instances, he said?and ultimately, ?all of them recognized that the unity of the country was more important.?

?We operate on the premise as historians that by and large there is nothing new, the details change, but the fundamental story is traditionally the same and it rhymes and sways,? Mr. Engel said. ?Words fail us in this situation.?

While Mr. Trump focuses on the legal fight, he has spent little time on his official duties or planning his agenda for the remaining 62 days of his term, administration officials say. In the 16 days since the election, his public schedule has featured only the occasional lunch and a trip to the Arlington National Cemetery, and he has spoken publicly only twice, using one of those appearances to complain about the vote-counting process.

His schedule for Thursday for the third day in a row shows no public events.

As of Thursday afternoon, the White House hadn?t yet advised organizers of the Group of 20 summit?scheduled to be held this weekend in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia?whether Mr. Trump would take part, according to a diplomatic official.

The White House didn?t respond to a request for comment.

The legal campaign has exacerbated tensions among the president?s advisers, people familiar with the discussions said. Early last week, top campaign aides on a conference call laid out a path for how the legal effort could conceivably reverse calls in some states, according to people familiar with the call.

Since then, some aides feel the strategy has lost what little focus it had.

?There was this period of hope that there?s fraud. And then it was, ?Is there really enough fraud?? ? said a campaign aide. ?It?s starting to get a little embarrassing.?

The president put Mr. Giuliani in charge of the legal effort after a tense Oval Office meeting last week in which the former New York mayor accused other lawyers of lying to the president about his slim odds of overturning the election, according to a person familiar with the meeting. That prompted deputy campaign manager Justin Clark to call Mr. Giuliani a ?f?ing asshole.? Mr. Trump elevated Mr. Giuliani, the person said, because ?he was the only person telling the president he could win.?

Echoing concerns from other Trump advisers, Mick Mulvaney, Mr. Trump?s former acting chief of staff, said in an interview with Fox Business Network Wednesday that Mr. Giuliani wasn?t the best choice. ?This is the most important lawsuit in the history of the country, and they?re not using the most well-noted election lawyers,? he said.

Asked to comment on the criticism against Mr. Giuliani, senior Trump campaign adviser Jason Miller responded that there was ?nobody in the country better suited? to uncover election fraud than Mr. Giuliani, whom he called the ?Eliot Ness of his generation,? referring to the Prohibition-era crime fighter. Mr. Giuliani, who served as U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York from 1983 to 1989, didn?t respond to requests for comment.

Meanwhile, Mr. Trump has turned his ire on those in the GOP and the government who haven?t supported his claims. This week, he broached on Twitter the prospect of a Republican primary challenge for Ohio?s Republican governor, Mike DeWine, who had called for the president to allow the transition to the Biden administration to begin. Mr. Trump, in private phone calls and on Twitter, has sought to pressure Republican Gov. Brian Kemp of Georgia to support claims of voter fraud.

Mr. DeWine?s office didn?t respond to a request for comment. A spokesman for Mr. Kemp, Cody Hall, said the office has been in contact with the administration and ?we continue to support their efforts to ensure that every legal vote is counted.? Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, a Republican, has defended the election process as secure and transparent.


On Tuesday evening, Mr. Trump fired via Twitter a top cybersecurity official, Chris Krebs, who oversaw efforts to safeguard the election from foreign interference and had in recent weeks disputed Mr. Trump?s claims of fraud.

Sen. John Cornyn (R., Texas) said of Mr. Krebs?s dismissal: ?It just adds to the confusion and chaos. And I?m sure I?m not the only one that would like some return to a little bit more of a?I don?t even know what?s normal anymore.?

Mr. Trump?s decision not to concede has delayed significant portions of the transition process as parts of the government, including the Pentagon and intelligence agencies, withhold resources and briefings from the president-elect?s advisers.

Mike DuHaime, a longtime GOP strategist, said it was time for reality to set in for the Trump campaign.

?Donald Trump lost,? he said in an interview. ?We shouldn?t be telling people it was fraud when it wasn?t.? He added that many Republicans ?who do know better are sitting silent right now out of fear that Donald Trump may or may not support them in 2022 or 2024.?

With top campaign officials now largely cut out of the legal effort, aides instead have focused on winding down the operation. A dwindling number show up at the Virginia headquarters every day, where Mr. Giuliani and his team often huddle in a conference room.

And at the White House, many officials have begun preparing for life after January?s inauguration, submitting resumes to Fox News or seeking work on Capitol Hill.

Write to Rebecca Ballhaus at Rebecca.Ballhaus@wsj.com and Alex Leary at alex.leary@wsj.com
 

Old School

OVR
Forum Member
Mar 19, 2006
38,197
371
83
74
Biden's win in Georgia reaffirmed after recount
BY LACRAI MITCHELL, CAROLINE LINTON


NOVEMBER 20, 2020 / 8:16 AM / CBS NEWS

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/georgia-election-recount-biden-win/

Georgia's hand recount has been completed and President-elect Joe Biden's victory has been reaffirmed, Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger said Thursday. According to a statement from Raffensberger, the hand recount upheld and reaffirmed the original outcome produced by the machine tally of votes cast.

"Georgia's historic first statewide audit reaffirmed that the state's new secure paper ballot voting system accurately counted and reported results," Raffensberger said in a statement. "This is a credit to the hard work of our county and local elections officials who moved quickly to undertake and complete such a momentous task in a short period of time."

The hand recount was part of an audit that is required by a new state law. It is not connected to any suspected problems with the results of this election or an official recount request. The law requires the audit to be completed before the counties' results can be certified by the state, which must be done by Friday.

Mr. Trump can request a recount because the results were still within 0.5%, but not until after the state certifies its results.

Georgia was one of five states Mr. Biden flipped from President Trump in 2016. Mr. Biden won the state by an 0.3% margin. The state has not voted to send a Democrat to the White House since former President Bill Clinton won it in 1992.

President Trump has alleged without evidence that illegal votes were counted in the presidential election and declared Georgia's recount a "scam." Mr. Trump has also falsely claimed that the state would "flip Republican" when all votes are counted. "Get it done! @BrianKempGA," he tweeted Thursday to the state's Republican governor.

In response to Raffensberger's announcement, the Trump campaign said in a statement that "This so-called hand recount went exactly as we expected because Georgia simply recounted all of the illegal ballots that had been included in the total." The statement did not provide any evidence of illegality.

The Peach State will have a runoff election in January to decide two Senate races.
 

WhatsHisNuts

Woke
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2006
27,580
1,004
113
50
Earth
www.ffrf.org
Biden's win in Georgia reaffirmed after recount
BY LACRAI MITCHELL, CAROLINE LINTON


NOVEMBER 20, 2020 / 8:16 AM / CBS NEWS

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/georgia-election-recount-biden-win/

Georgia's hand recount has been completed and President-elect Joe Biden's victory has been reaffirmed, Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger said Thursday. According to a statement from Raffensberger, the hand recount upheld and reaffirmed the original outcome produced by the machine tally of votes cast.

"Georgia's historic first statewide audit reaffirmed that the state's new secure paper ballot voting system accurately counted and reported results," Raffensberger said in a statement. "This is a credit to the hard work of our county and local elections officials who moved quickly to undertake and complete such a momentous task in a short period of time."

The hand recount was part of an audit that is required by a new state law. It is not connected to any suspected problems with the results of this election or an official recount request. The law requires the audit to be completed before the counties' results can be certified by the state, which must be done by Friday.

Mr. Trump can request a recount because the results were still within 0.5%, but not until after the state certifies its results.

Georgia was one of five states Mr. Biden flipped from President Trump in 2016. Mr. Biden won the state by an 0.3% margin. The state has not voted to send a Democrat to the White House since former President Bill Clinton won it in 1992.

President Trump has alleged without evidence that illegal votes were counted in the presidential election and declared Georgia's recount a "scam." Mr. Trump has also falsely claimed that the state would "flip Republican" when all votes are counted. "Get it done! @BrianKempGA," he tweeted Thursday to the state's Republican governor.

In response to Raffensberger's announcement, the Trump campaign said in a statement that "This so-called hand recount went exactly as we expected because Georgia simply recounted all of the illegal ballots that had been included in the total." The statement did not provide any evidence of illegality.

The Peach State will have a runoff election in January to decide two Senate races.

Yes, but the Bat Shit crazy people will still claim Trump won. We jneed to get this fucktard Trump out of the office and hope the never ending stream of misinformation starts to make some of these gullible dopes realize they've been duped.
 

yyz

Under .500
Forum Member
Mar 16, 2000
41,667
1,450
113
On the course!
Yes, but the Bat Shit crazy people will still claim Trump won. We jneed to get this fucktard Trump out of the office and hope the never ending stream of misinformation starts to make some of these gullible dopes realize they've been duped.

They will always remember how Trump got fucked.

:facepalm:
 

Cricket

sporadic wins
Forum Member
Nov 25, 2005
5,219
354
83
71
WNY
They will always remember how Trump got fucked.

:facepalm:
Quote Originally Posted by WhatsHisNuts View Post
Yes, but the Bat Shit crazy people will still claim Trump won. We jneed to get this fucktard Trump out of the office and hope the never ending stream of misinformation starts to make some of these gullible dopes realize they've been duped.
They will always remember how Trump got fucked.


You two mina birds are too ignorant to think that you too may have been duped. Time will tell.
 

Old School

OVR
Forum Member
Mar 19, 2006
38,197
371
83
74
Quote Originally Posted by WhatsHisNuts View Post
Yes, but the Bat Shit crazy people will still claim Trump won. We jneed to get this fucktard Trump out of the office and hope the never ending stream of misinformation starts to make some of these gullible dopes realize they've been duped.
They will always remember how Trump got fucked.


You two mina birds are too ignorant to think that you too may have been duped. Time will tell.


:facepalm:...........Trump is gone in

https://whenistrumpgone.com/

:00hour:00hour:00hour:00hour:00hour:00hour:00hour:00hour:00hour:00hour:00hour
 

yyz

Under .500
Forum Member
Mar 16, 2000
41,667
1,450
113
On the course!
Quote Originally Posted by WhatsHisNuts View Post
Yes, but the Bat Shit crazy people will still claim Trump won. We jneed to get this fucktard Trump out of the office and hope the never ending stream of misinformation starts to make some of these gullible dopes realize they've been duped.
They will always remember how Trump got fucked.


You two mina birds are too ignorant to think that you too may have been duped. Time will tell.


Wrong again.

If the Biden ticket turns out to be a complete dumpster fire,like the current administration, I wont pretend it wasn't.
 

JT

Degenerate
Forum Member
Mar 28, 2000
3,591
81
48
60
Ventura, Ca.
It won't be a dumpster fire. It is pretty obvious under Clinton and Obama things got better overall as time went on. Pop quiz, under what party was the national budget last a surplus? It was a DEMOCRAT. :00hour
 

Old School

OVR
Forum Member
Mar 19, 2006
38,197
371
83
74
It will take "The Team" a long time to put out the dumpster fires and clean things up.

and Trump's narcissistic tantrums on the way out the door only make it worse.

But make no mistake..................


200w.gif
 

ChrryBlstr

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 11, 2002
7,407
54
48
Hoosier country
Buncha stable geniuses. Bwahahahaha

Peace! :)


<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">One more time, so more people begin to internalize this fact:<br><br>The President's personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, who is leading the charge to overthrow the will of the people in this election, is under active FBI investigation for working with Russian intelligence.</p>— Scott Stedman (@ScottMStedman) <a href="https://twitter.com/ScottMStedman/status/1330301599051362310?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 22, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">BREAKING NEWS: Republicans erroneously claim there are too many votes in Michigan, because they think that the upper peninsula of Michigan is in Canada.<br><br>(This is not photoshopped. This really happened.) <a href="https://t.co/OcOPariPym">pic.twitter.com/OcOPariPym</a></p>— Steve Hofstetter (@SteveHofstetter) <a href="https://twitter.com/SteveHofstetter/status/1329865460364566528?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 20, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 

Old School

OVR
Forum Member
Mar 19, 2006
38,197
371
83
74
Chris Christie Shreds Trump's Legal Team: It's Been a 'National Embarrassment' (Video)
Jeremy Fuster 3 hrs ago

https://www.thewrap.com/chris-christie-trump-legal-team-national-embarassment-video/

Former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie slammed Donald Trump and his legal team?s efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election, calling his legal team?s conduct a ?national embarrassment? on ABC?s ?This Week.?

?Listen, I?ve been a supporter of the president, I voted for him twice, but elections have consequences and we cannot continue to act as if something happened here that didn?t happen,? Christie said.

no shit
 

Old School

OVR
Forum Member
Mar 19, 2006
38,197
371
83
74
Election updates: Christie calls Trump legal team 'national embarrassment'; Hogan tells Trump 'stop golfing and concede'
William Cummings
Matthew Brown
USA TODAY
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...es-trump-biden-electors-president/6381507002/

Former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, a Trump ally, said on ABC News' "The Week" that "the president's legal team has been a national embarrassment." He called Sidney Powell's unsubstantiated allegation that Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp was part of an elaborate conspiracy to rig the election for Biden "outrageous conduct by any lawyer. "

"They allege fraud outside the courtroom, but when they go inside the courtroom, they don't plead fraud and they don't argue fraud," Christie said. "Listen, I've been a supporter of the president's. I voted for him twice. But elections have consequences, and we cannot continue to act as if something happened here that didn't happen."

Christie said if the Trump team is "unwilling to come forward and present the evidence" of widespread election fraud, "it must mean the evidence doesn't exist."

Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan ? a fierce Trump critic who did not vote for him in 2016 or 2020 ? told CNN's "State of the Union" that Trump's effort to pressure legislators in states he lost into flipping the electors for him was "completely outrageous."

"Now we're beginning to look like we're a banana republic," Hogan said. "It's time for them to stop the nonsense. It just gets more bizarre every single day. And, frankly, I'm embarrassed that more people in the party aren't speaking up."


Trump attacked Hogan on Twitter after the interview aired Sunday, criticizing him for his purchase of coronavirus testing kits for his state from South Korea.

"If you had done your job, America's governors wouldn't have been forced to fend for themselves to find tests in the middle of a pandemic, as we successfully did in Maryland," Hogan tweeted in response.

"Stop golfing and concede."

? William Cummings
 

ChrryBlstr

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 11, 2002
7,407
54
48
Hoosier country
It is only a matter of time before judges start holding Trump's lawyers in contempt or sanctioning them over this nonsense. When the dust settles, some of them should probably be disbarred. Giuliani, for instance. Lawyers have been disbarred for less.

Peace! :)


?This is simply not how the Constitution works?: Federal judge eviscerates Trump lawsuit

The judge issued a withering opinion in his dismissal of the suit that Rudy Giuliani turned up to argue in a small Pennsylvania city this week.

A federal judge in Pennsylvania eviscerated President Donald Trump?s attempt to throw out millions of votes Saturday, dismissing his campaign?s lawsuit with a withering opinion that described a dearth of proof to justify the drastic demand.

?This Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence,? U.S. District Judge Matthew Brann wrote. ?In the United States of America, this cannot justify the disenfranchisement of a single voter, let alone all the voters of its sixth most populated state. Our people, laws, and institutions demand more.?

The ruling is the latest rejection by federal and state court judges of Trump?s effort to overturn President-elect Joe Biden?s victory. And the judge?s stinging refutation of the campaign?s claims is yet another indication that Trump?s last-ditch effort to cling to power is slipping. Pennsylvania counties are due to certify their votes by Monday, leaving the final statewide certification in the hands of Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar, a Democrat and a defendant in the lawsuit.

Trump has faced a series of legal and political setbacks in the last two days. Some of his allies on Capitol Hill have begun to publicly recognize Biden?s victory. Michigan state lawmakers, whom Trump summoned to the Oval Office on Friday, emerged insisting they would not intervene in their state?s election process to aid Trump. Georgia?s Republican governor and secretary of state certified a victory for Biden Friday, despite Trump?s objections. And a Republican-controlled board in Arizona?s largest county certified its results Friday evening and rejected any claims of fraud.

The sharply worded, 37-page opinion is a blow to the lawyer Trump picked just last weekend to spearhead his legal efforts to challenge the election, former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani. Giuliani made an unexpected appearance in Brann?s courtroom in the small central Pennsylvania city of Williamsport on Tuesday.

Trump was counting on Giuliani?s presence to reverse the public narrative that the campaign?s legal drive to salvage the election was failing. Instead, Giuliani was mocked by legal commentators for being unprepared, unfamiliar with basic legal standards applicable to the case and even for forgetting the name of the judge.



Brann also expressed alarm at the draconian relief that Giuliani sought: The disenfranchisement of 7 million Pennsylvania voters ? the state?s entire electorate ? in the hopes of stripping its 20 electoral votes from Biden?s column.

?This Court has been unable to find any case in which a plaintiff has sought such a drastic remedy in the contest of an election, in terms of the sheer volume of votes asked to be invalidated,? he said, ?One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption ? That has not happened.?

In his opinion, Brann picked apart each argument offered by Giuliani.

The judge dismissed the Trump campaign?s argument that its observers were unfairly denied access to vote-counting operations in certain counties, noting that both Trump and Biden?s observers were subject to the same restrictions. He also said the Trump team?s lawyers misunderstood the lessons of Bush v. Gore ? the Supreme Court ruling that delivered the 2000 election to George W. Bush ? in their attempt to apply it to the current case.

And Brann rejected the notion that counties who offered voters an opportunity to ?cure? defective mail-in ballots should have those votes thrown out because other counties ? those with a larger proportion of Trump voters ? did not. The decision not to offer voters a chance to cure ballots was not made by the parties the Trump campaign sued, namely Boockvar and seven heavily Democratic counties.

In rejecting this claim, Brann shredded the Trump legal team?s mix-and-match approach to their argument.

?This claim, like Frankenstein?s Monster, has been haphazardly stitched together from two distinct theories in an attempt to avoid controlling precedent,? Brann wrote.

Brann was appointed by President Barack Obama, but is regarded as a conservative judge and an atypical Obama nominee. Brann, who was selected by Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.), served as a regional Republican Party chairman in Pennsylvania for about a decade before being nominated to the federal bench.



?Even assuming that they can establish that their right to vote has been denied, which they cannot, Plaintiffs seek to remedy the denial of their votes by invalidating the votes of millions of others. Rather than requesting that their votes be counted, they seek to discredit scores of other votes, but only for one race. This is simply not how the Constitution works,? the judge wrote.

In a statement signed by Giuliani and campaign legal adviser Jenna Ellis, the Trump campaign pledged to appeal Brann's ruling, adding: "Today?s decision turns out to help us in our strategy to get expeditiously to the U.S. Supreme Court. Although we fully disagree with this opinion, we?re thankful to the Obama-appointed judge for making this anticipated decision quickly, rather than simply trying to run out the clock."

In a statement, Toomey said Biden had won Pennsylvania and with it the presidential election: ?With today?s decision by Judge Matthew Brann, a longtime conservative Republican whom I know to be a fair and unbiased jurist, to dismiss the Trump campaign?s lawsuit, President Trump has exhausted all plausible legal options to challenge the result of the presidential race in Pennsylvania."

Trump later assailed Brann and Toomey in a tweet, adding: "WILL APPEAL!!!"

The court also rejected an attempt from the Trump team to further amend its complaint.

?Given that: (1) Plaintiffs have already amended once as of right; (2) Plaintiffs seek to amend simply in order to effectively reinstate their initial complaint and claims; and (3) the deadline for counties in Pennsylvania to certify their election results to Secretary Boockvar is November 23, 2020, amendment would unduly delay resolution of the issues,? Brann wrote.

Brann also frowned on the merry-go-round of representation that marked the Trump campaign?s efforts throughout the suit.

?Although this case was initiated less than two weeks ago, it has already developed its own tortured procedural history,? Brann wrote. ?Plaintiffs have made multiple attempts at amending the pleadings, and have had attorneys both appear and withdraw in a matter of seventy-two hours.?



Brann mentioned in passing a ?rude and ill-conceived voicemail? one of the lawyers representing Trump received from a junior attorney at Kirkland & Ellis, saying it ?distracted the Court?s attention from the significant issues at hand.? The judge said the message was inappropriate but he rejected a Trump lawyer?s request to impose sanctions on the firm, whose attorneys represented Boockvar.

The Trump campaign wasn?t the only party to the case to face some upheaval on its legal team. On Friday, the Kirkland lawyers moved to withdraw from the case, to be replaced by a team from the law firm, Kramer Levin, which included a key lawyer for Democrats during the impeachment of President Donald Trump, Barry Berke.

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/11/21/federal-judge-tosses-trump-suit-over-pennsylvania-election-results-439010
 

ChrryBlstr

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 11, 2002
7,407
54
48
Hoosier country
So much for that Kraken. lolz

Peace! :)


<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">8 days ago Trump said Sidney Powell was on the team, 3 days ago the official GOP account elevated her conspiracy theories, and today they disavow Powell altogether.<br><br>This is an absolute trainwreck even by Trump standards. <a href="https://t.co/tcHylNvvwK">pic.twitter.com/tcHylNvvwK</a></p>— Josh Jordan (@NumbersMuncher) <a href="https://twitter.com/NumbersMuncher/status/1330672898818846721?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 23, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top