under angle

[agkil12]

Originally the Portland game was the low under, but now it's the Orlando game.

What's the rule for this system when the line shifts??

Do you take the opening line or the moved line??

 

[jer-z jock]

Opening lines!! Guys, I think alot of the reason some of the original thread starters aren't answering the questions is because you have to read a little. If you dont want to read then you dont want to follow the system, ALOT IF NOT ALL the questions being asked have been either discussed or answered. Hope that helps but take a little time and read EVERY POST.....it may save you a few dollars or show you what to do when no one responds!! BOL

 

[jer-z jock]

:nono:

ORLANDO / HORNETS UNDER 187

IS LOOKING LIKE THE PLAY FOR 2DAY


GOOD LUCK EVERYBODY!! :00hour

:nono:


DONT DO THAT!!!!!!! YOU MAY BE MISLEADING PEOPLE. IF THATS WHAT YOU WANNA PLAY FINE BUT UNLESS YOU ARE SURE OF THE SYSTEM RULES AND SURE OF THE PLAYS PLEASE DONT DO THAT!!! Money can be lost:nono:

 

[Ohwell42]

That is correct. As long as there are at least 4 games on the board, then take the lowest total. There are times when it gets a bit tricky and a couple of games are all hovering around the same number. I have yet to come up with a great way of making the determination in those situations.........But that is certainly not the case this evening, Rockets/Spurs would be the play.

By this statement, it doesnt say to use opening lines.

 

[BUCSnotYUCKS]

It's at 188 on Bodog now, jump on it!

ps.- Even though the Portland game is looking like a solid would've bet. haha

 

[Keyser Soze]

Jer-Z is correct about the redundant questions.

Secondly, I took the Portland game under this morning because it was a point and a half better than the Orlando number. You can't wait around all day to see what they end up doing at tip off, you can lose valuable points that way. I mentioned before, if a game is the clear cut lowest and it seems to be hedging upward, I will wait it out a bit to see if I can get a better number, but if it starts moving in the other direction, I am grabbing it.

Jack has been keeping the running total on this thread, so I am not sure what game he is using, but for the purposes of the system that I use, I played Port under tonight. .......

Also, I got it at 187, I didn't see it moving up before I played it, so that is the number I am using.

 

[jer-z jock]

Jer-Z is correct about the redundant questions.

Secondly, I took the Portland game under this morning because it was a point and a half better than the Orlando number. You can't wait around all day to see what they end up doing at tip off, you can lose valuable points that way. I mentioned before, if a game is the clear cut lowest and it seems to be hedging upward, I will wait it out a bit to see if I can get a better number, but if it starts moving in the other direction, I am grabbing it.

Jack has been keeping the running total on this thread, so I am not sure what game he is using, but for the purposes of the system that I use, I played Port under tonight. .......

Also, I got it at 187, I didn't see it moving up before I played it, so that is the number I am using.

Let's get' er done....I found the same number when I checked, then when the OTHER game went lowest I almost chit!!:142smilie BOL

 

[BUCSnotYUCKS]

Keyser makes a good point. As long as you follow the system, and make the bet when you can, then it should play out right. Place your bet when you can place it, and take the lowest at that time.

You cant sit around all day and hoping to maybe squeze a point or 2 and end up having it go in the wrong direction. You'll be skewing the system.
------------

Portland game looks GREAT
Orlando game looked bad at first, but scoring has come to a hault.

GL BOYS

 

[MadJack]

Jack has been keeping the running total on this thread, so I am not sure what game he is using, but for the purposes of the system that I use, I played Port under tonight.

i was going to ask you what one to use for record purposes. i bet port early this morning at 187 just after it came out. then around 6pm i saw the other game was lower and took that one too :142smilie

i'll use port for the record.

thanks

 

[Ohwell42]

i didnt get to check the lines until 3pm ET, at that time Or/NO was 187 and Port/Cha was at 189 so that is why i took the Or/NO.

 

[Keyser Soze]

May not matter:banghead:

 

[Dr Feelgood]

Port/Char is a joke...I should have hedged at half but I thought why bother, its a winner...that is unreal...no wonder I hate the NBA...

 

[agkil12]

Port/Char is a joke just like this system....

 

[Steve's plays]

I still can't believe that under didn't hit, thought there was no reason to take the over in the 2nd half, 60 points in the 4th quarter, you have to be kidding me.

 

[jer-z jock]

Port/Char is a joke just like this system....

Thanks for contributing, and I hope you cash every ticket you place from this day forward as all SYSTEMS ALWAYS DO. Ashame you missed the 8-10 units from the previous weeks.:142smilie Be patient hang on and hang in there would be the best bet.

 

[MadJack]

under angle system is:

YTD: 10-5
DOUBLE PLAYS: 2-2 (these plays are included in the 10-5 overall record)

1st time we lost 3 in a row

some played port and lost, some played orl and won and some played both and split but we decided to count the port game for the record.

ridiculous that 69 points were scored in the 4th Q of the port game. they couldn't miss anything!

 

[jer-z jock]

under angle system is:

YTD: 10-5
DOUBLE PLAYS: 2-2 (these plays are included in the 10-5 overall record)

1st time we lost 3 in a row

some played port and lost, some played orl and won and some played both and split but we decided to count the port game for the record.

ridiculous that 69 points were scored in the 4th Q of the port game. they couldn't miss anything!

MJ, can we * or sidenote the fact that on a 4 game day the game that moved to the lowest total was a winner vs the opening line, maybe this in time to come could prove to be a filter sooner or later. Just probing the thought or idea

 

[BUCSnotYUCKS]

The fact that Charlotte and Portland either or scored 30pts in 1 quarter is a joke.

It won't happen very often this season that either team scores 30 points in any quarter.

 

[Cie]

The fact that Charlotte and Portland either or scored 30pts in 1 quarter is a joke.

It won't happen very often this season that either team scores 30 points in any quarter.

:shrug:

 

[Steve's plays]

Appears tuesday's game is not on the board yet, i'm assuming Philly-Wash will be lowest total. Guess Vegas is waiting to see the status of Arenas. Philly scored in the 70's twice last week....:mj07: