Billy Blastoff
- Thread starter Billy Blastoff
- Start date
Not sure it is a play. Line opened at -2.5 and now is -1.5. I thought Billy used the opening line but not sure. At -1 it would be a play. Better wait for Billy to make the call on this one.
Not a play
No plays today
As I said it is a very boring system but if you follow the rules a few beds that you have have a legit shot to win it?s more fun to invest your money into gamble your money
SIU was not a play based on the system it is OK to play them they are not in the bottom 4 conferences
ok, great.
so then, where do you fellas retrieve the opening 'vegas line' from?
in my remedial web search of opening line, its showing 1.5, though you're saying 2.5 - where are you pulling that from?
thanks in advance - im just trying make sure am following system correctly
Hey Billy, i remember the system only being effective until a certain point in the season. Are you still using a particular cutoff date?
That is true but that was only under the Q factor
I no longer wish to enter the data and there are so many data sites out there I dedicated my time to figuring out what combination of sites would get me to a comfortable situation where I feel a high probability of winning.
Naturally with my background in data mining I realized despite the early success with the Q factor (over 70% ) that as soon as conference play started The categories that I used to come up with my numbers were no longer successful in conference play.
With this new system it uses almost complete opposite philosophies and data categories to come up with their numbers so I do not feel that there is any cut off for this new system.
My only fear about publishing this new system is that people cannot just be happy with getting the information they have to question this and that and why I will probably hang around for a little bit but I?m sure at some point I will get tired of all the questions but I have now given everyone a reliable source to get winners and actually make money but I?m sure many people wil start to Complaining that this one week the system only went 50% and so on and so forth I remember winning 16 games in a row and then the system lost three games and people were bitching and moaning on here about the system doesn?t work.
And I will re-iterate this new system will not put out a lot of games during the course of a week be happy if you get a total of five or six games for the week but you cannot change the parameters to make selections all your success rate will decrease I?d rather have money in my pocket instead of watching a game and watching it lose
Personally I do not care how many people have the system the most important part is that you keep money in your pocket and stop letting the bookies drive around in Cadillacs and Mercedes
I was just checking.. I see two others on the long slate.. may need to check conferences - but this is what I came up with..
SW Missouri St. -1.5 over Bradley
St. Bonaventure -7 over Massachusetts.. line is up to -9
UCLA +2.5 over Stanford.. line is now UCLA -1
Both lines moving in the direction of the system
i like to look at the situational aspect of matchups, and all three of these games are attractive from that standpoint.
st bonny is one of the best a10 teams out there. umass is - well - umass. they're playing in rochester tonight, a second home to them, but we're getting basically a neutral court line. bonnies should crush.
mo st is loaded this year and was expected to compete for the mvc title, but they have been underachieving. they just got hosed at home saturday by n iowa. expect a focused rebound tonight.
stanford was picked in the bottom half of the pac12 in preseason, but they've been overachieving. not sure when the last was they won in the city of angels. doubt it will be tonight.
glta
st bonny is one of the best a10 teams out there. umass is - well - umass. they're playing in rochester tonight, a second home to them, but we're getting basically a neutral court line. bonnies should crush.
mo st is loaded this year and was expected to compete for the mvc title, but they have been underachieving. they just got hosed at home saturday by n iowa. expect a focused rebound tonight.
stanford was picked in the bottom half of the pac12 in preseason, but they've been overachieving. not sure when the last was they won in the city of angels. doubt it will be tonight.
glta
Sorry I am not at my computer the only one I remember off my top of my head was UCLA
Its time consuming but talisman explains how to cap their statistics and come up with the line on your own...I found UTA, S. Bama, S. Miss, and Northridge for today
If you go back in, there is one figure in the Talisman row and I believe it
makes for a play in the UTSA/UTEP game. I could be wrong though.
Check it out. The opening line is 1.5 and has 7OT -7.00 and Talisman -5.80.
Let me know how you make out.
GL
SDJ
