- Mar 9, 2008
- 373
- 0
- 0
It al depemds
It al depemds
I guess it depends how badly a player wants to bet on a fight, Joey, especially if a Brit/Euro book is his only option. The draw rule is a bookie's dream, yes, and is a hassle for players, but it is not insurmountable.
Say a player wants to bet on a fighter at -120 and feels solid about his pick. He puts down $120 to win $100 and throws $5 on the draw at +2500. If his side wins, he wins $95 instead of the $100 he would have won at a U.S.-rules book. If he loses he loses $125 instead of losing $120. If the draw hits, he wins $5. (I think I've done the math right.) It all depends on the odds and how strongly a player feels about his wager.
Your "lesson" is a very good one for players to bear in mind. As my Las Vegas pal Arne Lang always says: "Sometimes your best bet is the one you don't make."
It al depemds
Maybe I am reading SAFEGUARD too literally.
With all due respect... you would have to be a moron to do such a thing.
It's a bookmakers dream.
Anyone that bets draw as safeguard deseves to lose their money.
Look at it this way. Why pay insurance on a potential blackjack that pays +150 , before the hand is even dealt. That's what your doing. I can see maybe an in progress draw bet but before the bout even starts?
You either pass on betting fight all together or you bet the draw because you think the draw can win. Not to insure you dont get the short end of the stick.
The bout didnt cost me anything, but shame on me if I am going to deal something that consistently shows a level incompetence on the part of the judges that is not already factored into the number.
How many draws and bad decisions took place in the UK on Fridays in 2010 that left people scratching their heads. Sure it happens all over the world, but why not be disciplined and just pass on betting the bout all together. It was overpriced from the get go.
LESSON: In the end its not always about the good deals you make, but rather the bad deals you dont make. Apply that to betting and you will see passing on a fight is sometimes the smartest wager on the board.
I guess it depends how badly a player wants to bet on a fight, Joey, especially if a Brit/Euro book is his only option. The draw rule is a bookie's dream, yes, and is a hassle for players, but it is not insurmountable.
Say a player wants to bet on a fighter at -120 and feels solid about his pick. He puts down $120 to win $100 and throws $5 on the draw at +2500. If his side wins, he wins $95 instead of the $100 he would have won at a U.S.-rules book. If he loses he loses $125 instead of losing $120. If the draw hits, he wins $5. (I think I've done the math right.) It all depends on the odds and how strongly a player feels about his wager.
Your "lesson" is a very good one for players to bear in mind. As my Las Vegas pal Arne Lang always says: "Sometimes your best bet is the one you don't make."