Cop TASERs Pit Bull Attacking Family

fatdaddycool

Chi-TownHustler
Forum Member
Mar 26, 2001
13,687
254
83
60
Fort Worth TX usa
Why not, I thought they were just as unlikely to attack as any other dog?
He's not going to change your mind because you're unwilling to listen. If you were truly willing to listen you'd most likely have done some research on the subject other than to simply find articles that support your position. If you did that you might learn something
 

theGibber1

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 27, 2001
8,615
63
0
Dallas TX
He's not going to change your mind because you're unwilling to listen. If you were truly willing to listen you'd most likely have done some research on the subject other than to simply find articles that support your position. If you did that you might learn something



Going to respectfully call bullshit.. Not because of some internet articles or the media but from my own experience.. Had two of these damn things turn on me and it was the most teryfing shit I've ever experienced.. They were my roommates in college.. I knew and lived with these dogs for at least 4 yrs and out of nowhere the Alpha turned on me.. Didn't take long for the other to join in.. Had to lock myself in the damn bathroom..

Few years later one of them killed the other while he and his wife were at work. You call hedge ignorant but to say these dogs are not naturally aggressive is just plain dumb.. Why else would they be picked for fighting and not a lab or some such???

:toast:
 
Last edited:

hedgehog

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 30, 2003
32,621
570
113
49
TX
Going to respectfully call bullshit.. Not because of some internet articles or the media but from my own experience.. Had two of these damn things turn on me and it was the most teryfing shit I've ever experienced.. They were my roommates in college.. I knew and lived with these dogs for at least 4 yrs and out of nowhere the Alpha turned on me.. Didn't take long for the other to join in.. Had to lock myself in the damn bathroom..

Few years later one of them killed the other while he and his wife were at work. You call hedge ignorant but to say these dogs are not naturally aggressive is just plain dumb.. Why else would they be picked for fighting and a lab or some such???

They are bred to fight, doesn't surprise me at all gibber one dog turned on the other, glad you lived through them turning on you, I would be in favor of a law forbidding anyone from owning one, they are too dangerous
 

saint

Go Heels
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
9,501
140
63
Balls Deep
There are at least 10 countries that ban ownership of pit bulls.

Oh, wait, they must be in on the conspiracy too. It's all fabricated by the media. They are biased- not the .000001% of the population like FDC.

We've been down this road FDC. You're wrong.
 

fatdaddycool

Chi-TownHustler
Forum Member
Mar 26, 2001
13,687
254
83
60
Fort Worth TX usa
Yes Saint we have been down this road. Thank you for proving my point and your continued ignorance on the subject. What a surprise you found some obscure tidbit of info that seems to add weight to you're opinion and, as is typical of dentists, you once again take the narcissistic approach of claiming yourself correct. So personally, I don't really care if you think I'm wrong. Historically, you've been on the wrong of most these type discussions anyway. Like when you lied about your insurance premiums going up more than they did etc. .. So what you can take from this is that I don't really value your opinion on anything Saint. It's never been an informed one, so let's not waste my time and yours thinking that you calling me wrong on anything is any less ridiculous than calling a dentist a doctor.

Hope that helps,
FDC
 
Last edited:

fatdaddycool

Chi-TownHustler
Forum Member
Mar 26, 2001
13,687
254
83
60
Fort Worth TX usa
Going to respectfully call bullshit.. Not because of some internet articles or the media but from my own experience.. Had two of these damn things turn on me and it was the most teryfing shit I've ever experienced.. They were my roommates in college.. I knew and lived with these dogs for at least 4 yrs and out of nowhere the Alpha turned on me.. Didn't take long for the other to join in.. Had to lock myself in the damn bathroom..

Few years later one of them killed the other while he and his wife were at work. You call hedge ignorant but to say these dogs are not naturally aggressive is just plain dumb.. Why else would they be picked for fighting and not a lab or some such???

:toast:
Gibber,
I don't think you're specifically referring to me as dumb, but if that is the case I would put forth that the very same breed you are referring to as being "naturally aggressive" had been referred to by our very same society as the "nanny dog" for more than fifty years. It is a dog that was bred entirely in the U.S. and was never bred to be aggressive. That's simply untrue and that historical information us readily available to anyone that would like to take the time to educate themselves on the subject. You know, prior to calling someone dumb when they are entirely incorrect on the subject.
Sorry that happened to you with the dogs though brother. I still dig you though bro

I forgot who it was that mentioned a conspiracy but it's ignorant shit like that keeps the public misinformed. It's so much easier to turn on the TV and believe everything they hear rather than spend ten minutes educating themselves and formulating a well thought out opinion. Who the fuck mentioned a conspiracy though? Because I said the media sensationalizes pitty attacks? Wow.


Hedge,
You're fat, (I meant to say far there but fat is always appropriate when speaking of you) more dangerous to your kids lives than all the dogs in the world put together.
Have you any information on the subject, and please don't go looking now or posting a bunch of links to unrelated shit, or personal information or experience on the subject?

No, you don't. You just continue to be completely unimpressive as an organism let alone a human being.

Hope that helps,
FDC
 
Last edited:

PocketAces

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 30, 2003
6,020
99
48
49
WI
There has to be some stats out there of percentage of dog attacks sorted by breed.
 

fatdaddycool

Chi-TownHustler
Forum Member
Mar 26, 2001
13,687
254
83
60
Fort Worth TX usa
There is. Pit bull advocates think the data accumulation process is wrong. Id love to see a ratio of pit bull owners to penis size.
You know what bbc, I'm one of those owners and that statement about penis size........ is fucking stupid and baseless. I'm a pit bull owner as well as a rottweiler, Labrador, Shepard, retriever, chow, Newfoundland, Catahoula Leopard dog, toy poodle, old English sheep dog, Norwegian Elkhound, min pinscher, chihuahua, husky, malamute, St. Bernard, doberman, maltese, shih tzu, mastiff, wiemariener (sp?), cattle dog, and terrier owner at some point in my adult life so what the fuck does that say about my penis size? Maybe we can measure what level of pretentiousness and narcissism it takes for you to make such an asinine statement.
Also, it isn't advocates that say the data collection on the matter is flawed, it is simple scientific methodology that says they're flawed. Find me anything bobby, find me one fucking stat concerning this matter where the statistics are accurately collected on all breeds for the same span of time? You can't. Every single one of those lists you speak of as being accurate are based solely on attacks AS REPORTED BY THE MEDIA!

Now I'm quite positive that I have pointed this to you and everyone else a number of times, and even armed with this knowledge you dumb it down to make it about something else. You cannot feasibly make am accurate statement about attacks so you make a shitty comment about people in order to make yourself seem cool or more generously adorned with penile spongy tissue. Are you ten?
If you want to have a discussion based on fact, I'll be happy to have it. If you're going to be a childish dick to me, something that I never do to you, then don't bother.
Ya feel me?
The fact is no dog in the entire world bites more people than Labrador breeds. The bites are not always reported, nor always vicious, but I would hazard to say that since they are the most popular breed in the world and their numbers far outweigh most every breed, it stands to reason that they would bite more people. You don't see that though.

Let me ask you this Bob, the violent crime rate in the USA is far worse than most other countries in the world, are we bred that way? Is it part of our nature? So we have smaller dicks than Norway? Since there are more black men in prison per capita than white or Asian, or native American, are black men bred to rape and kill more than others? And don't black men supposedly have large penises?

So you see bbc, it's not us advocates that are putting out the "flawed scientific data" message as it relates to this subject. Apparently it's big dicks doing and saying those things because their thought process is obscured by an obsession with male genitalia.

The truth is that your one of those people that has let the media convince them on a certain subject rather than doing the research yourself and applying just a small bit of common fucking sense to your thought process.

Hope that helps,
FDC
 

BobbyBlueChip

Trustee
Forum Member
Dec 27, 2000
20,657
256
83
52
Belly of the Beast
You know what bbc, I'm one of those owners and that statement about penis size........ is fucking stupid and baseless. I'm a pit bull owner as well as a rottweiler, Labrador, Shepard, retriever, chow, Newfoundland, Catahoula Leopard dog, toy poodle, old English sheep dog, Norwegian Elkhound, min pinscher, chihuahua, husky, malamute, St. Bernard, doberman, maltese, shih tzu, mastiff, wiemariener (sp?), cattle dog, and terrier owner at some point in my adult life so what the fuck does that say about my penis size? Maybe we can measure what level of pretentiousness and narcissism it takes for you to make such an asinine statement.
Also, it isn't advocates that say the data collection on the matter is flawed, it is simple scientific methodology that says they're flawed. Find me anything bobby, find me one fucking stat concerning this matter where the statistics are accurately collected on all breeds for the same span of time? You can't. Every single one of those lists you speak of as being accurate are based solely on attacks AS REPORTED BY THE MEDIA!

Now I'm quite positive that I have pointed this to you and everyone else a number of times, and even armed with this knowledge you dumb it down to make it about something else. You cannot feasibly make am accurate statement about attacks so you make a shitty comment about people in order to make yourself seem cool or more generously adorned with penile spongy tissue. Are you ten?
If you want to have a discussion based on fact, I'll be happy to have it. If you're going to be a childish dick to me, something that I never do to you, then don't bother.
Ya feel me?
The fact is no dog in the entire world bites more people than Labrador breeds. The bites are not always reported, nor always vicious, but I would hazard to say that since they are the most popular breed in the world and their numbers far outweigh most every breed, it stands to reason that they would bite more people. You don't see that though.

Let me ask you this Bob, the violent crime rate in the USA is far worse than most other countries in the world, are we bred that way? Is it part of our nature? So we have smaller dicks than Norway? Since there are more black men in prison per capita than white or Asian, or native American, are black men bred to rape and kill more than others? And don't black men supposedly have large penises?

So you see bbc, it's not us advocates that are putting out the "flawed scientific data" message as it relates to this subject. Apparently it's big dicks doing and saying those things because their thought process is obscured by an obsession with male genitalia.

The truth is that your one of those people that has let the media convince them on a certain subject rather than doing the research yourself and applying just a small bit of common fucking sense to your thought process.

Hope that helps,
FDC

7"?
 

PocketAces

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 30, 2003
6,020
99
48
49
WI
It sounds to me that more scientific data gathering is needed. It really shouldn't be too tough to gather the information. Dog attacks are documented by local authorities and not just the media right?

The number that I am interested in is what percentage of each breed are involved in attacks. Then the breeds could be compared by percentage not total population.

We'd all probably be in for a surprise.

I wonder what percentage of attacks would be deemed acceptable by breed advocates and the general public?
 

The Joker

Registered
Forum Member
Aug 3, 2008
28,116
358
83
46
Tennessee
www.madjacksports.com
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatal_dog_attacks_in_the_United_States

67% of fatal attacks involve PIT BULLS

NUFF SAID

It should be illegal to own one

1016708_10204818814136160_2917537695535101831_n.jpg
 

fatdaddycool

Chi-TownHustler
Forum Member
Mar 26, 2001
13,687
254
83
60
Fort Worth TX usa
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatal_dog_attacks_in_the_United_States

67% of fatal attacks involve PIT BULLS

NUFF SAID

It should be illegal to own one
First of all there is no such specific breed of Pitt bull dog. Several different breeds have been grouped into the Pitt bull classification for reporting offenses. Many mutts that may be part boxer or terrier may be "named" as a Pitt bull, while a golden retriever is listed as exactly that yet it's a Labrador. With that knowledge we know that the Pitt bull, being the one breed that was originally bred only in the USA, is the most populous of the current reported breeds in the states accounting for almost 49% of our entire dog population. Add on top of that the number of times dogs are incorrectly identified, since cops rarely get anything right, and the fact that a fatal dog attack requires a larger breed and that number is to be expected. That is how actual research and factual information searches are done for smart people hedge. Like I told you earlier, flawed information is only good to those ignorant enough to believe anything they read or hear. As long as it's said by Fox of course.
Where exactly did you get your information regarding this 67% number you're referring to?
If you actually did read this somewhere, did you check to see what data was gathered and from where to publish this report? Did every fatal attack get followed up with a qualified expert identifying the exact breed of the dog to ensure accuracy? Of course not, if you even read that and didn't pull it straight from your ass, it will say as reported by news accounts.
Get your fucking facts straight dumbass before you start advocating the removal of my country's liberty and freedoms.

Hope that helps,
FDC
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top