Dick Cheney is a Spiteful Traitor

Trench

Turn it up
Forum Member
Mar 8, 2008
3,974
18
0
Mad City, WI
On spin issue--I take it then you can't read his own words

Your irrefutable proof is Gumby/liberal logic. Is none to contrary either--your boy Gumby will release only part he wants to--guess you couldn't read that either.

Bottom line if it takes the pres has to put bullet in terrorist head himself--he better damn well do it if it that or american lives--

--and your boy Gumby had been quite clear on issue--he rather suck dicks and chase rabbits than infringe on terrorist rights over saving American lives.

--so how about me giving you some irrefutable proof that Gw/Cheneys methods were effective--no attack after 911.

We'll see what Gumby does--however I don't envy his position--he's ran his mouth about last 8 years-yet it is impossible for him to improve on record since 911--best he can hope for is tie--and if he fucks up--he might want to coral rest of his family living here illegally for 3years now--and get out of dodge. :)

DTB... If you could organize your random and disconnected thoughts into something that resembles a coherent point, I'd be more than happy to respond.

Now try again. :0corn
 

The Sponge

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2006
17,263
97
0
The thought that there are still some people in this country that support this vile money grubbing piece of shit is stunning to say the least. Then again the neo-con ass kissers in here were never known to be deep thinkers.
 

Lush Rimbough

Anointed One.
Forum Member
May 1, 2009
105
0
0
Illinois
I thought we are a county founded on the rule of law and justice. We had a legal system in place that made other counties green with envy. We are better than that to resort to using torture, especially from our elected officials like Bush and Cheney.
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,555
214
63
"the bunker"
I thought we are a county founded on the rule of law and justice. We had a legal system in place that made other counties green with envy. We are better than that to resort to using torture, especially from our elected officials like Bush and Cheney.

yeah...torture...people are volunteering to have it done...some more than once....

let's see people volunteer to be hobbled,to get kicked in the balls, have his fingers broken or have cigerettes put out on their faces....

how do we get really bad people to tell their plans to kill us?...a strongly worded letter?...


should we use sarcasm?....dramatic irony, metaphor, puns, parody, and satire....show them no mercy?..

well i use all these tools on the tools on this board and they don`t work....the libs never skip a beat....

/:lol:
 

Trampled Underfoot

Registered
Forum Member
Feb 26, 2001
13,593
164
63
yeah...torture...people are volunteering to have it done...some more than once....

let's see people volunteer to be hobbled,to get kicked in the balls, have his fingers broken or have cigerettes put out on their faces....

how do we get really bad people to tell their plans to kill us?...a strongly worded letter?...


should we use sarcasm?....dramatic irony, metaphor, puns, parody, and satire....show them no mercy?..

well i use all these tools on the tools on this board and they don`t work....the libs never skip a beat....

/:lol:

Ask yourself this question. Why do people hate Americans so much? Why are people willing to die to kill us?
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,555
214
63
"the bunker"
Ask yourself this question. Why do people hate Americans so much? Why are people willing to die to kill us?

because they`re religious fanatics....who are not only trying to kill us...they`re killing people the world over.....anybody that doesn`t toe their islamic line of bullshit...

denmark,the phillipines,somalia,india,thailand,dagestan,nigeria,russia,chechnya,dubai,algeria,pakistan,iraq,afghanistan,jordan,lenbanon,egypt,mauritania,kenya,sudan,china,saudi arabia....

and on and on...and that`s just a partial list for 2008...

you have the right to be as stupid and hysterical in your hatred of america as you obviously are......and thankfully,others have the right to point it out...

keep carrying spy`s water...it suits you..
 

Trampled Underfoot

Registered
Forum Member
Feb 26, 2001
13,593
164
63
because they`re religious fanatics....who are not only trying to kill us...they`re killing people the world over.....anybody that doesn`t toe their islamic line of bullshit...

denmark,the phillipines,somalia,india,thailand,dagestan,nigeria,russia,chechnya,dubai,algeria,pakistan,iraq,afghanistan,jordan,lenbanon,egypt,mauritania,kenya,sudan,china,saudi arabia....

and on and on...and that`s just a partial list for 2008...

you have the right to be as stupid and hysterical in your hatred of america as you obviously are......and thankfully,others have the right to point it out...

keep carrying spy`s water...it suits you..

I love America, but i'm embarassed by our government. You should be too.

Its easy to label me as anti-american when its quite the opposite. You are just easily intimidated by people with logical thoughts.
 

Trench

Turn it up
Forum Member
Mar 8, 2008
3,974
18
0
Mad City, WI
I love America, but i'm embarassed by our government. You should be too.

Its easy to label me as anti-american when its quite the opposite. You are just easily intimidated by people with logical thoughts.
Tramp... of course any display of dissent from the policies of their neoconservative leaders will cause chickenhawks like Weasel to remind you (quite vocally) that they're more patriotic than you because you dare to be critical of foreign policy that serves the agenda of the military industrial complex (of which Dick Cheney just happens to be a charter member).
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,408
121
63
Bowling Green Ky
I'm having a tough time here Smurph
I asked you to go over speeches and even put their context links up and ask you to back up you one liner--and have gotten zilch--other than avoiding with aversion tactics to other videos.

--and not just you --I see no other liberal here has used reference from either speech--

Same shit-just diff topic--either you don't know what was said or it contradicts your opinion.

I thought leaving you example might help--but evidently not--

Let me give you a few more from a European prospective--

<TABLE class=page-main-table id=usersub-main-table cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR id=page-tr-sub-header><TD class=page-td-sub-header id=usersub-td-sub-header colSpan=2>


<!-- /mod mod_smarty_mod --></TD><TD></TD></TR><TR id=page-tr-main><TD class="page-td-main usersub-component usersub-component-task" id=usersub-td-main vAlign=top>

The 10 punches Dick Cheney landed on Barack Obama's jaw

Posted By: Toby Harnden at May 21, 2009 at 23:21:41 [General] Posted in: Foreign Correspondents
<LINK href="http://fast1.onesite.com/resources/css/modules/tag_content.css?ver=9.05.15" type=text/css rel=stylesheet><SCRIPT src="http://fast1.onesite.com/resources/scripts/tag_content_ajax.js?ver=9.05.15" type=text/javascript></SCRIPT><SCRIPT src="http://fast1.onesite.com/resources/scripts/ajax_wrapper.js?ver=9.05.15" type=text/javascript></SCRIPT>
Tags:
View More
AEI, Barack Obama, dick cheney, Guantanamo Bay, National Archives




The spectacle of two duelling speeches with a mile of each other in downtown Washington was extraordinary. I was at the Cheney event and watched Obama's address on a big screen beside the empty lectern that the former veep stepped behind barely two minutes after his adversary had finished.
So who won the fight? (it's hard to use anything other than a martial or pugilistic metaphor). Well, most people are on either one side or the other of this issue and I doubt today will have prompted many to switch sides.
But the very fact that Obama chose to schedule his speech (Cheney's was announced first) at exactly the same time as the former veep was a sign of some weakness.


The venues for the speeches said something. Obama showily chose the National Archives, repository for many of the founding documents of the US, and spoke in front of a copy of the Constitution - cloaking himself in the flag, as Republicans were often criticised for doing.
To hear Cheney speak, we were crammed into a decidedly unglamourous and cramped conference room at AEI, favourite think tank of conservative hawks.
The former veep's speech was factual and unemotional and certainly devoid of the kind of hokey, self-obsessed, campaign-style stuff like this, from Obama's address today: "I stand here today as someone whose own life was made possible by these documents. My father came to these shores in search of the promise that they offer. My mother made me rise before dawn to learn their truths when I lived as a child in a foreign land."
In terms of Obama's purported aim for his speech - to present a plan for closing Guantanamo Bay aimed at placating Congress - he failed. The reception on Capitol Hill was lukewarm with even Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.
Cheney's speech wasn't stylish, there were no rhetorical flourishes and the tone was bitingly sarcastic and disdainful at times. But it was effective in many respects and Cheney showed that Obama is not invulnerable. Here are 10 of the punches he landed on the President's jaw:
1. "I've heard occasional speculation that I'm a different man after 9/11. I wouldn't say that, but I'll freely admit that watching a coordinated, devastating attack on our country from an underground bunker at the White House can affect how you view your responsibilities."
Anyone who was in New York or Washington on 9/11 (I was here in DC) was profoundly affected and most Americans understand this. Obama was, as far as I can tell, in Chicago. His response - he was then a mere state senator for liberal Hyde Park - was startlingly hand-wringing and out of step with how most Americans were feeling. This statement by Cheney reminds people of the tough decisions he and Bush had to make - ones that Obama has not yet faced.
2. "The first attack on the World Trade Center was treated as a law- enforcement problem, with everything handled after the fact: arrests, indictments, convictions, prison sentences, case closed."
This was the pre-9/11 mindset, much criticised after the attacks. Many sense that this is the approach Obama is increasingly taking.
3. "By presidential decision last month, we saw the selective release of documents relating to enhanced interrogations. This is held up as a bold exercise in open government, honoring the public's right to know. We're informed as well that there was much agonizing over this decision. Yet somehow, when the soul searching was done and the veil was lifted on the policies of the Bush administration, the public was given less than half the truth."
The release of the documents was a nakedly political move by Obama and Cheney called him on it. This passage from Obama's speech today came across as completely disingenuous:"I did not do this because I disagreed with the enhanced interrogation techniques that those memos authorized, and I didn't release the documents because I rejected their legal rationales -- although I do on both counts. I released the memos because the existence of that approach to interrogation was already widely known, the Bush Administration had acknowledged its existence, and I had already banned those methods."

4. "It's hard to imagine a worse precedent filled with more possibilities for trouble and abuse than to have an incoming administration criminalize the policy decisions of its predecessor. Apart from doing a serious injustice to intelligence operators and lawyers, who deserve far better for their devoted service, the danger here is a loss of focus on national security and what it requires."
Obama's suggestion that Bush administration officials might be prosecuted for legal and policy judgements about what was an was not permissible in interrogations was chilling. I doubt most Americans have any enthusiasm for such a witch-hunt and it flies in the face of Obama's stated desire not to "re-litigate" the Bush years.
5. "We had a lot of blind spots after the attacks on our country, things we didn't know about al Qaeda. We didn't know about al Qaeda's plans, but Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and a few others did know. And with many thousands of innocent lives potentially in the balance, we did not think it made sense to let the terrorists answer questions in their own good time, if they answered them at all."
The political climate is very different now from what it was just after 9/11 but it could change again in a heartbeat if and when there is another terrorist attack. Most Americans do not favour torture but do want the CIA and other agencies to question suspected terrorists very vigorously indeed if there is any chance they might know something about an attack on the US homeland.
6. "On his second day in office, President Obama announced he was closing the detention facility at Guantanamo. This step came with little deliberation, and no plan. Now the president says some of these terrorists should be brought to American soil for trial in our court system. Others, he says, will be shipped to third countries; but so far, the United States has had little luck getting other countries to take hardened terrorists."
Obama's grand announcement at the start of his administration that Gitmo would be closed within a year was clearly not properly thought out. If he fails to achieve what he promised, he will pay a big political price and Cheney was marking his card on the issue.
7. "The administration has found that it's easy to receive applause in Europe for closing Guantanamo, but it's tricky to come up with an alternative that will serve the interest of justice and America's national security."
The notion that Obama makes gestures designed to court popularity abroad is one that could find increasing resonance - many Republicans strongly suspect it already.
8. "If fine speechmaking, appeals to reason, or pleas for compassion had the power to move them, the terrorists would long ago have abandoned the field."
As Cheney said this, sarcasm dripped from his lips. Obviously "fine speechmaking" but no real substance is not a new charge against Obama and it hits home. And Cheney successfully mades the point that much of the rhetoric from the Left tends to suggest that if only the US did not waterboard people, if only the US was viewed as Obama rather than Bush, Venus rather than Mars then it would be universally loved and al-Qaeda would wither away. UNfortunately, that's not the real world.
9. "It's worth recalling that ultimate power of declassification belongs to the president himself. President Obama has used his declassification authority to reveal what happens in the interrogation of terrorists. Now let him use that same power to show Americans what did not happen thanks to the good work of our intelligence officials."
Cheney is pushing Obama to declassify documeents relating to the information gained from terrorist suspects who were subjected to Enhanced Interrogation Techniques. This puts Obama in a bind. If he does so, it prolongs an argument he wants to move on from and prolongs the Obama vs Cheney meme that is distracting and doesn't really help him. if he doesn't, he looks like he has something to hide.
10. "To the very end of our administration, we kept al-Qaeda terrorists busy with other problems. We focused on getting their secrets instead of sharing ours with them. And on our watch, they never hit this country again. After the most lethal and devastating terrorist attack ever, 7- 1/2 years without a repeat is not a record to be rebuked and scorned, much less criminalized."
It's indisputably an achievement of the Bush administration that it prevented the US from being attacked after 9/11. By ramming this point home, Cheney tees things up for some very tough questioning of Obama in the event that the US is attacked again.





</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 

Trench

Turn it up
Forum Member
Mar 8, 2008
3,974
18
0
Mad City, WI
I'm having a tough time here Smurph
I asked you to go over speeches and even put their context links up and ask you to back up you one liner--and have gotten zilch--other than avoiding with aversion tactics to other videos.

--and not just you --I see no other liberal here has used reference from either speech--

Same shit-just diff topic--either you don't know what was said or it contradicts your opinion.

I thought leaving you example might help--but evidently not--

Let me give you a few more from a European prospective--

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

Since when are you interested in the perspective of the socialist Europeans?

So Toby's all warm & fuzzy about Bush "keeping us safe" since 9/11. Gotta news flash for you, Toby and Weasel... The reason we haven't had an attack since 9/11 is because since then we've taken intelligence seriously instead ignoring it as Bush did right up until 9/11.

Toby also thinks closing Gitmo and moving "hardened terrorists on to U.S. soil" is scary. The mightiest country since the dawn of mankind and we're afraid of 250 Muslim extremists already in custody. We've got Supermax prisons located around the country from which NO ONE has ever escaped. But apparently you, Toby & Weasel are afraid those "hardened terrorists" are gonna be escaping all over the country, hijacking planes and flying 'em into the nearest farm silo. Ridiculous.

Hey DTB, are you & Toby Facebook Friends and do you follow his Twitters too? I can hardly wait for you to post Michelle Malkin's perspective on this. ;)

Next. :0corn
 
Last edited:

smurphy

cartographer
Channel Member
Jul 31, 2004
19,896
133
63
16
L.A.
I'm having a tough time here Smurph
I asked you to go over speeches and even put their context links up and ask you to back up you one liner--and have gotten zilch--other than avoiding with aversion tactics to other videos.

What can I say, I've learned well from your example. I appreciate all the "fill" you provide though. It reminds me of when I thought I wrote a good paper in high school because it was many pages. It never really said anything, but the bulk looked impressive. ...But at least I never sent my teacher to a scam website because of my biased research.

I try not to state the obvious or repeat myself too much. No sense it getting into everything again and again - it always ends with you resorting to insults directed at over half the country. Kosar is much better at presenting the facts ad nauseam and enduring your responses than I. This was simply a basic opinion and question. I'm not answering shit. :)
 

Lush Rimbough

Anointed One.
Forum Member
May 1, 2009
105
0
0
Illinois
yeah...torture...people are volunteering to have it done...some more than once....

let's see people volunteer to be hobbled,to get kicked in the balls, have his fingers broken or have cigerettes put out on their faces....

how do we get really bad people to tell their plans to kill us?...a strongly worded letter?...


should we use sarcasm?....dramatic irony, metaphor, puns, parody, and satire....show them no mercy?..

well i use all these tools on the tools on this board and they don`t work....the libs never skip a beat....

/:lol:

You know I was just thinking this morning that no one was as stupid as deadeye, but I was wrong. GarbageWezzy, you ARE the most profoundly stupid person I have met out here so far. Yeah, grind out a cigarette in someone?s face or some other form of physical injury and they will tell you ONLY THE TRUTH. Their deepest darkest secrets will only come in extreme pain, and it?s nothing but the truth, why would they lie? Right!?

God your such a dumb-ass, you give uneducated rednecks a bad image.

TORTURE DOES NOT WORK, AND AS AMERICANS WE ARE BETTER THAN THAT.
 

Jabberwocky

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 3, 2006
3,491
29
0
Jacksonville, FL
This is a point that is lost on the idiots, Lush. If anyone cared to do any research they would realize that interrogators with actual experience in the field overwhelmingly agree that torture is not an effective means of obtaining reliable information.

Here is an excerpt from a piece published in the Washington Post. Not that gw will read any of it, he has a hard time with taking in information other than sound bites on Fox.

The Torture Myth
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A2302-2005Jan11.html

"By contrast, it is easy to find experienced U.S. officers who argue precisely the opposite. Meet, for example, retired Air Force Col. John Rothrock, who, as a young captain, headed a combat interrogation team in Vietnam. More than once he was faced with a ticking time-bomb scenario: a captured Vietcong guerrilla who knew of plans to kill Americans. What was done in such cases was "not nice," he says. "But we did not physically abuse them." Rothrock used psychology, the shock of capture and of the unexpected. Once, he let a prisoner see a wounded comrade die. Yet -- as he remembers saying to the "desperate and honorable officers" who wanted him to move faster -- "if I take a Bunsen burner to the guy's genitals, he's going to tell you just about anything," which would be pointless. Rothrock, who is no squishy liberal, says that he doesn't know "any professional intelligence officers of my generation who would think this is a good idea." "
 

Lush Rimbough

Anointed One.
Forum Member
May 1, 2009
105
0
0
Illinois
I can see W responding to history equating him with Harry Truman.

George W. Bush: "Like I always said, the truck stops here."

Eddie

Or as FDR, "We have nothing to fear, but ear it self, don't fear the reaper dude".

Or as JFK, "We choose to go the mall, not because it's easy, because it's kinda, sorta hard....fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice...can't get fooled again".

Or even Lincoln, "Four score and seven years ago...What's a score"?

:mj07:
 
Last edited:

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,408
121
63
Bowling Green Ky
One thing about GW---he stuck by his priciples/conviction from beginning to end--either you agreed or you didn't.
Now we have Gumby--who flops more than Billy Bass on main issues. Here are facts--again
++++++++++++++++++

Observers of all political stripes are stunned by how much of the Bush national security agenda is being adopted by this new Democratic government. Victor Davis Hanson (National Review) offers a partial list: "The Patriot Act, wiretaps, e-mail intercepts, military tribunals, Predator drone attacks, Iraq (i.e. slowing the withdrawal), Afghanistan (i.e. the surge) -- and now Guantanamo."
Jack Goldsmith (The New Republic) adds: rendition -- turning over terrorists seized abroad to foreign countries; state secrets -- claiming them in court to quash legal proceedings on rendition and other erstwhile barbarisms; and the denial of habeas corpus -- to detainees in Afghanistan's Bagram prison, indistinguishable logically and morally from Guantanamo.
What does it all mean? Democratic hypocrisy and demagoguery? Sure, but in Washington, opportunism and cynicism are hardly news.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

I've asked which Gumby liberals here voted for--the Tony Robbins or Bush Light version and failed to get answer yet--of course we knew they have no answer--except one--they flop to whichever Gumby's flavor of the day is--
--goes something like this-with accompaning photo's

O "Bless you my liberal lemmings of Da Base, here is my -hope-change message of today--
capt.e1fc2ec03cec4644b050994be454f3bd.obama_ingh122.jpg


----and here is Jabbers-Trench-Haskell and a couple others in their "Yes We Can" chants during their mentors blessing--

Ace%20Dance.gif


:)
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,555
214
63
"the bunker"
Yeah, grind out a cigarette in someone?s face or some other form of physical injury and they will tell you ONLY THE TRUTH. Their deepest darkest secrets will only come in extreme pain, and it?s nothing but the truth, why would they lie? Right!?

God your such a dumb-ass, you give uneducated rednecks a bad image.

TORTURE DOES NOT WORK, AND AS AMERICANS WE ARE BETTER THAN THAT.

i guess that`s why nobama released only the interrogation methods......and not the result of said interogations...

pretty shrewd move(but only if you have the mental capacity of a carrot and know that the morans that blindly follow you aren`t interested in the facts)...

you see,the THREE folks that were waterboarded gave up information on impending follow up attacks on los angeles....and the capture of other high-profile terrorists...this is confirmed by clinton appointee george tenet and obama`s dirrector of national intelligence, dennis blair, a critic of the use of the "enhanced techniques,"...he also said they yielded "high value information.".....

but obama won`t declassify and release this information...because it doesn`t help his moronic left wing assertion that water boarding "doesn`t work".....

well then,just release the rest of the info...the info that tells us what the waterboarding sessions yielded....

this is the most open administration in history,isn`t it?..obviously not....

the constitution is not a suicide pact...the first duty of our government is protecting it`s citizens...

you see,bottom line....in the big picture in the minds of the left ranting about waterboarding = torture,it's really not about torture, human rights, treatment of prisoners, etc....

it's about BLAMING AMERICA!....

"Mercy to the guilty is cruelty to the innocent" -Adam Smith


/you can pull your pants up now,lush...
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top