stevieD-i have bumped one of my previous posts, which may be the one that SixFive is talking about. Also, I have included the links at the end of this post for your viewing pleasure. I mean not to say that global warming is BS, rather that the alarmist scientists who say humans are changing earths climate so extremely that we will have to change our lives to accomidate it-are overstating the point. the earth has warmed and cooled since it began and will continue to do so no matter what.
my favorite global warming alarmist quotation is one i have read time and time again. "The earth hasnt been this warm for 400 years". This may be true, but 400 years ago the earth was this warm, and i dont recall any cars and factories and airplanes clogging our atmosphere.
my point is this: we need some honest debate on the subject and that is exactly what we arent getting. mixing politics with atmospheric science (and that is exactly what is happening Note that Al Gore is now the spokesman for the GW growd) is like mixing oil and water.
anyways, check out the links and consider the fact that much more money is going INTO PROVING global warming for a host of reasons than the amount of money going into DISPROVING its effects. skepticism remains my priority.
http://eteam.ncpa.org/commentaries/global-warming-religion-or-science
http://eteam.ncpa.org/commentaries/...d-by-global-warming-but-political-hot-air-is-
http://www.ncpa.org/pub/st/st285/index.html
my favorite global warming alarmist quotation is one i have read time and time again. "The earth hasnt been this warm for 400 years". This may be true, but 400 years ago the earth was this warm, and i dont recall any cars and factories and airplanes clogging our atmosphere.
my point is this: we need some honest debate on the subject and that is exactly what we arent getting. mixing politics with atmospheric science (and that is exactly what is happening Note that Al Gore is now the spokesman for the GW growd) is like mixing oil and water.
anyways, check out the links and consider the fact that much more money is going INTO PROVING global warming for a host of reasons than the amount of money going into DISPROVING its effects. skepticism remains my priority.
http://eteam.ncpa.org/commentaries/global-warming-religion-or-science
http://eteam.ncpa.org/commentaries/...d-by-global-warming-but-political-hot-air-is-
http://www.ncpa.org/pub/st/st285/index.html