Making a Murderer (2015)

vinnie

la vita ? buona
Forum Member
Sep 11, 2000
59,163
212
0
Here
tumblr_m8ikq3OmGW1qf1qcoo1_400.gif
 

Cie

Registered
Forum Member
Apr 30, 2003
22,391
253
0
New Orleans
Im extremely confident he was conspired against in the alleged sexual assault arrest and prosecution based on information provided in the 1st 2 episodes
 
Last edited:

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,573
226
63
"the bunker"
Im extremely confident he was conspired against in the alleged sexual assault arrest and prosecution based on information provided in the 1st 2 episodes

let`s be clear...from everything I`ve read,this wasn`t a "documentary"...it was advocacy journalism/film making...there was nothing objective about the show...

it was made to produce the desired effect...
 

Cie

Registered
Forum Member
Apr 30, 2003
22,391
253
0
New Orleans
let`s be clear...from everything I`ve read,this wasn`t a "documentary"...it was advocacy journalism/film making...there was nothing objective about the show...

it was made to produce the desired effect...

I hearya. Had this conversation last night. The sketch looking like Averys dated mugshot is hard for me to get past.
 

The Joker

Registered
Forum Member
Aug 3, 2008
28,116
358
83
47
Tennessee
www.madjacksports.com
let`s be clear...from everything I`ve read,this wasn`t a "documentary"...it was advocacy journalism/film making...there was nothing objective about the show...

it was made to produce the desired effect...

Let's be clear. You're saying none of this was set up. Avery is 100% guilty. The documentary film crew used "creative" editing and what's presented is 100% distorted.
 

BobbyBlueChip

Trustee
Forum Member
Dec 27, 2000
20,707
287
83
53
Belly of the Beast
let`s be clear...from everything I`ve read,this wasn`t a "documentary"...it was advocacy journalism/film making...there was nothing objective about the show....

Much of the counter points that are being presented were originated from the defense attorney who is arguing his point on Reddit. And nobody's quoting him.

There are some things that i think that they should have shown and didn't, but the directors have bias to get their product sold and the fact that they were imbedded in with the family.

But, you should watch the show and form your own opinion. It's worth it.
 

Cie

Registered
Forum Member
Apr 30, 2003
22,391
253
0
New Orleans
Much of the counter points that are being presented were originated from the defense attorney who is arguing his point on Reddit. And nobody's quoting him.

There are some things that i think that they should have shown and didn't, but the directors have bias to get their product sold and the fact that they were imbedded in with the family.

But, you should watch the show and form your own opinion. It's worth it.
What do u think about the sketch artist? That dude looks like a criminal thru 2 episodes.

Sent from my SM-G925V using Tapatalk
 

BleedDodgerBlue

Admin
Forum Member
Feb 12, 2004
7,383
82
0
49
los angeles
Just finished episode 10. Pretty interesting watch. I just can't see how Steve and his dipshit nephew are capable of cleaning up evidence, but that's me. I know they had 5 days, but they could have 5 years and probably miss something.

That Brendan kid gained 100 lbs easy his first year in prison. I guess prison food isn't that bad.

Anyone know what happened to Jodi, or at least if she's still single? She's my kind of lady.
 

layinwood

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2001
4,771
40
0
Dallas, TX
Why is Avery saying, "Maybe my brothers did this"? Why did he *67 two phone calls to Halbach? Why did he admit she was there between 2-2:30 on the 31st, then called her phone that evening WITHOUT using *67, and asking why she never showed up that day?

I have watched all of the shows but haven't gotten into the other evidence presented. Did he really call asking why she never showed up that day? Is there a vm of that or what?
 

layinwood

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2001
4,771
40
0
Dallas, TX
YYZ, I just looked at some of the stuff including an interview with the prosecuting attorney. He called at 4 something and didn't use *67 but isn't it just speculation as to why he called? Some people are saying he called so he could say she never showed up but that's all speculations by tv watchers.

FYI, I'm not on either side of the innocent or guilty. I do find a lot of valid reasons for both sides though.
 

ClevelandSteamers

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 15, 2015
3,006
20
38
My mother is "one million percent sure" that he did it. She thinks the kid had something to do with it, but forcefully.
 

vinnie

la vita ? buona
Forum Member
Sep 11, 2000
59,163
212
0
Here
I just can't see how Steve and his dipshit nephew are capable of cleaning up evidence, but that's me. I know they had 5 days, but they could have 5 years and probably miss something.

Not the way they said they killed her. I agree
 

hedgehog

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 30, 2003
32,697
599
113
49
TX
Just finished episode 10. Pretty interesting watch. I just can't see how Steve and his dipshit nephew are capable of cleaning up evidence, but that's me. I know they had 5 days, but they could have 5 years and probably miss something.:0008

Anyone know what happened to Jodi, or at least if she's still single? She's my kind of lady.QUOTE] :scared:scared:scared

I think he could be innocent, there is no doubt the police planted evidence
 

ClevelandSteamers

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 15, 2015
3,006
20
38
http://www.avclub.com/article/read-pro-steven-avery-list-what-was-left-out-makin-230634

Since the documentary left so that made the defense look bad xstop


Dean Strang recalled that one of the investigators involved in finding DNA under the hood of Halbach?s car admitted to not changing gloves after handling evidence inside her car. [source]

Culhane testified that the amount of Avery?s DNA on Halbach?s hood latch (which could have been blood) was very small, similar to what you would get from rubbing Avery?s toothbrush on it, or from the unchanged gloves of the tech who handled blood evidence inside the car and then touched the hood. [source]

Blaine Dassey testified that his brother, Bobby, was asleep when he got home from school around 3:40 p.m., contradicting Bobby?s testimony that he got up at 2:30 p.m. and saw Teresa headed toward Steven?s trailer. [source]

Dean Strang stated they had a forensic anthropologist at trial who testified that an open fire wouldn?t have generated enough heat to burn a body in the way that those bones were destroyed, but it didn?t make the documentary. [source]

In between 3:30 and 4 p.m., a propane delivery truck driver (John Leurquin) saw a green SUV leaving the Avery property but couldn?t identify the driver or if it was a male or female. He delivers propane for Valders Co-op. Usually fuels up near Avery property at 3:30 for about half an hour. [source]

Teresa Halbach?s clothing: ?Police said she was wearing blue jeans, a white button-down shirt and a summer jacket when she was last seen. Schmitz would indicate that Halbach was at his residence at approximately 1:30 p.m. Was there for approximately 10 minutes. Was wearing a white shirt, waist?waist-length jacket, and blue jeans. (Day 4 of Dassey Trial.) Zipperer would indicate that Halbach was at her residence between approximately 2 to 2:30 p.m. Was there for approximately 10 minutes. Was wearing a white top, waist-length jacket, and blue jeans. (Day 4 of Dassey Trial.) Bobby Dassey said when he saw Teresa Halbach photographing the van Avery was selling October 31, 2005, she was wearing a knee-length coat and slacks.? [source 1, 2]

William Newhouse, a gun expert with the Wisconsin State Crime Lab, said he couldn?t conclusively link a bullet found in a crack in Avery?s garage to a .22-caliber rifle seized from his bedroom. (He could only confirm that it was definitely a bullet from a .22 caliber rifle.) There was no DNA on the gun, no blood blow-back that you?d get from shooting someone at that close range and no blood mist/spatter around the garage that would also be present had someone been shot in the garage. [source]

On the ?Kelly Files? interview, Dean Strang mentioned that there were little drops off deer blood all over Avery?s garage, essentially debunking the theory that they could have cleaned all the blood evidence out of the garage, since had they cleaned it that thoroughly, there wouldn?t have been any deer blood. [source]

On the leg irons/handcuffs from Avery?s house: They tested those for DNA and found a mixture of DNA from two or more people. They confirmed Avery to be a source of one of the matches. Most importantly, they excluded Teresa?s DNA as a match. [source]

Investigators never dusted the Toyota key (with Steven?s DNA) for fingerprints. [source]
 

Snafu

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 16, 2002
8,492
222
63
Finland
Anonymous (hacker group) said that they have new hacked information about this case.
Anything about that? They were upposed to publish that information last week.


If Avery didn't know Halbach went missing why did he stop calling on her phone ?

:shrug:
 

ClevelandSteamers

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 15, 2015
3,006
20
38
I'm just waiting for yyz to chime in and tell us that because we didn't live there we don't know anything :0002
 

vinnie

la vita ? buona
Forum Member
Sep 11, 2000
59,163
212
0
Here
Just finished episode 10. Pretty interesting watch. I just can't see how Steve and his dipshit nephew are capable of cleaning up evidence, but that's me. I know they had 5 days, but they could have 5 years and probably miss something.

That Brendan kid gained 100 lbs easy his first year in prison. I guess prison food isn't that bad.

Anyone know what happened to Jodi, or at least if she's still single? She's my kind of lady.
<iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/HTz673OMTF0" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="360" width="640"></iframe>..
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top