(all Friday 2/11/11 picks in this post)
(ledger: -30,532)
Pick: Errani-Voskoboeva 20 under -112, risking 2240 to win 2000 :sadwave:
Pick: Zvonareva-Peng 20' under -135, risking 1350 to win 1000 :sadwave:
Pick: Baghdatis -3' (Ljubicic) -105, risking 2100 to win 2000 :sadwave:
Pick: Kvitova +117 (Wickmayer), risking 2000 to win 2340 :0074
Pick: Petkovic -190 (Mattek), risking 3800 to win 2000 :sadwave:
POST-analysis: very tough loss. shows the extreme caution must be taken backing anyone on very short turnaround with any kind of health problem, no matter how seemingly small. too easy to go by the name, but nadal and nadal with breathing problems are both called and priced as "nadal," but they're not the same thing. same with petkovic and "petkovic + quick turnaround + sore legs." Under average conditions i think petkovic would win, but not quite here.
Pick: Kanepi -155 (Cibulkova), risking 3100 to win 2000 :0074
Pick: Troicki +105 (Cilic), risking 2000 to win 2050 :0074
Pick: Troicki-Cilic 23 under -105, risking 2100 to win 2000 :0074
Pick: Raonic -180 (Berankis), risking 3600 to win 2000 :0074
NOTE: i again think raonic over (berankis) is the strongest play on the day
POST-analysis: again, fairly easy vic for the big server; but there are indications against someone who can get his serve back he'll have problems. under no pressure today thanks to serve, but his ground strokes were sprayed, and against better player he will have to do better
Pick: Dolgopolov -235 (Mello), risking 2350 to win 1000 :0074
why: normally would say wiser to take fav -3 here, but mello has been hot, could see the 3 pushing or losing if mello takes a set, but in the end i think dolgo wins, 235 not too bad
POST-analysis: this kid has really become good, someone have to think long and hard before going against
Pick: Monfils -825 (Smyczek), risking 1650 to win 200 :0074
why: just a dumb bet, for fun fri nite and to remind why not to make dumb bets. hopefully get a scare like a horror movie but walk out ok. this bet is the equivalent of hopping between freeway cars to grab a wind-blown dollar. most likely it cashes, but as we saw earlier today with petkovic, the short turnaround can be a problem. monfils outclasses the 'czek, but he's an injury-prone clown too, and that unjustifies the huge price. still, i think you will agree that dumb bets are just as fun as smart ones, especially if you dont lose. this said, restate that i expect to win every bet i make, i dont post stuff i dont believe in; if it's dumb, like this one, or an angry chase, i will always post that
Pick: Del Potro -2 (Hewitt) -128, risking 2560 to win 2000 :0074
why: better, younger player at very reasonable price. if he wins, he'll almost surely at least push, so can cut a good 40c off the price by taking the games, which all evidence indicates is the right way to play favs. del Po's serve is so strong that even if he yields a set, it's highly unlikely he gets less than four games, which makes the games choice more enticing against the ml. 2 or 2' always look easy for fav but they can be dangerous where you have a player known to relax. this happens more among women. they win a hard-fought first set, kick back in the second, then come back in the third. that's the kind of bet where the dog cashes the seemingly small 2 or 2' games. for example: 46 63 57. dog +2 cashes as games are -1 to fav, even tho dog lost 2 of 3 sets.
Pick: del Potro-Hewitt 23 under -113, 2260 to win 2000 :0074
Pick: Istomin +4 (Verdasco) -103, risking 3090 to win 3000 PUSH
Pick: Istomin +329 (Verdasco), risking 2000 to win 6580 :sadwave:
why: legitimate chance to win at a very nice return
POST-analysis: verdasco is damn good, isto played quite well but not enough
(ledger: -26,432)