Obama + Auto Bailouts = Success Story

[bleedingpurple]

Just because one uses vulgarity on a men's gambling site does not mean he/she will use the vulgarity in front of children.

I use vulgarity a ton on this site and with the play of the Vikings I like to rant. I like to because I do not use that language around my nephews or any other children.

Does using vulgarity on a message board or around my buddies make me unitelligent? Not really just means I like to curse when Favre throws another pick and my team gets blown out..

 

[Lumi]

Just because one uses vulgarity on a men's gambling site does not mean he/she will use the vulgarity in front of children.

I use vulgarity a ton on this site and with the play of the Vikings I like to rant. I like to because I do not use that language around my nephews or any other children.

Does using vulgarity on a message board or around my buddies make me unitelligent? Not really just means I like to curse when Favre throws another pick and my team gets blown out..

That's funny,

I have never seen you use vulgarity when talking about the Vikings? :shrug: :shrug:

:mj07: :mj07: :mj07:

 

[MadJack]

Just because one uses vulgarity on a men's gambling site does not mean he/she will use the vulgarity in front of children.

I use vulgarity a ton on this site and with the play of the Vikings I like to rant. I like to because I do not use that language around my nephews or any other children.

Does using vulgarity on a message board or around my buddies make me unitelligent? Not really just means I like to curse when Favre throws another pick and my team gets blown out..

Exactly. That's how I fukin talk :shrug:

I know when NOT to talk like that too :0008

I think I'm MORE intelligent because of my flexibility of vulgarity usage :0074

 

[Cie]

I think I'm MORE intelligent because of my flexibility of vulgarity usage :0074

:0002

 

[Trampled Underfoot]

I think I'm MORE intelligent because of my flexibility of vulgarity usage :0074

Not according to some of the morons in here. :facepalm:

 

[DOGS THAT BARK]

Not according to some of the morons in here. :facepalm:

You have put new meaning to :facepalm:

Jack and everyone is speaking about diff of using language around guys/crew which we all do--vs women and children which most of us look at differently.

Lets verify your no character/disfunctional family view which is what everyone is referring to.

Here is case in point where Mags was distinctly talking about children and you think post was so outrageous you copied it thinking he'd change it.
++++++++++++++++++++
mags

Sorry Woodson, I do protect my 4 year old from words like "F**K"..... and, based on the postings that Muffy has made, I couldn't be sure that he wouldn't be blurting this out...

Now, if you want to take issue with protecting young children from this type of language, well, I'm not sure what type of man you are. Maybe you watch porn and use those words with 3-4 year olds.... Happily, I don't.

To each his own. Heck, maybe you watch kiddie porn with your kiddies. More power to you. I'd rather my children wait until they are older to deal with the vulgarities in life.

We've had a great trip in Europe (except for the French of course, who are striking all transportation because they are raising the retirement age to 62 from 59 :mj07: )... what sad sacks they are.....

But anyway, if I knew Muff would act like a gentleman, and not use poor language infront of small children, I MAY have been there. But, at best it was a 50/50 proposition - so why take the chance?

Again, Woodson, if you had small children, you may understand. But I'm guessing you are older, and don't care how small children are treated. Which, of course, is your choice.

My children don't need to know the "F**K" word at the age of 4. Just sayin'
+++++++++++++++++++++

The tramp:

Are you drunk? I'm gonna quote this so Woodson can see this before it gets deleted.

http://www.madjacksports.com/forum/showthread.php?t=419647&page=3



---and I'm still waiting for you to name restaurants that let you curse around other families--and again expect your a big hit on the Chucky Cheese circuit.

I'd hide your face too---:facepalm:

 

[Trampled Underfoot]

doggie you are looking more pathetic by the hour. I think we can all agree that Woodson is a pretty good guy. Well the following was his response to the post by mags:

Where did child pornography ever come into play?

Why would you even have those thoughts?

I really don't even know what to say.

Seriously, I don't want any part of any discussion with you ever going forward.

Yeah, doggie. I do think it was pretty bad. Obviously you are too blinded to see it. Just like how you are nothing but a sheep for your party. Your posts are proof that you are incapable of critical thinking. Who says a higher education is a waste of time? :SIB

 

[bleedingpurple]

How does vulgarity evolve into "kiddie porn" in the first place? Secondly Mags already knew and admitted knowing about the vulgarity in the first place, so why would he ask to meet in the first place? Then when the guy says he will meet and even pay then the vulgarity becomes an issues..

I don't think it is a big deal but defending him because of politcial views is a bit odd. I think everyone would of been a bit taken back by Mags initial response if in that situation. Just saying..

 

[Cie]

I think we can all agree that Woodson is a pretty good guy.

Speak for yourself, numbnuts













:mj07:

 

[Lumi]

I have a hard time knowing when and if it's appropriate to bust in a BP type tirade "Fuck, shit, fuck, fucking Favre" while at a nursery school or at a nursing home? I get so god damned fucking confused ! FUCK ! :facepalm:

 

[Duff Miver]

I have a hard time knowing when and if it's appropriate to bust in a BP type tirade "Fuck, shit, fuck, fucking Favre" while at a nursery school or at a nursing home? I get so god damned fucking confused ! FUCK ! :facepalm:

Stop it. Maggot and doggie have precious babies reading this forum.

Maybe they will move on to the Disney Channel forum.

 

[bleedingpurple]

I have a hard time knowing when and if it's appropriate to bust in a BP type tirade "Fuck, shit, fuck, fucking Favre" while at a nursery school or at a nursing home? I get so god damned fucking confused ! FUCK ! :facepalm:

Well this should be my last FUCK CHILDRESS rant.. It's great day when that fucker got fired.

 

[Lumi]

Well this should be my last FUCK CHILDRESS rant.. It's great day when that fucker got fired.

No, It was a great FUCKING DAY BP ! :toast:

NOW ! Put that Hill Billy in Wranglers in his Truck and send him Far ve, Far ve a way, I am sick of hearing his FUCKING name ! :0008

 

[THE KOD]

You have put new meaning to :facepalm:

Jack and everyone is speaking about diff of using language around guys/crew which we all do--vs women and children which most of us look at differently.

Lets verify your no character/disfunctional family view which is what everyone is referring to.

Here is case in point where Mags was distinctly talking about children and you think post was so outrageous you copied it thinking he'd change it.
++++++++++++++++++++
mags

Sorry Woodson, I do protect my 4 year old from words like "F**K"..... and, based on the postings that Muffy has made, I couldn't be sure that he wouldn't be blurting this out...

Now, if you want to take issue with protecting young children from this type of language, well, I'm not sure what type of man you are. Maybe you watch porn and use those words with 3-4 year olds.... Happily, I don't.

To each his own. Heck, maybe you watch kiddie porn with your kiddies. More power to you. I'd rather my children wait until they are older to deal with the vulgarities in life.

We've had a great trip in Europe (except for the French of course, who are striking all transportation because they are raising the retirement age to 62 from 59 :mj07: )... what sad sacks they are.....

But anyway, if I knew Muff would act like a gentleman, and not use poor language infront of small children, I MAY have been there. But, at best it was a 50/50 proposition - so why take the chance?

Again, Woodson, if you had small children, you may understand. But I'm guessing you are older, and don't care how small children are treated. Which, of course, is your choice.

My children don't need to know the "F**K" word at the age of 4. Just sayin'
+++++++++++++++++++++

The tramp:

Are you drunk? I'm gonna quote this so Woodson can see this before it gets deleted.

http://www.madjacksports.com/forum/showthread.php?t=419647&page=3



---and I'm still waiting for you to name restaurants that let you curse around other families--and again expect your a big hit on the Chucky Cheese circuit.

I'd hide your face too---:facepalm:

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,


damn thats just too stupid:142smilie

 

[Trench]

Sorry Woodson... if you want to take issue with protecting young children from this type of language, well, I'm not sure what type of man you are. Maybe you watch porn and use those words with 3-4 year olds.... Happily, I don't. To each his own. Heck, maybe you watch kiddie porn with your kiddies. More power to you.

I don't know Woodson or his politics but for Mags to imply that he (Woodson) watches child pornography, with his own kids present, simply because Woodson extended an olive branch to Duff... well, that is some truely twisted thinking.

 

[Trench]

Stop it. Maggot and doggie have precious babies reading this forum.

Maybe they will move on to the Disney Channel forum.

"So Mags... it's your contention then that you and your friend "Dogs" here
frequent the Disney Channel Chat Room in hopes of trading beer and condoms
for Miley Cyrus concert tickets?"

 

[DOGS THAT BARK]

doggie you are looking more pathetic by the hour. I think we can all agree that Woodson is a pretty good guy. Well the following was his response to the post by mags:



Yeah, doggie. I do think it was pretty bad. Obviously you are too blinded to see it. Just like how you are nothing but a sheep for your party. Your posts are proof that you are incapable of critical thinking. Who says a higher education is a waste of time? :SIB

Reference was to you not Woodson. Your old bait and switch ain't gettin it. Guit trying to divert your quote to someone else.

 

[DOGS THAT BARK]

Stop it. Maggot and doggie have precious babies reading this forum.

Maybe they will move on to the Disney Channel forum.

Put that pic of your girlfriend Anne back up here along with your quote of what she- you and rest of your women love--

--and we'll let the forum decide:0corn

 

[Trampled Underfoot]

Reference was to you not Woodson. Your old bait and switch ain't gettin it. Guit trying to divert your quote to someone else.

You are such an idiot. It's impossible to even debate you.

 

[Trench]

You are such an idiot. It's impossible to even debate you.

Yeah, it can be frustrating debating Dogs. I guess that's why so many others have given up. Lately, he's even challenged the patience of Chadman, who bends over backwards trying to hold a civil debate with him, only to be rewarded with insults about his character and his ability to teach children in an unbiased manner. :facepalm: