Obama + Auto Bailouts = Success Story

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,495
256
83
Victory Lane
It also helps expose the intelligence difference - if you must use vulgarity to make yourself feel better about yourself, then you just aren't that smart. And given how much vulgarity Muffy uses, I assume he has about an 8th grade education (which is surprising given his age - I would guess he is 50+ after seeing the pictures). Most people by then are somewhat civilized. Not in this case. I clearly made the right decision in this situation.

Case closed.
...........................................................

hey Maggot did you notice the camera angle when the picture of his wife was taken ?

DTBlackgumby is trying to verify he is disabled.

Lowest of the scum in here and you also attend the KKK meetings with dogs so you just should admit it.

apologize and move on
 

Mags

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 8, 2000
2,813
27
48
...........................................................

hey Maggot did you notice the camera angle when the picture of his wife was taken ?

DTBlackgumby is trying to verify he is disabled.

Lowest of the scum in here and you also attend the KKK meetings with dogs so you just should admit it.

apologize and move on

Ah, Scotty, the race card. Always the staple of the liberal playbook. I'm not surprised - when liberals have no argument, they just pull out the "umm, well, you must be a racist!". What a joke you are.

In terms of apologies - none is owned to Muffy. I did not use vulgarity. However he did. He actually owes me and my family an apology. I clearly made the right decision not meeting him - which admittedly I should have recognized the danger in exposing my family to him and never discussed meeting to begin with.

Now, Woodson - yea, he hit my trigger with his disregard for children BUT I did go too far there, and for that, Mr. Woodson, I DO APOLOGIZE.

Keep playing that race card Scotty. That's pretty much your entire schtik.

Have a nice day.
 

Mags

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 8, 2000
2,813
27
48
...........................................................

hey Maggot did you notice the camera angle when the picture of his wife was taken ?

FYI - Scotty the camera angle had nothing to do with it. Look at the hands - they are dead giveaways on approximate age.

Those are not the hands of a under 50 year old woman. Not that there is anything wrong with being old - just pointing out the obvious, that Muffy must be an older gentleman.

We are all (God willling) going to get old someday.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,465
135
63
Bowling Green Ky
Ground Control to Major Tom...

Your "News Bulletin" is 4 1/2 years old!!! :142smilie

:facepalm:

Lets see you couldn't comprehend DUH and now you evidently couldn't comprehend--

--This headline back in 2006 pretty much summed things up for me--

Is it you can't read or can't comprehend--

You and tramp better hope they don't cut your stamps off--


The relevance--it was flashing neon sign to bankruptcy to come--

of course you couldn't remotely figure that out from post--that's why your groveling for that tit while others are worried about taxes.

Maybe you can get the Tramp to quit his customer service job (%^$#&%$@#) at-
"we 'B' toys and shit" and become your financial advisor. :lol:
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,465
135
63
Bowling Green Ky
...........................................................

hey Maggot did you notice the camera angle when the picture of his wife was taken ?

DTBlackgumby is trying to verify he is disabled.

Lowest of the scum in here and you also attend the KKK meetings with dogs so you just should admit it.

apologize and move on

I'm just saying what Muffins said Scott--was way before his reference to what his girls loved.

---of course hard to seperate fact from fiction from the troll section--you know what I mean?

One month its a rant on healthcare reform and I can't get health insurance and got bills to pay-----the next its a property and casualty claim and they are waiting for huge settlement--how does one seperate fact from fiction.:SIB
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,495
256
83
Victory Lane
One month its a rant on healthcare reform and I can't get health insurance and got bills to pay-----the next its a property and casualty claim and they are waiting for huge settlement--how does one seperate fact from fiction.:SIB

...............................................................

you dont when its none of your business

its pretty simple to understand
 

Trampled Underfoot

Registered
Forum Member
Feb 26, 2001
13,593
164
63
I see its doggies time of the month again. Let me tell you what doggie dogshit. I used to deal with pieces of shit like you all the time. When I had a rep get some old rusty old cunt on the phone like you who thought they were special, they would always be as sweet as pie until I told them the way it is. Then they would either cry or get all tough with empty threats. Which route do you usually take doggie?
 

hedgehog

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 30, 2003
32,725
609
113
49
TX
I guess a dirtbag like Mags is very depressed that those people kept those nice paying jobs. He must be in tears that those union jobs are still intact and those families are living off of a decent wage. Hope he didn't go shoot himself. On second thought it would be a win for the workers of this country if he did find the time to just off his selfish self.

harsh words there spongie

Mags, you seem like a good guy with values and morals.
 

Mags

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 8, 2000
2,813
27
48
harsh words there spongie

Mags, you seem like a good guy with values and morals.

Thanks Hedgie.

I get pretty frustrated with these boards. They could be pretty interesting - and I like the chance to hear both sides of issues - both liberal and conservative - it makes all more rounded, and better educated.

But I do hate how a certain group, who I'll admit tend to be liberal in nature, always start with the vulgarity, name calling, and of course, throwing out the race card whenever an issue is discussed.

I't be cool if MJ would just give any member a 3 strikes type policy - if you use vulgarity or insult a member/call them names: 1 strike - 10 day ban. 2 strikes - 30 day ban. 3 strikes - lifetime ban in the political forum.

It could be a fun and informative forum - with important issues being discussed and debated. But as soon as a topic starts, one of the liberals starts with name calling or vulgarity, and then the discussion ends up being worthless. It is really rather disappointing - and it seems as if it is a consistent behavour by the Left side of the forum - and there are times where I do think they have something positive to add, but it gets lost behind the name calling, profanity, and race baiting. It is reallly too bad.

Not sure why some people have to do the "personal attack" or race baiting. I guess that is something that Obama taught everyone to do - when he went after the financial, insurance, and any other industry that wasn't union based. It was a learned, and unfortunate, behavior.

It is nice to see that the conservative bunch has values, and for the most part, don't sink to those levels.

Have a good night!
 

Trampled Underfoot

Registered
Forum Member
Feb 26, 2001
13,593
164
63
Not sure why some people have to do the "personal attack" or race baiting. I guess that is something that Obama taught everyone to do - when he went after the financial, insurance, and any other industry that wasn't union based. It was a learned, and unfortunate, behavior.

It is nice to see that the conservative bunch has values, and for the most part, don't sink to those levels.

You just can't make shit like this up. Your memory seems to be quite selective there mags. If you actually applied this to yourself you would have been banned long ago.
 

Mags

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 8, 2000
2,813
27
48
You just can't make shit like this up. Your memory seems to be quite selective there mags. If you actually applied this to yourself you would have been banned long ago.

TU - show me ONE message, ONE, where I started with personal attacks or vulgarity WITHOUT being attacked first. Just one.

I (and many other members who do not use profanity/vulgarity) CONSTANTLY get attacked or race baited, just because the left doesn't agree with conservative viewpoints.

I certainly can show you UNPROVOKED attack after attack by Scott, Muff, TU etc. Probably in every single thread this happens.

Can't you guys just grow up and discuss issues without using profanity/name calling/race baiting?

Jeez, it is like dealing with high school kids at times.
 

Trampled Underfoot

Registered
Forum Member
Feb 26, 2001
13,593
164
63
TU - show me ONE message, ONE, where I started with personal attacks or vulgarity WITHOUT being attacked first. Just one.

I (and many other members who do not use profanity/vulgarity) CONSTANTLY get attacked or race baited, just because the left doesn't agree with conservative viewpoints.

I certainly can show you UNPROVOKED attack after attack by Scott, Muff, TU etc. Probably in every single thread this happens.

Can't you guys just grow up and discuss issues without using profanity/name calling/race baiting?

Jeez, it is like dealing with high school kids at times.

blinders-by-fm.jpg
 

Trampled Underfoot

Registered
Forum Member
Feb 26, 2001
13,593
164
63
You know mags it does get old. For you to insinuate that its not a two way street is just insane. Do I need to read you off a list of the right wing nut jobs that have been on this board in the last few years? Really?

Just taking yourself for example, what you did to Duff was pretty insulting. You asked to meet him in Paris. He agreed and offered to pay for dinner and you insulted him in quite a few ways. In fact you were beyond rude. That is just one example from the past month. You need to start looking at your statements from the outside. Maybe you should take a deep breath before you actually hit the submit button. Then perhaps you won't look like such the hypocrite going forward.
 

Trench

Turn it up
Forum Member
Mar 8, 2008
3,974
18
0
Mad City, WI
Lets see you couldn't comprehend DUH and now you evidently couldn't comprehend--

--This headline back in 2006 pretty much summed things up for me--

Is it you can't read or can't comprehend--
Sorry Dogs but I don't use pre-pubescent mall-rat words like "DUH". Perhaps if you were to expand your limited vocabulary, you could express yourself in an adult manner.

I also fail to "comprehend" the relevance of a 4 1/2 year old "News Bulletin" about quarterly losses at GM in the context of the current discussion.

Perhaps you could use your eloquent command of the English language to explain the meaning of "DUH", 4 1/2 year old news bulletins, and how I was guilty of "race-baiting" in a thread about General Motors and the bailout of the U.S. auto industry? :shrug:

Thanks in advance... :0008

:0corn
 
Last edited:

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,465
135
63
Bowling Green Ky
Thanks Hedgie.

I get pretty frustrated with these boards. They could be pretty interesting - and I like the chance to hear both sides of issues - both liberal and conservative - it makes all more rounded, and better educated.

But I do hate how a certain group, who I'll admit tend to be liberal in nature, always start with the vulgarity, name calling, and of course, throwing out the race card whenever an issue is discussed.

I't be cool if MJ would just give any member a 3 strikes type policy - if you use vulgarity or insult a member/call them names: 1 strike - 10 day ban. 2 strikes - 30 day ban. 3 strikes - lifetime ban in the political forum.

It could be a fun and informative forum - with important issues being discussed and debated. But as soon as a topic starts, one of the liberals starts with name calling or vulgarity, and then the discussion ends up being worthless. It is really rather disappointing - and it seems as if it is a consistent behavour by the Left side of the forum - and there are times where I do think they have something positive to add, but it gets lost behind the name calling, profanity, and race baiting. It is reallly too bad.

Not sure why some people have to do the "personal attack" or race baiting. I guess that is something that Obama taught everyone to do - when he went after the financial, insurance, and any other industry that wasn't union based. It was a learned, and unfortunate, behavior.

It is nice to see that the conservative bunch has values, and for the most part, don't sink to those levels.

Have a good night!

The entire internet could be cleared of most the trash with one very simple adjustment.

Back in internets infancy most sites that had forum had IP address attached to replies.

If all people that posted on internet had to be identified to post --you lose all the cyber trolls that stir up most the shit.

They would -as in their real world -be too scared/embarrased to come out from under that rock that protects them.

It would be the ole--:mj08: kurby :wall: back to obscurity.

Of course that will never happen as internet is about ad revenue and quantity trumps quality--
-so will always continue to be the place where the cyber trolls can be "unverifiably" all that they can be. :)

--but most know their grifts and realize they are for- "amusement only".
 
Last edited:

The Sponge

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2006
17,263
97
0
TU - show me ONE message, ONE, where I started with personal attacks or vulgarity WITHOUT being attacked first. Just one.

I (and many other members who do not use profanity/vulgarity) CONSTANTLY get attacked or race baited, just because the left doesn't agree with conservative viewpoints.

I certainly can show you UNPROVOKED attack after attack by Scott, Muff, TU etc. Probably in every single thread this happens.

Can't you guys just grow up and discuss issues without using profanity/name calling/race baiting?

Jeez, it is like dealing with high school kids at times.

U calling people like me a welfare recipient makes me want to kick u right in ur cunt. Discuss issues? We all know your stances. A self centered blow hard that as long as u are bringing in a check u couldn't give two dicks about anyone else. I know it is rare but at least Dogs shows some compasion from time to time. Why don't u go in the thread i started and explain to me why Wendell Potter (A HUGE insurance insider)apologized to Michael Moore from the slim tactics the insurance companies used to slim his film, knowing full well that Moore was pointing out what slimy Insurance companies pull. I will be breathlessly waiting. Wendell Potter, a guy who finally found his conscience and quit his million dollar job because he was so sick of what Insurance companies pull, that it ate him alive. Now a guy like u? As long as u are getting a paycheck it doesn't matter what u do for a living. That is the difference between a real man and a scumbag. Good day.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,465
135
63
Bowling Green Ky
I see its doggies time of the month again. Let me tell you what doggie dogshit. I used to deal with pieces of shit like you all the time. When I had a rep get some old rusty old cunt on the phone like you who thought they were special, they would always be as sweet as pie until I told them the way it is. Then they would either cry or get all tough with empty threats. Which route do you usually take doggie?


Yep --Here was one such occasion--but I did like your "pay per view" :)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oXOyFHYwbgw&feature=related
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,495
256
83
Victory Lane
In all seriousnous Trench--doubt I ever make much sense to you-we have totally diff vulues and character.

You have to remember--I'm a tax payor/ vet and business owner of 27 years. I come from conservative family with grandparents and parents all celebrating 50th wedding anniversaries--none ever collecting a penny in welfare.

--and you on the otherhand identify with Gumby/Da Base :0008
.................................................................

you try to explain this away with values and character

and you cant even spell values for christ sakes.

its more about comprehension and intelligence.

And you fail on both counts.
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,495
256
83
Victory Lane
Thanks Hedgie.

I get pretty frustrated with these boards. They could be pretty interesting - and I like the chance to hear both sides of issues - both liberal and conservative - it makes all more rounded, and better educated.

But I do hate how a certain group, who I'll admit tend to be liberal in nature, always start with the vulgarity, name calling, and of course, throwing out the race card whenever an issue is discussed.

I't be cool if MJ would just give any member a 3 strikes type policy - if you use vulgarity or insult a member/call them names: 1 strike - 10 day ban. 2 strikes - 30 day ban. 3 strikes - lifetime ban in the political forum.

It could be a fun and informative forum - with important issues being discussed and debated. But as soon as a topic starts, one of the liberals starts with name calling or vulgarity, and then the discussion ends up being worthless. It is really rather disappointing - and it seems as if it is a consistent behavour by the Left side of the forum - and there are times where I do think they have something positive to add, but it gets lost behind the name calling, profanity, and race baiting. It is reallly too bad.

Not sure why some people have to do the "personal attack" or race baiting. I guess that is something that Obama taught everyone to do - when he went after the financial, insurance, and any other industry that wasn't union based. It was a learned, and unfortunate, behavior.

It is nice to see that the conservative bunch has values, and for the most part, don't sink to those levels.

Have a good night!

................................................................

you would have been gone long ago.

I aint no liberal

I am a centrist like Kosar
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top