official preemptive presidential debate thread...

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
Obama won RAYMOND

read it and weep

its a foregone conclusion

when a debator says about 6 or 7 times that his opponent is right during a debate....it doesn't show well for the debator....

when a debator talks over the other person it doesn't show well.....

when a debator gives round about answers instead of direct answers it doesn't show well for the debator...

when a debator makes facial gestures...it doesn't show well for the debator...

when a debator raises his hand to try to get a point across...it doesn't show well for the debator...

when a moderator asks the debators what cuts you would make because of the economy & one debator answers that he will add programs...it doesn't show well for a debator...

you guys can spin it any way you want but mccain came off much stronger than the stuttering obama....
 
Last edited:

Blackman

Winghead
Forum Member
Aug 31, 2003
7,867
42
48
New Jersey
The two insta-polls out -- from CBS and CNN -- declared Obama the winner. CBS had it 39% to 25% for Obama, CNN 51% to 38%.

Just posting what I read -- take it for what it's worth. I'm sure a Fox poll would swing differently.

These polls are as jaded as the judges in a Don King fight.
 

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
The two insta-polls out -- from CBS and CNN -- declared Obama the winner. CBS had it 39% to 25% for Obama, CNN 51% to 38%.

Just posting what I read -- take it for what it's worth. I'm sure a Fox poll would swing differently.

These polls are as jaded as the judges in a Don King fight.

it just shows that people see the samething differently...
 

The Sponge

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2006
17,263
97
0
I watched a good part of it - while watching the Twins suck ass against the Royals every so often. Doing my best to be objective, and before reading the thread here...I think both did well at face value.

If I had to judge a winner in the eyes of the public, I'd say McCain gained more from the night - but it should have easily been his night. I agree with the take on McCain avoiding direct contact with Obama, and his painful avoidance of looking at him. It's a debating strategy from someone presumed to be a stronger individual - to not give credence or credit in any way - and that's what McCain tried to do. Considering that the moderator was asking them to interact, especially, I would guess most thought favorably and strongly about Obama doing that, and it made him look stronger - and McCain weaker and more reserved.

I thought McCain showed a good range on foreign policy, and Obama had some good selective points. The McCain mantra about cutting spending showed through, and sounded good to Joe Sixpack and his base. I thought Obama sounded better overall on the economy, with some ideas and his reiteration about cutting taxes for almost everyone - and McCain didn't really knock that down. I thought Obama tied McCain to Bush pretty well, and McCain painted Obama as dangerous regarding dealing with despots.

They both scored some points, probably pulled some from the center. But I'd have to award the debate itself slightly to Obama, but the night and bigger public benefit to McCain.

.

Up to this point Chad your post was the only one worthy of a read. We got guys saying the same crap for months about how these two don't belong on the stage like somehow they should be up there. I think i give this debate to McCain for the simple reason that a few of his lies will stick with people and the way he kept belittling Obama, calling him naive and Obama letting him keep getting away with it. Two things i thought were very disturbing were Obama refusal to go after McCain when McCain kept piling on his bullshit on how he supports veterans. Veterans of America give him a 20 percent rating.:shrug: Where was Obama with this? Another thing, why didn't Obama keep saying over and over again that if they didn't go into Iraq there would have not been a so called surge? It really is said that guys in this thread can sit there and watch 15 hours of poker but a presidential debate was to painful for them to sit thru. Like somehow it is easy for McCain and Obama to stand there in front of 100 million people and just answers questions with the greatest of ease. I do think Obama looked more presidential with a lot more style and grace. I give a slight edge to McCain because nobody thought he had a chance.
 
Last edited:

Blackman

Winghead
Forum Member
Aug 31, 2003
7,867
42
48
New Jersey
it just shows that people see the samething differently...

I agree. Personally I thought both candidates did a good job of appealing to the audience they already have, while neither really drew blood when it came to those in the middle. McCain wasn't able to make Obama look weak on national security/ foreign policy and Obama wasn't able to make McCain look feeble minded and out of touch.


Just read that the Fox Poll was 82-16 for McCain. All a matter of Righties going to one site to vote and Lefties going to another, hence the very skewed results.

Going to be a very interesting 38 days....
 

The Sponge

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2006
17,263
97
0
Just read that the Fox Poll was 82-16 for McCain.

.

That is very surprising. Other stations don't have the numbers ridculous but Fox does.:shrug: Weird how this happens all the time. Then we have the one guy here who has McCains **** in his ass explaining why McCain won with every same talking point i heard on Fox. Strange how this always seems to happen with him. You think he could come up with his own thoughts for a change.
 

Sun Tzu

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 10, 2003
6,197
9
0
Houston, Texas
Arguing who won a debate is pure BS. Folks are going to say the guy they support won. You see a single pundit go against their guy?

The average American doesnt have a clue. Incredibly they just dont know BS when they hear it. Every "independent economist" has said neither guy's economic plan will work and both will lead to a massive increase of the debt. Of course the networks dont discuss that. But Obama hopes the $500 check he wants to send you gets your vote and McCain wants to act like ending earmarks will save the day. And Lehrer...what a buffoon. ..ask a real question like " Obama how are you going to pay for all that crap you want" and so on.

From a pure "debate standpoint" - ie if this was a College debate tournament - McCain won. Obama is a far superior ortator and McCain a far better debater. If folks cut through the bs I thought McCain performed better, but Obama did what he had to do and look like he belonged. However the "I agree w McCain" over and over was a major major blunder. I think he was trying to look collegial and bipartisan, but it didnt come across that way. McCain went too far belittling Obama. Not that the point swerent valid, but the independent voters he is trying to woo dont generally like that sort of thing.
 

smurphy

cartographer
Channel Member
Jul 31, 2004
19,909
133
63
16
L.A.
when a debator says about 6 or 7 times that his opponent is right during a debate....it doesn't show well for the debator....

when a debator talks over the other person it doesn't show well.....

when a debator gives round about answers instead of direct answers it doesn't show well for the debator...

when a debator makes facial gestures...it doesn't show well for the debator...

when a debator raises his hand to try to get a point across...it doesn't show well for the debator...

when a moderator asks the debators what cuts you would make because of the economy & one debator answers that he will add programs...it doesn't show well for a debator...

you guys can spin it any way you want but mccain came off much stronger than the stuttering obama....

you are desperate
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
71
Boston
The fact that both of them are for the Bailout is kind of disturbing. I saw it as a draw.
 

dawgball

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 12, 2000
10,652
39
48
50
So, what Independent party should I vote for Dawgball?

For no other reason except to get your vote with the biggest one for statement purposes, you should probably go Libertarian.

Their party views are the closest to mine anyway. My wife wants to put a McCain/Palin sign in our yard. I think I will let her if I can put a Barr/Root one up.

I'm still shocked about the Wayne Allyn Root pick, but oh well. Better than more of the BS Dems and Reps.

http://www.bobbarr2008.com/
 

dawgball

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 12, 2000
10,652
39
48
50
http://www.mogulus.com/reason

This is funny.

Barr was debating live online from somewhere else during last night's debate.

Why not let him in the debate? That's why I hate our system. I don't think you can let everyone in the debate, but he is a third party choice for the public. He would freaking slay these two jokers out of the big parties!

If someone sees the video posted, link it here. If I see it, I'll be back.
 

BobbyBlueChip

Trustee
Forum Member
Dec 27, 2000
20,704
285
83
53
Belly of the Beast
For no other reason except to get your vote with the biggest one for statement purposes, you should probably go Libertarian.

Their party views are the closest to mine anyway. My wife wants to put a McCain/Palin sign in our yard. I think I will let her if I can put a Barr/Root one up.

I'm still shocked about the Wayne Allyn Root pick, but oh well. Better than more of the BS Dems and Reps.

http://www.bobbarr2008.com/

I figured most of my views coincide with the Socialist Worker Party, but I don't know if they'll be on the ballot. Wayne Allen Root it is.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top