President Donald J Trump

[hedgehog]

your ideals and my ideals are about the same. we would be friends if we met in reel life

Bring a backhoe just in case............:0008

:facepalm:
S&L scandal, recession, inflation from the massive overspending and debt increase of the 80's..... those coattails?

Stick that in your glass and drink it :0003 directly from Wikipedia

Prior to the 1992 presidential campaign, America had undergone twelve years of conservative policies implemented by Ronald Reagan and George Herbert Walker Bush. Clinton ran on the economic platform of balancing the budget, lowering inflation, lowering unemployment, and continuing the traditionally conservative policies of free trade. In 1992, Bill Clinton was elected President of the United States of America. During Clinton?s presidency (1993 to 2001), the economic policies he put into place for the U.S. were termed Clintonomics. Clinton inherited Alan Greenspan as Chairman of the Federal Reserve.

 

[BobbyBlueChip]

directly from Wikipedia .

I can never tell if you're trolling. You have a real talent.

God bless America. Now more than ever.

 

[saint]

In fairness the authority in this country is a joke. Hard to respect.

Utterly absurd comment from a smart guy.

 

[fatdaddycool]

it is funny, for all the protesting they do and how quick they are to point out it is their right and freedom of speech, they have a total disrespect for authority. probably a lot of the same twats that try to challenge police and film them when they get pulled over refusing to show ID and such.

:facepalm:

I guess because I once again just say things to you that others think about your beliefs makes me the bad guy. Your "civil rights this" and "civil rights that" is what my comments are aimed at. Read your civil rights comment again, and how does that apply to what airportis stated with his calling the people out that were damaging property and bullshit. It's still just "damn twats exercising their civil rights and shit" comment you made.

Now I need to figure out what to write that will make me likeable again, according to diatribe King. Must be conversations he seems to be having with "others", so I better mind my p's and q's. FDC can dish it out but can't take it

"How quick they are to point out it is their RIGHT AND FREEDOM OF SPEECH". Apparently, my "civil rights this" comment is a direct response to airportis' comment about the 1st Amendment. That's how it relates, it's a direct response to his reference. Now please tell me how YOUR response has any correlation to mine that could possibly lead you to make the egomaniacal claim of being "protector of the realm".


So you're speaking for what others are thinking about my beliefs? That's what that is?
Are you actually going to go with that?
Of all the people on here, you're the one that has assumed the role as spokesperson for all those that aren't strong enough or have the fortitude to speak for themselves? Really?

"Calling people out" isn't posting on a general forum that they are "savages" when you have zero personal knowledge of any one of them.

Get a grip Chuck. You aren't solpeaking for anyone and there is no substance to a goddamned thing you said. You throw out shitty little comments line "diatribe King" and all the other bullshit and now try to pass it off objective criticism. Fuck you!

I didn't have to have a mixed family to defend against bigotry and racism, I didn't just start to defend same sex marriage, or gender neutral bathrooms because I had to learn to deal with a gay family member or a trans dog. I don't defend then when it's convenient for me.

Speaking for others my ass, you're bitching because you're a bitch, that's it. I'm tired of trying with you, tired of your snide fucking comments and pretentious ass.

Good, don't do it again. Don't do to me what I don't do to you. Don't make comments on here for "others" and don't comment on my "beliefs", and we'll be just fine.

Feel free, to show me where I "dished it out,but couldn't take it".


Fuck


Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

 

[WhatsHisNuts]

Stick that in your glass and drink it :0003 directly from Wikipedia

Prior to the 1992 presidential campaign, America had undergone twelve years of conservative policies implemented by Ronald Reagan and George Herbert Walker Bush. Clinton ran on the economic platform of balancing the budget, lowering inflation, lowering unemployment, and continuing the traditionally conservative policies of free trade. In 1992, Bill Clinton was elected President of the United States of America. During Clinton?s presidency (1993 to 2001), the economic policies he put into place for the U.S. were termed Clintonomics. Clinton inherited Alan Greenspan as Chairman of the Federal Reserve.

I wonder why he ran on a platform of balancing the budget, lowering inflation, and lowering unemployment? :mj07:

 

[zig]

Sure. Lots of Trump supporters are out destroying property and beating up people for wearing Clinton Hat and because Trump won the election.See it everyday here in Raleigh.

No, they just hide behind their hoods and send out anonymous racist hate letters.
http://www.nbc15.com/content/news/Hate-Mail-Targets-Two-Local-Families-401398846.html

 

[Wineguy]

"How quick they are to point out it is their RIGHT AND FREEDOM OF SPEECH". Apparently, my "civil rights this" comment is a direct response to airportis' comment about the 1st Amendment. That's how it relates, it's a direct response to his reference. Now please tell me how YOUR response has any correlation to mine that could possibly lead you to make the egomaniacal claim of being "protector of the realm".


So you're speaking for what others are thinking about my beliefs? That's what that is?
Are you actually going to go with that?
Of all the people on here, you're the one that has assumed the role as spokesperson for all those that aren't strong enough or have the fortitude to speak for themselves? Really?

"Calling people out" isn't posting on a general forum that they are "savages" when you have zero personal knowledge of any one of them.

Get a grip Chuck. You aren't solpeaking for anyone and there is no substance to a goddamned thing you said. You throw out shitty little comments line "diatribe King" and all the other bullshit and now try to pass it off objective criticism. Fuck you!

I didn't have to have a mixed family to defend against bigotry and racism, I didn't just start to defend same sex marriage, or gender neutral bathrooms because I had to learn to deal with a gay family member or a trans dog. I don't defend then when it's convenient for me.

Speaking for others my ass, you're bitching because you're a bitch, that's it. I'm tired of trying with you, tired of your snide fucking comments and pretentious ass.

Good, don't do it again. Don't do to me what I don't do to you. Don't make comments on here for "others" and don't comment on my "beliefs", and we'll be just fine.

Feel free, to show me where I "dished it out,but couldn't take it".


Fuck


Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

If that is how you "think" I wrote what I did, then once again, it is your beliefs. Did it feel good to tell me Fuck You? Civil rights was not my topic about speaking for others, egomaniac. You call out 1 fucking word from his post, savages. And then turn that into your Civil Rights comment as always. For the record, I am a total Civil Rights defender, just not with other bullshit. You failed to answer my question, but that's OK, don't need an answer anymore.

Read between the lines what UGA12 wrote, and he is completely correct. Just basically let you say what you want, and leave it at that. Don't come back to receive more of your rants, always having to have the last word over many years on here with many different people and personalities. I was not speaking of your beliefs, just your overall rants, period. You can believe that the grass is orange and the sky is green for all I care.

You win, now go thump your chest.

 

[airportis]

Alan,
I can read and so can you. At the start of the paragraph did he quantify his statement as some not all, because I don't see it.

It doesn't matter anyway, because as much as airportis dislikes me or we disagree, I actually respect the guy. I think he's an intelligent, respectful man. I doubt that he enters into anything without forethought. I don't believe him to be racist in the true sense of the word, in that I mean he's probably like most all of us when we get stuck being a slow driver and the driver turns out to be Asian many of us might think to ourselves, "big surprise there", and move on. I think he adds a lot to the forum and he hates my guts, so he can't be all bad. He keeps me on my toes and paying attention though and I respect him for that. We just have different views and ways of expressing ourselves sometimes.

I don't have to see things your way to respect your opinion.



Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Nothing I posted is racist. I am not any "type" of racist. Not sure what you gathered from my post that gives you that assumption. In fact, the video of the people beating the guys Jeep up, the majority look like white folks to me. Not that that matters because they are still acting like savages. Rioting and destroying property because of a result they do not like.

And I do not hate anyone on an internet forum. This is an internet forum. I do not invest enough feelings to hate someone over the internet.

 

[fatdaddycool]

Nothing I posted is racist. I am not any "type" of racist. Not sure what you gathered from my post that gives you that assumption. In fact, the video of the people beating the guys Jeep up, the majority look like white folks to me. Not that that matters because they are still acting like savages. Rioting and destroying property because of a result they do not like.

And I do not hate anyone on an internet forum. This is an internet forum. I do not invest enough feelings to hate someone over the internet.

I don't think you're a racist and I didn't mean to imply that. I didn't watch the video. Sorry for the confusion of my post but no, you didn't say or imply anything racist.

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

 

[fatdaddycool]

If that is how you "think" I wrote what I did, then once again, it is your beliefs. Did it feel good to tell me Fuck You? Civil rights was not my topic about speaking for others, egomaniac. You call out 1 fucking word from his post, savages. And then turn that into your Civil Rights comment as always. For the record, I am a total Civil Rights defender, just not with other bullshit. You failed to answer my question, but that's OK, don't need an answer anymore.

Read between the lines what UGA12 wrote, and he is completely correct. Just basically let you say what you want, and leave it at that. Don't come back to receive more of your rants, always having to have the last word over many years on here with many different people and personalities. I was not speaking of your beliefs, just your overall rants, period. You can believe that the grass is orange and the sky is green for all I care.

You win, now go thump your chest.

No Chuck, I made sure the entire sentence where he addressed the rights issue was capitalized, so I didn't pull out one word at all, you did.

You're a total Civil Rights defender, and you weren't addressing me for others about my "rights this and rights that" stance, and even though that's exactly what you said, you didn't say it. Do I have that right? Or were you speaking for what someone else was thinking about what I was thinking?


Uga can speak for himself and I'm not reading between anything.


What you wrote is what you wrote. Like I stated earlier, I'm tired of your snide remarks and shitty comments. So you got what you got and now you are trying to play this "poor me" bullshit about how this is all my fault and all you were doing was asking a question, bullshit. You weren't speaking of my beliefs? What?
Did you even read your post before you wrote this one? Maybe you were taken over by the "spirit of posters past"?






Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

 

[Cie]

Stick that in your glass and drink it :0003 directly from Wikipedia

Prior to the 1992 presidential campaign, America had undergone twelve years of conservative policies implemented by Ronald Reagan and George Herbert Walker Bush. Clinton ran on the economic platform of balancing the budget, lowering inflation, lowering unemployment, and continuing the traditionally conservative policies of free trade. In 1992, Bill Clinton was elected President of the United States of America. During Clinton?s presidency (1993 to 2001), the economic policies he put into place for the U.S. were termed Clintonomics. Clinton inherited Alan Greenspan as Chairman of the Federal Reserve.

Wkipedia.......hahahahahahajhahahahahahahahahhahaha

 

[Handi Capper]

Actually "under God" wasn't added until 1954. ...So....

sorry shane, i've no idea what ur tlkin bout, i'm talkin bout forefathers in 1770s

 

[lowell]

No, they just hide behind their hoods and send out anonymous racist hate letters.
http://www.nbc15.com/content/news/Hate-Mail-Targets-Two-Local-Families-401398846.html

Whatever they did it seemed to work in Wisconsin. Glad Trump got the cheese there.
Don't recall your being upset with local Trump office in Hillsborough NC being firebombed or offices in Denver being vandalized or motorist being beaten for voting for Trump.

 

[Wineguy]

No Chuck, I made sure the entire sentence where he addressed the rights issue was capitalized, so I didn't pull out one word at all, you did.

You're a total Civil Rights defender, and you weren't addressing me for others about my "rights this and rights that" stance, and even though that's exactly what you said, you didn't say it. Do I have that right? Or were you speaking for what someone else was thinking about what I was thinking?


Uga can speak for himself and I'm not reading between anything.


What you wrote is what you wrote. Like I stated earlier, I'm tired of your snide remarks and shitty comments. So you got what you got and now you are trying to play this "poor me" bullshit about how this is all my fault and all you were doing was asking a question, bullshit. You weren't speaking of my beliefs? What?
Did you even read your post before you wrote this one? Maybe you were taken over by the "spirit of posters past"?






Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Your comment in an earlier post above:

Airportis was generalizing and you call him out for using that word because he doesn't know them personally. I think he is pretty smart to not know any of them. When you meet them all please fill us in so we are informed as to who they really are. Your words exactly below, not mine. This had nothing to do with YOUR fucking Civil Rights, dense head! If you cross a line exercising your Civil Rights, they are no longer Civil Rights. You then deserve Criminal Rights. Thank goodness I never have to text you, who knows how you would misconstrue what is written.

"Calling people out" isn't posting on a general forum that they are "savages" when you have zero personal knowledge of any one of them. "

Thump. Thump. Thump.

 

[Handi Capper]

 

[saint]

Whatever they did it seemed to work in Wisconsin. Glad Trump got the cheese there.
Don't recall your being upset with local Trump office in Hillsborough NC being firebombed or offices in Denver being vandalized or motorist being beaten for voting for Trump.

And....boom goes the dynamite

 

[saint]

The irony of people angry with Trump winning because of his intolerance, showing intolerance of people who exercised their right to vote, is mind-blowing.

 

[REFLOG]

View attachment 6020

:mj07:

 

[StevieD]

The irony of people angry with Trump winning because of his intolerance, showing intolerance of people who exercised their right to vote, is mind-blowing.

They have tolerance as long you agree with them. If you don't they call you a racist and everything else under the sun and for some reason they find that ok.

 

[saint]

They have tolerance as long you agree with them. If you don't they call you a racist and everything else under the sun and for some reason they find that ok.

You got it. How quick the racist card comes flying. But it's okay to be intolerant because Trump supporters are backing an intolerant person. Sort of like teaching my boys that just because someone punches them doesn't mean it's then okay for them to return the favor.