President Donald J Trump
- Thread starter saint
- Start date
:mj07::mj07::mj07:
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
:142smilie:142smilie:142smilie:142smilie
I am sorry, are you addressing me? Did I address you? Now I have to reply to this. You are such a fucking egomaniac to think I am referencing you???????? For this post??? Did you watch it? A blonde woman saying she needs to let it go. How in the world did you draw yourself into this? I was solely talking about HRC and Jill Stein, but think whatever you wish. This post of yours really does take the cake. I had referenced Jill Stein a few posts before. You want to take back all your little name calling in your post? Remember you weren't going to address me nor I you. Your "thinly veiled" thoughts, however, thought otherwise. Still fucking laughing at what you thought.
Correct me if I am wrong but the content that got all the attention was about the DNC trying to help her get the nomination over Bernie and the DNC chairwoman leaking debate questions to HRC. Sounds like you have much more significant detail and I'm open to what it is. It does seem strange that nobody cares the hacks could have been from a foreign country trying to use the info to sway voters. The CIA is investigating but more people would rather the issue just go away than get to the bottom of it. Nothing will change but it sure seems worth looking into.
Somebody gets it! Yay yay yay. Let's get mad at the way they were released but not at the actual content THAT HILLARY authored.
Yet.....those same people applaud Edward Snowden and call him a hero for hacking emails and exposing our government's unethical and unconstitutional actions. You can't support him and then rail on whomever released the Clinton emails. It's completely hypocritical.
Don't you think the voters have the right to know that Hillary received debate questions ahead of the debates? Isn't it reasonable for said voters to perhaps change their opinion of Hillary with the new information?
BTW she has emails showing direct pay to play with the Prince of Morocco, agreeing to go speak there for I think 10 or 12 million into her family's pocket via speaking fees. This is not conjecture, this was spelled out in her emails. All one needs to do, along with that public information, is look at the Clinton Foundation donations post-election to date.
Politicians are all crooked, both sides. But I have a particular problem with Hillary using her position as secretary of state to personally fill their family coffers with millions. It's just fucked up. Trump is a fucktard too, but at least he did it in private sector and didn't use our country as leverage to enrich his family. He may have taken advantage of the tax code but he broke no laws. If you want to get pissed, get pissed that the tax code is written the way it is.
You know what Chuck, I've never considered you to be a stupid or unintelligent person and I don't now. I don't like your shitty little comments and the way to come into a thread, jab at me and then act the martyr. I don't like how you consistently try to change the topic ever so slightly when called out for pulling that shit. This entire little spat started because you did exactly that and you expect that nobody should ever question you about it. It's aggravating as fuck and it pisses me off. It even pisses me off when you do it to others, like you did to Gary very early in this thread, yet I don't immediately recall me ever saying anything about you acting that way towards anyone else other than myself. What's equally as bothersome is, whether intended or not, you insult my intelligence. You really insult it by denying your intentions in your posts. You knew what the fuck you were doing and so did I. I may be a lot of things but stupid isn't one of them. I don't care how many times or what poor martyrdom bullshit you wail about in an effort to deny it, we both know the truth. It's not like you did a great job disguising it.
Instead, why don't you just man the fuck up and say what you're going to say and then, stand the fuck behind it instead of everyone else for once.
Hope this helps,
FDC
Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk
Man, have not been here in a week and this thread is still here? Lol, do I even waste my time reading the last 10 pages or so? I think it was 21 or 22 when I was last here. Maybe later after coffee but rogue one reviews are number one on my list now.
:0003
:0003
Hey Wood,
If I posted something about Trump that is untrue, point it out to me and I'll delete it or change it to reflect the truth.
I don't deny the $131mill on its surface, stinks. However it doesn't stink anymore than many of the things from the other side that are so readily dismissed or at least diminished by the right. The balance of scrutiny and supposition by the right and the media, from before the primaries even started, was directed at the comportment of the Clinton's. It's been an all out attack on Hillary since republicans took both houses. The level of which we've never seen before against a political figure that wasn't in office. The right consistently engaged in libelous and scandalous propaganda, regardless of truth or embellishment, directed squarely at the person they considered to be the next democratic nominee for president. There were more investigations to find one freaking small letter C halfway down the page of one email thread than there were into Bush's faulty WMD's in Iraq war.
It was and still is unheard of and ridiculous the amount of money and tax revenue was spent by republicans to falsely lay the blame for the Benghazi squarely at her feet, which even the consideration of is absolutely absurd.
Now we are confronted with a president elect that has publicly insulted people of differing, cultures, races, gender, and even the handicapped. He's been involved in numerous bad business deals, has flip flopped several times on several fronts. Publicly asked Russia to hack Clinton's emails, had the CEO of the company building the Dakota pipeline also state publicly and unequivocally that he contributed to Trump's campaign with the assurance that when he takes office all necessary permits will be issued. At present they're so assured of this that they've continued to build the pipeline past the restrictions of their existing permits in spite of President Obama refusing those permits, and have vowed that they'll continue to do so and just pay the fine.
I feel that in their zeal and excitement of getting an entirely conservative republican government, which historically has been very bad for our country, people are disregarding some very real danger signs.
The amount of holdings Trump actually has and what's reported in Exxon is unknown, however considering his history and statements over many years extolling the value of said company, and that Forbes has it listed as one of his top five biggest benefactors of his decisions going forward, makes me curious. When he makes the CEO of the one company that would most directly benefit from lifting sanctions in Russia the SoS, and we find out that Russian intelligence which is directed by Putin has involvement in our election in an effort to get Trump elected, I think that has to be given at least half the scrutiny Pizzagate was given.
Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk
The left's take on Benghazi is to sweep it under the rug? Really? So 17 investigations using tax payer funds is the same as saying get over it?
Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk
:mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07:
Are you fucking kidding me? This is your fucking twist once again? I am sorry but you are stupid on your assumption then. Plain and simple. There, I manned up with the truth. Not one piece of that was aimed at you or anyone here. But you still enjoy talking down like I am some fucking child. Nice try on the spin though, for God's sake, get the fuck over yourself. Go ahead and spin that, because you will somehow.
I actually got over it with Gary because he discusses and asks people things, rather than name call and talk down to people. I like him and have enjoyed playing golf and have shared wine with him. But glad you went back and read it all again. I cheered Gary and we moved on.
:mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07::mj07:
You truly need to pull your panties out and discuss things with others.
Please provide link to post where I call Snowden a hero, or anything of the sort.
I'll ask a question from earlier: Are you okay with foreign countries trying to influence our elections? Yes or no will suffice.
I think the public absolutely deserves to know she got the debate questions in advance. It's complete bullshit and the DNC should be punished, if there's a way to do so.
In all honesty, the pay to play stuff in the emails is pretty much how I expect a lot of these assholes operate. "You want this, it'll cost you." I never really gave much of a shit because I think their charity does good work.
Trump used money from his charity to pay for his legal fees, so no, it wasn't all done in the private sector.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/21/us/politics/donald-trump-foundation-charity.html?_r=0
Every little bit helps, 9 million in aid is a lot, until you look at the big pic........
The Clinton family?s mega-charity took in more than $140 million in grants and pledges in 2013 but spent just $9 million on direct aid.
The group spent the bulk of its windfall on administration, travel, and salaries and bonuses, with the fattest payouts going to family friends.
On its 2013 tax forms, the most recent available, the foundation claimed it spent $30 million on payroll and employee benefits; $8.7 million in rent and office expenses; $9.2 million on ?conferences, conventions and meetings?; $8 million on fundraising; and nearly $8.5 million on travel. None of the Clintons is on the payroll, but they do enjoy first-class flights paid for by the foundation.
In all, the group reported $84.6 million in ?functional expenses? on its 2013 tax return and had more than $64 million left over ? money the organization has said represents pledges rather than actual cash on hand.
Some of the tens of millions in administrative costs finance more than 2,000 employees, including aid workers and health professionals around the world.
But that?s still far below the 75 percent rate of spending that nonprofit experts say a good charity should spend on its mission.
Charity Navigator, which rates nonprofits, recently refused to rate the Clinton Foundation because its ?atypical business model . . . doesn?t meet our criteria.?
The Clinton family?s mega-charity took in more than $140 million in grants and pledges in 2013 but spent just $9 million on direct aid.
The group spent the bulk of its windfall on administration, travel, and salaries and bonuses, with the fattest payouts going to family friends.
On its 2013 tax forms, the most recent available, the foundation claimed it spent $30 million on payroll and employee benefits; $8.7 million in rent and office expenses; $9.2 million on ?conferences, conventions and meetings?; $8 million on fundraising; and nearly $8.5 million on travel. None of the Clintons is on the payroll, but they do enjoy first-class flights paid for by the foundation.
In all, the group reported $84.6 million in ?functional expenses? on its 2013 tax return and had more than $64 million left over ? money the organization has said represents pledges rather than actual cash on hand.
Some of the tens of millions in administrative costs finance more than 2,000 employees, including aid workers and health professionals around the world.
But that?s still far below the 75 percent rate of spending that nonprofit experts say a good charity should spend on its mission.
Charity Navigator, which rates nonprofits, recently refused to rate the Clinton Foundation because its ?atypical business model . . . doesn?t meet our criteria.?
Apparently they are called "The Dukes" and the FBI warned the DNC repeatedly 7 months prior that it looked like they were trying to gain access to their server. The DNC ignored the warnings and eventually slipped up. Total incompetence. :facepalm:
The Clinton team failed the nation with such amazing bumbling.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/us/politics/russia-hack-election-dnc.html?_r=0
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/us/politics/russia-hack-election-dnc.html?_r=0
they may have been fans of the show, i have no proof otherwise
.....there's no way they were fans of the movie though. what a piece of crap that was.
....then again they are russians who prove over and over they have bad taste, so :shrug:
