THE SPORTS ADVISORS
COLLEGE BASKETBALL
(1) North Carolina (28-2, 19-8 ATS) at (6) Duke (26-3, 15-11-2 ATS)
Top-ranked North Carolina takes a seven-game winning streak up the road to Cameron Indoor Stadium, where it seeks to exact some revenge against archrival Duke in a battle to determine the ACC regular-season champion.
The Tar Heels (13-2, 8-7 ATS in the ACC) thumped Florida State 90-77 for its fifth consecutive double-digit ACC victory. However, they were on the wrong end of an 8-0 run over the final 75 seconds and came up short as a 16-point home favorite, dropping to 4-3 ATS during their seven-game winning streak.
Duke (13-2, 8-5-2 ATS in the ACC) prepped for this showdown with Wednesday?s 86-70 rout of Virginia as a 6?-point road chalk. Since losing their first two conference games in mid-February, the Blue Devils have won four in a row, but they?re just 1-5-1 ATS in their last seven conference affairs.
Duke took advantage of the shorthanded Tar Heels a month ago in Chapel Hill, winning 89-78 as a 4?-point road underdog. That snapped the Blue Devils? three-game SU and four-game ATS losing skid against Carolina, which played last month?s game without injured point guard Ty Lawson. Good news for the Tar Heels: They?ve cashed in seven of their last nine visits to Cameron Indoor Stadium.
Including Duke?s win in February, the underdog is on an 11-3 ATS roll in this rivalry. The last two meetings were double-digit blowouts after the previous seven battles were decided by a total of 27 points, with win margins of seven points or less in each contest.
North Carolina has won all seven of its ACC road games ? four by double digits (3-1 ATS) and three others by a total of four points (0-3 ATS). Meanwhile, the Blue Devils are perfect at home this year at 15-0 (9-3-2 ATS). However, since cashing in their first three ACC home outings, they?re 0-2-2 ATS in their last four when hosting league foes.
The Tar Heels are on ATS streaks of 40-19 overall, 17-7 following a SU win and 20-8 on Saturdays.
This showdown features two of the top three scoring offenses in the nation. The Tar Heels rank second at 90.1 points per game, and they?re also 11th in field-goal offense (48.6 percent). Meanwhile, Duke puts up 85.1 ppg, which ranks third nationally, on 47.1 percent shooting.
These teams hurdled the 164-point total in their first meeting this year, making the over 5-0 in the last five clashes (2-0 at Duke). The over is also on runs of 4-0 for UNC overall, 8-2 for UNC on the road, 20-8 for UNC in ACC play, 5-1 for UNC on Saturdays, 10-4 for Duke overall, 35-16 for Duke in the ACC and 5-1 for Duke on Saturdays.
ATS ADVANTAGE: NORTH CAROLINA and OVER
(12) Louisville (24-6, 16-11-1 ATS) at (11) Georgetown (24-4, 11-14 ATS)
Louisville (14-3, 12-4-1 ATS in the Big East) is red-hot heading into the regular-season finale, coming off Sunday?s 68-54 beating of Villanova as an 11-point home chalk. The Cardinals have won nine straight games and been nearly as impressive against the spread, going 8-1, all in Big East play. Seven of those nine victories have come by at least eight points, and five were by double digits.
Georgetown (14-3, 7-10 ATS in the Big East) squeaked out a road win at Marquette on Saturday, winning 70-68 in overtime as a four-point underdog for its fourth straight victory (3-1 ATS). The Hoyas? recent pointspread uptick comes on the heels of an 0-5 ATS nosedive, all in conference action.
Georgetown was Louisville?s third victim during its current nine-game winning streak, with the Cardinals taking a 59-51 home win laying 3? points on Feb. 9. In last year?s lone meeting, Georgetown won and covered as a one-point road favorite, 73-65.
The Cardinals are a sterling 15-3-1 ATS in their last 19 roadies and have further positive ATS trends of 13-3-1 overall, 7-1 after a SU win, 6-1 after a spread-cover and 23-6-2 in Big East play. The Hoyas, conversely, are on negative ATS streaks of 4-10 on Saturday, 2-5 after a SU win, 2-9 after a pointspread victory and 1-5 at home.
The over is 5-2 in Louisville?s last seven road trips, but the under is 13-5 in its last 18 after a SU win. For Georgetown, the under is on lengthy streaks of 51-23 overall, 45-16 at home, 42-17 coming off a win and 41-17 in conference play. Finally, last month?s meeting fell well short of the 125-point posted price.
ATS ADVANTAGE: LOUISVILLE and UNDER
UAB (22-8, 15-9-1 ATS) at (2) Memphis (29-1, 15-10 ATS)
Alabama-Birmingham (12-3, 10-5 ATS in Conference USA) stretched its winning streak to five games with Wednesday?s 84-70 home rout of Tulsa as a 7?-point chalk, cashing for the fourth straight time. The Blazers, hoping to secure a second NCAA Tournament berth for Conference USA, are 7-1 in their last eight games (6-2 ATS) ? with the only blemish being a heartbreaking last-second home loss to Memphis.
Memphis (15-0, 7-8 ATS in CUSA) has rebounded from its only loss all season ? a 66-62 setback to Tennessee last month ? with a three-game winning streak, including a 72-55 road win over Southern Methodist on Wednesday. But the Tigers came up short as a 22-point road favorite at SMU, their fourth consecutive non-cover. John Calipari?s squad has followed up an 8-1 ATS romp by cashing just three times in its last 12 outings.
Memphis is on an 8-2 tear in this rivalry (7-3 ATS). A riot nearly broke out at the conclusion of the last game between these two teams three weeks ago, as Memphis escaped Birmingham with a 79-78 victory but failed to cash as an 8 ?-point favorite, halting a 3-0 ATS run by the Tigers. The Tigers are still 10-4 ATS in the last 14 series clashes overall and 7-1 ATS in the last eight gatherings at the Pyramid. Also, the home team is 4-1 ATS in the last five meetings.
The Blazers are on a 5-0 ATS run in Saturday games and are 5-1 ATS in their past six against teams with a winning record. On the flip side, the Tigers are on negative pointspread runs of 1-4 after a non-cover, 1-5 against winning teams and 1-6 at home.
The over has cashed in seven of UAB?s last nine starts, and the over is 4-1 in Memphis? last five league contests. However, the under is 8-1 in UAB?s last nine against winning teams, 35-16 in its last 51 on the highway and 6-1 in Memphis? last seven against winning teams. Finally, the under is 8-1 in the last nine series meetings (4-0 in the last four in Memphis), but the one over occurred in last month?s battle in Birmingham.
ATS ADVANTAGE: MEMPHIS
Baylor (20-9, 12-9 ATS) at Texas Tech (16-13, 15-9 ATS)
Baylor?s hopes for an NCAA bid took a hit Wednesday with a 71-57 home loss to Texas A&M as a two-point chalk, halting a 3-0 SU and a 4-0 ATS run. The Bears (8-7 SU and ATS in the Big 12), who at one point this season were 16-2, are just 4-7 in their last 11 starts (5-6 ATS), all in the Big 12.
Texas Tech (7-8, 9-6 ATS in the Big 12) was handed its worst loss in school history on Monday at Kansas, getting blasted 109-51 as a 19?-point pup. Just two days earlier, the Red Raiders had upset No. 5 Texas 83-80 as a five-point home ?dog, a rout that followed a 98-54 embarrassment at Texas A&M.
Baylor topped Texas Tech 80-74 on Feb. 6, but the Red Raiders got the cash as a 7?-point road pup. Despite that result, the Bears are still 8-3 ATS in the last 11 clashes in this series. Finally, the home team is on a 5-1 ATS tear, and the underdog is 9-2 ATS in the last 11 head-to-head contests.
The Bears are 19-7 ATS on their last 26 road trips, but they are 2-5 ATS in they?re last seven following a SU loss.
The Red Raiders are on a 10-1 ATS spree in Lubbock. Also, they?ve shown a strong ability to bounce back from bad efforts, going 7-0 ATS in their last seven after a pointspread setback and 9-1 ATS in their last 10 after a SU loss.
The ?over? trends run heavy for both teams. For Baylor, the over is on streaks of 19-7 overall, 17-4 in Big 12 play, 7-1 on the road, 4-0 against winning teams, 6-0 after a SU loss and 19-7 on Saturday. Meanwhile, Texas Tech has topped the total in five straight games, and the over is 4-0 in its last four after a SU loss. Finally, the over is 5-0 in the last five series meetings overall and 4-0 in the last four battles in Lubbock.
ATS ADVANTAGE: TEXAS TECH and OVER
(16) Vanderbilt (25-5, 15-14 ATS) at Alabama (15-15, 9-15 ATS)
Vanderbilt (11-4, 8-5-2 ATS in the SEC) squeaked past Mississippi State 86-85 in overtime Wednesday but couldn?t cash as a 3?-point home chalk, ending a three-game ATS run. The Commodores are 8-1 in their last nine games (6-3 ATS).
Alabama (4-11, 6-9 ATS in the SEC) lost to LSU 80-74 catching two points in Baton Rouge for its second straight defeat, while also ending a two-game ATS uptick. The Crimson Tide are just 2-6 in their last eight games (4-4 ATS), all in conference action, though they could be due for a win: each of their last two wins has been preceded by two losses.
Vandy is on a 6-0-1 ATS streak in this series, including a 94-73 blowout victory as a 1?-point home pup last season. Two years ago in Tuscaloosa, though, ?Bama posted a 77-74 overtime win, getting the push as a three-point chalk. The underdog is 5-1-1 ATS in the last seven in this series.
The Commodores are 6-2 ATS in their last eight SEC outings, including 6-1 ATS following a SU win, and they?re 6-2 ATS this year as a favorite of seven points or less. Conversely, the Crimson Tide are 5-12 ATS in their last 17 Saturday starts, 1-6 ATS as a ?dog of seven or fewer and 4-9 ATS at home this year, though have won three straight in Tuscaloosa, cashing in the last two.
The under is 6-1 in Vandy?s last seven roadies and is 7-3 in its last 10 when coming off a win. However, the over is 11-5 in the Commodores? last 16 Saturday starts and is 4-1-1 the last six meetings in this series.
ATS ADVANTAGE: VANDERBILT
(7) Stanford (24-5, 14-15 ATS) at USC (19-10, 16-11 ATS)
Southern Cal (10-7 SU and ATS in the Pac-10) boosted its NCAA Tournament resume with Thursday?s come-from-behind 93-89 overtime win over Cal, but the Trojans failed to cover as eight-point favorites. USC has won four of its last five starts and six of its last nine, all in Pac-10 play, but is just 4-5 ATS in that span (0-2 ATS in the last two).
Stanford (13-4, 8-9 ATS in the Pac-10) also went to overtime Thursday, suffering a devastating 77-67 loss at No. 3 UCLA that cost the Cardinal a shot at the regular-season league crown. Not only did the Cardinal blow a 14-point second-half lead, but they couldn?t even cover as an 8?-point road underdog. The loss snapped Stanford?s four-game win streak (2-2 ATS), but Trent Johnson?s team has still won 11 of its last 13 starts (7-6 ATS), all in conference action.
USC has cashed the last two in this series (1-1 SU), losing 52-46 on Jan. 5 as a 7?-point road pup and winning 83-79 in overtime laying 2? points in last year?s Pac-10 Tournament. Last year at USC, the Trojans won 69-65, but the Cardinal narrowly took the money as five-point pups. Stanford is 7-3 in the last 10 meetings, but each team has covered five times, with the road team going 6-3 ATS in the last nine regular-season battles.
The Cardinal are on ATS slides of 2-5 overall, 5-11 following a pointspread defeat and 1-6-1 after a SU loss, but they are 5-1 ATS in their last six Saturday starts. At the opposite end of the spectrum, the Trojans are on positive ATS runs of 27-11 on Saturday, 14-6 after a non-cover and 33-16 against teams with a winning SU record.
Although the January meeting between these two fell miles short of the 131?-point posted
total, the over is 4-0 in the last four meetings on USC?s home floor. Also, for Stanford, the over is on streaks of 4-0 on the road, 6-1 versus the Pac-10 and 4-1 on Saturday. For USC, the over is on tears of 4-1 overall, 5-1 on Saturday, 21-7 against the Pac-10 and 8-3 coming off a win.
ATS ADVANTAGE: OVER
(21) Marquette (22-7, 13-10 ATS) at Syracuse (18-12, 13-15 ATS)
Syracuse (8-9 SU and ATS in the Big East) halted an extremely untimely three-game SU and ATS skid by thumping Seton Hall 85-73 Wednesday as a 2?-point favorite. The Orange have seen their NCAA hopes fade, going 2-5 SU and ATS over the last seven games, all in Big East contests.
Marquette (11-6, 9-8 ATS in the Big East) took a respite from league play on Tuesday to pound first-year Division I Florida Gulf Coast 67-37 at home in a non-lined game. The Golden Eagles are 5-1 SU and ATS in their last six Big East matchups, but the one loss came last Saturday at home against Georgetown, a 70-68 overtime setback as a four-point chalk.
These two teams met just once last year, with Syracuse winning and cashing 70-58 as a 3?-point road ?dog.
The Golden Eagles are on several positive pointspread runs, including 5-0 on the highway, 6-1 against the Big East, 4-1 after a SU win and 8-2 this year as a favorite of 12 points or less.
Syracuse is 9-4-1 ATS in its last 14 Saturday starts, but the Orange are 4-10 ATS in their last 14 when coming off a spread-cover.
For Marquette, the over is on runs of 5-2 overall, 5-1 on Saturday and 37-18-2 on the highway. Also, Syracuse has hurdled the total in four of its last five Saturday outings, but the under is 7-1 in the Orange?s last eight after a spread-cover and 5-1 in their last six when coming off a SU win.
ATS ADVANTAGE: MARQUETTE
(6) Kansas (27-3, 16-12 ATS) at Texas A&M (22-8, 12-12 ATS)
Kansas (12-3, 7-8 ATS in the Big 12) capped a perfect 20-0 season at home and remained in a tie for first place in the Big 12 with Monday?s historic 109-51 rout of Texas Tech, handing the Red Raiders their worst loss in history. The Jayhawks easily cashed as a 19?-point favorite, their second straight spread-cover after an 0-5 ATS slump.
Texas A&M (8-7, 7-8 ATS in the Big 12) hammered Baylor 71-57 as a two-point road underdog on Wednesday, but the Aggies are still just 2-4 SU and ATS in their last six. Their last three contests have been decided by margins of 14 points (win over Baylor), 27 points (loss at Oklahoma) and 44 points (win over Texas Tech). The straight-up winner has covered in each of the team?s last 14 games.
The Aggies upset Kansas last year, winning 69-66 as a five-point road underdog. Still, the Jayhawks are 7-3 ATS in the last 10 clashes. Also, the ?dog is 4-0 ATS in the last four series meetings, with the road team winning three of those contests outright.
The Jayhawks are 2-3 SU in their last five road games and they?ve failed to cash in six consecutive games on the highway (all in the Big 12). They?re also 1-4 ATS in their last five Saturday outings.
Texas A&M is 4-3 SU and 3-4 ATS in Big 12 home games, losing two of the last three.
Kansas has topped the total in three straight games and 12 of the last 17, but the under is 3-1 in its last four on the road. Also, the over is 5-2 in A&M?s last seven at home and 2-0 in the last two head-to-head meetings.
ATS ADVANTAGE: NONE
Arizona (18-12, 15-12-1 ATS) at Oregon (17-12, 13-11-3 ATS)
Arizona (9-9 SU and ATS in the Pac-10) posted its most convincing win of the season on Thursday at Oregon State, hammering the Beavers 81-45 as an 11-point road favorite. The Wildcats are still just 3-6 (4-5 ATS) in their last nine games.
Oregon held off Arizona State 67-61 on Thursday for its second consecutive win, which comes on the heels of a three-game losing skid. The Ducks pushed as a six-point home favorite and they?re 4-2-1 ATS in their last seven.
Oregon pummeled the Wildcats 84-74 as a seven-point road underdog two months ago. The Ducks have won two in a row in this rivalry and they?re 5-1 ATS in the last six, with the underdog cashing in each of those six battles.
The Wildcats have won consecutive conference road games (2-0 ATS) and they?re 4-2 SU and ATS in their last nine Pac-10 visits, with the winner covering the spread in all six contests. Overall, Arizona is on a 6-2 ATS roll on the highway, and the ?Cats are 7-2 ATS as an underdog of seven points or less.
The Ducks are on ATS streaks of 13-6-3 at home and 10-3-1 on Saturdays. However, they?re just 1-3-2 ATS in their last six conference contests in Eugene.
Arizona has stayed under the total in five straight games overall and 14 of 20 on the road (including three in a row), and the under is also 6-3 in Oregon?s last nine (4-0 at home). Also, the under is 4-1 in the last five series meetings, but the one ?over? hit in the January contest at Arizona.
ATS ADVANTAGE: UNDER
MISSOURI VALLEY TOURNAMENT
(at St. Louis, Mo.)
(20) Drake (25-4, 17-7-1 ATS) vs. Creighton (21-9, 15-11 ATS)
Drake (16-3, 11-7-1 ATS) advanced to the semifinals of the Missouri Valley tournament with yesterday?s 68-46 rout of Indiana State, cashing as a 10-point favorite to halt an 0-3 ATS slide in league play. Despite the victory, the Bulldogs have followed up a 21-game winning streak by going just 4-3 in their last seven, and they?re 3-4-1 ATS in their last eight after starting the season 15-3 ATS.
After the Bulldogs? victory Friday, Creighton held off Bradley 74-70 as a 1?-point chalk in a quarterfinal game. The Bluejays are 7-3 in their last 10 games, but just 5-5 ATS.
Drake swept the season series from Creighton, winning 68-60 in overtime as a 4?-point road underdog and 75-65 as a five-point home favorite. Both games were played in an eight-day span back in January. Prior to this season, Creighton had been on a 6-0 SU and ATS in this rivalry. Also, the favorite has cashed in seven of the last eight series meetings.
Creighton is 6-1 ATS in its last seven neutral-site contests.
The over is on streaks of 20-8-1 for Creighton overall (11-5-1 last 17) and 9-2 for Drake overall, though the Bulldogs had a 4-0 ?over? streak snapped when Friday?s game versus Indiana State stayed well under the posted price. Also, the under is 3-1 in the last four head-to-head meetings.
ATS ADVANTAGE: NONE
Illinois State (23-8, 14-15 ATS) vs. Northern Iowa (18-13, 14-13 ATS)
Illinois State (14-5, 9-10 ATS in conference) opened tournament play by edging Missouri State 63-58 on Friday night, covering as a 2?-point favorite. The Redbirds have won five in a row and seven of their last eight, and they?ve followed up a 2-9 ATS slide with three consecutive spread-covers. Also, during their five-game winning streak, the Redbirds, who rank 12th nationally in scoring defense, having given up an average of just 50.8 points per game.
Northern Iowa (10-9, 11-8 ATS in conference) stunned Southern Illinois in its opening-round game Friday, scoring a 54-49 upset win as a six-point underdog. The Panthers have won and covered three in a row after going 1-5 SU and 0-6 ATS in their previous six contests.
The teams split their regular-season series, with the host winning each time. Illinois State prevailed 51-46, but failed as a 7?-point favorite, while Northern Iowa earned a 69-61 win as a 1?-point chalk three weeks later.
Illinois State has won three straight and four of its last five on the highway (3-2 ATS). Also, the Redbirds improved to 1-2 SU and ATS in neutral-site games this year with last night?s win.
Northern Iowa is now 2-4 ATS in neutral-site games this year after last night?s win, but the Panthers are 10-3 ATS in their last 12 neutral-site contests as an underdog. They?re also 6-1 ATS in their last seven after a spread-cover.
Illinois State has stayed under the total in five consecutive games. Meanwhile, Northern Iowa had a three-game ?over? streak snapped on Friday, and the under is now 11-1 in its last 12 neutral-site games.
ATS ADVANTAGE: UNDER
HORIZON LEAGUE TOURNAMENT
(at Indianapolis)
Illinois-Chicago (18-14, 18-11 ATS) vs. (14) Butler (27-3, 14-13-2 ATS)
Butler won the Horizon League title going away with a 16-2 record, including 11 consecutive conference wins to close the season, but went just 5-11-2 ATS, all as a favorite. The Bulldogs? only blemish over the regular season?s final six weeks was a 71-64 Bracketbuster home loss to Drake two weeks ago.
Illinois-Chicago (11-9, 12-8 ATS in conference) used a big second half to eliminate Loyola-Chicago 60-49 as a five-point chalk on Friday. The Flames, who defeated Youngstown State 70-59 in an opening-round tournament game on Tuesday, have won three in a row SU, and they?re 10-4 ATS in their last 14, though they?ve alternated spread-covers in their last nine contests.
Butler swept the season series from the Flames and barely got the cash in both contests, rolling 73-57 as a 14-point home favorite and 51-46 as a 4.5-point chalk
The Horizon League tournament is being played on Butler?s home court, Hinkle Fieldhouse in Indianapolis, where the Bulldogs are 13-1 (7-7 ATS), including 9-0 in conference play, but just 3-6 ATS. Meanwhile, Illinois-Chicago improved to 4-6 (5-5 ATS) in conference road games with yesterday?s win over Loyola-Chicago.
The under is 8-2 in Illinois-Chicago?s last 10 contests, including 6-2 on the highway. Also, both series meetings between these teams this year stayed low.
ATS ADVANTAGE: BUTLER and UNDER