Trump's Tweets

[Skulnik]

Graham claims the only ones against releasing Russia probe details 'are worried about being exposed'
Fox News ^ | May 26, 2019| Ronn Blitzer

Posted on ‎5‎/‎26‎/‎2019‎ ‎8‎:‎19‎:‎02‎ ‎PM by Innovative

President Trump has authorized Attorney General Bill Barr to declassify all materials related to the Russia investigation, and Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., is giving his full support.

Graham said that while Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation was "not a witch hunt" like Trump has claimed, he wants to know exactly how and why it began, and expressed suspicion for those who do not support Trump's decision to release the relevant documents.

"The people who are worried about this are worried about being exposed for taking the law in their own hands," Graham said on "Fox News Sunday."

Graham was referring to the process the FBI used in applying for a FISA warrant to monitor former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page. Republicans have claimed that the FBI improperly relied on and misrepresented information from Christopher Steele's unverified Russia dossier. Democrats have downplayed the role the dossier may have played in the process.


(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...

 

[Skulnik]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I was actually sticking up for Sleepy Joe Biden while on foreign soil. Kim Jong Un called him a ?low IQ idiot,? and many other things, whereas I related the quote of Chairman Kim as a much softer ?low IQ individual.? Who could possibly be upset with that?</p>— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1133492876296511491?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 28, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

[Skulnik]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Congresswoman Sharice Davids (D-KS) Proudly Wearing a Shirt Saying: "ALL MY HEROES KILLED COLONIZERS." How Are These People in Congress?! Is it not hate speech to cheer murder of whites? <a href="https://t.co/YyBbvWEiSA">pic.twitter.com/YyBbvWEiSA</a></p>— Denise (@Likeshesays) <a href="https://twitter.com/Likeshesays/status/1132516719501512704?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 26, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

[WhatsHisNuts]

Botched Voter Purge in Texas

Botched Voter Purge in Texas

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">It wasn?t a ?botched voter purge.? It was a botched plot to intentionally disenfranchise US citizens. <a href="https://t.co/4Or36Ic2Lm">https://t.co/4Or36Ic2Lm</a></p>— David Leopold (@DavidLeopold) <a href="https://twitter.com/DavidLeopold/status/1133343494708387840?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 28, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Skulnik must have missed this one.

 

[WhatsHisNuts]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Attorney General Barr has deliberately misrepresented key aspects of Mueller?s report and decisions in the investigation, which has helped further the president?s false narrative about the investigation.</p>— Justin Amash (@justinamash) <a href="https://twitter.com/justinamash/status/1133410107461689345?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 28, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

This is a Republican. Feel free to read the whole thread. :0003

 

[Skulnik]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Attorney General Barr has deliberately misrepresented key aspects of Mueller?s report and decisions in the investigation, which has helped further the president?s false narrative about the investigation.</p>— Justin Amash (@justinamash) <a href="https://twitter.com/justinamash/status/1133410107461689345?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 28, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

This is a Republican. Feel free to read the whole thread. :0003

Mueller doesn't want to TESTIFY before Congress, guess why Gary.

MY ANSWER, He doesn't want to commit PERJURY.

 

[Skulnik]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Rush is fit to be tied over Mueller's cowardly statement. <a href="https://t.co/rtPEz63jsh">pic.twitter.com/rtPEz63jsh</a></p>— Lisa Mei Crowley (@LisaMei62) <a href="https://twitter.com/LisaMei62/status/1133770196852891649?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 29, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

[Skulnik]

Mueller Just Proved His Entire Operation Was A Political Hit Job That Trampled The Rule Of Law

If there were any doubts about Special Counsel Robert Mueller?s political intentions, his unprecedented press conference on Wednesday should put them all to rest. As he made abundantly clear during his doddering reading of a prepared statement that repeatedly contradicted itself, Mueller had no interest in the equal application of the rule of law. He gave the game, and his nakedly political intentions, away repeatedly throughout his statement.

?It is important that the office?s written work speak for itself,? Mueller said, referring to his office?s 448-page report. Mueller?s report was released to the public by Attorney General William Barr nearly six weeks ago. The entire report, minus limited redactions required by law, has been publicly available, pored through, and dissected. Its contents have been discussed ad nauseum in print and on television. The report has been speaking for itself since April 18, when it was released.

If it?s important for the work to speak for itself, then why did Mueller schedule a press conference in which he would speak for it weeks after it was released? The statement, given the venue in which it was provided, is self-refuting.

Let?s start with the Mueller team?s unique take on the nature of a prosecutor?s job. The standard American view of justice, affirmed and enforced by the U.S. Constitution, is that all are presumed innocent absent conviction by a jury of a specific charge of criminal wrongdoing. That is, the natural legal state of an individual in this country is innocence. It is not a state or a nature bestowed by cops or attorneys. Innocence is not granted by unelected bureaucrats or federal prosecutors.

[link to thefederalist.com (secure)]

 

[Skulnik]

American Bar Associations speaks out against Mueller's criminal conduct today in his presser.

"Rele 3.8 (F): Professional Conduct

"The Prosecutor in a criminal case shall refrain from making extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused."


Well I guess that about covers that.

 

[REFLOG]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Attorney General Barr has deliberately misrepresented key aspects of Mueller?s report and decisions in the investigation, which has helped further the president?s false narrative about the investigation.</p>— Justin Amash (@justinamash) <a href="https://twitter.com/justinamash/status/1133410107461689345?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 28, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

This is a Republican. Feel free to read the whole thread. :0003

LOL, he is part owner of Michigan Industrial Tool, as well as tool factories in China. Im sure that has nothing to do with his position on Mueller report:0008

 

[WhatsHisNuts]

Here's the playbook:

-Mueller is not credible
-Ignore that the special counsel was appointed by a Republican
-Ignore that Mueller and his team were Republicans
-Blame everything on the Democrats
-Ignore the fact that Fusion GPS was first hired by Republicans
-Obama and Hillary are the real guilty parties
-Ignore the 37 indictments
-Ignore the Trump personnel convicted/jailed as a result of the investigation
-If a Republican criticizes Trump, criticize him

 

[Skulnik]

Here's the playbook:

-Mueller is not credible
-Ignore that the special counsel was appointed by a Republican
-Ignore that Mueller and his team were Republicans
-Blame everything on the Democrats
-Ignore the fact that Fusion GPS was first hired by Republicans
-Obama and Hillary are the real guilty parties
-Ignore the 37 indictments
-Ignore the Trump personnel convicted/jailed as a result of the investigation
-If a Republican criticizes Trump, criticize him

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The fact that Dems are running with it will turn even more people away from the Dem Party. Dems and Independents who believe in the rule of law and believe a person is innocent until proven guilty will be turned off by attempts to impeach an innocent President.<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/WalkAway?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#WalkAway</a> <a href="https://t.co/o372kD8MZu">https://t.co/o372kD8MZu</a></p>— Lisa Mei Crowley (@LisaMei62) <a href="https://twitter.com/LisaMei62/status/1134073725144444930?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 30, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

[Skulnik]

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-...s-already-been-indicted-russia-investigation/

 

[Penguinfan]

I find it funny neither side can accept two things that are undeniable and still model their entire existence around:

1. Trump will not be impeached, get over it.

2. There will be no wall, deal with it.


Can we all move on to running the country now?


Idiots on both sides, that's the problem here.

 

[Skulnik]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">1) LMAO! Trump is screaming it at you all in broad daylight!<br><br>He is taunting the deep state and the dems. Trump is engaging in theatre here by boasting about the meeting where he took control of Mueller.<br><br>Let?s break this colossal tweet down and go back to the genesis of the SC. <a href="https://t.co/NFqINxsYW8">https://t.co/NFqINxsYW8</a></p>— Clandestine (@RodSneaky) <a href="https://twitter.com/RodSneaky/status/1134197687400534016?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 30, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

[Skulnik]

HUGE! Barr Investigating Why a 2016 ?Counterintelligence Defensive Briefing? Did NOT Warn Trump Campaign About ?Russian Outreach

[link to www.thegatewaypundit.com (secure)]


According to Fox News reporter Catherine Herridge, the FBI did not tell then-candidate Donald Trump that the ?Russians? were trying to infiltrate his campaign during a defensive intel briefing in mid-August of 2016.

Counterintelligence chief Peter Strzok was a coordinator for the FBI briefing, which included multiple agencies in August of 2016, just 18 days after Strzok opened ?Crossfire Hurricane,? the CI investigation into ?Trump-Russia.?

 

[Skulnik]

WILLIAM BARR BLASTS MEDIA FOR IGNORING SURVEILLANCE AGAINST TRUMP CAMPAIGN

[link to dailycaller.com (secure)]






William Barr pulled no punches when discussing the media?s coverage of the origins of the Trump-Russia probe, as well as of the surveillance activities carried out against the Trump campaign.
?Normally the media would be interested in letting the sunshine in and finding out what the truth is,? Barr told CBS News in an interview that aired Friday.
?They?re supposed to be the watchdogs of, you know, our civil liberties.?

Attorney General William Barr accused the media in a new interview of being uninterested in finding out about the origins of the Trump-Russia probe, and of shirking their duty as watchdogs for the public.

 

[Skulnik]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="und" dir="ltr"> <a href="https://t.co/PujIAeB2Mh">pic.twitter.com/PujIAeB2Mh</a></p>— Johnny Montana (@agenda42) <a href="https://twitter.com/agenda42/status/1134636068060483586?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 1, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

[WhatsHisNuts]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Protesters wearing red jumpsuits and hats marked "Trump Babysitters" were working on an inflatable depicting President Trump as a baby, dressed in a diaper. The balloon will fly over Parliament Square, a stone's throw from the Houses of Parliament. <a href="https://t.co/0tDlpqZDvU">https://t.co/0tDlpqZDvU</a> <a href="https://t.co/4GJLCCh7Nw">pic.twitter.com/4GJLCCh7Nw</a></p>— NBC News (@NBCNews) <a href="https://twitter.com/NBCNews/status/1135848442692026368?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 4, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

[REFLOG]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Protesters wearing red jumpsuits and hats marked "Trump Babysitters" were working on an inflatable depicting President Trump as a baby, dressed in a diaper. The balloon will fly over Parliament Square, a stone's throw from the Houses of Parliament. <a href="https://t.co/0tDlpqZDvU">https://t.co/0tDlpqZDvU</a> <a href="https://t.co/4GJLCCh7Nw">pic.twitter.com/4GJLCCh7Nw</a></p>— NBC News (@NBCNews) <a href="https://twitter.com/NBCNews/status/1135848442692026368?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 4, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

6 protestors :lol: