2010 World Cup Picks

GoldenTaint

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 26, 2009
870
23
0
[Halftime]

Pick: North Korea-Ivory Coast 5 under -503, risking 503 to win 100 :0074

Pick: North Korea-Ivory Coast 4' under -215, risking 430 to win 200 :0074
 
Last edited:

GoldenTaint

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 26, 2009
870
23
0
[halftime]

Pick: Brazil -1 (Portugal) +571, risking 100 to win 571 :sadwave:
 
Last edited:

GoldenTaint

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 26, 2009
870
23
0
Pick: Spain -1/2 corners (Chile) -410, risking 820 to win 200 :0074 (4-3)

why: Spain will dominate possession, the game will be played in Chile territory, more corners for Spain
 
Last edited:

GoldenTaint

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 26, 2009
870
23
0
Pick: Honduras-Switzerland 3 under -226, risking 904 to win 400 :0074

why: don't see Honduras scoring. should be two goals at most, three if a freak score, not more. good price for no more than 10% risk of loss
 
Last edited:

GoldenTaint

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 26, 2009
870
23
0
Pick: Honduras-Switzerland 2 under +155, risking 300 to win 465 :0074

why: much greater chance to go under 2 than over 2, good return
 
Last edited:

GoldenTaint

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 26, 2009
870
23
0
ANALYSIS: in reading these threads, don't see much attention to corners. I kind of like these bets, particularly where you can ID a team that you think will win but are nearly certain will control the ball and pace and action. In that case, it is much easier to get tripped up by a freak goal, whereas if you have the corners, the risk is diffused. Betting on corners is like betting the phillies will beat the royals over seven games as opposed to one game. of course, you pay a higher price, but it seems that the risk is greatly reduced. only seen a couple freak corners results out of the first round (where the CLEAR favorite, ie the team favored by more than -300, didn't come thru). in the vast majority of cases where the better team is identifiable, where you can get a good fix on which half of the field the game will be played in, you can be pretty close to 90% sure one side will win the corners. another way to look at it is to look for the side, however good, that packs it in on defense and relies on counterstrikes for offense. japan or north korea are good examples. they might win the game, but they'll still lose the corners because most of the game is played in their half of the field. teams with great technical skill, like arg and spain and brazil, teams that focus on completed passes, are always going to be likely to dominate corners against mediocre or poor teams - to dominate them above and beyond the high price you have to take, typically -300 to -450 range. i dont think the prices reflect the actual likelihood. pretty much the only way you can get tripped up here is a side that is actually TOO dominant (ie, scores a bunch of goals and then kicks back) or that doesn't have the normal incentive to attack/score goals - as per spain today, which very nearly screwed me, only winning corners by one, 4-3 over chile. apart from that, "better" (better passing) more aggressive teams will win corners pretty much as a mathematical function. corners are easier to obtain than goals, so very often even a team that dominates play might not score, whereas almost always it will end up ahead on corners.
 

GoldenTaint

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 26, 2009
870
23
0
(ledger: -298)

Pick: USA +1/2 goals (Ghana) -263, risking 526 to win 200 :0074

Pick: USA -1/2 corners (Ghana) +109, risking 500 to win 545 :sadwave: (2-2)

why: i expect usa to have more possession than ghana, which will tend to counterstrike. more possession should and usually does lead to more corners, and the extra size, i mean odds on, is nice too

(ledger: -598)

WHINE: ghana gets a corner kick in last 10 seconds, turning win into loss. :facepalm:
 
Last edited:

GoldenTaint

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 26, 2009
870
23
0
(ledger: -598)

Pick: Germany-England corners 9' over -112, risking 560 to win 500 :0074 (4-6)

NOTE: it is telling about gambling psychology that there is no term for the opposite of bad beat. so we will say this wonder win on corners was as lucky as the loss on ghana-usa corners last game was unlucky

Pick: 2Parlay: Germany +1 (England); Argentina +1/2 (Mexico), risking 726 to win 200 :0074

why: think there will be lots of attacking by both sides in Germany-England, resulting in corners. think there's a good chance germany gets down a goal, which will result in intensified attacking and make the over on corners even likelier. as for parlay, only thing favoring england over germany is experience - but that experience is losing - to germany...in big games. germany is likelier to win, and if england wins in regulation, i highly doubt it will be by more than one goal. same with argentina. mexico has a history of coming up small. i highly doubt they can do better than tie argentina in regulation. (both bets for 90m + stoppage only, not including extra period/shootout)
 
Last edited:

GoldenTaint

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 26, 2009
870
23
0
Pick: Argentina -1/2 corners (Mexico) -285, risking 570 to win 200 :sadwave: (2-5)

why: argentina has absolutely dominated corners to this point in the competition. mexico has been out-cornered. i don't expect a wide disparity here, but i do expect arg will end up with more corners. the danger is that arg will get up 2 or 3 goals and then relax and counterattack. mex is pretty good at passing-possession, and if they get down 2 goals in 1h, this bet could lose. but i'm guessing that doesn't happen, that this goes back and forth, with a small to medium advantage for arg in both goals and corners.
 
Last edited:

GoldenTaint

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 26, 2009
870
23
0
Pick: Argentina -1/2 goals (Mexico) -157, risking 471 to win 300 :0074

why: history. arg is flat better. i think arg wins by at least 1 in regulation, and if it does win by 1, i want to get paid, not pushed. -157 is very fair price for that result
 
Last edited:

GoldenTaint

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 26, 2009
870
23
0
Pick: Slovakia-Netherlands 3 under -203, risking 812 to win 400 PUSH

Pick: Slovakia +1/2 corners (Netherlands) +225, risking 200 to win 450 :sadwave: (2-5)

why: don't see huge scoring game. slovakia has won corners in all three matches, worth a shot that continues here

ledger: (-368)
 
Last edited:

GoldenTaint

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 26, 2009
870
23
0
Pick: Brazil (Chile) advances to next round -425, risking 850 to win 200 :0074

Pick: Brazil-Chile 3 under -201, risking 804 to win 400 PUSH

Pick: Chile +1/2 corners (Brazil) +210, risking 400 to win 880 :sadwave: (6-8)

why: history says brazil beats chile. most feel this will be high scoring, i think it's a lot likelier there are less than 3 goals scored than more. as for corners, both sides have won more corners than lost in stage one. i think corners are basically a tossup, brazil has played more defensively this tournament, and if brazil gets up chile will come at her even harder. chile says going in she's going to be on the attack. so it's worth putting out a decent amount for more than double return.
 
Last edited:

GoldenTaint

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 26, 2009
870
23
0
Pick: Japan-Paraguay 3 under -402, risking 808 to win 200 :0074
 
Last edited:

GoldenTaint

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 26, 2009
870
23
0
ledger: (-398)

Pick: Spain -1/2 corners (Portugal) -147, risking 882 to win 600 :0074

Pick: Spain-Portugal corners 9' over -109, risking 654 to win 600 :sadwave: (6-3)

why: spain is a great possession team, tends to spend the entire game around its opponent's goal box. portugal has not yielded any goals. this suggests it will be difficult for spain to score, so they'll keep the pressure on, as opposed to getting up by 2 or 3 and relaxing. portugal is good, and will get some corners itself, but spain is better, and at -147, it's worth laying a good chunk for a very good return. in any case, given the technical quality, the great passing and attacking skills of these teams, i think is very likely that total corners is over 10. if one team gets up, the other team will go wild trying to equalize. both teams are high quality, not the draggy-draw type play by teams with inferior technical control (england, slovakia). spain played very sluggishly last game, but that should clear up here as the incentive is back.

POSTSCRIPT: utterly ridiculous bad-beat loss on 9'o. There should have been at least 13 corners but ended on 9, painful. Easily could have been 7 corners in first 15 minutes, instead of 4. Somehow no corners in last 20 minutes.

ledger: (-456)
 
Last edited:
Bet on MyBookie
Top