Farewell Matt Leinert
- Thread starter CWood97
- Start date
DerekNJND said:
Great point about UM, especially since I indicated Nebraska was the right side prior to the game (see Volfans thread). You're a homer, I'm a capper.
btw, I don't see where I compared Leinert's life to my own. You picked the fight by saying "its obvious you never went to college".
I am done with you. Go find an Ohio State fan to get in a pissing contest with.
A Notre Dame guy talking about women? Have you ever seen the Notre Dame women? They have to run over to St Mary's and that's just a different breed of dog.
:mj07: :mj07:Sun Tzu said:
Btw Sun, congrats to you and your Horns. I trust you had a hell of a time in Pasadena.
Scott4USC said:
Scott, I'm not sure what his argument was, but it was prefaced by saying "I'm sure you didn't go to college".
btw, pretty impressive sig you got there. Puts things in perspective re: USC's run. It'll be interesting to see if Pete keeps it going or they go the way of Miami.
Sun Tzu said:
I guess you prefer the comforts of same sex relationships? HEY, what you do on YOUR time, is completely up to you....
CWood97 said:
You criticized the guy for staying in college another season. I simply pointed out the benefits of him staying put.
I've been to U of M, people do have fun there, just NOT you i guess
CWood97 said:
When did I say ND would win OR cover?
If I'm such a homer and not a capper, then why did I make almost a grand off ND this season, betting a team that was only 6-5 ATS? At 100-150 per play, had to be some bets the other way there.. WRONG again
I still dont think you even went to college :mj07:
DerekNJND said:
What if he didnt? Big deal, not everyone goes to college.
Are you mocking with all your little :mj07: all of the young men & women of our military fightin & dying for this country overseas everyday as well? A good % of those brave soldiers havent attended college. I would like to see you :mj07: at them to thier families.
The arrogance, ego-centric & pumpous nature of your being just coming blazing into focus more & more clearly with every statement you make on this site.
:gf:
3 Seconds said:
Nice try. I'm not mocking anyone, just making a point about Matt Leinhart.
Did you fight for the military? Nope! So leave them out of it. Nobody made fun of the armed services, you have now gone waaaaaaaaaaaaay past the line that your crossed two weeks ago!
Derek, you lost it?......That Ohio St loss is getting to you.......I agree with Sun Tzu, women at ND are hideous.......I see you keep calling people out and using this guy :mj07: alot.......Whats up with all the insults...........You say you went to ND, did you play any sports?.....I'm going to say No........All the people I know that went to ND and didnt play sports (6 out of 6) were all tools. Thats 100%.....I'm sure it doesn't drop off much throughout campus and I'm sure you are part of the 97% tools that dont play sports........so cut the insults and the know it all shit.........you and scotty do make a nice couple though!
DerekNJND said:
In this example alone you are mocking CWodd97 & every person that didnt go to college.
Actually, son I am from a military family, I am 4th generation US ARMY. I served my time out of Ft. Bliss in El Paso, Tx & a small stint @ Ft. Dix in NJ. Not to mention my little brother was in Iraq & just recently got back. I can & will speak about our troops whenever I please a$$hole.
So the next time you choose to open that mouth of yours where nothing but shi!t comes out of think twice.
Last edited:
Yeah, it almost defies all laws of probablility how consistently disgusting ND women are. The 'doability' % is higher for women in prison.
kosar said:
I can admit when someone else is right.
You HAVE GOT ME HERE! There are some real COUGARS at ND. Most of the goodies ARE across the street. I'm not sure why this is relevant, getting chicks in college is getting chick in college NO MATTER where it is.
For all of those criticizing the ND chicks, I'm sure you were ALL boning California cheerleaders in college right? :mj07: Get real.
BTW, my gf im with now went to VTECH, I would NEVER settle down with an ND chick. All the ones I dated got old real quick.
Dice34 said:
I played intramural baseball and basketball. Also I fought in Bengal Bouts 2 years. In case you dont know, its a school wide boxing tourny.
So you know alot of tools? Hmmm, birds of a feather....
I think that makes more sense than you implying I am a tool just because you hang out with tools, right?
Personally, I dont care who you hung out with. You dont know me, and I've learned that those who call names are the ones who usually fit the profile more accurately
Read my post. Women at ND ARENT that great, thats why I didnt end up with one. Doesnt mean there arent some diamonds in the rough though. Just gotta work a little harder than at most places..
Last edited:
3 Seconds said:
What I said has NOTHING to do with the army. I said if someone criticizes someone for leaving college EARLY, they must have NEVER GONE THEMSELVES! That is a SPECIFIC post AIMED AT ONE PERSON ON THIS BOARD, not all who didnt go to college. The mocking is aimed at PEOPLE WHO CRITICIZE LEINHART FOR NOT LEAVING COLLEGE! ALL people in the army who didnt go to college DO NOT FIT this prospectus.
Personally, I dont care what you have done with your trifling life, so PLEASE dont tell me any more about it.
Your assumptions and generalizations MAKE NO SENSE!!
I was "mocking" Cwood, and you generalized that to mean I mock ALL who didnt go to college, particularly those in the armed forces? Wheres the logic there?
Its simple. You're trying to attack me under a HEROIC NATIONAL cause. You are SUCH A JOKE :mj07: :mj07:
Derek,
I do not agree with this war, but I think it's sick that you mock our soldiers. This might blow your pea-brain but it is possible to do both. I joined the Army AFTER I graduated from college and there are many more in the same boat. For you to imply that our soldiers are ignorant, while they're in Iraq protecting your right to be a jerkoff is the lowest of the low.
I do not agree with this war, but I think it's sick that you mock our soldiers. This might blow your pea-brain but it is possible to do both. I joined the Army AFTER I graduated from college and there are many more in the same boat. For you to imply that our soldiers are ignorant, while they're in Iraq protecting your right to be a jerkoff is the lowest of the low.
kosar said:
I mock you, not our soldiers. You are not a soldier. You cant even win a debate with someone half your age, how could you defend a country?? :mj07:
I made fun of ONE PERSON who I dont think went to college. How does that involve EVERYONE who never went to college?
If I say I dont like corn, does that mean I dont like ALL vegetables? Your logic is flawed.
If I say I dont like corn, does that mean I dont like ALL vegetables? Your logic is flawed.
kosar said:
ND women arent special, but lets see a picture of that hog you sleep next to before YOU become JUDGE AND JURY :mj07:
or the ram, whatever you're into man...hey you start talkin about prison man and I begin to doubt your heterosexual credentials a bit.
DerekNJND said:
Actually D-Nice your logic is flawed.
A law student wants to argue logic. Now I am sure you had to have taken some mathematics or philosophy in your undergrad program.
I suggest you go re-read the laws of logical proof, specifically the rules of inference.
Premise 1: CHood(a) is laughable cause he didnt got to college.(q)
Premise 2: Anyone(b) is laughable cause he/she didnt got to college. (q)
Here is your mathematical proof that it is logically correct w/ justifications & rule of inference noted.
1. a-->q...................Premise (P)
2. b-->q...................Premise (P)
3. ~avq...................1. Switcheroo (T1)
4. ~bvq...................2. Switcheroo (T1)
5. (~avq)^(~bvq)......3, 4. Conjuction (C)
6. (~a^~b) vq...........5. Distributive Law (T1)
7. ~(avb)vq...............6. De Morgans Law (S)
8. (avb)-->q.............. 7. Switcheroo (T1)
So, therefore, smart guy by mocking one (a) with a :mj07: based solely on the condition of not attending college, it is safe,LOGICALLY ,to substitute any that meet that sole condition stated to apply to (a) as well.
Way to go D-Nice :clap:
Last edited:
