NBA 2020 Playoff Plays

Englishman

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 20, 2003
2,268
26
0
Lincoln Park, New Jersey
Confession - I rarely watch NBA on TV.
This will sound strange, and rightfully so, but I've formed a habit of kicking back and watching the game on espn's gamecast. For two reasons:

First, I find the graphics oddly addicting. If you want a score, you root for the solid dot, if you want a miss, you root for the empty circle. Or, you root for the ball to go through the hoop, or bounce off. (Strange, yes, I know.)



I don't think this is weird at all. I prefer to watch the games on Bet365.com. I just can't bring myself to watch the games themselves....so many interminable commercials, coaching histrionics, bizarre and biased commentary.

Not just NBA either....MLB, NFL and even tennis and golf. I watch golf on the PGA tour website.

This is the best way I can just cut out all the BS.

Where is that Scarlet Knights story you promised me?
 
Last edited:

RBD

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 23, 2020
1,274
50
48
True story:

Early 80's, Neighbor Roger stops by on a Saturday morning.

Roger is a newbie to sports betting, wants to know who I like on the day's slate.

I tell him I have some early game action on the local boys, the Scarlet Knights.
He calls his guy, places a wager.

We're getting 13 points.

With about a minute left to go in the game, Rutgers down 6-0, the other team scores a touchdown.
Rutgers is now down by 12 points.

The opponent's head coach calls a time out. The game goes to a commercial.

"We're fucked," I said.

"Yeah, that sucks. We were a minute away from winning. Oh well, could have been worse, we could have lost," Roger said.

"We ARE going to lose," I said.

"How do you figure? We're getting 13, it's a push."

I had to explain it to the novice.

"You see, the thing about college ball, there's this thing called The Alumni. It's made up of former students. They're now successful businessmen, and they like to help their Alma Mater out with financial contributions. They also like to bet on their games. And, like all bettors, they like winning more than losing. So, if a head coach wants to keep his job, it's wise to keep the Alumni happy."

"So?"

"So, let me ask you a question. Why does a head coach, whose team just scored a touchdown to put them up by two scores, call a time out, with less than a minute left in the game?"

"I don't know. Why?"

"Because he needs time to get his two point conversion people ready and on the field. They're about to go for two points, which is why I said, 'We're fucked.' We're about to lose by one point."

"You're crazy," Roger said. "They'll kick the extra point, we get a push."

The commercial ends.

The team takes the field.

No place holder, no kicker; QB under center.

I didn't say a word, just gave Roger-the-newbie a knowing frown.

Yes, of course, the two-point conversion was good.
Rutgers lost by 14.
I lost my bet.
Roger lost his bet BUT . . . learned a lesson.
 
Last edited:

RBD

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 23, 2020
1,274
50
48
Re: Rutgers
For a brief shining moment, there was Schiano.
But then, the natural order of things was restored.


Today's spots look pretty much like Wednesday's card when they first forfeited. Copied and pasted from there:

Slim pickings today, no Q1 plays qualify.

If anyone is looking at Q1 stuff, here are some numbers to consider.
Q1 in Orl/Milw is at 56'.

Here are the Q1 totals from the first four games of the series: 56, 38, 54, 40.

Not one Q1 has gone Over 56' (which is the same total the books hung on the last Q1.)

They are averaging 47 pts in Q1, which is 9' points fewer than today's #.

ALL those numbers point to Un 56'.
Which makes me lean to the Over because . . .
If winning was as simple as betting on that which looks obvious, there would be more winners than books.
There are not more winners than books.

Temp plays today: Orl/Milw Un, OKC/Hou Ov, Milw -14.

Record on sides in this system, 8-3, Favs 4-1, Dogs 4-2. Totals are 6-6, Ov 2-1, Un 4-5.

Team total spots: Port Ov 104', LAL Ov 118.
(On Wednesday, OKC qualified as a team total Over and I gave it out as a Buy. It no longer qualifies because the line on today's game has gone up; it misses by 1/2 point now.)

No buys for me yet.
Still trying to formulate an opinion as to what play will be like after a few days off.
Are they going to want to put on a show?
Are they going to play like lazy slugs who wanted another day off?

I'm buying something, not sure what, but I'll be back.

Update: Not a lot of data on the record with only three games charted, but I took the OKC/Hou game Over 228.
 
Last edited:

RBD

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 23, 2020
1,274
50
48
Recap: In an NBA playoff game, OKC put up not one, not two, but three quarters of under 20 points. Looks like somebody wants to escape the bubble and see their friends and family.
Missed with the Over, back to.500.

Another good day for the systems shared here.
Milw game Under, W
Milw - 14 Push
OKC game Over, L
Port team total Over, W
LAL team total Over, W

I'll count the Milwaukee game as a Push because that's the number my morning post here had it at, but if you got 14 you need more outs or you're a lousy shopper because 13' was the common number.
Call it a 3-1-1 day on the systems. Combine it with the other two days where we had games played this week and the record is 9-5.

Back with plays after I finish 'capping.

First update - no Q1 plays. Damn.

Second update - Temperature plays:
Tor -2, Bos/Tor Ov, LAC/Dal Un, Den/Utah Un.
Record on these:
Sides 8-3, Favs 4-1, Dogs 4-2
Totals 7-7, Ov 2-2, Un 5-5.

Update: Still working on team totals, have one in the first game, Toronto under 109'.
The record on these is 6-11, so I would fade this if I was buying it.
CORRECTION - rushing to get these numbers in before tip-off, the Toronto team total is an Over not an under. Record on these is 29-19.
I bought it, but won't count it as a buy here, it's too close to tip off for people to get in on it if they wanted to.

Finished with Team totals. Nothing in the Clipper game, both Denver and Utah qualify as Over's.

For now, just the two buys below.


Buys:
Tor -2
Bos/Tor Ov 217'
 
Last edited:

RBD

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 23, 2020
1,274
50
48
Toronto shoots 28% in the first half.
TWENTY-EIGHT.
5-24 from 3-point range??!!
This, from the defending champs?
Just 42 points from the team that put up 77 in the first half of their last game.
Turnovers, fouls, can't hit layups.
Ugly.
 

RBD

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 23, 2020
1,274
50
48
Recap: Off an 0-2 morning, back to two games under .500.

Log book shows that a few days ago we had the same situation as we have tonight, both teams Over in the team total system, and the game Under in the temperature system.
Result that night was Denver team total went Over, Utah team total stayed Under, game went Over.

I'm buying the game Over 219 and Utah Over 111.
 

RBD

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 23, 2020
1,274
50
48
Recap: From my last post - "Log book shows that a few days ago we had the same situation as we have tonight, both teams Over in the team total system, and the game Under in the temperature system.
Result that night was Denver team total went Over, Utah team total stayed Under, game went Over.

I'm buying the game Over 219 and Utah Over 111."


And the results last night were the same - Den team total Ov, game Ov, Utah team total Un.

I chose Utah instead of Denver for my team total buy, and got a split, losing the team total, winning the full game Over. Record now 13-15.
After a 36 pt first quarter, I was looking good, but the Jazz folded after that, putting up 20 and 23 in the next two quarters. They were losers by the end of the third quarter, failing to put away Denver and their non-existent defense for the second time. Now the Jazz face elimination. The team has no killer instinct, no heart, and Gobert might be the most uncoordinated player I've ever seen. When he tries to dribble it looks like he's wearing mittens.

Back later with plays.

Update: Third day in a row with no plays qualifying for a Q1 spot (Houston missed by .1 There has to be a differential of 3 pts or > between the # I make, and the book's #. Hou came in at 2.9 but I don't force a play, it either fits the parameters of the system or it does not.)

Temperature play has one fit, Mia/Mil Ov, but record on these is 2-3 so no buy for me.

Two team totals qualify: Mia and Hou, I'm buying both.

Buys
Mia Ov 109'
Hou Ov 115'
 
Last edited:

Coach Woody

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 12, 2003
1,409
5
0
58
Colorado
RBD,

Thanks for the plays....

I was all over the over last night.....been riding that play with the NUGGETS over for a long time now. hope to keep rolling it.

I like the plays tonight. I am seeing many people on the under in both games so that makes me even more excited about the over tonight. They are looking game and could be right but team wise I love it.

Was wondering, I know you are a big college football guy....are you going to be playing anything early on here in the year. I see that games for the books start this week. Just curious.

Thanks and roll some overs tonight

Coach Woody
 

RBD

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 23, 2020
1,274
50
48
Coach,

College football is the only sport I make investments in, and I will be sharing my plays here.
I already have two spots circled (neither of them are in my best system), haven't bought anything yet.
Still have more work to do.

I'll try to keep it simple, not too much info. I know when I post fades on plays with losing records people sometimes misinterpret or are unsure what I am recommending. I'll avoid that this year and just post the plays.
(And I'll use the word "system" though I don't like it, because using alternate terms can be confusing.)

My best system is on Ov/Un's, with Unders being the most profitable over the last 14-15 years.
It's a contrarian spot - when a certain % of indicators and recent history show the game to favor the Over, I bet the other way and take it Under.

I love handicapping football (college, not Pro.)
I don't really like NBA, this is the first year I tried to handicap it.
Even with $ riding on it, I find myself changing the channel and not watching. And the audio is the worst.
I try not not be political in my sports posts, but yesterday, one of the female announcers said something like, "We need more diversity in the world, for example (I missed who she named) is predominantly white. That has to change."
She's calling out a group for being predominantly white, while doing a telecast of an NBA game.
The lack of self awareness, not to mention hypocrisy, is staggering.

Racism will not end, when, as many people say, "We stop judging someone by the color of their skin."
Racism will end when we stop seeing the color of a person's skin, and simply see people as people.


Anyway . . .

I used to like MLB the best, but it bores me as much as the NBA. I like college hoops.

I'll leave you (and anyone else reading this and would like to participate) with a question:

What is the only sport where you can bet on the entity that wins, but your ticket is a loser that you cannot collect on?
 
Last edited:

RBD

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 23, 2020
1,274
50
48
Horse racing is a good guess. That sport is as crooked as it gets.
But when a horse wins and is taken down for an infraction it didn't really win.
The answer is - boxing.
Anyone who bets the fights KNOWS what I'm talking about.

I used to write for Ring Sports Magazine, had ringside press passes, access to fighters, post-fight press conferences etc. Only sport I know where the guy you bet on can beat the hell out of his opponent, land more punches - both jabs AND power punches - and lose on the judge's scorecard.
Or, you bet the Over, and the ref jumps in and stops the fight when the guy isn't really hurt that badly, and the Under pays out.
I've also benefitted from crooked decisions, bet on a guy who got beat only to be declared the winner, but, like bad beats in other sports, it seems you're on the wrong side of the fix more often than the good side.

Recap: Split last night.
Lost the unit banked on the Miami team total Over when the Houston team total lost.
Hard to get a W with an Over when you start out 3-18 from three point range.

And speaking of fixes and crooked sports, I'm not surprised to see a lot of people yelling about Westwood fixing the game last night, but I don't agree. He makes too much money to have to stoop to fixing.
He just sucked.
I saw two turnovers in a row in Q2, one of them was a pass to no one.
I guess he was seeing ghosts with his teams' jersey on.
With under ten seconds to go, tied at 100, had a chance to get to OT and a possible win, but Houston foolishly fouled OKC, giving them two free throws. Down 102-100, with just 7 seconds left, still had a chance to tie,
but . . . Westwood happens. Another turnover. Which is one of many reasons people are screaming "Fix!"


Today - no Q1 plays again.
Lines are tighter now, may not see any more of these. A shame as they are at 24-13, Favs 5-1, Dogs 19-12.

Temp spots: Same as game one in the series, Bos/Tor qualifies as an Over. At 2-4 this may be worth a fade.

Team totals: All four teams qualify as Overs today. Seems like the source I use for numbers here has adjusted expectations/math that calls for high scoring in the later games in this series.
Here are the team total plays that qualified in the first six games:

Game 1 - Utah Under (Loser), Den Under (Loser) Full game Over by 45 pts
Game 2 - no plays
Game 3 - no plays
Game 4 - Denver Over (Winner), Utah Over (Winner) Full game went Over by 39'
Game 5 - Utah Over (Loser), Denver Over (Winner) Full game Over by 4'
Game 6 - Denver Over (Winner) Utah Over (Loser) Full game Over by 7
Game 7 - Utah Over (?), Denver Over (?)

Overall team totall record 4-4, Den 3-1, Utah 1-3
Full game total record is 4-0 Over.

Just some thoughts - seems most people exect Utah to complete the choke job and lose today.
I hate betting with popular opinion, and I can't see the Jazz losing three straight times to this Denver defense.
Then again, they don't have to lose three in a row. They only have to lose once.
And the Jazz did look totally flat last time out; no excuse for that in an elimination game.

Toronto expected to bounce back today, but I don't know, this matchup seems like trouble for them.

Back with buys after I figure out my plays.

Buys:
In the early game, I'm going with the fade of the 2-4 Temp spot, I bought Bos/Tor Un 218'.
Also, no system play, bought Tor -1'.
 
Last edited:

RBD

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 23, 2020
1,274
50
48
Stick with the systems and I do okay.
Hit with the Under, lose with the non-system play on Raptors.
Toronto has no heart, had eight point lead going into the fourth, get outscored something like 20 -8 at the start of the quarter.
Reminds me of the Jazz, so . . .
adding Denver -1
 

Coach Woody

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 12, 2003
1,409
5
0
58
Colorado
Great call on the Nuggets last night....had them as well.

Ugly win but we will take it.

Interested to see what your numbers turn up today....I like a few plays here. so will wait to see if they match mine.
Looking heat buck over and Rocket Thunder under

but again no plays yet still trying to decide if I am missing something.
 

RBD

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 23, 2020
1,274
50
48
Yes Coach, that was ugly. As ugly as it gets.

How ugly?

Utah had a 36 point first half.
That is the exact same amount of points they scored in the first QUARTER of their last game.

Denver had a 15 point third quarter.
I'm not going to lose a half-hour of my day by opening every box score of theirs to see if that was the lowest quarter they had all year, but I'm pretty sure it was.

Making things even worse - they scored only 15 AGAIN,
IN THE FOURTH QUARTER,
OF A PLAYOFF GAME,
WITH ELIMINATION ON THE LINE!!!

And, if Conley's last second shot - a shot that was as in-the-basket as much as any missed shot I have ever seen - didn't pop back out, Murray's horrendous, moronic mistake (not dribbling the clock down until he got fouled) would have been entered into the books right next to Wenber's "time-out called when they had no time outs left" as one of the biggest bonehead moves in the history of the sport.

People are getting on Craig for missing the layup - and righfully so (how does a "pro" baller miss an uncontested layup like that??!!?) but Murray should not have made the pass. He almost single-handedly sent his team home from the playoffs.

I have no doubt in my mind that last night and this morning, all over the world, there are bettors who are swearing off ever betting the NBA again. It was THAT ugly.

I felt bad for Mitchell, he put in a helluva an effort in the second half, but then I heard his post game comment, which, naturally, the sjwp's (Social Justice Warrior Princesses) at ESPN just HAD to feature under an all CAPS heading in their story on the game:
"Mitchell said the pain on his face was nothing compared to the families of people who have been victims of police brutality and racism."

They preach at us in the pregame show.
They preach while the game is being played.
They preach during the interviews after commercial breaks (at one break last night, the "sports reporter" asked two questions of the coach, a required question about the game, then the real question she wanted to ask - the setup for further preaching about sjw issues.)
They preach during the post game show.

I DON'T CARE WHAT SIDE OF POLITICS ANYONE RESIDES ON, BUT KEEP IT OUT OF SPORTS!!!
Or at least limit it to just 25% of your "sports" coverage (<- sarc.)

And they wonder why their ratings are down over 20% including night games and weekends.


Recap: Hit two of three last night. Missed with the Raptors, hit with the fade on the 2-4 Temp play, now 2-5.
Came back in my post and kicked myself in the ass for buying a non-system play, and, with two system plays left (team total Over on Utah and Den) I didn't take either, went with a non-system play again, got lucky when Denver hung on for a W. Record 16-17.

I didn't take either of the Overs because Utah lost the last two times in that spot, and though Denver had been winning in that spot (at 3-1, as noted in my morning post) I don't like going to the well too often.

After watching Toronto collapse, I remembered the Jazz's attitude/demeanor during and after their last collapse/blown chance to advance, the lack of aggressiveness after the first quarter, the hesitation to shoot (no one wanted to look bad and miss) the finger-pointing, back-biting, etc.
You cannot win at the top level of sports unless you are totally focused at the task at hand.
Utah did not seem to be focused, so I pulled the trigger on Denver.

I'll be back as soon as I can with today's plays.

First Update:

Note - ALL four games this week have stayed Under the total. And by no small margin, an avg. of 26 pts.
Yes, the Den game skews that number to the high side because it stayed Un by 59 pts, but remove that game from the equation and the avg. is still double digits at 15 pts. That's no small differential.

The books, of course, have factored this into the lines.
Last Mia/Milw game was 224, today's is 221.
Last OKC/Hou game was 226', today's is 217'.

Still, even with that drop, does anyone feel like betting Overs today?

Q1 plays - nothing qualifies.

Temperature plays: OKC/Hou Over, fade material at 2-5.

No buys for me yet.

Second Update: Two team totals qualify as Overs, Mia and OKC.
After four losses yesterday, this system is now at 31-24, 56%.
It was hitting at 65%, but has been dropping steadily (all things even out over time.)

Factoring in the drop in W % for this play,
AND after watching OKC put up three quarters with less than 20 pts vs. Houston just two games ago,
AND the way the games stayed Under yesterday,
AND OKC's PPG avg. of 104 in this series, there is little chance that I'll play Over 111'.

Miami team total Over is a possible for me, only concern is a slight let up with a 2-0 lead in the series?

No buys yet.
 
Last edited:

lakrfan2000

Registered
Forum Member
Feb 5, 2017
191
4
18
Miami team total Over is a possible for me, only concern is a slight let up with a 2-0 lead in the series?

Hey RBD, Love the write-ups and your handicapping skills. Just one note and it might be a typo. The Heat are only up 1-0 in the series against The Bucks.

Good luck today!
 

RBD

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 23, 2020
1,274
50
48
Laker,
No not a typo, just a diabolical plot to get you to stop in and say "hello."

(My error, I was thinking of the Celtics. THANKS for picking me up on it. As I always say, I do a LOT of work with numbers, no matter how much I double-check and edit for corrections something can always slip by me. Good luck to you, also.)

Despite all the Unders this week, and the downward trend in the team total system, I'm taking Mia Ov 108.
I hit with this on Monday, and I like that they didn't need a freakish quarter (like a 36 or >) to score 115.
They were consistent at 29, 31, 32 and 23.
The 23 in Q4 was likely because they had the game in hand. I think Milwaukee, down 0-1, will do better than two 23 pt Q's and an 18 pt Q4, which hopefully will push Miami higher also.

Also adding the full game Ov 221'.
 
Last edited:

lakrfan2000

Registered
Forum Member
Feb 5, 2017
191
4
18
Congratulations! I had both overs and The Heat for the win!

Looks like you also predicted a Heat victory with your 2-0 comment.

Good job brutha!
 
Last edited:
Bet on MyBookie
Top