NBA 2020 Playoff Plays

RBD

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 23, 2020
1,274
50
48
Thanks, Coach.
Yes, we're all adults, we make our own decisions, but still, after giving out a play with a strong writeup like that Tor/Bos game, I feel like dropping in with an apology in case anyone read my analysis and bet it.

Here's some lousy news. The league announced yesterday that after reviewing the game, the refs blew the call on the final shot. A foul should have been called on Anunoby, sending Walker to the line for two free throws. If he makes either of the two, game over, no OT.
Thanks NBA, I feel so much better now knowing your screwup screwed me.
Oh well, "Spilled milk" and all that stuff . . .

Recap: I took the day off, no plays yesterday, still five games under .500, with a couple of games left in this round, plus the semi-finals and finals to get back in black. I need to get on a mini-run.

The system plays I posted yesterday both won.

The Temp play Over lost again, so the fade was a winner.
Record there is now 10-4** (** means two of the Losses were Wins at the end of regulation.)

And the new play "Bet Under When Both Teams Qualify as Overs in the Team Total system" won, so that one is 11-6** (13-4 when factoring in OT Losses.)

I think the Temp play is weak, and due to level off.
The sides on a Temp play are a true "temperature taking" of both teams, one is hot, the other is cold.
But the Ov/Un is a contrarian play.
When X % of factors on both teams say the game will go Under, I say it's time for the scales to balance out and go Over, so I chart and play it as an Over.

The reason the Over is failing miserably is that over the past 10 days or so the Ov/Un record in the playoffs is 4-17. And two of those Overs were Under at the end of regulation but went Over in OT.
Because of this, all the stats keep pointing to an Under, which leads to me charting it as an Over.
This bubble has to burst, it's just the natural order of things. The same six to eight teams are not going to keep playing to the Under, not to mention the books, who were inititally slow to react, are finally adjusting the #'s as the public is riding the trend and beating them.

All of this says proceed carefully when looking at Unders over the remaining games.

Today:
No Q1 plays.
Temp plays LAC -8 (Favs in this spot are 4-2) Bos /Tor Ov (fade it to Under at 10-4**.)

Here is an example of what what I said about the books adjusting the #'s:
Today's Tor/Bos game has a total of 204' at most houses.
Here are the other games in this series, starting with game one - 217', 218, 216', 215', 214, 209'.)
Today's 204' is 13-14 pts fewer than the first two games, and a full five pts fewer than last game.
Here are the six scores at the end of regulation: 206, 201, 207, 193, 200, 196.
Even with the lowered total, four of the six are Under today's # of 204'.

I'll update if I buy.

Update: Both team totals qualify as Overs in the Den/LAC game, full game Under in this spot is 11-6**.

No buys for me.
 
Last edited:

RBD

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 23, 2020
1,274
50
48
Recap: No plays yesterday.

Temp system lost with LAC -8; 4-3 now.

Temp fade on Bos/Tor won,
11-4** now (**13-2 excluding OT.)

"Bet Under when both team totals say play over" won;
12-6** now (**14-4 excluding OT.)

Today:
No Q1 spots.
Temp fade spot on Hour/LAL Over.

I took the last two days off.
Had I just played the best % plays, the Ov/Un spots, I would have banked three units.
"Just Play the Damn Systems!!!"

I'm going to play the Laker game today.
It opened 215, I see 216 & 216' now.
I'll wait on buying in case it goes up a little more, and until I get the team total numbers done.

Update: Neither team qualifies as an Over in the team total play tonight. I was hoping both did, because I have more faith in that system winning than the Temp play.

Here are the totals from the last four games:
227', 223, 232, 218.
Here are the scores:
209, 226, 214, 210.
Three of the four are Under tonight's total.

Unders are on a 22-7 run in the playoffs.
If I'd been riding the Under in some of those I'd keep betting, but I haven't been. And I hate jumping on an already-established streak.
No buy.
 
Last edited:

RBD

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 23, 2020
1,274
50
48
Recap: Nailed the Q1 Over 54', four games under .500 now.

Yes, it was a non-system play and I said I'll stay away from those, but I really liked the number at 54'.
Sunday mornings are for relaxing, it has a different feel than other mornings of the week.
I looked at the Sunday playoff games by these two, specifically at Q1 to see how they came out of the gate, playing defense or not, and saw Q1's of 66 & 69 (Den/Utah), and 58 & 63 (LAC/Dal.)
All four spots easily Over yesterday's number.

Then I looked at all Q1's in this series, and saw: 62, 69, 65, 38 and 51.
That's an avg of 57 pts per Q1.
Three of five were easily > than the 54' the books hung on this game.
I tossed out the 38 as a freak quarter in which Den only scored 12. Chances are that was not going to happen again. Based on the avg Q1 between these two, and heavily weighting their Sunday playoff spots, I thought 54' looked extremely doable, took the Over, and got a W when it came in at 60.

Tuesday:
No Q1 spots.
Temp play has Mia/Bos Over, Den/LAC Over, and LAC -7.
Record on totals on these is 4-12** (** two wins came in OT) still a solid fade at 12-4.
Sides are 10-7, Favs 4-3.

No buys for me yet.
 

Coach Woody

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 12, 2003
1,409
5
0
58
Colorado
Awesome call on the game yesterday;... I pulled the trigger on that game myself after reading your buy and comparing it to what I had.

I had the NUGGETS yesterday as well.

I am liking them tomorrow as well. Probably just gave the nuggets the kiss of death by saying that. I think they are just playing with a different attitude. Having fun and Murray an Joker are playing with something to prove. Listen I was the first to say they are done. (glad they proved me wrong) These last few games have been fun. The Clippers look at the Nuggets like aren't these guys suppose to just go away? Lay down and die? :shrug: Nuggets look back at them like we don't care you have more talent you will need to bury us to get rid of us..... 16 points isn't enough...If fact laugh at 16 points.


Just see this as a classic game 7. Very close. and if Clippers cover its a late cover from F,Ts
 

RBD

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 23, 2020
1,274
50
48
Glad you had the Q1, Coach.
I didn't do my usual write-up because I was cold lately, but I did like the #'s.

Just ran team total #'s to see if I had a game where both teams were Overs, hoping to get that Under spot again, but no, nothing qualifies, just the plays mentioned in my last post.

No buys tonight. I'll have action, not sure what though.
I'll post if I see something that makes me pull the trigger on a buy.

Itching to go against the Unders trend and play Over 208, but . . .
Does Den play tight/choke in game sevens?

Yes, they beat Utah, or did they? Den scored 15 in Q3 and Q4 in game seven.
If you lose a game seven to a team that scored a combined 30 pts in the second half, you pretty much beat yourself.

Look at the avg combined pts in the first six games/combined score in game seven,
two series from LY and Utah this season:
213/176 (37 <)
217/196 (21 pts <)
230/158 (this season, Utah, 72 pts <)
Those are some ugly numbers, not exactly inspiring a play on Den or the Over tonight.
 
Last edited:

RBD

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 23, 2020
1,274
50
48
Recap: No plays last game.
Good move on beating down that itch to play Den Over after reviewing their game 7 #'s.

Today:
No Q1 spots
No Temp spots
One play active, both team totals qualify as an Over. Taking the full game Under in this spot is 12-6.

Looking at the one play that's active today, I reviewed team totals from their last game.
Books #/actual score (regulation time):
Mia 104'/106
Bos 108'/106
Mia barely made it Over, Boston stayed Under, barely.

The projected #'s that I use to measure against the book's for tonight's game are
5.9 higher for Mia, 5.3 higher for Boston in comparison to game one.
Clearly, the OT #'s are factored into tonight's projected #'s.
This is accurate, but also not accurate.
It's accurate in that it factors in the actual score of game one,
but it's inaccurate in that OT should not be factored into 'capping.

Shooting %'s for game one were identical to season-long stats for both teams, for FG & 3 pt'ers.
I was hoping there was a sizable differential between game one and their season avg's to help point me to an Ov or Un, but, no.

Every way I slice and dice this game comes out to an Over, except for the play noted above, and its 12-6 record.

No buy for now.

Update: Which Q is the highest scoring Q for Miami during these playoffs? Q4?
Mia has scored 53 or > in Q4 in 7 of their 10 playoff games.
Until that stat drops, I'll buy a 70% chance play, every time I see one, especially when the # I can get is 2' pts fewer.
Ov 50' Q4.

(Bos Q4's 53 or > in just 5 of 12, vs Pil & Tor - two teams similar to Mia in PPG offense & defense.
They were 2-2 vs Phil, 2-5 vs Tor.
They were 6 of 12 using tonight's #, 50', with two of the misses landing on 50.
They're 1-0 vs Miami. Hoping for another tight game in Q4 with both teams in the penalty early. I like this spot.)
 
Last edited:

RBD

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 23, 2020
1,274
50
48
Recap: Used Q1 Ov 50', lost, gave back the unit I made earlier this week, back to 5 games under .500.

No Q1 or Temp plays today.
Both teams qualify as team total Over play. When betting the full game Under when both teams qualify as Overs the record is now 13-6 after it won in last night's game.

I didn't play it last night, I am playing it tonight. I'm tired of letting winners sail past me as I track them and post them, but don't buy them. Den/LAL Un 210.
 

RBD

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 23, 2020
1,274
50
48
Recap: Yesterday's game was the perfect exampe of why I said I don't like feel jumping on a play that I laid off of and watched it win.
I laid off it Thursday it wins, I bet it on Friday it loses.
I set a limit before the season started. I'm at that limit with one more loss. I'll be very picky before buying another game.
Posting for record purposes only.
No Q 1 plays, no Temp plays.
Both teams qualify as Overs, I have one play active, "Bet the Under when both teams grade out as a play on the Over."
After this play lost last night, the record is 13-7.

No buys for me tonight.
 

RBD

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 23, 2020
1,274
50
48
No Q 1 plays.

Temp play Over 214 (record on these is 5-12 now. Fade this spot.)

Both teams qualify as Overs, I have one play active, "Bet Under when both teams grade out as a play on the Over." The record on these is 14-8 (lost Saturday; won Sunday.)

No buys for me tonight.
 

RBD

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 23, 2020
1,274
50
48
Tue Sept 22: I think there's a higher chance this line goes up rather than down, so I bought it now.
Bos/Mia Ov 210'.

Update, Wed Sept 23: Good move buying yesterday as it's at 212 across the board now.
No Q1 spots, no Temp plays. Same spot active as yesterday, "Bet Under when both teams grade out as a play on the Over." The record on these is 14-9 (lost yesterday, hopefully loses today, too.)
 
Last edited:

RBD

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 23, 2020
1,274
50
48
Recap: I live to fight another day . . .
Hit with Bos/Mia Over in a game I really needed.
I'll be back.
 

RBD

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 23, 2020
1,274
50
48
Five games under .500 again after a win last time in.

Not system plays, just pure handicapping.
I made my #'s - side, total and Q's - then compared to the books.
Largest differential is in Q4, where my # is about 5 pts higher.

Next I double checked the Q4 avg of both teams, 26 pts each for a combined 52, but with a weighted avg of > 4 pts higher based on recent play than that 52 pts combined for the full season.

Then I checked tonight's # against the last ten Q4's these teams played,
Miami's last five vs Bos and LAL's last five vs Den, and 7 of 10 were 52 or higher.

Hope they both get in the penalty early, and hit some FT's.

I bought Q4 Ov 52.
 
Last edited:

RBD

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 23, 2020
1,274
50
48
With a 26-point lead at the end of three, neither team has any urgency to score in Q4.
It'll be a slow pace, with LA using the full shot clock before putting one up.
And there's no way to buy off of it.
This is going to be ugly.
 
Last edited:

RBD

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 23, 2020
1,274
50
48
Update: Oh ye (me) of little faith ...
 
Last edited:

Coach Woody

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 12, 2003
1,409
5
0
58
Colorado
GREAT CALL on the 4th quarter. Agreed with thought we were in trouble.

BUT WE WERE NOT:00hour:00hour:00hour:00hour

Hopefully we can use again.

I like it in the NFL also.

Keep it up!!!!:0008:0008:0008
 

RBD

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 23, 2020
1,274
50
48
Coach,
Thanks. It was a fun bet to watch. Expected the worst going in due to the expected game script based on the score, never got a comfortable amount of pts that gave us a sure winner, never fell too far off the pace to make it look hopeless. Then, with the win in sight and two minutes to go, a couple missed shots and turnovers made it scary close. Like I said - fun.

And THANK YOU for mentioning the NFL Q4 spot I gave #'s on, wasn't sure anyone took notice or tried it.
Hope you had it on KC/Balt, I had pocket $ on it. May use it again this week in two different games I have circled. If the spots look good, I'll post as either a buy or just something for bettors to think about if they're looking for some action on the game.

LakerFan,
You're welcome. Most of the credit goes to the Heat for not quitting. A lot of teams down by almost 30 pts would have played a slow-paced Q4 and given up, but Miami played hard and put up 30.
But . . . if it wasn't for your boys swishing that 3 ptr on their final possession it would have been a 1 pt L.

Recap: Q4 goes Over 52 for a win. Four games under .500 now.
May hit the same play again tomorrow night.
With only 6 games left at most, the only way to make up four games and juice is to increase wager size.
I don't do that in sports I follow and do well with, I'm certainly not doing it in something I only dabble in, like the NBA. I might make two same size wagers in a game if it looks and feels right.
Back tomorrow if I have a play.
 

RBD

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 23, 2020
1,274
50
48
After hitting a season low at six games under .500, I went conservative/selective, hit two straight W's, 22-26 now.

And that is where my season will likely end.

The last play I pointed out here (Mia/LAL Q4's Over if you can get 52 or <) has won in three of the four games. I would not recommend it tonight and am not buying it myself because if Miami, down 1-3 in the series, is losing late in the game (as they have been in most of this series) they may quit in Q4.

I didn't win overall on the season, gave a lot of winning info, didn't play the systems enough and made bad choices on when to buy. But I hope I gave some useful info on how to 'cap games, different things to look for, different ways to look at numbers.

NBA and MLB are not my sports. I made a little in MLB, lost a little in NBA.
NFL doing well so far, college is flat.
But all of it has been fun . . .

Thank you to all who stopped by to say "hi" and post opinions.
See ya in the football forums . . .
 
Last edited:
Bet on MyBookie
Top