giant... since northcoast power sweep is so hot right now... and i know you just post up the national pick for them.. can you please post the rest of there picks from northcoast power sweep....thanks
HERE YA GO ODAYJIMMY!!!!!!!
First meeting. This will be the Jayhawks 1st ever BCS bowl game, their 11th all-time bowl & 3rd under Mangino.
They last played in the Ft Worth Bowl, a 42-13 (-3) win over Houston in 2005. This is the 3rd KU appearance
in the Orange Bowl (last in ?69, 15-14 loss to Penn St). VT will be making their 15th straight bowl incl 4 BCS
gms under Beamer & have gone 6-8 SU & ATS. They faced Georgia LY in the Chick-fil-A Bowl, a 31-24 loss
(-3). The Hokies have played in one Orange Bowl, a 41-21 (+16) loss to Nebraska in ?96. The Jayhawks won
11 straight & rose to #2 before losing the ssn finale to Missouri 36-28, but it did little to hurt their BCS chances
as MU fell to OU in Big 12 Title gm. VT is by far the toughest def they will meet TY. VT was crushed by LSU
48-7 early in the ssn & lost to BC 14-10 mid-ssn. They redeemed themselves, beating BC 30-16 in the ACC
Champ gm. Under Beamer, VT has had 10+ wins in 7 of 9 ssns. Kansas went 10-1 ATS TY but is 10-14 ATS
(incl bowls) as an AD under Mangino while VT is 12-2 (incl bowls) as an AF the L/3Y. KU has played 5 bowl
caliber teams going 4-1 SU & ATS, outscoring those foes on avg 32-19 & outgaining them on avg 440-391.
VT has played 7 bowl caliber teams (BC 2x) and is 6-2 SU & 5-3 ATS outscoring opp?s on avg 26-19 but were
outgained on avg 334-322. VT plays its HG?s on grass while KU was 0-6 ATS on it before going 3-1 the L/2Y.
The Hokies have 10 seniors among 17 upperclassmen starters and KU has 5 among 18. Both teams should
be represented well here as KU faithful travelled TY with all their success and this is the biggest bowl in school
history while the VT always brings a crowd incl 10,000 that traveled to Durham (23,000 in attn).
Since their early loss to BC, in a game they completely dominated for the first 55 mins, the Hokies have
outscored their opp?s 174-75. QB?s Glennon and Taylor have combined for 23 TD and have embraced their
shared role. RB Ore led the team in rushing but did not have the year that was expected after finishing #1 in
the ACC LY. Their #2 rusher is QB Taylor. The Hokies are avg 199 ypg thru the air and the off ranks #54. The
OL avg 6?4? 320 but only opened holes for 134 ypg (3.4) rush & all?d 49 sks (#114 in NCAA). The strength
of VT is their defense (#5) and the infamous ?Beamer Ball? sp tms (#4). VT is 2nd in the NCAA in scoring
defense only all?g 15.5 ppg. The DL avg 6?3? 277 with 3 Sr starters led by DE Ellis and DT Booker. VT is only
all?g 86 ypg (2.8) and has 43 sks. The LB corps is solid with AA Adibi (#1 tklr) and the return of Hall (#2 tklr),
who missed 4 gms with inj. The Hokies have our #3 ranked pass eff D all?g 207 ypg (53%) and are tied at #3
in NCAA with 9 pass D TD and 21 int. The secondary is led by CB Flowers and ?Macho? Harris, who have 5
int apiece. PR Royal is 8th in the NCAA and has 2 TD. VT has blk?d 117 P?s, FG?s or xp S/?90.
Kansas has our #14 offensive ranking avg 44 ppg & 491 ypg. They rank #2 in scoring offense & #6 in
total offense in the NCAA. KU returned 6 starters from LY but had to replace their top RB, WR and didn?t
know in spring who the QB was going to be. Soph Reesing (5?11?) became the only QB to start every game
under Mangino & was on a 6 gm streak without an int until 2 vs Mizzou. Meier provides a capable backup at
QB & is too athletic to keep off the field. FB-turned-RB McAnderson led the team in rushing as their between
the tackle bruiser while #2 RB Sharp provides the Jayhawks with a speed option. The WR corps is led by
NFL prototype Henry who provides a legit deep threat. The OL avg 6?5? 301 paving the way for 197 ypg (5.0)
but all?d 22 sks (5.0%). They are led by the Big 12?s most legit NFL OL RT Collins (Outland finalist). The def
returned 8 starters from a ?06 squad that all?d 26 ppg. They have our #15 ranking, all?g only 16 ppg (#5 NCAA),
318 ypg & tallying 21 sks. The DL avg 6?3? 266 and solid all?g 91 rush ypg (3.1). The leader of the def is LB
Mortenson, who led the Big 12 in tfl. Nagurski finalist CB Talib led the Big 12 in PD including a 100 yd IR TD
& also added 4 off TD. KU has our #9 pass efficiency defense all?g 227 ypg (58%) with a 16-20 ratio and KU
has our #56 ST?s ranking led by KR Herford who ranks 7th in the NCAA.
The Orange Bowl isn?t a bad consolation considering Kansas had the BCS Championship game in
their sights. Virginia Tech finished at 11-2 and was demolished in an early season marquee game at LSU
and let BC QB Ryan score twice in the final 3 minutes for their second loss. Once they got beat in week
2, their goals changed to winning the ACC and making an Orange Bowl appearance. The difference in
this game may very well come down to the special teams and ?Beamer Ball? will always win that battle.
One of KU?s most potent weapons is KR Herford with a 30 ypr avg but that is also negated by the VT KR
def that allows 18.8 ypr and has 12 TB?s. KU played their biggest game under Mangino in their loss to
Missouri while high profile games have been a norm for VT.
FORECAST: VIRGINIA TECH 30 Kansas 17 RATING: 4★
----------------------------------------------------------------------
These 2 teams have met just once before, a 31-31 tie in 1989. Rutgers is 9-2-1 SU but 5-6 ATS vs current
MAC teams. RU was 2-0 as a DD AF TY while BSU was 3-1 as an AD. Ball St is 3-5-1 SU vs current BE teams
but 6-1 ATS vs non-conf foes the L/2Y. BSU tallied 7 wins for the 1st time S/?96 when they played in their last
bowl (18-15 loss, +6? in LV Bowl). HC Hoke is one of 18 HC to coach at his alma-mater, prior to that he was
an asst at Mich. The Knights are in their 3rd straight bowl & 4th in school history. They beat Kan St 37-10 in
the ?06 Texas Bowl. Prior to RU, Schiano had been an asst in 7 bowls most recently at Miami, Fl. RU played
7 bowl caliber teams (2-5 ATS) being outscored by an avg of 32-25 but outgaining them by 420-398 ypg.
BSU played 4 bowl caliber teams (2-2 ATS) being outscored by an avg of 39-27 and outgained by 521-414.
They had 2 common opponents, Buf & Navy (both 2-0 SU & ATS). RU outscored those two on avg 39-14
and outgained them by a 520-262 ypg margin. BSU outscored them by an avg of 42-23 and outgained them
by 523-402 ypg but needed OT to beat Navy. RU had 12,500 fans LY in the trip to Texas and both schools
are less than 500 miles from Toronto. The Cardinals only avg?d 13,085 fans for their 5 home games.
After a Cinderella 10-2 ssn LY Rutgers finished with a very disappointing 7-5 record. They defeated
#2 USF, but dropped 3 of 5 incl the 41-38 UL loss where they led by 18 in the 2H. The Knights have
our #38 off ranking avg 31 ppg & 437 ypg. QB Teel suffered a thumb inj vs Norfolk St that affected his
throws in 8 gms until the UL game. When he?s healthy this is a very balanced offense. RU is doing
opposing defenses a favor if they don?t give AA RB Rice the ball as he?s the #3 rusher in NCAA. WR?s
Britt & Underwood became just the 26th duo in the NCAA to crack 1,000 yds in the same ssn. The OL
avg 6?5? 308, paving the way for 190 ypg (4.6) allowing just 10 sks (2.8%) which is 2nd fewest in NCAA.
They are led by 3 seniors including OT Zuttah. Rutgers defense allowed 65 ypg more than LY & went
from +11 to -6 in TO margin. They have our #43 ranking all?g 22 ppg, 317 ypg with 35 sks. The smallish
DL avg?s 6?3? 259 all?g 156 rush yds (3.9) led by Sr DT Foster. The secondary has our #33 pass D eff
all?g 161 ypg (51%) with an 11-9 ratio (#2 pass D in NCAA). RU has our #102 ST?s ranking led by K/P
Jeremy ?Judge? Ito who holds the school record for career points scored.
The Cardinals exceeded expectations, winning a share of the MAC West crown with their only MAC
losses to the two Div Champs. They got some national attention when they came up just short of upsetting
a ranked Nebraska team after missing a game winning FG in the final seconds (41-40, +23). This will be
Ball St?s first game in a dome since 1996 (Minny) but they did hold 5 practices in the RCA Dome (Colts), to
get used to playing indoors. They are led by just 3 senior starters (all def) and 15 upperclassmen starters.
Ball St has our #67 offense avg 32 ppg and 432 ypg. They do have our #22 passing offense led by QB
Davis who had five 300+ gms including a career high 422 vs Nebraska and is also the team?s #5 rusher.
Their rushing game took a hit when they lost RB Lewis after just 4 starts as he had two 100+ games and
still finished as the team?s #2 rusher. WR Love is the team?s top receiver and is #7 in the NCAA in all-purp
yds avg 197 ypg. The #2 receiver is Mackey Award semi-finalist TE Hill who is tied with Love in rec TD.
The OL avg 6?4? 290 and has opened holes for 4.1 ypc and all?d just 20 sacks (4.6%). The Cardinals have
our #81 def all?g 26 ppg & 419 ypg. The DL avg just 6?2? 252 and is ranked #99 in NCAA all?g 197 ypg
rush (4.9) with 21 sacks. They are led by DE?s Booker and Crawford, who combined for 29 tfl. The top two
tacklers are LB?s including WLB Haines who was the #6 tackler in the MAC. Ball St has our #89 pass eff
defense all?g 222 ypg (64%) with an 18-18 ratio as the secondary starters combined for 14 int led by CB
Hill. Ball St has our #52 ST?s ranking led by P Miller who finished #3 in the NCAA with a 45.8 avg.
Ball State is thrilled to be making their first bowl appearance since 1996. They got some press early
in the season after the Nebraska game but as we found out everyone scored on the Cornhuskers. They
did finish getting outgained vs bowl eligible teams by 107 ypg. Rutgers finished their season losing 3 of
5 (1-4 ATS) and QB Teel was inconsistent with a thumb injury. Rutgers? goal was clearly to make a BCS
bowl and for the 2nd straight season they end up in a bottom tier post season game. The talent disparity
is overwhelming on the defensive side and with a healthy QB the offense is potnet behind AA RB Rice.
HC Schiano got his disappointed team focused in LY?s Texas Bowl (37-10 vs Kan St) and will motivate
them again to finish the season off with a win.
FORECAST: RUTGERS 38 Ball St 21 RATING: 2★
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tulsa won the only meeting in ?89, 45-10. Since that game BG is 5-6 SU but 8-2 ATS vs current CUSA
teams incl a 52-35 (-3) win over Memphis in their last bowl (?04 GMAC). This will be BG?s 3rd bowl under
HC Brandon, going 2-0 SU & 1-1 ATS, both as the fav. Tul is 6-2 SU & 3-1 ATS vs current MAC schools.
HC Graham was at Rice LY and ended a 45 yr drought leading the Owls to their 1st bowl S/?61 where
they got drilled by Troy 41-17 in the New Orleans Bowl. This is Tulsa?s 4th bowl in 5 yrs and they are 1-2
SU & ATS (all as dogs). BG faced 3 bowl caliber tms going 0-3 SU & 1-2 ATS. They were outgained on
avg 431-405 and outscored 40-23. The Hurricane played 5 bowl caliber tms (UCF 2x) going 3-3 SU & ATS
outgaining them 480-457 but were outscored by a 37-36 avg. Tulsa has 9 Sr?s among 15 upperclassmen
starters while BG has just 5 among 12. BG is 3-2 ATS as an AD TY incl an upset of Minn 32-31 (+14)
while UT is 7-5 ATS as an AF (2-3 TY). BG shared the MAC East Title but lost the tiebreaker. They will
have had 44 days off while UT has had 36 days to think about its Conf Championship loss
BG turned things around TY going 8-4 (best rec?d in MAC) after their 1st losing ssn (4-8) S/?00. QB
Sheehan beat out ret starter Turner, almost doubling Turner?s ?06 pass yds. Turner was moved to a slash
pos and leads the team in rushing. RB Geter was leading the team in rushing as a True, but has been
slowed by nagging inj?s although he still played in 11 gms. Barnes leads the team in rec yds in his 1st
full yr at the position. WR Partridge is the #2 rec, despite missing 5 with a thumb inj and could return
here. The OL has 3 Sr starters incl Rimington finalist C Lichtensteiger & avg 6?4? 295. They did allow
27 sks (5.5%) but opened holes for 4.1 ypc. BG all?d 29.5 ppg (most S/?97) and 205 ypg rushing (4.6)
which is the most in over a decade. The DL avg 6?3? 262 and is led by DE Briggs. The LB unit may be
without WLB Haneline, who is the #2 tackler despite missing 3 with a leg inj. They have our #85 pass
eff def all?g 208 ypg (60%) with a 21-14 ratio. Their bright spot is S Mahone who is #3 in the NCAA in
int. They have our #72 off and our #93 D which is off its best gm of the yr (held a Toledo tm avg 33 ppg
to 10 pts). BG has our #94 ST, which is actually an improvement as they were ranked last in ?06! A big
reason for their ?improvement? is two new kickers in K Vrvilo and P Iovinelli.
Tulsa has our #15 off avg 543 ypg & 40 ppg led by QB Smith. HC Graham made a great hire in
OC Malzahn who incorporated the no-huddle around Smith allowing him to flourish passing for over
300 yds in all 13 gms (CUSA record). He finished #2 in pts accounted for behind Heisman winner
Tebow. He spreads the ball around with 7 rec?s having 26+ catches led by WR Marion who avg 31.9
ypc (#1 NCAA)! The Hurricane run game lost OK transfer Tennial prior to the yr. Adams took over
breaking 1,100 yds. The OL lost 4 Sr starters from LY but actually opened up holes for 168 ypg (4.2),
the most S/?03. The OL is the biggest in the conf avg 6?3? 312 and is led by the right side of Morsey
and Thomas. They have just 1 Sr starter up front and all?d 30 sks (5.8%). Tulsa runs a 3-3-5 def &
the 469 ypg all?d is the most S/?97. The DL is led by DE Hopkins and they avg 6?3? 257 which makes
them a small but fast group as the unit recorded 25 sks but all?d 196 rush ypg (4.6). The LB corps is
the anchor of the D as the top 3 tacklers reside there. Chamberlain & Coleman both rank in the top 20
in NCAA in tkls. Tulsa is getting burned in the secondary ranking #98 in our pass eff D all?g 273 ypg
(59%) with a 28-11 ratio. While the off is potent the def has really cost Tul as it ranks #104 all?g 40+
pts in 6 gms. Tulsa has our #96 ST?s & K Tracy who hit 11-12 FG?s LY has hit just 7-12 and att?d just
1 FG in the L/6 gms. The punt unit has a net of 32.9 (#93 NCAA) due to pooch punts by QB Smith.
Tulsa switched to the no-huddle off and behind QB Smith they finished #1 in ttl off. The offense avg?d
40 ppg and totaled 35+ pts in 9 gms. Unfortunately their quick strike offense left the defense on the field
for extended periods of time and they all?d an avg of 35 ppg and gave up 30+ pts in 9 gms. While not quite
as prolific, BG avg?d 32 ppg and did finish the ssn avg 38 ppg the L/4. Both tms also struggle defending
the pass with our #85 (BG) and #98 pass eff D?s. The total is high at 75 but this bowl has that history and
these teams have topped that total in a combined 7 gms. Sit back relax and enjoy the fireworks.
FORECAST: OVER 75 RATING: 1★