djv,
I don't understand what you are trying to show with your coin-flipping experiment. If you are trying to suggest that handicapping sports is no different from fipping a coin then I have to say I strongly disagree with you. Such a discussion is probably better left for another thread.
Hoops,crab, yyz,
I sat next to one of the biggest bookmakers in the Caribbean last year during football season and from my experience it's my opinion that winners move the line more than money does. However, I agree that I doubt many move the line for a consistent winner who bets $200 a pop (Carib is an exception to this). Whether they SHOULD or not is another matter! This is also probably better left discussed in another thread.
JSMOOTH,
Are you trying to claim that all touts lose money? How can you possibly claim that without knowing the record for every tout?? I have followed a tout for 2 years for example and he is showing modest profits so far.
Isn't it POSSIBLE that there are a handful of honest, good touts out there. Once you reconize this, the next step ( ahuge one) is to use sound judgement to find out which ones they are. I agree that this is probably impossible most of the time.
Bama6895,
The player loses in the long run with that ploy. Half the time he pays 100 for the random pick and the other half he receives 25. That loses in the long run. (Plus he would lose juice on his plays)
Night Owl,
I agree that if you are a small player then it may not be profitable for you to use a tout (I have mentioned this before already). And I agree that the biggest problem by far is deciding whether the tout/handicapper is good enough to produce and honest. I think the fact that you insist on tracking the cappers record yoursef is wise.
To answer you first question, it looks like the people at this forum at least don't have the interest (I don't know about the money) but I am trying to find out why and I have yet to hear a sound argument against the principle.
I don't understand what you are trying to show with your coin-flipping experiment. If you are trying to suggest that handicapping sports is no different from fipping a coin then I have to say I strongly disagree with you. Such a discussion is probably better left for another thread.
Hoops,crab, yyz,
I sat next to one of the biggest bookmakers in the Caribbean last year during football season and from my experience it's my opinion that winners move the line more than money does. However, I agree that I doubt many move the line for a consistent winner who bets $200 a pop (Carib is an exception to this). Whether they SHOULD or not is another matter! This is also probably better left discussed in another thread.
JSMOOTH,
Are you trying to claim that all touts lose money? How can you possibly claim that without knowing the record for every tout?? I have followed a tout for 2 years for example and he is showing modest profits so far.
Isn't it POSSIBLE that there are a handful of honest, good touts out there. Once you reconize this, the next step ( ahuge one) is to use sound judgement to find out which ones they are. I agree that this is probably impossible most of the time.
Bama6895,
The player loses in the long run with that ploy. Half the time he pays 100 for the random pick and the other half he receives 25. That loses in the long run. (Plus he would lose juice on his plays)
Night Owl,
I agree that if you are a small player then it may not be profitable for you to use a tout (I have mentioned this before already). And I agree that the biggest problem by far is deciding whether the tout/handicapper is good enough to produce and honest. I think the fact that you insist on tracking the cappers record yoursef is wise.
To answer you first question, it looks like the people at this forum at least don't have the interest (I don't know about the money) but I am trying to find out why and I have yet to hear a sound argument against the principle.