LM - You're welcome.
Recap: 0-2, -$200
Record: 53-58, +$622
On Day One of my commitment to play all spots for the entire week, I get two plays that qualify, and I pull The Grom and Darvish as opponents. Ugh.
They gave up a grand total of ONE run between them. Double Ugh.
Updated Charts:
GP: 55-41, +$1,931
BB: 106-83, +$2,048
Today:
GP has Cin, NYM
BB has Wash, Atl, Az, SD, KC, Tor, Det, Chi C
My commitment to play all games that qualify puts me in a bad spot today.
First, the systems produced NINE plays, and I don't like playing a lot of games. The more games you play, the more you give the edge back to the house.
Second, I don't really like any of these except Toronto.
I have a clash between the two systems as one says play NYM, the other says take their opponent, Atl.
H2H GP has a slight edge at 4-3.
It also gives SD as a play and they're in a spot I like to play AGAINST - a team that's won 5 in a row.
Teams that have won 5 in a row and are at home are 15-16, and since they're hot, and at home, you usually get a good price on the dog, making it a profitable fade. (They're an even better fade on the RD, 5-9.) Min in same spot, 5 in a row, at home.
Still, I made the commitment so I'll stick with it (though I'm not playing the Cubs, I don't lay -200 in MLB.)
Buys:
Cin +108
NYM -101
Wash +115
Az +132
SD -102
KC +240
Tor +112
Det +105
I feel like I'm whistling past the graveyard . . .
Update: Cincy had a 5 run lead, bottom of the 8th, and they gave up 5 runs.
I'm thinking, "If they lose this game after blowing a 5 run lead in the 8th it portends bad ju-ju for the rest of my games, right?" (Portends??!!)
They blew the lead, but put up three runs in the 9th and won. Therefore, by the rule of transformative properties (transformative properties??!! WTF are you babbling about?) it means I'll do well with the remaining games, right?
With a W already in my pocket from the first game, I can go 3-4 in the remaining games and still bank a profit on this dangerous day (or 2-5 if I can get a W with KC.)