Chuck,
You don't represent the "people" nor does Trump's election reflect what "the people" want. He lost the popular vote by the largest margin in history by a winning candidate. He got less than 46% of the voting population which was the smallest voter turnout in history if you look at percentage by census. That's not indicative of what "the people" want by any stretch. Hillary lost because of the smear campaign engineered by the GOP that was funded by misappropriated tax revenues.
What exactly should I give him credit for? What had he done except lie over and over again that he's deserving of praise?
I said that it is my nature to defend the causes in attached to our believe in. If something I say or post ultimately reaches an open ear then I'm good with it. I'm not trying to change the world nor get everyone to think like me. That's unrealistic and not at all what I meant.
I will say that I don't post the things I do with certain individuals in mind unless it's a direct response to their post. It seems to me as if you're under the impression that I'm addressing you or that I have you in mind when I post. I assure you, I don't.
I'm not spewing anger and hatred all the time either. I do when people say stupid shit like climate change is a hoax and such.
I'm not sure how you keep insisting that the "people" want this or that as if you are speaking for the majority or that you have your finger on the pulse of the collective population, you don't.
For some reason you keep preaching to me about how I need to act. I'm not sure why you feel empowered to do so bit it is what it is.
Hope this helps,
FDC
Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk[/QUOTE
The people I am referring to is pretty logical to most. The correct people in the individual states that voted had enough say as a collective group to win the Electoral Vote. Those are the rules they both had to play by. The number of people in each state that Trump needed to give him the electoral votes he needed, SPOKE! Is that clear enough? Here is a real life example in my world.
In my world of selling, there are groups of hospitals that form an Integrated Delivery Network together to get better pricing, purchase the same Medical instruments, and demand the same attention. They are in every state. I deal in a similar world as the Electoral College. If there are 11 hospitals that are deciding on an instrument, my job is to get the Director and VP level at each individual hospital to say they want my instrument. That means the rural 30 bed hospital has the same vote as the 300 bed hospital. If you get 6 of the 11 pushing for you, the contract will be yours. That way, every town counts, similar to every state. And you know where some "Managers" may have more pull helping others choose your instruments, so you focus there as well, i.e. in the election, those "hospitals" were Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Ohio, etc..
Donald Trump had the "right" people in his court to win the election. Hillary didn't. He was more intelligent in where he campaigned. GOP Smear was not the reason.
Can I reference the people I meant, now? Without your semantics of what people I meant? I have to start the grill. :0067
