Thunder's Service Plays Forum

[Cie]

Stanley is the best poster on this forum imo

 

[Sportsaholic]

Stanley is the best poster on this forum imo

:0003

 

[Roger Baltrey]

So he has kept proper tracking of his record the whole time?

Where is that info at? Look I have zero problem with what Jack or thunder is doing more power to them. I do doubt that this style of betting and money management works. I just would love to see a couple full seasons of proper record keeping from thunder.

I've bet his stuff for whole seasons and came out fine. No you don't get the the same odds as he does but wins and doesn't do it with typical favorites etc. Trust me he's a good capper.

 

[dunclock]

Thunder and Senor ... even for your FB buddies :shrug:

:mj07:

Totally wish you guys the BEST of luck :0074

 

[hedman]

I am just totally pissed the password isnt password.

You cant tell me I was the only one that tried it.

:facepalm:

 

[Sportsaholic]

I am just totally pissed the password isnt password.

You cant tell me I was the only one that tried it.

:facepalm:

Odd.............I tried Tranny..........:shrug:

 

[Nole]

Try "Ponch".


:0008

 

[saint]

Wasn't "team ramrod" either :shrug:

 

[Trampled Underfoot]

I am just totally pissed the password isnt password.

You cant tell me I was the only one that tried it.

:facepalm:

I tried that one alone with a bunch of very appropriate terms. Nothing.

:mj07: :mj07: :mj07:

Once he starts posting his plays after the games start, we'll get a feel for it.

 

[pug]

I spent a few hours going through Thunder's college football plays from 2012 and here is what I came up with record wise. Note that I stopped after November 3rd because it's so time consuming due to all of the plays. I didn't count juice, just record:

3% 41-28
4% 63-58
5% 44-30
6% 33-26
7% 13-11
8% 0-2

 

[THUNDER]

I spent a few hours going through Thunder's college football plays from 2012 and here is what I came up with record wise. Note that I stopped after November 3rd because it's so time consuming due to all of the plays. I didn't count juice, just record:

3% 41-28
4% 63-58
5% 44-30
6% 33-26
7% 13-11
8% 0-2

Yea 2 losers on those 8s one of them really hurt -but we should of finished 5-3 between 8 and 9s-thanks pug

 

[Trampled Underfoot]

I spent a few hours going through Thunder's college football plays from 2012 and here is what I came up with record wise. Note that I stopped after November 3rd because it's so time consuming due to all of the plays. I didn't count juice, just record:

3% 41-28
4% 63-58
5% 44-30
6% 33-26
7% 13-11
8% 0-2

That would put him right around a 55.25%. That is assuming you can get down on the lines that he was posting on the forums.

Good job doing the leg work for some people.

 

[pug]

Note that a lot of Thunder's plays are +money also to reduce/neutralize the juice.

 

[Trampled Underfoot]

Note that a lot of Thunder's plays are +money also to reduce/neutralize the juice.

I remember him buying a ton of points too like Scott. My calculation was assuming -110. If you didn't tally the +/- amounts, your work was for nothing.

 

[THUNDER]

I remember him buying a ton of points too. My calculation was assuming -110. If you didn't tally the +/- amounts, your work was for nothing.

I buy points the opposite way - For plus what are you talking about. not for more juice plus money over 30% of my plays alot of them +115 or more

 

[THUNDER]

I remember him buying a ton of points too like Scott. My calculation was assuming -110. If you didn't tally the +/- amounts, your work was for nothing.

Never buy points like scott ever

 

[Trampled Underfoot]

I buy points the opposite way - For plus what are you talking about. not for more juice plus money over 30% of my plays alot of them +115 or more

You don't have to convince me. I just had a few minutes so I did a weighted average based on your units for those who cared. That was assuming -110.

I actually am late crunching golf numbers tonight. The Euro tour kicks off soon and I have work to do. I'm sure i'll pop back in eventually.

 

[THUNDER]

You don't have to convince me. I just had a few minutes so I did a weighted average based on your units for those who cared. That was assuming -110.

I actually am late crunching golf numbers tonight. The Euro tour kicks off soon and I have work to do. I'm sure i'll pop back in eventually.

Just clarifying your statement- GL hope you do well

 

[Korn]

I didn't count juice, just record:

3% 41-28
4% 63-58
5% 44-30
6% 33-26
7% 13-11
8% 0-2

So if you take those #'s and assume you were at starting BR for each play then at an avg of -110 juice it would be +97.5% and at -105 juice would be +133.25%

And for fun I ran it thru at -120 avg per play and would still be +26%

 

[DOGS THAT BARK]

Stanley is the best poster on this forum imo

He certainly has contributed more time and effort than anyone here. Golf forum has always been unique from every other section here.


Selkirk is another... who probably few know and would be my most valuable poster..and only motive has been help others.

This has been an interesting thread as far as defining principles/character/motives of many.
Has been a couple of surprises but not many.