- Feb 26, 2001
- 13,593
- 164
- 63
Now, I honestly see the Dems point on not making it two separate issues because they can't trust Trump to negotiate DACA after a budget is passed. I get it.
Exactly.
Now, I honestly see the Dems point on not making it two separate issues because they can't trust Trump to negotiate DACA after a budget is passed. I get it.
Doing what's best for the country is what we pay them for, no? Certainly I understand they have agendas that get pushed during negotiations like this but you don't think this one is taking things too far? People's livelihoods, children's health care, etc... in exchange for immigrant reform that doesn't need solved today.
One side is not exactly negotiating in good faith here by holding millions hostage to further their pet cause. A cause that they mostly care very little about except that it's Trump's signature issue so NOW it has to be a thing that holds up the budget.
People like you who just want a win so the other side loses are the problem with this country.
The shutdown doesn't affect unemployment, FYI.
The easy answer, and in line with what I have said all along, is no, Trump's actions do not line up with the values I hold to.
I think the results he's getting are slightly better than what Hillary would have gotten by now but I don't know that nor do I have any way to prove it. I do think we got tax cuts we would not have gotten with HRC and just as much as his stupid wall is an issue for him, taking away what is left of traditional values would have been Hillary's agenda. We would be fighting the same fight only over different issues.
Would you feel the same if Hillary were in office and the GOP was holding up the budget over the border wall?
Let me ask you this question, you bring up things like Trump's infidelity, his locker room talk, buying off porn stars, etc... as things that should disturb me about him, but it would appear you are OK with Hillary stealing, her lack of concern over national security, Benghazi and, not to mention, her husband cheating on her while in the very office we are discussing.
Why are all the shortcomings of Bill and Hillary ok, but Trump's worthy of execution?
DACA should have been done a long fucking time ago. Get it done and the rest of this shit will be done in no time.
And that's the problem. It's a legal form of blackmail. I'm not naive enough to think this doesn't happen, but in this case one side is playing with people's livelihood while the other just wants to pass something as basic as the budget.
Not even close to a level playing field. DACA has time to be dealt with, Monday morning working people start missing paychecks. Also, I hold that DACA is only important to the Dems because immigration is on Trump's big list.
So, in this case we have one side asking for a kill shot while one side just wants the basic foundation of the country to keep churning along AND that kill shot isn't even all that important to those asking for it, they just want to post an L for the opposition.
Very petty IMO and hurting a lot of people along the way. In all honesty, when did DACA become such a personal issue for you (or any Dem) that you would fuck the country over it? I'm guessing right about the time it became a bargaining chip and not a moment before.
RE: it would appear you are OK with Hillary stealing, her lack of concern over national security, Benghazi and, not to mention, her husband cheating on her while in the very office we are discussing.
What stealing? Wouldn't she have been convicted or at least indicted by now? Kenneth Starr spent the Bill Clinton presidency trying to take them down and ended up with squat.
What is her lack of concern over national security? The private servers? I definitely think it was a mistake in judgement but not a huge concern. I think a bigger mistake is revealing classified info to Russians in the Oval Office (Trump did this) and picking a fight with North Korea, but that's just my opinion.
Benghazi: It was a fuck up, no doubt. They happen. It sucks.
Bill Clinton cheating on her. Here's the thing, I'm not the one pointing to "traditional values". I would trust Bill to run the country but not to drive my wife to the airport. And that's where I lose my mind with you "values" guys. You keep pointing to the importance of them but when we point out the lack of values exhibited by your candidate, shoulders just get shrugged. What do you think of the traditional family values where couples stay together through thick and thin, because the one that you think has no traditional values lives it while the other has been divorced twice?
Why would the dems trust anything that Trump says?
They have no reason to believe he will keep his word.
Trump ended DACA in September, but the dems are supposed to trust that it will get done before the deadline?
Trust is a two way street and Trump has nothing but lie since day one.
And that's the problem. It's a legal form of blackmail. I'm not naive enough to think this doesn't happen, but in this case one side is playing with people's livelihood while the other just wants to pass something as basic as the budget.
Not even close to a level playing field. DACA has time to be dealt with, Monday morning working people start missing paychecks. Also, I hold that DACA is only important to the Dems because immigration is on Trump's big list.
So, in this case we have one side asking for a kill shot while one side just wants the basic foundation of the country to keep churning along AND that kill shot isn't even all that important to those asking for it, they just want to post an L for the opposition.
Very petty IMO and hurting a lot of people along the way. In all honesty, when did DACA become such a personal issue for you (or any Dem) that you would fuck the country over it? I'm guessing right about the time it became a bargaining chip and not a moment before.
Another point to be made that you will ignore if it happens. If DACA isn't done now, the GOP will try to get more concessions when they do DACA later. So at this point you don't want the Dems playing games? Well if they don't they will have to give up more later. I am shocked how fucking naive you are with this.
What is naive is to think you are fooling anyone into thinking you gave a shit about DACA before it became a bargaining chip for your side.
Face it, you just want an "L" for Trump and hope your side gets it at any cost. Congrats, you are well on the path.
Again I ask, if the situation was reversed and Hillary couldn't get a budget passed because the GOP demanded funding for the border wall be included, would you feel the same?
You don't have to answer, we all know.
You have just as much evidence (if not more) that Hillary was guilty of those things than Trump is of revealing secrets to the Russians. I can ask you the exact same question, if it could be proven he did give them info then why hasn't he been arrested, impeached, indicted?
You are willing to assume facts not in evidence when it comes to Trump, but not Hillary. Why?
I don't think Benghazi can be written off as a "fuck up" and shrugged off as "it happens". It was avoidable and decisions were made that cost people lives. Again, had that been Trump you would want him hung, but Hillary does it and "it happens"?
We could not disagree more.
You misunderstand my stance. You brought up Trump's cheating like it was a big deal yet shrug off Bill's. The playing field should at least be level and it certainly isn't. Dems are shouting LOOK TRUMP PAID OFF A PORN STAR!!!!!! but ignore what Bill did.
At the end of the day I would trust Bill Clinton to run the country as well, I thought he did among the very best jobs as President we could ask for under some difficult circumstances. I genuinely don't care if he got a blowjob in the Oval Office or not much like it shouldn't matter to you what Trump did in the past. What should matter is how they run the country. I fully and readily admit Trump's done a horrible job, but that doesn't give license to his opposition to hold the country hostage over DACA, which is exactly what they are doing.
In response to your question around what traditional values I believe Hillary would target, I don't think she would "target" any, but I think they slowly get eroded away under her watch. Look, I don't want to argue over what I think is right compared to what you think is right, but you have to admit that the country has moved so far left in the last 8 years that we accept things today that would be unthinkable 12 years ago, especially to those of us on the right.
I'll offer an example that I really don't want to get into a debate about, but just so you know where I'm coming from, it is unimaginable to me my daughter has to share a public bathroom with a crossdresser just to appease the incredible minority of transgenders out there who didn't need to make a big deal out of where they took a shit, but they did, and got their way. I'm still in awe over that one and don't believe we got to that point.
Hillary's supporters were all about pushing boundaries, most of them wanted to elect her just because she is a woman, not because she was the most qualified Democrat (she certainly wasn't). I have no idea how far they would test those boundaries, and didn't want to see for myself.
VALUES: I bring up Trump's cheating as a big deal because you keep telling me your choice was about values. When I point out the guy is morally bankrupt, you dismiss it.
You have just as much evidence (if not more) that Hillary was guilty of those things than Trump is of revealing secrets to the Russians. I can ask you the exact same question, if it could be proven he did give them info then why hasn't he been arrested, impeached, indicted?
You are willing to assume facts not in evidence when it comes to Trump, but not Hillary. Why?
I don't think Benghazi can be written off as a "fuck up" and shrugged off as "it happens". It was avoidable and decisions were made that cost people lives. Again, had that been Trump you would want him hung, but Hillary does it and "it happens"?
I'm not sure, given all that you have posted in this forum not just this thread) how you the GOP not giving in on negotiating DACA to pass a completely unrelated budget makes this their fault?
Basically what I see you saying is "if the don't give in then it's their fault". I guess that one very one-sided way of looking at it.
Side A has all the power and really wants to kill a program championed by Side B. They also really want to purchase something Side B is completely against, but need Side B support to do so. Why won't Side B just give in to Side A?
Politics is about negotiation and compromise. This is how it works. Doesn't matter if it is two totally unrelated issues or two directly tied together. If your vote matters, you will try to leverage it to get what you want. There was already a bi-partisan plan that would have kept the government up and running, but somebody decided to reject it at the last minute. He now owns the shutdown, like it or not.
DACA can be handled after the fact
No, it can't. Fucking A. :facepalm:
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.